Cisco Sourcefire SNORT vs Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention comparison

Cisco Sourcefire SNORT vs. Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention

Download the complete report

Helped 914,262 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cisco Sourcefire SNORT

Ranking in Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS)

12th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Palo Alto Networks Advanced...

Ranking in Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS)

8th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2026, in the Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) category, the mindshare of Cisco Sourcefire SNORT is 2.9%, up from 2.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention is 4.1%, down from 5.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention	4.1%
Cisco Sourcefire SNORT	2.9%
Other	93.0%

Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS)

Featured Reviews

reviewer2772102

Cloud Architect at a consultancy with 1-10 employees

Logging and customizable rules have helped improve threat monitoring and detection

The logging is mainly what I consider one of the best features with Cisco Sourcefire SNORT. Being able to log and store it in a file allows you to push it to a centralized repository. The logging and reporting help improve incident response. You should always be logging threats, any sort of misconfiguration, and anything that could be an issue. It's important to at least log and monitor it. The basic rules provide a good baseline in assessing Cisco Sourcefire SNORT's ability in providing real-time analytics for threat detection, but as a professional, you should look to constantly modify that baseline. They provide extensive customizability so you can define your own rules. The customizability allows it to be adaptable in protecting against diverse network threats to the constant change.

Read full review

Partha Dash

Global Network Tech Lead at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

Advanced protection enables us to confidently secure against evolving threats

Palo Alto Networks can improve Advanced Threat Prevention by catering to the growing adoption of AI and agentic tooling. The Threat Protection modules should have the necessary intelligence to protect against those types of threats, as AI will be there to do a human job; this is an evolving area. From an Advanced Threat Protection perspective, the technology associated with Palo Alto Networks, such as their sandboxing environment, is quite good. However, Palo Alto needs to focus on how to bring that technology to end users and how easy it is to use, especially in a hybrid environment where users work from various locations. While Palo Alto excels in certain setups, they need to improve the user experience in distributed working conditions.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"This solution makes life a lot easier as there are fewer man-hours required and we no longer need too many resources to manage it."

"Users have access to intelligent security automation as one of the features, which can easily automate your event impact assessment so your IPS policy tuning can be done as well as your network behavior analysis, and you can do real-time contextual awareness with correlation of events created on your applications, user devices, operating systems, or vulnerabilities, with all of this real-time data captured including your apps and port scans."

"Cisco technical support is unbeatable. It offers a premium service every time."

"The product is inexpensive compared to leading brands such as Palo Alto or Fortinet."

"I like most of Cisco's features, like malware detection and URL filtering."

"It has a huge rate of protection. It's has a low level of positives and a huge rate of threat protection. It's easy to deploy and easy to implement. It has an incredible price rate compared to similar solutions."

"The most valuable feature is the visibility that we have across the virtual environment."

"The most valuable feature of this solution is the filtering."

More Cisco Sourcefire SNORT pros

"As a next-generation IPS, it's a very good firewall."

"Most of the features of Palo Alto Threat Prevention are alright. I recommend features like content filtering, IP address, & intelligent firewalls. The reporting feature is very good."

"Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention provides protections against both known and unknown threats quickly, and they have great Cyber Threat Alliance integration, which allows anything that is even unknown to get to our systems quickly in terms of being patched."

"Overall, Palo Alto Threat Prevention doesn't need much more; from a general point of view, you get everything."

"The stability of Palo Alto Networks Threat Prevention is good."

"After the proper implementation of that product, we've not had one hack attempt."

"The solution has many features that save me time."

"We are currently using the URL filtering feature, which is the most popular."

More Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention pros

Cons

"To be frank, the product is not really stable, although they're working on that."

"Integration with other components — even Cisco's own products — can be enhanced to improve administrative experience."

"The initial setup is a little difficult compared to other products in the market. It depends on the environment. If we are doing any migration, it might take months in a brown-field environment."

"The cloud can be improved."

"With the next release, I would like to see some PBR, so that you can do the configuration with the features."

"I don't think this solution is a time-based control system, because one cannot filter traffic based on time."

"This solution needs to be more customizable."

"To be frank, the product is not really stable, although they're working on that. Whenever I go to the technical community with an issue, they will usually say that it is not there yet, but the technical team are working on it. The issues are not insolvable. I think they should just keep working on the product to make sure that the product can become very stable. The technical support is great. I appreciate that. We have a lot of communities supporting Firepower now, so you can find help for whatever issue you have."

More Cisco Sourcefire SNORT cons

"The organization mail security solutions could be improved. There is no mail security solution available."

"In terms of what needs improvement, the only thing I don't like is the support."

"Palo Alto Networks Threat Prevention could improve the commercial offing. Other solutions, such as Fortinet provide better commercial features."

"My overall rating for Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention is 3 out of 10."

"Right now we are focusing on email. If Palo Alto can increase the features related to email filtering and the new malware, it would help us protect our systems."

"Mission learning techniques should continue to expand and detect unknown threats on the fly."

"The price of licenses should be lowered to make it less costly to scale our solution."

"In Africa, the technical support is probably not as good as in Europe and the USA because it's a specific premium support, partner-enabled premium support and all of that. But it's really good, I don't really have any complaints, it's fairly good. I'll give them 80%."

More Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The cost is per port and can be expensive but it does include training and support for three years."

"Licensing for this solution is paid on a yearly basis."

"I don't know the exact amount, but most of the time when I go to a company with a proposition, they will say, "This thing that you are selling is good, but it's expensive. Why don't you propose something like FortiGate, Check Point, or Palo Alto?" Cisco device are expensive compared to other devices."

"If one is an extremely expensive product, and ten is cheap, I rate the tool's price as a five."

"We have a three-year license for this solution."

"Palo Alto Networks Threat Prevention could improve by having consistent pricing at system levels."

"It is an expensive solution and I would like to see a drop in price."

"If you want to have all of the good features then you have to pay extra for licensing."

"The pricing and the licensing are pretty competitive at this stage. As a reseller, I would like to see the price come down a little bit so I can compete better against other firewalls because we do that all the time."

"From one to ten, with one being the most expensive, I would rate the pricing of Palo Alto Networks Threat Prevention a one out of ten. It is my understanding that Palo Alto Networks Threat Prevention is the most expensive one."

"The pricing could be lower."

"It's not too expensive."

"The product’s pricing is expensive for small companies."

More Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

914,262 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Construction Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

Outsourcing Company

Manufacturing Company

Outsourcing Company

11%

Construction Company

Financial Services Firm

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	5
Midsize Enterprise	9
Large Enterprise	7

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	10
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	15

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cisco Sourcefire SNORT?

If one is an extremely expensive product, and ten is cheap, I rate the tool's price as a five. There are some other tools in the market that are more expensive than Cisco. There are no additional c...

What needs improvement with Cisco Sourcefire SNORT?

I have not had much experience with the community-driven rule set while utilizing Cisco Sourcefire SNORT. I don't have experience with recognizing zero-day vulnerabilities, but based on my knowledg...

What is your primary use case for Cisco Sourcefire SNORT?

Endpoint protection is the main use case. The main aspect involves specifying different rules, and when network traffic hits these rules, it will try to block the traffic or at least log the traffi...

Which is the best DDoS protection solution for a big ISP for monitoring and mitigating?

Arbor would be the best bid, apart from Arbor, Palo Alto and Fortinet have good solutions. As this is an ISP, I would prefer Arbor.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Palo Alto Networks Threat Prevention?

Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention requires an add-on license and is considered expensive compared to competitors like Cisco AMP and FortiGate ( /products/fortinet-fortigate-reviews ) fi...

What needs improvement with Palo Alto Networks Threat Prevention?

ExtremeCloud IQ vs Cisco Sourcefire SNORT

Comparisons

Compared 9% of the time

TrendAI Tipping Point vs Cisco Sourcefire SNORT

Compared 8% of the time

Splunk User Behavior Analytics vs Cisco Sourcefire SNORT

Compared 8% of the time

Fortra's Tripwire Enterprise vs Cisco Sourcefire SNORT

Compared 8% of the time

Check Point IPS vs Cisco Sourcefire SNORT

Compared 5% of the time

More Cisco Sourcefire SNORT Competitors

Darktrace vs Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention

Compared 11% of the time

TrendAI Tipping Point vs Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention

Compared 8% of the time

Vectra AI vs Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention

Compared 7% of the time

Trellix Intrusion Prevention System vs Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention

Compared 6% of the time

Fortinet FortiGate vs Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention

Compared 3% of the time

More Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention Competitors

Product Reports

Cisco Sourcefire SNORT

Download Cisco Sourcefire SNORT product report

Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention

Download Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention product report

Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention report

Also Known As

Sourcefire SNORT

No data available

Overview

Cisco Sourcefire SNORT is a versatile cybersecurity tool offering threat detection, scalability, and integration with Cisco tools. It is recognized for ease of configuration and comprehensive protection, making it suitable for intrusion prevention and firewall applications.

Cisco Sourcefire SNORT provides advanced malware protection and integrates seamlessly with Cisco products. It enables automatic IPS tuning, real-time visibility, and intelligent security automation, which together enhance network security. Users benefit from its URL filtering, email spam elimination, and it delivers low false positives. Though highly effective, feedback highlights a desire for improvements in stability, dashboard effectiveness, traffic blocking customizations, and integration with Cisco DNA Center. Cost concerns and calls for cloud-based deployments also emerge in user feedback. Technical support and performance are also discussed, with VPN configuration posing challenges.

What are the key features of Cisco Sourcefire SNORT?

Threat Detection: Identifies and mitigates network threats efficiently.
Scalability: Easily adapts to growing network demands.
Cisco Integration: Works smoothly with existing Cisco infrastructure.
Advanced Malware Protection: Provides comprehensive security against sophisticated threats.
Real-Time Visibility: Offers live insights into network activity.
Automatic IPS Tuning: Adjusts security policies dynamically.

What benefits can be found in user reviews?

Ease of Configuration: Streamlined setup process.
Comprehensive Protection: Low false positive rates ensuring broader security.
Robust Support: Access to extensive Cisco support network.

Organizations primarily deploy Cisco Sourcefire SNORT for network security in sectors like finance and healthcare. Used extensively in data centers with Cisco Firepower, it provides intrusion prevention, URL filtering, and VPN security. Pre-configured settings make it practical for on-premises deployment, ensuring secure user-to-server and server-to-server interactions.

Cisco

Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention provides comprehensive security with application control, real-time threat detection, and seamless integration with cloud services. Known for its high performance and ease of use, it addresses diverse security challenges for modern organizations.

Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention integrates machine learning, behavioral analysis, anti-malware protection, and WildFire sandboxing to deliver proactive defense against threats. Its features include advanced firewall capabilities, comprehensive bandwidth management, and robust reporting. Integration with cloud-based URL filtering enhances organizational security efforts. While the tool offers significant protection, areas like pricing, ease of use, false positive management, and documentation clarity require improvement. Expanding AI capabilities and optimizing support will enhance threat prevention and user experience.

What are the most important features?

Application Control: Provides precise control over applications to reduce risks and ensure compliance.
Real-Time Threat Detection: Identifies and mitigates threats instantly for proactive security.
Machine Learning: Enhances threat prediction and detection by analyzing patterns.
WildFire Sandboxing: Offers advanced malware analysis and prevention.
Cloud-Based URL Filtering: Enhances network security by filtering web traffic.

What benefits should users look for?

High Performance: Ensures efficient threat interception with minimal latency.
Ease of Use: Offers a user-friendly experience with intuitive interfaces.
Comprehensive Security: Provides thorough protection through multi-layered security features.
Effective Reporting: Delivers detailed insights for better decision-making.

Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention is implemented across industries for server protection and LAN/WAN traffic security, providing solutions for network testing and application control. Organizations benefit from features like GlobalProtect VPN, anti-spyware, and vulnerability protections, ensuring security through efficient deployment both on-premises and in the cloud.

Palo Alto Networks

Sample Customers

CareCore, City of Biel, Dimension Data, LightEdge, Lone Star College System, National Rugby League, Port Aventura, Smart City Networks, Telecom Italia, The Department of Education in Western Australia

University of Arkansas, JBG SMITH, SkiStar AB, TRI-AD, Temple University, Telkom Indonesia

Cisco Sourcefire SNORT vs. Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention