Cisco Sourcefire SNORT vs ExtremeCloud IQ comparison

Cisco and Extreme Networks are both solutions in the Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) category. Cisco is ranked #14 with an average rating of 8.0, while Extreme Networks is ranked #18 with an average rating of 9.0. Cisco holds a 3.1% mindshare in ID, compared to Extreme Networks’s 0.9% mindshare. Additionally, 95% of Cisco users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 97% of Extreme Networks users who would recommend it.

Cisco Sourcefire SNORT

Read 20 Cisco Sourcefire SNORT reviews

1,181 Views
1,004 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

ExtremeCloud IQ

Read 77 ExtremeCloud IQ reviews

2,776 Views
250 Comparison Views

97% willing to recommend

Cisco Sourcefire SNORT

ExtremeCloud IQ

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 19, 2024

Cisco Sourcefire SNORT and ExtremeCloud IQ compete in the network security space. Cisco Sourcefire SNORT appears to have the upper hand in robust security features, while ExtremeCloud IQ leads in ease of use and integration capabilities.

Features: Cisco Sourcefire SNORT offers advanced intrusion detection, open-source flexibility, and real-time threat management. ExtremeCloud IQ provides seamless network management, intuitive configuration, and easy scalability.

Room for Improvement: Cisco Sourcefire SNORT could improve with a more user-friendly setup, enhanced customer support, and simplified deployment processes. ExtremeCloud IQ can benefit from cost reduction, more robust security features, and better integration with third-party services.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Cisco Sourcefire SNORT requires a technical setup with expertise for effective deployment, with reliable customer support requiring technical knowledge. ExtremeCloud IQ provides streamlined cloud-based deployment with user-friendly configuration and responsive support, reducing setup complexity and simplifying maintenance.

Pricing and ROI: Cisco Sourcefire SNORT is cost-effective due to its open-source nature, offering high long-term ROI for security customization. ExtremeCloud IQ has a higher upfront cost, delivering substantial ROI through enhanced network management and operational efficiencies, justifying the initial investment with comprehensive features and reduced resource expenditure over time.

To learn more, read our detailed Cisco Sourcefire SNORT vs. ExtremeCloud IQ Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Cisco Sourcefire SNORT vs. ExtremeCloud IQ

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cisco Sourcefire SNORT

Ranking in Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS)

14th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

ExtremeCloud IQ

Ranking in Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS)

18th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Network Management Applications (13th), Network Access Control (NAC) (9th)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) category, the mindshare of Cisco Sourcefire SNORT is 3.1%, up from 2.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ExtremeCloud IQ is 0.9%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Cisco Sourcefire SNORT	3.1%
ExtremeCloud IQ	0.9%
Other	96.0%

Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS)

Featured Reviews

reviewer2772102

Cloud Architect at a consultancy with 1-10 employees

Logging and customizable rules have helped improve threat monitoring and detection

The logging is mainly what I consider one of the best features with Cisco Sourcefire SNORT. Being able to log and store it in a file allows you to push it to a centralized repository. The logging and reporting help improve incident response. You should always be logging threats, any sort of misconfiguration, and anything that could be an issue. It's important to at least log and monitor it. The basic rules provide a good baseline in assessing Cisco Sourcefire SNORT's ability in providing real-time analytics for threat detection, but as a professional, you should look to constantly modify that baseline. They provide extensive customizability so you can define your own rules. The customizability allows it to be adaptable in protecting against diverse network threats to the constant change.

Read full review

Ufuk KINDAP

Technical Coordinator at Yildiz Technical University

Cloud-based deployment eases IT workload and supports network management

I struggled with the documentation. I expected comprehensive documentation and videos but found them to be too simple. I needed deep details and more thorough resources. Although there were costly courses available, the lack of budget was a hindrance. Improving documentation with more detailed videos and resources would be beneficial.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Cisco Sourcefire SNORT is easy to configure and the reporting is great. It's also very user-friendly."

"The most valuable features of Cisco Sourcefire SNORT are the dashboard for monitoring events."

"The most valuable feature is the visibility that we have across the virtual environment."

"Cisco technical support is unbeatable. It offers a premium service every time."

"In general, the features are all great. However, if I need to take hardware for ASA, because they need to upgrade to Firepower, we want to create rules. For that, most of the time we go to the command line. Right now Firepower is working really hard on the grid. You can apply all those rules to the grid. Even if you want to monitor the logs, for example, the activity will tell you which particular user has been blocked because of that rule. Firepower's monitoring interface is very good, because you can see each and every piece. ASA also had it, but there you needed to type the command and be under the server to see all that stuff. In Firepower you have the possibility to go directly to the firewall. The way the monitoring is displayed is also very nice. The feature I appreciate most in Firepower is actually the grid. The grid has worked very well."

"The solution is stable."

"The solution can be integrated with some network electors like Cisco Stealthwatch, Cisco ISE, and Active Directory to provide the client with authentication certificates."

"The whole solution is very good, and stable."

More Cisco Sourcefire SNORT pros

"ExtremeCloud IQ helps with monitoring networking at low costs, acting as a controller in a cloud environment, eliminating the need for an appliance controller or wireless LAN controller, thus saving on investment and reducing TCO costs."

"Everything can be seen from the dashboard."

"I like ExtremeCloud IQ's unified single-pane-of-glass dashboard. It offers a lot of visibility of performance, and it's great for troubleshooting. You don't have to go to 55 different places. You can get the information you need with just a few clicks."

"HiveManager is extremely easy to use for anyone with little network experience."

"The deployment made my life very easy."

"It excels in Wi-Fi and switch management, as well as other internal management aspects, offering speed and efficiency that surpass what other competitors provide."

"The deployment made my life very easy."

"Another valuable feature is the automation of Wi-Fi configurations, which allows the wireless network to auto-reconfigure in case of problems."

More ExtremeCloud IQ pros

Cons

"I would like to have analytics included in the suite."

"The solution's approach to managing traffic blocking is confusing and impractical."

"I did not experience any pain points that required improvement. Maybe a couple of false-positives, but that's about it."

"If the price is brought down then everybody will be happy."

"The initial setup is a little difficult compared to other products in the market. It depends on the environment. If we are doing any migration, it might take months in a brown-field environment."

"Performance needs improvement."

"The pricing needs to be improved. We have lots of low-budget clients around us. Budget constraints are always a deterrent in our market."

"Integration with other components — even Cisco's own products — can be enhanced to improve administrative experience."

More Cisco Sourcefire SNORT cons

"I would like to see more security features such as NAC integrated to the solution. This would allow customers to be able to control all other users under one dashboard."

"The licensing model could be improved."

"Browser load time for the cloud is long and needs improvement."

"The certification costs from suppliers are getting out of control, and it's not just Extreme. We have the same problem with Cisco and Huawei."

"Its price could be lower. It is a simplified solution, but it has price challenges. It is costly as compared to other solutions. It has almost everything. The only thing is that MAC is not possible on the cloud, and it has to be on-premises."

"The managing of switches within this solution could be improved."

"Integrating the network access control solution can be complex, as it essentially combines two separate products."

"A room for improvement in ExtremeCloud IQ is roaming. My team is facing roaming issues with the solution, particularly when using VoIP over WiFi. For example, VoIP sometimes breaks when you walk around the customer site. In terms of what I'd like to see in the next release of the solution, right now, the inventory for ExtremeCloud IQ is awful. There's no stock, and you must wait a year and a half for new stocks. It's awful."

More ExtremeCloud IQ cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Licensing for this solution is paid on a yearly basis."

"If one is an extremely expensive product, and ten is cheap, I rate the tool's price as a five."

"We have a three-year license for this solution."

"I don't know the exact amount, but most of the time when I go to a company with a proposition, they will say, "This thing that you are selling is good, but it's expensive. Why don't you propose something like FortiGate, Check Point, or Palo Alto?" Cisco device are expensive compared to other devices."

"The cost is per port and can be expensive but it does include training and support for three years."

"It is easy for customers to use this product because they are able to interchange the license depending on their usage rather than having to buy individual licenses for each asset."

"ExtremeCloud IQ's pricing is high."

"Buy near the end of Q4 in order to get a deal."

"The price was okay."

"Bring the cost down."

"I would advise that you be sure to compare apples with apples. Many customers just look at the price per AP and licences, and compare that against other solutions. But, they do not look at the complete picture such as: TCO - how much the equipment will cost you over, say, seven years? Will the customer need to change complete infrastructure when they want to buy the newest hardware? Does support include a lifetime warranty and RMA?"

"This solution offers annual licensing that is middle of the range in terms of cost."

"It is not the cheapest product but I think that the price is reasonable because you get a lot of support of it's needed."

More ExtremeCloud IQ pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

University

13%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Government

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

10%

Educational Organization

Comms Service Provider

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	6
Midsize Enterprise	8
Large Enterprise	7

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	45
Midsize Enterprise	14
Large Enterprise	24

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Cisco Sourcefire SNORT?

The product is inexpensive compared to leading brands such as Palo Alto or Fortinet.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cisco Sourcefire SNORT?

If one is an extremely expensive product, and ten is cheap, I rate the tool's price as a five. There are some other tools in the market that are more expensive than Cisco. There are no additional c...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Cisco Sourcefire SNORT?

I have not had much experience with the community-driven rule set while utilizing Cisco Sourcefire SNORT. I don't have experience with recognizing zero-day vulnerabilities, but based on my knowledg...

See all answers

What are pros and cons of Aruba 515 Series AP vs. Cisco Meraki or Extreme Networks?

Depends. I have personally used both Cisco and Aruba so I am familiar with them. Extreme I am not, so unless they have some feature that I need or want, I wouldn't consider them. Do you have expe...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ExtremeCloud IQ?

The licensing was a challenge due to budget constraints, and I used ExtremeCloud IQ without a license for a period. The documentation and training courses were also costly, impacting how easily I c...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering ExtremeCloud IQ?

I use ExtremeCloud IQ's real-time analytics. In the cloud solution, I get reports, and it works together with machine learning and artificial intelligence for those reports. This tool permits the c...

See all answers

Comparisons

Cisco Secure IPS (NGIPS) vs Cisco Sourcefire SNORT

Compared 15% of the time

Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention vs Cisco Sourcefire SNORT

Compared 13% of the time

Fortinet FortiGate vs Cisco Sourcefire SNORT

Compared 13% of the time

Zscaler Cloud IPS vs Cisco Sourcefire SNORT

Compared 7% of the time

Darktrace vs Cisco Sourcefire SNORT

Compared 6% of the time

More Cisco Sourcefire SNORT Competitors

Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN vs ExtremeCloud IQ

Compared 10% of the time

Ruckus Wireless vs ExtremeCloud IQ

Compared 10% of the time

Cisco Identity Services Engine (ISE) vs ExtremeCloud IQ

Compared 9% of the time

Aruba Wireless vs ExtremeCloud IQ

Compared 8% of the time

Mist AI and Cloud vs ExtremeCloud IQ

Compared 4% of the time

More ExtremeCloud IQ Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cisco Sourcefire SNORT

January 2026

Download Cisco Sourcefire SNORT product report

Buyer's Guide

ExtremeCloud IQ

January 2026

Download ExtremeCloud IQ product report

Also Known As

Sourcefire SNORT

Aerohive Networks, Aerohive HiveManager, HiveManager, ExtremeCloud , ExtremeSecurity

Overview

Snort is an open-source, rule-based, intrusion detection and prevention system. It combines the benefits of signature-, protocol-, and anomaly-based inspection methods to deliver flexible protection from malware attacks. Snort gained notoriety for being able to accurately detect threats at high speeds.

Cisco

ExtremeCloud is a resilient and scalable cloud-based network management solution offered by Extreme Networks as a subscription service.

The network is your platform of engagement for clients and staff. We have designed ExtremeCloud to provide superior user experience by empowering you and the applications that drive your business. The combination of Extreme Networks’ smart wired and wireless edges and the elasticity, resilience and scalability provided via state-of-the-art datacenters distributed strategically for worldwide availability allows you to respond to the changing needs of your business, at the speed of cloud, through a simple, multi-site aware user interface.

Extreme Networks

Sample Customers

CareCore, City of Biel, Dimension Data, LightEdge, Lone Star College System, National Rugby League, Port Aventura, Smart City Networks, Telecom Italia, The Department of Education in Western Australia

Henry Ford Health System, Baltimore Ravens, Brandili, Federal University of Alagoas, CEDAE, Caxias do Sul, UNISC Concurrency, CenturyLink Field, Louisiana College, Cricket Tasmania Stadium, Moscow Internet Exchange

Buyer's Guide

Cisco Sourcefire SNORT vs. ExtremeCloud IQ

December 2025

Free Report: Cisco Sourcefire SNORT vs. ExtremeCloud IQ

Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco Sourcefire SNORT vs. ExtremeCloud IQ and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Cisco Sourcefire SNORT vs. ExtremeCloud IQ report.

See our list of best Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) vendors.

We monitor all Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.