Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Claude for Enterprise vs GitHub CoPilot comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 4, 2026

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Claude for Enterprise
Ranking in AI Code Assistants
7th
Average Rating
7.0
Reviews Sentiment
5.1
Number of Reviews
3
Ranking in other categories
AI-Powered Chatbots (5th), AI Writing Tools (5th), Large Language Models (LLMs) (6th), AI Proofreading Tools (4th), AI Software Development (14th), AI Content Creation (6th), AI Research (3rd)
GitHub CoPilot
Ranking in AI Code Assistants
2nd
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
31
Ranking in other categories
Rapid Application Development Software (8th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the AI Code Assistants category, the mindshare of Claude for Enterprise is 10.7%, up from 9.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of GitHub CoPilot is 7.5%, up from 6.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
AI Code Assistants Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
GitHub CoPilot7.5%
Claude for Enterprise10.7%
Other81.8%
AI Code Assistants
 

Featured Reviews

Nishant Thakkar - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Analyst at WTW
Data visualization and workflow efficiency improve with automated features
I do not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer, and I was not offered a gift card or incentive for this review. We use other tech products such as Microsoft Excel and Slack. We can use my real name when publishing my review, along with my real company name. On a scale of 1-10, I rate Claude an 8.
TusharShankar - PeerSpot reviewer
QA Manager at Synechron
AI coding assistant has transformed development speed and supports learning new languages
Any technology comes with two things, or rather anything in this world has both sides, good and bad. LLMs also have the same thing. The bad part is for a person who is 100% dependent on AI because they won't be able to learn more if they are 100% dependent on that. The main thing is that there has to be restraint from our side. I won't say it is from the tool side, but from our side, we need to learn and we need to work on it. We need to review the code. That is one thing that we need to do from our end. From a technology perspective, it is designed to help us out, and it is totally on our side of thinking about how exactly we are going to use that. There is not any area for improvement from the tool side, but it is from the users altogether. Users should not be 100% reliant on AI or any LLMs. They need to work on it and they need to review the code.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Claude has positively impacted my organization, as evident from the metrics which show productivity doubling and turnaround time being cut in half."
"Overall, I rate Claude nine out of ten."
"Claude saves me significant time when conducting research or writing quick Python scripts."
"I can upload code snippets or class files and ask for solutions to improve them, which works well. It's a great productivity tool that saves me time searching websites. While there are alternatives like ChatGPT and other AI tools, the advantage of the tool is that it is built into the IDE."
"It enhances efficiency and productivity in development."
"Initially, OpenAI is free, but you'll need to pay for it later."
"The most valuable aspects in terms of features, revolve around its code generation capabilities."
"Copilot enhanced our productivity through its AI capabilities."
"When I write code, I feel like I have someone sitting with me to help me. Wherever I'm stuck, I just ask a question, and it provides guidance that I can use."
"The solution increases coding efficiency."
"The CoPilot app that you can use while creating presentations is very useful."
 

Cons

"The foundational model would have to be improved to be comparable to ChatGPT for everyday use cases."
"The product could be improved by offering automatic integration with other solutions, such as the ability to read Excel or text files and automate processes this way."
"Some of the suggestions provided by GitHub CoPilot are not accurate, making it an area of concern where improvements are required."
"The tool must improve its ability to work with multiple files."
"The tool needs to focus on integration, as it is the most important aspect. I would like to see some pre-designed modules included in my projects."
"The technology offered by the product in the retail industry and banking processes has certain shortcomings, making them areas that can be improved."
"There's room for improvement to ensure that suggestions align more precisely with the context of what I'm seeking, minimizing instances of unrelated or inaccurate code suggestions."
"The problem arises when a bot is not well-designed, which frustrates customers."
"They could improve the product in terms of integration with other tools."
"Users should not be 100% reliant on AI or any LLMs."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"The pricing for GitHub Copilot is around ten dollars per month."
"The solution is costly."
"GitHub CoPilot's pricing is reasonable. Our licensing costs were initially monthly, but then we switched to yearly payments. I rate the tool's pricing an eight out of ten."
"There is a need to pay around 10 USD to be able to use the solution."
"GitHub Copilot is a paid service, costing approximately $6 per month. There might be a free trial available."
"GitHub CoPilot is less expensive than other solutions."
"The product has a tiered pricing model that starts with a free version for individual developers but requires a separate license fee for enterprise use."
"We have a demo license. Once we understand what we'll do, we'll start with a paid license."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which AI Code Assistants solutions are best for your needs.
881,707 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
10%
Financial Services Firm
8%
University
8%
Comms Service Provider
8%
Financial Services Firm
16%
Computer Software Company
9%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Healthcare Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business14
Midsize Enterprise2
Large Enterprise16
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Claude?
For an individual user, it is very easy and straightforward. I cannot speak to larger teams.
What needs improvement with Claude?
The foundational model would have to be improved to be comparable to ChatGPT for everyday use cases. The system should be better at understanding when to reply directly with the foundational model ...
What is your primary use case for Claude?
I primarily use Claude for developing quick Python scripts, conducting research, and getting answers to complex questions. Claude saves me significant time when conducting research or writing quick...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GitHub CoPilot?
For now, I think it is okay. It is not that expensive. The kind of use that I am having with a $20-30 license, I think it is really of really good help.
What needs improvement with GitHub CoPilot?
Any technology comes with two things, or rather anything in this world has both sides, good and bad. LLMs also have the same thing. The bad part is for a person who is 100% dependent on AI because ...
 

Also Known As

Anthropic Claude 3 Haiku
No data available
 

Overview

Find out what your peers are saying about Claude for Enterprise vs. GitHub CoPilot and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.
881,707 professionals have used our research since 2012.