Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Amazon Q vs GitHub CoPilot comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Amazon Q
Ranking in AI Code Assistants
4th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
2.1
Number of Reviews
16
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
GitHub CoPilot
Ranking in AI Code Assistants
1st
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
28
Ranking in other categories
Rapid Application Development Software (8th)
 

Featured Reviews

Jayesh Patil - PeerSpot reviewer
Connectors and guardrails facilitate question-answer setups effectively
There isn't such an issue we have faced with Amazon Q regarding speed increasing. Syncing and indexing takes a lot of time, and they need to improve upon that. Remaining everything is good for us, and that is also acceptable as we can set it as a nightly job. Once it's done, it takes around one hour max for any number of documents. We were trying to address specific issues and challenges by implementing Amazon Q in our environment because currently, they don't provide any APIs directly. We find it difficult to integrate with our product. The second challenge is while connecting Jira, we need the ACLs to maintain our security, but it doesn't allow us to connect to Jira if our ACLs are on. We need to turn them off to connect to it. Even though we connected with the support team of AWS, they were not able to resolve our issue, so we were disappointed at that moment. As a part of improvement, we don't see any improvement areas for Amazon Q at present. We first need to test that we can integrate it with our product. We need the APIs before we can suggest improvements.
TarunRevalla - PeerSpot reviewer
Saves time with context-aware code suggestions and seamless integration
In terms of improvements for Copilot, I haven't considered much since it offers many useful interactions. It integrates well with GitHub repositories, tracks changes on PRs, and provides valuable suggestions where applicable. There is excellent support across various code editors like JetBrains, VS Code, and NeoGen. I also run many automations within GitHub. When an NPR is raised, it automatically provides suggestions, which is part of the enterprise edition without limitations. While I don't see immediate room for improvement, one suggestion is for Copilot to provide specific suggestions for certain lines of code instead of rewriting entire sections. If the tool could focus on specific lines where changes are suggested, it would save time and reduce server load.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The benefits of Amazon Q are that you don't need to build any code base at the backend to develop your RAG system or AI LLM-based summarization systems to do question-answer sets on the documents."
"Amazon Q significantly reduced the time we spent on testing; it served as a great tool where we could ask questions, get answers, and complete testing efficiently."
"The best feature of Amazon Q is that it has knowledge of my entire code base, entire repository, and its flows."
"The best feature Amazon Q offers is the code security scan, which actually depicts the threat assessment of the code or whether a particular code snippet can be utilized by attackers to find loopholes."
"The support team from Amazon provides comfort because previously we used to think and implement, which took considerable time, and now we can complete our projects and requirements in three months or two months."
"The explanation and documentation capabilities are excellent."
"The best feature of Amazon Q is the voice chat, where it talks back to you in normal language and you can query it."
"Amazon Q saved my time more than other products, such as GitHub Copilot, because it is conscious about particular AWS services."
"The product is easy to integrate."
"Initially, OpenAI is free, but you'll need to pay for it later."
"Copilot is highly recommended for everyone."
"GitHub CoPilot accelerates productivity. It is an easy-to-use solution that is also helpful in saving the team's time."
"The platform's most valuable feature is detecting and suggesting variables based on the existing file context."
"I can upload code snippets or class files and ask for solutions to improve them, which works well. It's a great productivity tool that saves me time searching websites. While there are alternatives like ChatGPT and other AI tools, the advantage of the tool is that it is built into the IDE."
"GitHub CoPilot is easy to use even for beginners and it supports the integration with CI/CD tools."
"GitHub CoPilot has good stability and performance."
 

Cons

"I discovered that the application logs me out automatically after some time, which becomes problematic as I then lose access to my chat history."
"Sometimes feedback is needed immediately. It takes a bit of time because there is a workload."
"While great for standard tasks, it sometimes struggles with more complex or multi-layered problems in large code bases."
"Even though we connected with the support team of AWS, they were not able to resolve our issue, so we were disappointed at that moment."
"The model is not able to give answers properly with the traffic it is facing, so it needs to be scaled more."
"They could enhance the product's accuracy of suggestions, especially when dealing with non-standard or legacy code."
"The only suggestion is to enhance Copilot's ability to assist developers with infrastructure as code tasks. Like, while using CI/CD pipeline, when I use YAML files, so it could just support the port number."
"One drawback is that the solution sometimes suggests unwanted code, especially if I accidentally press the tab. This doesn't happen often. Sometimes it seems to understand my code, but other times it doesn't. This inconsistency is confusing."
"The tool needs to focus on integration, as it is the most important aspect. I would like to see some pre-designed modules included in my projects."
"The solution is expensive. It should also support other programming languages."
"There's room for improvement to ensure that suggestions align more precisely with the context of what I'm seeking, minimizing instances of unrelated or inaccurate code suggestions."
"The technology offered by the product in the retail industry and banking processes has certain shortcomings, making them areas that can be improved."
"I don't have enough experience to share this kind of feedback."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"We have a demo license. Once we understand what we'll do, we'll start with a paid license."
"The product offers a free version and a paid version. Whether to choose the product's free version or paid version depends on the size of the company where it will be used."
"The solution is costly."
"A personal license is priced at ten dollars per month, while a professional or enterprise license costs nineteen dollars per user, and these rates are consistent for all users."
"GitHub CoPilot is less expensive than other solutions."
"It's affordable."
"We have a license but need another one for the GitHub CoPilot tool."
"GitHub CoPilot's pricing is reasonable. Our licensing costs were initially monthly, but then we switched to yearly payments. I rate the tool's pricing an eight out of ten."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which AI Code Assistants solutions are best for your needs.
865,295 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
17%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Comms Service Provider
6%
Financial Services Firm
16%
Computer Software Company
10%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Healthcare Company
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Amazon Q?
I currently use the free tier, and in all my use cases, it's been able to deliver. Even though machine learning models have errors, regarding its benchmark, it's able to perform well. The paid vers...
What is your primary use case for Amazon Q?
I use it for personal tasks and work. For personal projects, when I'm working on a weekend hobby, I can use it to create APIs, which helps to bootstrap. If I have a data set which I want to analyze...
What advice do you have for others considering Amazon Q?
I will recommend this solution. With the pricing, it's acceptable based on what you want to achieve or your priorities at a particular time. They have options for businesses. Depending on your work...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GitHub CoPilot?
I honestly don't have a clue about how much we usually pay for GitHub CoPilot because the increase in license costs is managed by another team, and I am not the administrator, so I generally don't ...
What needs improvement with GitHub CoPilot?
The areas of GitHub CoPilot that need improvement include the ability to debug, which is applicable to AI-driven tools that allow you to code, and to understand our application better and learn fro...
 

Comparisons

 

Overview

Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Q vs. GitHub CoPilot and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.
865,295 professionals have used our research since 2012.