Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Amazon Q vs Google Gemini AI comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 9, 2025

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
1.7
Amazon Q enhances efficiency by saving time, reducing labor needs, and increasing deployment speed, though ROI wasn't universally measured.
Sentiment score
3.9
Google Gemini AI improves productivity and efficiency but can incur costs, with variable financial impacts and competitive market standing.
Overall, there is a lot of increase in the movement of moving things to production grade and building things that are production grade from earlier, and the number of people that are required to build that scale of applications has been drastically reduced.
Ai Research Enthusiast And Developer at ADP
This indicates that if we use it in the organization, we would be able to save money for the client and potentially require fewer employees.
Assoicate Consultant at ZS
For some of the models it's actually free. It doesn't cost anything, but once you get to production scenarios in which you have to use the API, you have to pay.
Chief Technical Lead at a consultancy with 201-500 employees
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
2.0
Amazon Q's customer service is generally effective, with professionalism and expertise but some integration and communication challenges persist.
Sentiment score
4.0
Customers have mixed feelings about Google Gemini AI support, appreciating online resources but noting potential accessibility issues.
Anytime you have an issue, you reach out to them, and they are willing to understand the issue you're facing.
Site reliability engineer at a tech services company with 201-500 employees
All queries were resolved promptly, and questions about capabilities were answered clearly.
Engineering Lead at Lloyds Banking Group PLC
The customer support for Amazon Q is fantastic because the moment I encounter some issues in Amazon Q, I reach out to them and they help me in figuring it out, and they help me in rapidly closing that issue.
Ai Research Enthusiast And Developer at ADP
They rely on a self-service approach, providing a lot of information online through blogs and documents.
CTO at AlphaNuTech
Microsoft has done better, though they're not great at it, but they seem to be more responsive.
Senior Consultant at a outsourcing company with 201-500 employees
it's really difficult to reach them
Chief Technology Officer at MedPiper Technologies Inc
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
3.3
Amazon Q excels in scalability, integrates with AWS, but requires improved traffic handling; users appreciate efficiency and reduced overhead.
Sentiment score
5.9
Google Gemini AI is praised for scalability but faces concerns over context size, costs, and computing power limitations.
For improvement, I suggest enhancing admin control or original level settings, utilizing analytics, and sharing prompt or response history.
Student at Sharda University
The model is not able to give answers properly with the traffic it is facing, so it needs to be scaled more.
Cloud Architect at Acmegrade
Then we increased it with four types of data sources.
Associate Software Engineer
Google Gemini handles multiple PDF files and big files efficiently.
Director at a tech services company with 501-1,000 employees
It can conduct research quickly, taking only five to seven minutes to produce a ten-page research document with a reasonable executive summary.
CTO at AlphaNuTech
If you want to grow the amount of information that you want to insert into the model before you provide an answer, you have to use different techniques.
Chief Technical Lead at a consultancy with 201-500 employees
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
4.2
Amazon Q is stable and reliable but can improve memory handling and offline performance; reliant on stable internet.
Sentiment score
7.1
Google Gemini AI is praised for its stable, reliable performance, with minor concerns about occasional hallucinations and alternatives.
The service is very stable.
Site reliability engineer at a tech services company with 201-500 employees
It maintains consistent performance, rarely crashing or lagging, even during prolonged use.
Student at Sharda University
The accuracy of that particular model provides high assurance that the result will be as the user wants it to be.
Cloud Architect at Acmegrade
Everything I've tried so far works without instability, bugs, or hallucinations.
Emeritus Professor of Health Services Research at University of South Wales
Recently, Google Gemini has been very stable, without performance issues.
Director at a tech services company with 501-1,000 employees
 

Room For Improvement

Amazon Q needs improved IDE integration, longer sessions, better prompt handling, and enhanced multi-data reasoning for overall efficiency.
Google Gemini AI needs better customization, response speed, integration, code generation, and creative accuracy to improve user satisfaction.
The knowledge management integration, which is crucial in today's contact center business, should be more prominent in Amazon Connect.
Customer Success Manager at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
Out of 100%, Amazon Q will complete 80% and the remaining 20% of the errors, including build or runtime errors, you have to resolve manually.
Assistant consultant at Tata Consultancy
The moment I hit the context length of the window, it would ask me to clear the complete context, and it would lose the complete context of the chat that I had previously.
Ai Research Enthusiast And Developer at ADP
Google Gemini needs more accurate answers and the ability to export data to Excel or Google Sheets.
Director at a tech services company with 501-1,000 employees
When working on a 20-page document, Google Gemini sometimes loses context about earlier parts.
Chief Technology Officer at MedPiper Technologies Inc
Currently, it operates mostly autonomously, and while it provides structured activities, making the research configuration more accessible and flexible would be beneficial.
CTO at AlphaNuTech
 

Setup Cost

Amazon Q's integration benefits AWS users with productivity gains, despite high pricing compared to ChatGPT's premium version.
Google Gemini AI pricing is competitive but can become costly with multiple licenses due to currency fluctuations.
The Pro plan seems to be a bit expensive.
Assoicate Consultant at ZS
I was able to migrate the whole applications of my organization into Java 17, which is the latest version, in about ninety days.
Ai Research Enthusiast And Developer at ADP
Google Gemini is free.
Emeritus Professor of Health Services Research at University of South Wales
The per license cost is on par with others, but with the number of licenses, it becomes expensive.
Chief Technology Officer at MedPiper Technologies Inc
The feature of Gemini 2.5 research is highly discounted.
CTO at AlphaNuTech
 

Valuable Features

Amazon Q is praised for seamless AWS integration, efficient cloud management, robust security, and user-friendly real-time syncing.
Google Gemini AI enhances productivity with multi-modal features, automation, and seamless Google services integration for efficient task management.
Amazon Q helps boost productivity, enabling the delivery of quality and value to customers.
Site reliability engineer at a tech services company with 201-500 employees
The recent Agentic coding feature allows the tool to implement significant changes automatically, making it easier to maintain code by committing and pushing changes seamlessly while allowing for an easy undo option.
Senior Quality Engineer Data at Epsilon
The best feature of Amazon Q is that it has knowledge of my entire code base, entire repository, and its flows.
Software Developer at Enorvision AIML limited
The most valuable feature of Google Gemini is its ability to function as an intelligent assistant, providing accurate answers to natural language queries and performing translations.
Emeritus Professor of Health Services Research at University of South Wales
The AI capabilities of Google Gemini are a multi-modal LLM which allows me to pass documents, images, and texts in the same prompt.
Chief Technical Lead at a consultancy with 201-500 employees
It provides an experimental search module capable of scanning hundreds of websites to deliver summarized data.
Director at a tech services company with 501-1,000 employees
 

Categories and Ranking

Amazon Q
Ranking in AI Code Assistants
1st
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
3.7
Number of Reviews
20
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Google Gemini AI
Ranking in AI Code Assistants
3rd
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
6.0
Number of Reviews
16
Ranking in other categories
AI Writing Tools (1st), Large Language Models (LLMs) (1st), AI Proofreading Tools (1st)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the AI Code Assistants category, the mindshare of Amazon Q is 7.9%, up from 2.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Google Gemini AI is 6.9%, up from 4.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
AI Code Assistants Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Amazon Q7.9%
Google Gemini AI6.9%
Other85.2%
AI Code Assistants
 

Featured Reviews

Uday Boya - PeerSpot reviewer
Ai Research Enthusiast And Developer at ADP
Daily AI assistance has transformed debugging, automation, and rapid project delivery
One improvement for Amazon Q is that I use it in Visual Studio, and in Visual Studio, I am not given an option to upload an image in Amazon Q. Also, this is one part of it. The second part is the context window of Amazon Q is very less compared to other GenAI tools. The moment I would be in a deep research or deep development or deep debugging mode in Amazon Q, the moment I hit the context length of the window, it would ask me to clear the complete context, and it would lose the complete context of the chat that I had previously. The two major pain points are that I have Amazon Q in Visual Studio, but I am not given an option to upload an image as a reference in Amazon Q. The second part is the context window is so limited. The moment I deep dive into some discussion in terms of development or debugging or automation, I hit a context length of the window, and the moment I hit it, it would lose the complete context. It has an option of summarizing the complete context and having it as a memory, but it would not be sufficient because I would have given a lot of details in the chat by that time. I have mentioned the two points earlier, so those are the only two points that I have in mind for improvements needed for Amazon Q.
Luís Silva - PeerSpot reviewer
Chief Technical Lead at a consultancy with 201-500 employees
Tool proves competitive with cost-effectiveness and speed while benefiting decision-making and integration capabilities, but shows room for enhancing creativity and handling large data contextually
There is another benefit in that Google Gemini is highly competitive from a cost perspective. The cost per token is very competitive. It's not the best - the Chinese models such as DeepSeek are better, but I can't use them. From a cost perspective, between European and United States options, Google Gemini is very competitive. It's not only its cost, it's also very performing. The time it takes to process the prompts and context information is very fast. It's one of the fastest models in the market. That's another advantage. There are other models which are also very good in quality but not as fast, such as Anthropic Claude. Google Gemini currently has a very good balance. The AI capabilities of Google Gemini are a multi-modal LLM which allows me to pass documents, images, and texts in the same prompt. Being multi-modal makes my life easier. I don't have to translate information before I can work with it. Google provides free tools to test scenarios, which speeds up development and reduces costs. It's a very fast and accurate model with quality responses.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which AI Code Assistants solutions are best for your needs.
881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
16%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Comms Service Provider
7%
University
11%
Computer Software Company
9%
Comms Service Provider
8%
Government
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business2
Midsize Enterprise1
Large Enterprise13
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business6
Midsize Enterprise6
Large Enterprise6
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Amazon Q?
While using Amazon Q, I faced some challenges, such as navigating the interface initially.
What is your primary use case for Amazon Q?
I have completed a project where the company required testing R&D on Kubernetes. I tested it locally by installing MiniKube, Kubernetes, and all the containers. I configured the Kubernetes MCB ...
What advice do you have for others considering Amazon Q?
I find Amazon Q easy to use, and I believe anyone can use it without needing extensive technical knowledge. I would definitely recommend Amazon Q to other people; it's a great tool. I find it quite...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Google Gemini?
The pricing of Google Gemini AI is not well understood, so no feedback can be provided on the cost. It was thought to have come together with the device subscription.
What needs improvement with Google Gemini?
Google Gemini AI is not used much because it does not appear to be as responsive or as effective as Alexa when responding to questions, queries, instructions, or commands. When in a room with Googl...
What is your primary use case for Google Gemini?
Google Gemini AI is used for common, basic digital assistant queries such as asking about the weather and the time. Often there are conflicting responses from Google Home, Google Home Mini, and the...
 

Comparisons

 

Also Known As

No data available
Google Bard
 

Overview

Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Q vs. Google Gemini AI and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.
881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.