Cloudability vs VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth comparison

Apptio and Broadcom are both solutions in the Cloud Cost Management category. Apptio is ranked #3 with an average rating of 7.5, while Broadcom is ranked #7 with an average rating of 7.0. Apptio holds a 5.4% mindshare in CCM, compared to Broadcom’s 3.8% mindshare. Additionally, 78% of Apptio users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 90% of Broadcom users who would recommend it.

Cloudability

Read 17 Cloudability reviews

3,523 Views
3,453 Comparison Views

78% willing to recommend

VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth

Read 10 VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth reviews

3,477 Views
2,225 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

Cloudability

VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 3, 2026

Cloudability and VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth compete in cloud financial management. Cloudability seems to have the upper hand with strong AWS integration and fast data retrieval capabilities, making it highly valued for personalized dashboards and detailed reporting.

Features: Cloudability offers a Reserved Instance Planner for AWS, sophisticated dashboards, and effective rightsizing recommendations, enhancing cloud financial management through strong AWS integration. VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth excels in providing cloud visibility and transparency, supports multi-cloud environments, and offers robust cost optimization and forecasting tools.

Room for Improvement: Users of Cloudability seek simpler usage, expanded rightsizing models, longer data analysis windows, and better API documentation. VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth needs to enhance SaaS integration, on-premise offerings, and provide deeper cloud resource insights for better automation and data representation.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Cloudability is primarily used in the Public Cloud and is known for helpful regular support, though some users report inconsistencies. VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth supports both On-premises and Public Cloud. It provides a dedicated account manager but receives mixed feedback on technical support.

Pricing and ROI: Cloudability's pricing is seen as high, especially for smaller clients, operating on usage-based yearly charges, yet it provides significant ROI through features like reserved instances. VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth's pricing is competitive and flexible, with subscription models offering substantial ROI for varying company sizes.

To learn more, read our detailed Cloudability vs. VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth Report (Updated: June 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Cloudability vs. VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth

June 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 900,747 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cloudability

Ranking in Cloud Cost Management

3rd

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth

Ranking in Cloud Cost Management

7th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Management (26th)

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2026, in the Cloud Cost Management category, the mindshare of Cloudability is 5.4%, down from 13.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth is 3.8%, down from 5.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Cloud Cost Management Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Cloudability	5.4%
VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth	3.8%
Other	90.8%

Cloud Cost Management

Featured Reviews

reviewer2795433

Cloud Ops Lead at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

Gained multi-cloud cost visibility and have optimized spend with detailed reports and rightsizing

The IAM feature is something that we struggle with using. IBM, the company that runs Cloudability, released the Groups feature back in the summer of 2025. While Groups can be used in some parts of the tool, it can't be used across the entire tool. I've found that Groups is basically unusable because if it can't be used everywhere, you would have to run both group-based access control and direct user-based access control at the same time, which doesn't make any sense. The Groups feature has improved over time, but it's still not something we feel we can use on an everyday basis, so the IAM section remains an issue right now. Most of the tool is very well-functioning and developed, and that's the only real improvement area that we've seen.

Read full review

Cláudio Braga

AI Software Developer Engineer at IBM

Improves cloud cost control and accountability but could explore further enhancements

The most valuable features of this solution include the drive for accountability because we can allocate cloud costs back to specific business units or teams through showback and chargeback. Additionally, reduced waste is achieved because we can identify unused or underutilized resources and receive recommendations for resizing instances. VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth's unified dashboard helps streamline cloud management practices by unifying everything needed in one dashboard, such as metrics, instance workings, machines, and servers. All of this in just one dashboard is very helpful to improve agility and resolve issues, especially for the workloads. VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth helps manage compliance risks by preventing threats, stopping attacks, detecting threats, and securing workloads or endpoints where customers will be using the endpoints. The positive impact on my organization is substantial because we can reduce waste, optimize expenses, drive accountability, and secure the budget from unnecessary cloud costs.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The tool helps us to resize on AWS correctly."

"Cloudability's customizable alerts help me maintain budgetary goals by providing recommendations and alerts on slot usages."

"It provides us visibility, then we can turn around and can give the leadership team more information, which we could not previously give them."

"The most crucial feature in reducing my cloud costs has been the rightsizing recommendations, along with the dashboards that track reserved instance spending coverage and utilization. As for Cloudability's integration with our existing cloud infrastructure, it's not integrated directly into our AWS infrastructure but rather reads and pulls data from it, providing valuable insights and analysis for cost management."

"It has already given us insight into how to optimize. So, we are now ramping up steadily its usage."

"The pricing isn't too expensive."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is its ability to create reports and dashboards."

"All the tagging and mapping, which helps to create some virtual tags are useful features."

More Cloudability pros

"The most valuable thing I have found is the cost saving recommendations."

"The solution is useful for cloud transparency and visibility in reports and dashboards that I have generated, especially the pre-populated dashboards."

"The product is easy to use in terms of monitoring all the environments. It works for multiple clouds."

"VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth's unified dashboard helps streamline cloud management practices by unifying everything needed in one dashboard, such as metrics, instance workings, machines, and servers."

"Overall, it's one of the best products because it's easy to use and has a great dashboard."

"This solution is fast and very easy to understand, even if you are not a technician."

"It's one of our core tools within our Zones Cloud Platforms tool bag, when we're looking at how we help customers optimize their cloud spend across their Azure and AWS environments today."

"Cloud Health has tremendous scope, and is on many clouds, including Google Cloud, Amazon, AWS, and Azure."

More VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth pros

Cons

"I would like the API functionality to improve. The update time after uploading data could also be improved."

"We would like them to have a linear regression, so we can be predictive for budgets, allocations, and the year's follow ups. We also want to have a longer window of analytics with better certainty that our workload will fit the model, not just in a two week window."

"The technical support is terrible. You can't pick up the phone and talk to somebody."

"The dashboard needs to include more graphs per team to show what individual teams are spending in a given time period."

"The API is not well-documented. It is not straightforward and difficult to use. This needs to be improved, as it is very difficult for our developers to develop automation around it."

"Enhancements could be made in the user interface and customization, and leveraging GenAI would be an area for improvement in Cloudability."

"There is always room for improvement in education and training."

"More documentation with more use case scenarios would be nice."

More Cloudability cons

"CloudHealth doesn't have that capability; they can't reach down to that level right now."

"When you start to virtualize things it gets very expensive."

"Some companies may not be capable of affording this product."

"The performance and accuracy of Cloud Health need to be improved."

"They should provide information or tools to tune the cloud resources according to the environment size."

"If you are working with the OS you need help and other connectors to get more information."

"CloudHealth needs to start building out Turbonomics-types of features that help the customers who are using CloudHealth really understand everything down to the server level, the virtual machine level."

"The export features regarding CSV files and specifically around identifying savings plans have room for improvement, as well as the drill-down features for reservation utilization."

More VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price of the license or the usage is a percentage of the top consumption. So it varies from year to year."

"Cloudability is a bit expensive."

"We have seen ROI with the reserved instances, and having the ability to predict what reserved instances you can get. We can save tens of thousands of dollars, and hundreds of thousands of dollars in some cases."

"My team is one of the most expensive teams, and we look at it quite a bit. We have probably easily saved around $400,000 USD a year."

"It justifies the cost and is worth it."

"There could be flexibility in pricing for the product."

"The pricing is competitive and while other products are good they are considerably more expensive."

"I give the cost of the solution an eight out of ten."

"The licensing fees depend on how big the company is. If you are a larger company then you have a better contract with a better price. The price is different for a small company."

"CloudHealth has a subscription-based model."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Cost Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

900,747 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

24%

Retailer

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

15%

Construction Company

11%

Computer Software Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	2
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	13

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	7

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cloudability?

Pricing and setup cost for Cloudability are good. Compared to the rest of the industry, they may be a little more expensive than some other FinOps tools, but that's to be expected because they have...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Cloudability?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Cloudability?

I use Cloudability to track costs across a multi-cloud infrastructure estate, including Google Cloud, AWS Cloud, and Microsoft Azure. Everything from reports and dashboards to anomaly alerts and ri...

See all answers

What needs improvement with CloudHealth?

I do not see any flaws in VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth. Everything is fine for me. The performance is acceptable, and the layout is acceptable. It is very user-friendly, and there is nothing that needs...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for CloudHealth?

This product was used for financial management in my company because I was working for a FinTech. VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth's use case is related to financial control and resource governance across ...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering CloudHealth?

VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth's analytics in understanding cloud usage trends and expense forecasts is normally more for marketing staff and analyzing production servers in my case, so I am not very exp...

See all answers

Comparisons

AWS Cost Explorer vs Cloudability

Compared 7% of the time

Apptio One vs Cloudability

Compared 6% of the time

Finout vs Cloudability

Compared 6% of the time

CloudZero vs Cloudability

Compared 6% of the time

Azure Cost Management vs Cloudability

Compared 4% of the time

More Cloudability Competitors

IBM Turbonomic vs VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth

Compared 8% of the time

Yuki Snowflake Optimization Platform vs VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth

Compared 5% of the time

CloudCheckr vs VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth

Compared 5% of the time

CloudBolt vs VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth

Compared 4% of the time

AWS Trusted Advisor vs VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth

Compared 3% of the time

More VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cloudability

June 2026

Download Cloudability product report

Buyer's Guide

VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth

May 2026

Download VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth product report

Also Known As

No data available

Aria Cost powered by CloudHealth, CloudHealth

Overview

Cloudability offers advanced management of cloud costs across platforms, providing transparency, detailed billing, and reports. It integrates with AWS, Azure, and Google Cloud to optimize financial performance and resource utilization.

Cloudability is designed for comprehensive cost management in multi-cloud landscapes. Users benefit from its robust features, including cost optimization, forecasting, and detailed reporting. With tools like Reserved Instance Planner, it simplifies management of AWS environments. Its integration capabilities extend to multiple cloud platforms, providing a unified view of financials and resource usage. Despite its advantages, users seek better API integration for a seamless experience. Enhancements in automation, data accuracy, and dashboard customization are desired to improve usability and insights. Organizations leverage its capabilities to monitor and manage spending while optimizing infrastructure utilization.

What key features does Cloudability provide?

Groups and Views: Organize cloud resources for better oversight.
Detailed Reports: Access in-depth reports on cost trends.
Dashboard Customization: Build dashboards tailored to specific needs.
Tagging: Enhance resource tracking with tagging features.
Cost Optimization: Use rightsizing recommendations to reduce spend.
Integration: Manage expenses across multiple cloud providers.

Why consider Cloudability reviews?

Cost Efficiency: Evaluate reports on improved spending controls.
Spending Visibility: Assess transparency in cloud expenditure.
Financial Transparency: Monitor billing management improvements.
Resource Insights: Consider resource utilization and optimization reports.
Forecasting: Look for accurate predictions based on historical data.

Cloudability is widely implemented across industries where managing cloud costs is critical. In sectors such as technology, finance, and manufacturing, organizations rely on its capability to optimize multi-cloud environments. It allows teams to consolidate data for better financial tracking and resource efficiency, ensuring that infrastructure investment aligns with business objectives.

Apptio

VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth provides an intuitive dashboard, pricing flexibility, and accountability features, helping users allocate cloud costs, enhance security, and optimize expenses for improved cloud management.

VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth stands out for its comprehensive cloud cost allocation by team, ensuring expense optimization and increased security. Its compliance management, scalability, and competitive pricing offer significant advantages. The platform facilitates monitoring across multi-cloud environments and delivers cost-saving recommendations. Transparent reporting and robust support enhance agility and aid in effective issue resolution.

What are the key features of VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth?

Intuitive Dashboard: Simplifies cloud management with user-friendly interfaces.
Pricing Flexibility: Offers adaptable pricing models to suit diverse needs.
Accountability Features: Supports team-based cost allocation and tracking.
Compliance Management: Ensures security standards are consistently met.
Scalability: Supports elastic growth and resource management across environments.
Performance Optimization: Provides tools to optimize cloud performance and reduce waste.

What benefits should users expect when evaluating VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth?

Cost Savings: Identifies opportunities to optimize cloud spending.
Improved Security: Enhances cloud security protocols and monitoring.
Transparent Reporting: Delivers clear and detailed usage and cost reports.
Efficient Issue Resolution: Streamlines processes for swift problem-solving.

VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth is extensively implemented for cloud expenditure management in multi-cloud landscapes, aiding sectors like finance, healthcare, and retail in leveraging dashboards for enhanced transparency and financial control. Users rely on the platform for monitoring health conditions, reporting costs, optimizing spending, and driving accountability through detailed analytics and insights.

Broadcom

Sample Customers

Adobe, Uber, Pega, imgur, Pixable, Blackboard, Keboola, Avalara

Pinterest, Dow Jones, RhythmOne, Ziff Davis, Acquia, Mentor Graphics, Lookout, Veracode, SwiftKey, Amtrak, Shi, Imgur, SumoLogic, NewsUK, Cloudera, Canvas

Buyer's Guide

Cloudability vs. VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth

June 2026

Free Report: Cloudability vs. VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth

Find out what your peers are saying about Cloudability vs. VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

900,747 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Cloudability vs. VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth report.

See our list of best Cloud Cost Management vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Cost Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.