No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

CloudAMQP vs Liquidware Essentials Suite comparison

Why PeerSpot?
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

CloudAMQP
Average Rating
9.0
Reviews Sentiment
5.2
Number of Reviews
8
Ranking in other categories
Message Queue (MQ) Software (8th)
Liquidware Essentials Suite
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
AWS Marketplace (275th)
 

Mindshare comparison

CloudAMQP and Liquidware Essentials Suite aren’t in the same category and serve different purposes. CloudAMQP is designed for Message Queue (MQ) Software and holds a mindshare of 0.3%.
Liquidware Essentials Suite, on the other hand, focuses on AWS Marketplace, holds 0.2% mindshare, up 0.1% since last year.
Message Queue (MQ) Software Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
CloudAMQP0.3%
IBM MQ21.4%
ActiveMQ20.1%
Other58.2%
Message Queue (MQ) Software
AWS Marketplace Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Liquidware Essentials Suite0.2%
True PACS SaaS0.3%
CTG Cross-Border VPC Connection (Asia Pacific:Seoul-China:Beijing)0.3%
Other99.2%
AWS Marketplace
 

Featured Reviews

Gianluca Marchini - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Back End Engineer at Talksmedia S.R.L.
Message queues have unified data pipelines and have reduced costs for complex microservice workflows
CloudAMQP could be improved in some areas, though it seems pretty complete to me, also because there are plugins, so in case of a missing feature, which so far has never happened to me, you can develop them or look for them in this plugin marketplace. Something from a graphical point of view could be updated, which has always remained a bit outdated, but nothing major besides that. In terms of necessary improvements regarding the user interface or other less obvious aspects, I think it is not very straightforward to take advantage of the charts to understand what happened further back in time, because the visualization really limits the data, showing only the most recent ones. Log management is also not particularly intuitive, which in my opinion should be reviewed.
Use Liquidware Essentials Suite?
Leave a review
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Message Queue (MQ) Software solutions are best for your needs.
920,574 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Construction Company
39%
Comms Service Provider
12%
Outsourcing Company
6%
Manufacturing Company
6%
Construction Company
47%
Comms Service Provider
12%
Outsourcing Company
8%
Manufacturing Company
5%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business2
Midsize Enterprise3
Large Enterprise3
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with CloudAMQP?
CloudAMQP can be improved, as sometimes while upgrading, for instance, if I am running a Big Bunny cluster and want to upgrade to Happy Hour, there is a lag or slowness while upgrading from one que...
What is your primary use case for CloudAMQP?
Our main use case for CloudAMQP is that we are using it for RabbitMQ operations as a message broker, with CloudAMQP managing RabbitMQ. Apart from that, we use it for microservice communication. In ...
What advice do you have for others considering CloudAMQP?
My advice for others looking into using CloudAMQP is that if you are choosing any message broker, you can go directly to CloudAMQP. However, before making a choice, at least check their plans accor...
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Overview

Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Apache, Amazon Web Services (AWS) and others in Message Queue (MQ) Software. Updated: October 2026.
920,574 professionals have used our research since 2012.