No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

CloudAvocado vs Heimdall Proxy Enterprise Edition (ARM) comparison

Why PeerSpot?
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

CloudAvocado
Ranking in Cloud Cost Management
65th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Heimdall Proxy Enterprise E...
Ranking in Cloud Cost Management
30th
Average Rating
10.0
Reviews Sentiment
9.6
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Featured Reviews

Use CloudAvocado?
Leave a review
Tarandeep Kaur - PeerSpot reviewer
Devops Manager at Flash
Addressed database bottlenecks and has improved caching, read traffic routing, and connection pooling
Heimdall Proxy Enterprise Edition (ARM) has made a noticeable difference for our team by using caching in the project to remove repeated queries from the database depth, while read-write splitting allows us to do database replicas more effectively. Connection pooling also helps our teams when applications generate a large number of short-lived database connections. In our environment, we have seen 30 to 40% lower database CPU utilization on the workload benefiting from the caching, with around 35 to 40% average application response time. The best features Heimdall Proxy Enterprise Edition (ARM) offers include read-write splitting that routes read workloads to replicas while maintaining consistency for write operations, distributed query caching that has helped us reduce repetitive database queries reaching the underlying database, and connection pooling which assists us in managing connection spikes without requiring application-side connection management. Additionally, active proxy auto-scaling is very important to maintain availability as traffic increases. The impact of the auto-scaling feature on our operations is notable, as connection pooling has helped us lower the load, with 30 to 40% lower database utilization due to the splitting and pooling concept, and around 35 to 40% average application response time. Heimdall Proxy Enterprise Edition (ARM) has positively impacted our organization in many ways, with key outcomes such as saving around 40 to 45% for cacheable workloads, improving response times by around 35% for database-heavy transactions with read or write queries, achieving 35 to 40 hours per month saved in database performance troubleshooting and manual scaling activities, and saving approximately 500 hours annually from our engineering team. This makes a significant difference, alongside roughly 30% reduction in our database infrastructure growth requirements where the proxy was most effective.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Cost Management solutions are best for your needs.
913,683 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Construction Company
32%
Insurance Company
18%
Computer Software Company
15%
Comms Service Provider
10%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Heimdall Proxy Enterprise Edition (ARM)?
In terms of pricing, setup cost, and licensing, licensing is usage-based with reasonably low costs. The AWS Marketplace pricing is consumption-based, and currently, we are using a pay-as-you-go mod...
What needs improvement with Heimdall Proxy Enterprise Edition (ARM)?
I do not feel there is a problem we have faced with Heimdall Proxy Enterprise Edition (ARM) so far, but if I had to mention one experience that could be improved, it would be the routing policies. ...
What is your primary use case for Heimdall Proxy Enterprise Edition (ARM)?
As a DevOps team, our main use case for Heimdall Proxy Enterprise Edition (ARM) is as a database access layer between our applications and backend databases, with the main objective of improving da...
 

Comparisons

No data available
No data available
 

Overview

Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Nutanix, Broadcom and others in Cloud Cost Management. Updated: August 2026.
913,683 professionals have used our research since 2012.