No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

CloudBeaver AWS vs Oracle Database comparison

Why PeerSpot?
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

CloudBeaver AWS
Ranking in Database Management Systems (DBMS)
10th
Average Rating
8.2
Number of Reviews
10
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Oracle Database
Ranking in Database Management Systems (DBMS)
1st
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
294
Ranking in other categories
Relational Databases Tools (2nd)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2026, in the Database Management Systems (DBMS) category, the mindshare of CloudBeaver AWS is 0.6%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Oracle Database is 23.8%, up from 22.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Database Management Systems (DBMS) Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Oracle Database23.8%
CloudBeaver AWS0.6%
Other75.6%
Database Management Systems (DBMS)
 

Featured Reviews

KevinShah - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Data Scientist at Evolvision Technologies
Browser-based SQL access has streamlined team collaboration but still needs faster queries and better ML integration
CloudBeaver AWS can be improved because in rendering of the queries, if it is very complex or big, the responses in the browser get slowed down. Compared to DBeaver of desktop, it is noticeably very slower on the browser of AWS and heavy data engineering can be done, but it will have very slow responses configured altogether. That needs to be maintained. Even there is no connectivity of machine learning, MLflow kind of thing where Airflow or PySpark approaches can be integrated. Python pipelines can be created but the whole end-to-end machine learning pipeline gets stuck whenever we work out with DBeaver. That again is one of the issues that I would look out for to improve. Also, I need to maintain the infrastructure perfectly here. I need to manage it and need to identify the risks as well. The whole proper setup of VPCs or IAMs needs to be done. It is not a NLQ kind of thing. User queries need to be configured in manual approaches, not automated currently. It should be automated now. Debugging is very painful. That again is a vague approach here. Errors can be executed and we will not be getting out the clarity as well. During this whole approach, the logs are not perfect and intuitive and debugging is also very limited. The user interface and documentation look good, but I would still suggest improvements.
Philemon Olusegun - PeerSpot reviewer
Qhse Manager at a outsourcing company with 10,001+ employees
Reliable backups and high-capacity data management have transformed large-scale census projects
When it comes to how Oracle Database can be improved, for me it is all about training and development in terms of gamification, creating awareness, and spreading the word to aspiring database administrators and database developers. As I have used it in the past and in recent times, many people are trying to get into IT, so the opportunity exists. Oracle has the market opportunity to take this time to spread its offerings and ensure that many aspiring professionals are aware of its services and products. From my perspective, there is not much to add regarding the needed improvements for the interface and the documentation. I give it a nine because I think Oracle sometimes can make things complicated. You have many services, many products, and many tools for different use cases. So it is difficult for someone who is only used to a particular product, such as Oracle Database, to understand all the other products and services that it provides. Probably streamlining it and making it available with categorized use cases for specific job roles would help. If you are a database developer, these are the tools that you need to be familiar with in Oracle's suite of products, and if you are a database administrator, these are the tools. Categorizing them based on the job role or function of people who are accessing these products and providing training capabilities on how to use them and how these products interchange and talk to each other would be very important because that is one of the things I struggled with when I started my journey as an Oracle Database administrator. Having that visibility of all the software products and providing free training and documentation on how you can improve and which products are best suited for integration to your product from Oracle would go a long way to help organizations and professionals. Regarding Oracle Database's AI capabilities, I am very keen on its governance and security. I think more work needs to be done on the security and ensuring that the database for a large number of people is watertight. AI is here to stay; however, governance and more stress testing of the AI capabilities needs to be done to ensure there is no breach of data. I would rate it currently at 6 over 10 and there is room for improvement. As long as there are government policies and Oracle policies that can mitigate any breaches of data and serious security issues, releasing people's records over the internet, there is always room for improvement in that regard.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"CloudBeaver AWS's interactive dashboards contribute to our organization's data analysis needs, and I find it really good."
"CloudBeaver AWS has proven itself as a cost-effective, scalable, and collaborative platform for database management in the cloud."
"CloudBeaver AWS has positively impacted my organization mainly by improving debugging speed, team collaboration, and operational efficiency."
"CloudBeaver AWS has positively impacted our organization in terms of productivity and value addition by reducing the burden of connecting to the database."
"CloudBeaver AWS positively impacts my organization by improving developer productivity and simplifying database access."
"CloudBeaver AWS has impacted us positively in multiple ways."
"My environment looks very fruitful when I look for an ideal solution for teams or organizations."
"Since using CloudBeaver AWS, my organization has experienced many positive outcomes."
"The solution is very stable."
"The most valuable features of this solution are that it's stable, and it's safe."
"The original Oracle Database is good for us, especially because even if the ERP is running on Java, we still get good performances."
"On the enterprise level, it's very stable and reliable."
"it is very easy to use the product."
"It’s well worth the investment."
"This solution has the best performance, bar none."
"It's easy to use, it's robust, and it offers good security that we can count on."
 

Cons

"CloudBeaver AWS already covers most core database management needs very well, but a few improvements could make it even better for teams working with real-time systems and cloud monitoring."
"In terms of drawbacks, CloudBeaver AWS's cloud instances are slower than what local solutions provide. Debugging is not smooth or effective compared to what other databases provide."
"Regarding stability and scalability, I find it quite stable based on our infrastructure. However, with incorrect configurations, we might see issues that include throttling or pool exhaustion, so it is strictly based on configurations."
"The performance of CloudBeaver AWS can sometimes lag when making connections."
"While CloudBeaver AWS meets most of our needs, there are a few areas where it could be improved."
"There is room for improvement in CloudBeaver AWS, especially in query performance when dealing with large datasets or complex SQL queries."
"CloudBeaver AWS could be better if the official documentation were not sometimes too high-level."
"CloudBeaver AWS can be improved because in rendering of the queries, if it is very complex or big, the responses in the browser get slowed down; compared to DBeaver of desktop, it is noticeably very slower on the browser of AWS and heavy data engineering can be done, but it will have very slow responses configured altogether."
"It's a very expensive solution."
"Oracle has added a new optimizer option to do some very fancy stuff, but it provides the wrong results."
"As of now, Oracle is branded to Oracle only, the option of migrating to other databases is not available."
"Oracle itself does not provide an excellent migration tool to users, which is a shortcoming where the product needs to improve a lot."
"Its administration side is very difficult. To install Oracle Database, you need to have some prior knowledge. You must learn their commands. I was new to this, so I found some difficulty in it. Its installation should be easier. It is expensive, and it should be cheaper."
"Although we're not using the latest version, there are some ODB tools that are quite cumbersome to use."
"However, it can take quite a bit of time to explain details to first level support and gather debug and log information, that in some cases aren't necessarily relevant but is merely correct procedure in order to get the case assigned."
"It needs a better, less technical interface."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"It is very expensive. We pay in dollars, so the inflation and conversion cost is also there for us. They charge on a yearly basis for the license."
"It is an excellent product, as long as the organization can afford the price tag."
"The pricing should be cheaper."
"There is a license required to use Oracle Database."
"We pay a yearly maintenance fee."
"It is expensive."
"We pay for an annual license as well as monthly support."
"The licensing cost is not based on a yearly subscription but rather on the number of devices used annually."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Database Management Systems (DBMS) solutions are best for your needs.
920,336 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Construction Company
28%
Outsourcing Company
14%
Media Company
7%
Financial Services Firm
7%
Outsourcing Company
14%
Financial Services Firm
13%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Construction Company
10%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business7
Midsize Enterprise1
Large Enterprise5
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business87
Midsize Enterprise66
Large Enterprise181
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with CloudBeaver AWS?
There is room for improvement in CloudBeaver AWS, especially in query performance when dealing with large datasets or complex SQL queries. The SQL editor could also provide better autocomplete func...
What is your primary use case for CloudBeaver AWS?
As an AI engineer in a pharmaceutical company, I primarily use CloudBeaver AWS for database access and management. My main responsibilities include executing SQL queries, checking database records,...
What advice do you have for others considering CloudBeaver AWS?
I would rate CloudBeaver AWS at nine out of ten. I chose nine out of ten because it provides similar features to other editors, but the benefit is that we are using it in a cloud environment. If th...
How do you run Oracle Database at your organization and why?
My company has been using Oracle Exadata Database Service for some years now, and we are happy with it. I will allow myself to answer your questions about why and what benefits it provides us with ...
Do you know of any disadvantages of Oracle Database?
Undoubtedly, Oracle Database is a top product in its category. But it does have its disadvantages, and for me and my organization, that has been the limitations of the product. When it comes to Ora...
What is the best use for Oracle Database?
Oracle Database is flexible and can be used for many things. My company's main use case for this product is for storing data. We benefit from its high level of security as well as from the fact tha...
 

Also Known As

No data available
Oracle 12c, RDBMS
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
Agncia Nacional de guas, Anbima, Aria Systems, Asiana Airlines, Astelit LLC, Australian Finance Group, Banco Occidental de Descuento, Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited, BT, Caja de Seguros S.A., Casas GEO S.A.B. de C.V., Comic Relief UK, Corsair Components Inc., CSAM Health AS, CSOB Group, Datacraft Solutions, DenizBank A.S., Department of Treasury and Finance WA, Office of State Revenue, Deutsche B_rse AG, Deutsche Lufthansa AG, Deutsche Messe AG, Digicel Haiti, DPR COSEA, Essar Group, Essatto Software Pty Ltd, Farmšcia e Drogaria Nissei Ltda., Fomento Econ‹mico Mexicano S.A.B. de C.V. (FEMSA), FundaÊo Petrobras de Seguridade Social, Future Group, GFKL Financial Services AG, Grupo Posadas S.A.B. de C.V., Grupo Sinosserra, Guerra S.A. Implementos Rodovišrios, Hanatour International Service, Hays plc, Henan Mobile Co. Ltd, Hochschule Hof, Hong Kong and China Technology (Wuhan) Co. Ltd (Towngas Technology), Industries Corpa_al C.A., Infrastructure Development Finance Company Limited, Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatstica, Instituto Mexicano de la Propiedad Industrial, Kcell, LinkShare Corporation, MercadoLibre Inc., MetLife Inc., Nextgen Distribution, €BB-IKT GmbH, Octagon Research Solutions, Pacific Lutheran University, Paragon Data GmbH, Ping ltd., PJSC Trustbank, Prodaub _ Processamento de Dados de Uberl_ndia, Purdue University, Redknee Inc., Robi Axiata Limited, Shanghai Infoservice Technology Co. Ltd, Shanghai Sihua Technologies Co. Ltd, Sistema de Aguas de la Ciudad de M_xico, Solihull Metropolitan Borough Council, Suddenlink Communications, Suprajit Engineering Limited, Tallink Grupp, Terminales Ro de la Plata S.A., Therap Services LLC, Think Passenger Inc., Trafigura, Transmed S.A.L Lebanon, ValeShop, VelQuest Corporation, Vodafone Group plc, West Virginia Network, WIND Hellas Telecommunications S.A
Find out what your peers are saying about CloudBeaver AWS vs. Oracle Database and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.
920,336 professionals have used our research since 2012.