CloudBolt vs CloudCheckr comparison

CloudBolt and Spot - A Flexera company are both solutions in the Cloud Management category. CloudBolt is ranked #29, while Spot - A Flexera company is ranked #24 with an average rating of 8.0. CloudBolt holds a 2.1% mindshare in CM, compared to Spot - A Flexera company’s 1.6% mindshare. Additionally, 90% of CloudBolt users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 77% of Spot - A Flexera company users who would recommend it.

CloudBolt

Read 8 CloudBolt reviews

1,121 Views
964 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

CloudCheckr

Read 10 CloudCheckr reviews

1,220 Views
647 Comparison Views

77% willing to recommend

CloudBolt

CloudCheckr

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 17, 2024

CloudBolt and CloudCheckr are competing cloud management platforms. CloudBolt seems to have the upper hand in pricing and customer support, whereas CloudCheckr excels in comprehensive features.

Features: CloudBolt focuses on automation, hybrid cloud management, and efficient workload solutions. It allows for extensive customization, integration with multiple cloud platforms, and offers role-based access control. CloudCheckr is recognized for robust compliance, detailed reporting, and extensive cost visibility. It integrates seamlessly with AWS, Azure, and GCP, providing a simple interface for managing multi-cloud environments.

Room for Improvement: CloudBolt could enhance its reporting features and improve its compliance capabilities. Additional user interface enhancements could further simplify the user experience. CloudCheckr might benefit from simplifying its deployment process and strengthening its customer support responsiveness. Enhancements in automation could also add value to existing processes.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: CloudBolt offers a simplified deployment process facilitated by proactive customer service, ensuring quick onboarding and resolution of issues. In contrast, CloudCheckr's deployment process is more intricate but provides numerous configuration options. However, its customer service may fall short compared to CloudBolt.

Pricing and ROI: CloudBolt presents a lower initial setup cost and faster ROI, making it suitable for budget-conscious businesses. CloudCheckr, while having higher initial costs, offers long-term value through its rich feature set, appealing to businesses prioritizing detailed analytics and compliance.

To learn more, read our detailed CloudBolt vs. CloudCheckr Report (Updated: January 2026).

Buyer's Guide

CloudBolt vs. CloudCheckr

January 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

CloudBolt

Ranking in Cloud Management

29th

Ranking in Cloud Cost Management

45th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

CloudCheckr

Ranking in Cloud Management

24th

Ranking in Cloud Cost Management

11th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Managed Cloud Services (5th), AI Observability (76th)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Cloud Management category, the mindshare of CloudBolt is 2.1%, up from 2.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of CloudCheckr is 1.6%, up from 1.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Cloud Management Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
CloudCheckr	1.6%
CloudBolt	2.1%
Other	96.3%

Cloud Management

Featured Reviews

AdeolaEkunola

Director at NIGERCUBES LTD

The solution offers reliable resource control but needs to improve its UI

Cloudbox is just an abstraction software. There is no need for scalability. It's quite a simple solution. You might only need to increase the resources you apply to the CloudBold deployment. If, for example, the number of users increases, you might have to check the recommendations from CloudBolt and act accordingly. We have over 100 internal users. Regarding the infrastructure it sits on, the solution sits on the private of the on-prem, a VMware infrastructure that stands across two sites, the DR and the main production. We have over 60 ESXi of Asterisk and about 500 or 1,000 virtual machines.

Read full review

Karan Saini

Dev Ops Engineer at a construction company with 11-50 employees

Cost governance has improved and cost visibility now drives daily compliant optimization

CloudCheckr is an excellent tool overall. The feature that stands out is how it enables cost savings and efficiency. The cost visibility and reporting are really valuable, and the dashboard is informative and enables good decision-making. The actionable recommendations are beneficial, such as the auto-generated suggestions for optimization. The built-in security and compliance checks, along with scheduled reports, save a lot of manual effort and keep both engineering and finance teams aligned. CloudCheckr has been great and has helped solve problems by ensuring proper compliance. It does not just show data; it highlights actionable items for cost savings, security improvements, and compliance gaps. Scheduled reports are received on a regular basis according to defined schedules, providing more insights that can be shared with leadership and finance teams to ensure alignment. This results in a better picture where everyone is aligned and focused on growth while effectively and efficiently using financial resources. CloudCheckr has enabled an average cost saving of approximately 25% from the last year, and this occurred while also increasing the scale of production. It has significantly reduced manual efforts that would otherwise be spent manually checking costs, tracking where spending is occurring, and verifying whether everything is properly optimized.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The initial deployment was super easy."

"I find the self-service features valuable."

"Hybrid cloud platform for VM and app deployment and management, with very good stability. It's customizable, easy to set up, and can be deployed within half an hour."

"Role-based access control and application blueprinting."

"The solution's biggest advantage is flexibility"

"It's one of the leading players for cloud optimization. It's hard to find anything better."

"The most valuable feature of CloudCheckr CMx High Security is granular reporting. Additionally, the user interface is easy to use."

"The recommendation section is pretty helpful."

"The best feature I like about CloudCheckr CMx High Security is its simplicity. I love that it's not rocket science to use the solution. Even if you're not familiar with the cloud, you can easily figure out how to use CloudCheckr CMx High Security. You can use AWS, you can use Azure, and you can use GCP with the solution because the integration is quite simple. You can also use multi-cloud with it, and you could see the billing part. You'll have complete visibility into your cost which I love about the solution. I also love that data on any security issues and vulnerabilities are available on the go with CloudCheckr CMx High Security. You don't need to do anything different. Just run the scan and you'll have all these open findings in the tool, in terms of the priority level, so if it's critical, it will tell you, "It's critical," and you need to fix it right away."

"The solution is scalable for our purposes."

"It will automatically suggest areas for optimization."

"CloudCheckr has enabled an average cost saving of approximately 25% from the last year, and this occurred while also increasing the scale of production."

"The solution is mostly stable."

More CloudCheckr pros

Cons

"The solution is not easy to use. It's not intuitive enough to click anywhere in the solution and make it work."

"Could increase the number of integrations and add more out-of-the-box work flows."

"The management of SaaS must be improved."

"The area of integrating on-prem and cloud needs improvement."

"The scheduling feature of CloudBolt needs improvement because sometimes, it doesn't work."

"The reporting and analytic capabilities are very limited."

"What needs to be improved in CloudCheckr CMx High Security is integration. All the clouds are going quite fast, for example, all the cloud providers: Microsoft, Google, etc. CloudCheckr CMx High Security is good with AWS, no doubt about it, but with Azure and Google Cloud, I find that the solution is slow in that direction. If the vendor planned for CloudCheckr CMx High Security to be automated just for AWS, then it does make sense. If not, if the vendor is also targeting good integration with Google and Microsoft, then CloudCheckr CMx High Security integration needs improvement, in particular, it has to be faster. At the moment, its integration with Azure is not as good as its integration with AWS. With GCP, integration is nowhere."

"The performance of the tool really needs to be improved."

"The solution must improve its user interface."

"Self-healing could be a bit smoother and a bit cleaner, easier to access and more functional. That would help."

"CloudCheckr CMx High Security is complex. There are a lot of menus, and if you do not know what you are looking for you can get lost. However, the interface is self-explanatory. It's easy to understand where to go to get what you want."

"Some aspects could be made more customizable, such as the dashboard and UI."

"The solution needs to work better with larger capacities of data."

More CloudCheckr cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I rate the pricing an eight out of ten because the solution is expensive."

"The solution is reasonably priced."

"The system is cheaper if a customer has fewer servers since you pay by the node."

"The solution is reasonably priced."

"The cost is on par with other providers."

"A license is needed to use CloudCheckr CMx High Security, but because we are a managed service provider, the price of the license would vary. It depends on the type of cloud users we have, for example, it would be some type of percentage or monthly billing, etc."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

11%

Government

11%

Manufacturing Company

Outsourcing Company

Computer Software Company

15%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Educational Organization

University

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	6

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	7

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about CloudCheckr ?

The recommendation section is pretty helpful.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for CloudCheckr ?

The pricing and licensing are quite convenient. I am not certain about the exact costs involved because another team handles that aspect. Overall, the pricing was quite convenient and represented g...

See all answers

What needs improvement with CloudCheckr ?

Some aspects could be made more customizable, such as the dashboard and UI. Some features may be too advanced and may have a learning curve, potentially lacking customization. Overall, CloudCheckr ...

See all answers

Comparisons

Morpheus vs CloudBolt

Compared 30% of the time

VMware Aria Automation vs CloudBolt

Compared 8% of the time

BMC Helix Cloud Security vs CloudBolt

Compared 7% of the time

VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth vs CloudBolt

Compared 7% of the time

Flexera Cloud Management Platform (CMP) vs CloudBolt

Compared 4% of the time

More CloudBolt Competitors

Flexera Cloud Cost Management vs CloudCheckr

Compared 14% of the time

Cloudability vs CloudCheckr

Compared 9% of the time

IBM Turbonomic vs CloudCheckr

Compared 8% of the time

Apptio One vs CloudCheckr

Compared 6% of the time

IBM Cloud App Management vs CloudCheckr

Compared 4% of the time

More CloudCheckr Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

CloudBolt

January 2026

Download CloudBolt product report

Buyer's Guide

CloudCheckr

January 2026

Download CloudCheckr product report

Also Known As

No data available

CloudCheckr CMx High Security, CloudCheckr CMP

Overview

CloudBolt supports a variety of cloud technologies, from on-premises virtualization and private cloud to a wide range public and hybrid cloud configurations.

No need to rip-and-replace. CloudBolt provides easy import, syncing, and management of legacy deployments even as it helps you build out new cloud environments.

CloudBolt lets administrators create and maintain configuration standards while developing a reusable library of service and application templates.

CloudBolt

CloudCheckr CMx High Security is a cloud management platform that provides complete visibility into cost and security issues. The primary use cases are day-to-day operations, cloud management, identifying open vulnerabilities and issues from a security perspective, and cost management and optimization.

The solution is praised for its stability, simplicity, ease of use, scalability, excellent technical support, and granular reporting. CloudCheckr CMx High Security provides priority-level data on security issues and vulnerabilities, making it easy to identify critical issues that need immediate attention.

Spot - A Flexera company

Sample Customers

WM, CyWest, Panic, Camden, University of Maryland, Xerox, Neustar, Medidata, Continu, Aruba Networks, Neuberger Berman, Peak6, EverBank, Ascensus, Hosting Edge

Accenture, Logitech, Ingram, Cloudar, Infor, DXC, Cornell University, DLT, Lumen, Lightstream, Choice Hotels, B-Tech, SmileShark, PTP, Explicity, JCH Technology, Siemens Mobility

Buyer's Guide

CloudBolt vs. CloudCheckr

January 2026

Free Report: CloudBolt vs. CloudCheckr

Find out what your peers are saying about CloudBolt vs. CloudCheckr and other solutions. Updated: January 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our CloudBolt vs. CloudCheckr report.

See our list of best Cloud Management vendors and best Cloud Cost Management vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.