CloudBolt vs CloudCheckr comparison

CloudBolt and Spot are both solutions in the Cloud Management category. CloudBolt is ranked #19 with an average rating of 7.3, while Spot is ranked #28 with an average rating of 7.0. CloudBolt holds a 2.6% mindshare in CM, compared to Spot’s 1.2% mindshare. Additionally, 90% of CloudBolt users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 66% of Spot users who would recommend it.

CloudBolt

Read 8 CloudBolt reviews

1,084 Views
483 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

CloudCheckr

Read 8 CloudCheckr reviews

448 Views
215 Comparison Views

66% willing to recommend

CloudBolt

CloudCheckr

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 17, 2024

CloudBolt and CloudCheckr are competing cloud management platforms. CloudBolt seems to have the upper hand in pricing and customer support, whereas CloudCheckr excels in comprehensive features.

Features: CloudBolt focuses on automation, hybrid cloud management, and efficient workload solutions. It allows for extensive customization, integration with multiple cloud platforms, and offers role-based access control. CloudCheckr is recognized for robust compliance, detailed reporting, and extensive cost visibility. It integrates seamlessly with AWS, Azure, and GCP, providing a simple interface for managing multi-cloud environments.

Room for Improvement: CloudBolt could enhance its reporting features and improve its compliance capabilities. Additional user interface enhancements could further simplify the user experience. CloudCheckr might benefit from simplifying its deployment process and strengthening its customer support responsiveness. Enhancements in automation could also add value to existing processes.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: CloudBolt offers a simplified deployment process facilitated by proactive customer service, ensuring quick onboarding and resolution of issues. In contrast, CloudCheckr's deployment process is more intricate but provides numerous configuration options. However, its customer service may fall short compared to CloudBolt.

Pricing and ROI: CloudBolt presents a lower initial setup cost and faster ROI, making it suitable for budget-conscious businesses. CloudCheckr, while having higher initial costs, offers long-term value through its rich feature set, appealing to businesses prioritizing detailed analytics and compliance.

To learn more, read our detailed CloudBolt vs. CloudCheckr Report (Updated: May 2025).

Buyer's Guide

CloudBolt vs. CloudCheckr

May 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 860,168 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

CloudBolt

Ranking in Cloud Management

19th

Ranking in Cloud Cost Management

16th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

CloudCheckr

Ranking in Cloud Management

28th

Ranking in Cloud Cost Management

10th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Managed Cloud Services (5th)

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Cloud Management category, the mindshare of CloudBolt is 2.6%, up from 1.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of CloudCheckr is 1.2%, up from 1.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Cloud Management

Featured Reviews

AdeolaEkunola

Director at NIGERCUBES LTD

The solution offers reliable resource control but needs to improve its UI

Cloudbox is just an abstraction software. There is no need for scalability. It's quite a simple solution. You might only need to increase the resources you apply to the CloudBold deployment. If, for example, the number of users increases, you might have to check the recommendations from CloudBolt and act accordingly. We have over 100 internal users. Regarding the infrastructure it sits on, the solution sits on the private of the on-prem, a VMware infrastructure that stands across two sites, the DR and the main production. We have over 60 ESXi of Asterisk and about 500 or 1,000 virtual machines.

Read full review

Peter Ramnath

Associate Director, ITSM & Onboarding at a computer software company with 201-500 employees

Provides recommendations regarding how cost and consumption can be adjusted, but the reporting and analytic capabilities are very limited

We are not happy with the product’s reporting capabilities. We are planning to change the solution. The security compliance feature doesn’t give much data because CloudCheckr has done a majority of its development on AWS. The majority of our clients are on Microsoft Azure. There are a lot of features and information available for Amazon, but not for Azure. The tool wasn't meeting our expectations. The reporting and analytic capabilities are very limited. There's no ability to do scheduled email reports. The report could only be sent to a single email address. The tool was not very usable. We had multiple clients and tasks to work with.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The solution's biggest advantage is flexibility"

"I find the self-service features valuable."

"Role-based access control and application blueprinting."

"The initial deployment was super easy."

"Hybrid cloud platform for VM and app deployment and management, with very good stability. It's customizable, easy to set up, and can be deployed within half an hour."

"The most valuable feature of CloudCheckr CMx High Security is granular reporting. Additionally, the user interface is easy to use."

"The solution is scalable for our purposes."

"The initial setup is straightforward."

"It's one of the leading players for cloud optimization. It's hard to find anything better."

"The best feature I like about CloudCheckr CMx High Security is its simplicity. I love that it's not rocket science to use the solution. Even if you're not familiar with the cloud, you can easily figure out how to use CloudCheckr CMx High Security. You can use AWS, you can use Azure, and you can use GCP with the solution because the integration is quite simple. You can also use multi-cloud with it, and you could see the billing part. You'll have complete visibility into your cost which I love about the solution. I also love that data on any security issues and vulnerabilities are available on the go with CloudCheckr CMx High Security. You don't need to do anything different. Just run the scan and you'll have all these open findings in the tool, in terms of the priority level, so if it's critical, it will tell you, "It's critical," and you need to fix it right away."

"The recommendation section is pretty helpful."

"The solution is mostly stable."

"It will automatically suggest areas for optimization."

Cons

"Could increase the number of integrations and add more out-of-the-box work flows."

"The solution is not easy to use. It's not intuitive enough to click anywhere in the solution and make it work."

"The scheduling feature of CloudBolt needs improvement because sometimes, it doesn't work."

"The area of integrating on-prem and cloud needs improvement."

"The management of SaaS must be improved."

"The solution must improve its user interface."

"The performance of the tool really needs to be improved."

"Many features still need to be implemented in this tool."

"CloudCheckr CMx High Security is complex. There are a lot of menus, and if you do not know what you are looking for you can get lost. However, the interface is self-explanatory. It's easy to understand where to go to get what you want."

"The solution needs to work better with larger capacities of data."

"Self-healing could be a bit smoother and a bit cleaner, easier to access and more functional. That would help."

"The reporting and analytic capabilities are very limited."

"What needs to be improved in CloudCheckr CMx High Security is integration. All the clouds are going quite fast, for example, all the cloud providers: Microsoft, Google, etc. CloudCheckr CMx High Security is good with AWS, no doubt about it, but with Azure and Google Cloud, I find that the solution is slow in that direction. If the vendor planned for CloudCheckr CMx High Security to be automated just for AWS, then it does make sense. If not, if the vendor is also targeting good integration with Google and Microsoft, then CloudCheckr CMx High Security integration needs improvement, in particular, it has to be faster. At the moment, its integration with Azure is not as good as its integration with AWS. With GCP, integration is nowhere."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution is reasonably priced."

"The system is cheaper if a customer has fewer servers since you pay by the node."

"I rate the pricing an eight out of ten because the solution is expensive."

"The solution is reasonably priced."

"The cost is on par with other providers."

"A license is needed to use CloudCheckr CMx High Security, but because we are a managed service provider, the price of the license would vary. It depends on the type of cloud users we have, for example, it would be some type of percentage or monthly billing, etc."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

860,168 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

17%

Government

10%

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

Computer Software Company

20%

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about CloudBolt?

I find the self-service features valuable.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for CloudBolt?

I rate the pricing an eight out of ten because the solution is expensive. The license is expensive to acquire.

See all answers

What needs improvement with CloudBolt?

The area of integrating on-prem and cloud needs improvement. Another area that the solution needs to improve on is the UI. The UI can be much better.

See all answers

What do you like most about CloudCheckr ?

The recommendation section is pretty helpful.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for CloudCheckr ?

The price depends on the actual Azure consumption and what we feed into it. The cost is on par with other providers.

See all answers

What needs improvement with CloudCheckr ?

See all answers

Comparisons

Morpheus vs CloudBolt

Compared 67% of the time

BMC Helix Cloud Security vs CloudBolt

Compared 10% of the time

VMware Aria Automation vs CloudBolt

Compared 9% of the time

BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management vs CloudBolt

Compared 8% of the time

IBM Turbonomic vs CloudBolt

Compared 6% of the time

More CloudBolt Competitors

Flexera Cloud Cost Management vs CloudCheckr

Compared 19% of the time

Apptio One vs CloudCheckr

Compared 17% of the time

IBM Turbonomic vs CloudCheckr

Compared 15% of the time

AWS Cost Explorer vs CloudCheckr

Compared 13% of the time

Cloudability vs CloudCheckr

Compared 10% of the time

More CloudCheckr Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

CloudBolt

June 2025

Download CloudBolt product report

Buyer's Guide

CloudCheckr

June 2025

Download CloudCheckr product report

Also Known As

No data available

CloudCheckr CMx High Security, CloudCheckr CMP

Overview

CloudBolt supports a variety of cloud technologies, from on-premises virtualization and private cloud to a wide range public and hybrid cloud configurations.

No need to rip-and-replace. CloudBolt provides easy import, syncing, and management of legacy deployments even as it helps you build out new cloud environments.

CloudBolt lets administrators create and maintain configuration standards while developing a reusable library of service and application templates.

CloudBolt

CloudCheckr CMx High Security is a cloud management platform that provides complete visibility into cost and security issues. The primary use cases are day-to-day operations, cloud management, identifying open vulnerabilities and issues from a security perspective, and cost management and optimization.

The solution is praised for its stability, simplicity, ease of use, scalability, excellent technical support, and granular reporting. CloudCheckr CMx High Security provides priority-level data on security issues and vulnerabilities, making it easy to identify critical issues that need immediate attention.

Spot

Sample Customers

WM, CyWest, Panic, Camden, University of Maryland, Xerox, Neustar, Medidata, Continu, Aruba Networks, Neuberger Berman, Peak6, EverBank, Ascensus, Hosting Edge

Accenture, Logitech, Ingram, Cloudar, Infor, DXC, Cornell University, DLT, Lumen, Lightstream, Choice Hotels, B-Tech, SmileShark, PTP, Explicity, JCH Technology, Siemens Mobility

Buyer's Guide

CloudBolt vs. CloudCheckr

May 2025

Free Report: CloudBolt vs. CloudCheckr

Find out what your peers are saying about CloudBolt vs. CloudCheckr and other solutions. Updated: May 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

860,168 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our CloudBolt vs. CloudCheckr report.

See our list of best Cloud Management vendors and best Cloud Cost Management vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.