CloudCheckr vs Cloudability comparison

Apptio and Spot - A Flexera company are both solutions in the Cloud Cost Management category. Apptio is ranked #3 with an average rating of 7.9, while Spot - A Flexera company is ranked #12 with an average rating of 8.0. Apptio holds a 6.7% mindshare in CCM, compared to Spot - A Flexera company’s 2.8% mindshare. Additionally, 78% of Apptio users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 80% of Spot - A Flexera company users who would recommend it.

Cloudability

Read 17 Cloudability reviews

2,249 Views
2,204 Comparison Views

78% willing to recommend

CloudCheckr

Read 11 CloudCheckr reviews

1,735 Views
763 Comparison Views

80% willing to recommend

Cloudability

CloudCheckr

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 2, 2025

Cloudability and CloudCheckr are major players in the cloud management sector. Cloudability seems to have an advantage in AWS integration due to its depth in detailed cost analysis and reserved instance planning, while CloudCheckr offers better multi-cloud compatibility, making it appealing for varied cloud environments.

Features: Cloudability offers comprehensive metrics for financial management, reserved instance planning, and customized dashboards. Its integration with AWS is robust, with features such as tagging capabilities and rightsizing recommendations. CloudCheckr excels with strong billing capabilities, security insights, and the ability to scale easily across AWS, Azure, and GCP.

Room for Improvement: Cloudability users suggest enhancements in user onboarding, API documentation, and long-term forecasting. Discrepancies in billing data and automation needs in data handling are noted areas needing attention. It could also broaden its focus to include more cloud providers. CloudCheckr needs performance improvements with large datasets and better integration with Azure and GCP, while its non-AWS security compliance could be enhanced. Reporting and user guidance in both products could be improved.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Both products provide public cloud support, but only CloudCheckr extends to private clouds. Cloudability's support varies, with some users finding it inconsistent and lacking real-time options. CloudCheckr also receives mixed feedback, particularly outside AWS, requiring active customer engagement for effective support and deployment.

Pricing and ROI: Cloudability is perceived as expensive for large-scale users but can provide significant ROI through cost-saving recommendations, with some users claiming a 9x ROI. Its usage-based pricing model may deter smaller operations. In contrast, CloudCheckr is deemed fairly priced, delivering consistent value adaptable to diverse cloud usage structures. While both offer ROI through predictive analytics and reserved instance savings, Cloudability's cost may limit its appeal to smaller clients, whereas CloudCheckr remains reasonably priced across various scales.

To learn more, read our detailed CloudCheckr vs. Cloudability Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

CloudCheckr vs. Cloudability

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 884,797 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

ROI

Sentiment score

6.5

Cloudability boosts financial efficiency, saving users up to $400,000 annually through cost reduction, ROI, and budgeting optimization features.

Sentiment score

5.9

CloudCheckr CMx High Security users saw a 25% cost reduction and improved operations with automated invoicing benefits.

It'd be very easy to save at least 10 to 20% costs from cloud spend just by utilizing the features of right-sizing or commitments management that Cloudability offers.

reviewer2795433

Cloud Ops Lead at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

We save time by making the reporting easier.

reviewer2784351

Digital Marketing, Marketing Technology & Analytics Architect at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees

For more quotes and insights, download the Cloudability report

I have seen a return on investment of 100%, with significant cost avoidance and measurable savings within the first few months of deployment.

AbhishekGupta2

Sr PreSales Cloud Architect at a outsourcing company with 10,001+ employees

This part has been eliminated and has saved significant effort while ensuring all teams remain aligned at all times.

Karan Saini

Dev Ops Engineer at a construction company with 11-50 employees

For more quotes and insights, download the CloudCheckr report

Customer Service

Sentiment score

5.2

Enterprise customers receive strategic support from account managers, though response consistency and communication options are limited.

Sentiment score

7.5

Ingram's team experienced effective support overall but noted delays and inadequacies in handling complex technical issues.

The customer support from Cloudability is great.

reviewer2795433

Cloud Ops Lead at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

Cloudability's customer support is adequate, and I would rate it an 8 on a scale of 1 to 10.

reviewer2784351

Digital Marketing, Marketing Technology & Analytics Architect at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees

For more quotes and insights, download the Cloudability report

The additional support ended up taking longer than expected, with responses that did not meet our need for detailed and technical assistance.

AbhishekGupta2

Sr PreSales Cloud Architect at a outsourcing company with 10,001+ employees

Sometimes support needs to be reached, but they are very responsive and supportive.

Karan Saini

Dev Ops Engineer at a construction company with 11-50 employees

The customer support for CloudCheckr is fantastic.

reviewer2784525

Director, Trust Operations Analytics at a tech vendor with 1,001-5,000 employees

For more quotes and insights, download the CloudCheckr report

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score

7.1

Cloudability offers adaptable scalability, supporting large datasets but some users desire enhanced feature support and additional capabilities.

Sentiment score

8.0

CloudCheckr is highly scalable, efficiently managing multiple accounts and environments for enterprises, despite occasional performance issues with large data volumes.

Cloudability's scalability is excellent because it can link with as few as one cloud account to thousands of cloud accounts, so there are no issues there.

reviewer2795433

Cloud Ops Lead at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

For more quotes and insights, download the Cloudability report

It scales well for MSPs and large enterprises, allowing for management of hundreds of accounts and tens of thousands of resources while retaining performance and visibility.

AbhishekGupta2

Sr PreSales Cloud Architect at a outsourcing company with 10,001+ employees

For more quotes and insights, download the CloudCheckr report

Stability Issues

Sentiment score

7.3

Cloudability is seen as mature and stable, especially beneficial for multi-cloud cost management, with minimal impact during outages.

Sentiment score

8.1

CloudCheckr is highly rated for stability, with users noting reliable performance and minimal issues, making it a robust choice.

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the Cloudability report

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the CloudCheckr report

Room For Improvement

Cloudability requires interface simplification, improved rightsizing, automation, data integration, and enhanced cost allocation and sustainability features.

CloudCheckr requires better pricing clarity, onboarding, performance with large data sets, UI customization, security features, and third-party integrations.

I've found that Groups is basically unusable because if it can't be used everywhere, you would have to run both group-based access control and direct user-based access control at the same time, which doesn't make any sense.

reviewer2795433

Cloud Ops Lead at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

It would be beneficial if we could use resource tags to provide more fine-grained visibility.

reviewer2784351

Digital Marketing, Marketing Technology & Analytics Architect at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees

I believe that automating all manual processes in Cloudability would be beneficial, providing a proactive prescriptive analysis on what needs to be done to lower costs.

BapineeduBollempalli

Enterprise Data Architect at LTIMindtree

For more quotes and insights, download the Cloudability report

Another area is drift analysis; there have been complaints about tracking optimization opportunities, such as how to track opportunities identified in January and whether they were resolved in February.

AbhishekGupta2

Sr PreSales Cloud Architect at a outsourcing company with 10,001+ employees

CloudCheckr is a powerful and feature-rich tool with abundant metrics.

Karan Saini

Dev Ops Engineer at a construction company with 11-50 employees

An area where CloudCheckr can be improved is pricing.

reviewer2784525

Director, Trust Operations Analytics at a tech vendor with 1,001-5,000 employees

For more quotes and insights, download the CloudCheckr report

Setup Cost

Cloudability offers intuitive features valued by enterprise users; however, pricing challenges exist, especially for smaller companies.

CloudCheckr pricing is competitive, usage-based, and offers good value, with enterprises and providers appreciating its cost-effectiveness.

You also get value for money because of the breadth and depth of the features.

reviewer2795433

Cloud Ops Lead at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

For more quotes and insights, download the Cloudability report

Overall, the pricing was quite convenient and represented good value for money.

Karan Saini

Dev Ops Engineer at a construction company with 11-50 employees

Pricing is feature-tiered under the MSP licensing, and I would say the pricing was quite competitive and fair.

AbhishekGupta2

Sr PreSales Cloud Architect at a outsourcing company with 10,001+ employees

For more quotes and insights, download the CloudCheckr report

Valuable Features

Cloudability enhances cost management with features like dashboards, reporting, forecasting, and AWS integration for improved transparency and usability.

CloudCheckr offers cost-saving optimization, multi-cloud management, and financial alignment with ease of use for AWS, Azure, and GCP.

The Views feature is also beneficial because lots of teams may use Cloudability within an organization, allowing users to segregate data to particular Views so they are only looking at what's relevant to them.

reviewer2795433

Cloud Ops Lead at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

The forecasting feature has helped me understand how the resources are utilized and how the cost is burned, and then I use it to make changes to keep the cost in control.

reviewer2784351

Digital Marketing, Marketing Technology & Analytics Architect at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees

I find the reports to be extensive and elaborate, and I get whatever information I require.

BapineeduBollempalli

Enterprise Data Architect at LTIMindtree

For more quotes and insights, download the Cloudability report

CloudCheckr has enabled an average cost saving of approximately 25% from the last year, and this occurred while also increasing the scale of production.

Karan Saini

Dev Ops Engineer at a construction company with 11-50 employees

What makes CloudCheckr easy for me to use is its intuitive interface.

reviewer2784525

Director, Trust Operations Analytics at a tech vendor with 1,001-5,000 employees

Another valuable feature is the multi-cloud overview, providing unified reporting across AWS and Azure while allowing us to create different types of dashboards based on who logs into the platform.

AbhishekGupta2

Sr PreSales Cloud Architect at a outsourcing company with 10,001+ employees

For more quotes and insights, download the CloudCheckr report

Categories and Ranking

Cloudability

Ranking in Cloud Cost Management

3rd

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

CloudCheckr

Ranking in Cloud Cost Management

12th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Management (21st), Managed Cloud Services (4th), AI Observability (76th)

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Cloud Cost Management category, the mindshare of Cloudability is 6.7%, down from 13.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of CloudCheckr is 2.8%, down from 4.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Cloud Cost Management Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Cloudability	6.7%
CloudCheckr	2.8%
Other	90.5%

Cloud Cost Management

Featured Reviews

reviewer2795433

Cloud Ops Lead at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

Gained multi-cloud cost visibility and have optimized spend with detailed reports and rightsizing

The IAM feature is something that we struggle with using. IBM, the company that runs Cloudability, released the Groups feature back in the summer of 2025. While Groups can be used in some parts of the tool, it can't be used across the entire tool. I've found that Groups is basically unusable because if it can't be used everywhere, you would have to run both group-based access control and direct user-based access control at the same time, which doesn't make any sense. The Groups feature has improved over time, but it's still not something we feel we can use on an everyday basis, so the IAM section remains an issue right now. Most of the tool is very well-functioning and developed, and that's the only real improvement area that we've seen.

Read full review

AbhishekGupta2

Sr PreSales Cloud Architect at a outsourcing company with 10,001+ employees

Centralized cloud costs have boosted savings while reporting and user experience still need work

The best features CloudCheckr offers include out-of-the-box security and compliance check features that provide over 35 different types of compliance checks at no cost, best practice checks, and alerts. Another valuable feature is the multi-cloud overview, providing unified reporting across AWS and Azure while allowing us to create different types of dashboards based on who logs into the platform. Additionally, from an MSP standpoint, there is good ease of deployment, especially the billing and chargeback functionality for a reseller or managed services provider. CloudCheckr has positively impacted my organization by helping us manage multiple customers and tens of thousands of resources while retaining performance and visibility due to its multi-cloud support. We do not have to worry about jumping from one platform to another, and the better MSP support is beneficial from a billing and chargeback automation standpoint. The integration in compliance helps identify missing areas within our customer environments and improves them. On average, it has helped us provide approximately 15 to 20% savings through right-sizing or idle resource elimination. These are some of the immediate cost savings our customers have experienced after implementing recommendations from the tool.

Read full review

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Cost Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

884,797 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

22%

Retailer

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

Outsourcing Company

12%

Computer Software Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

Legal Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	2
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	13

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	8

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Cloudability?

The most crucial feature in reducing my cloud costs has been the rightsizing recommendations, along with the dashboards that track reserved instance spending coverage and utilization. As for Clouda...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cloudability?

Pricing and setup cost for Cloudability are good. Compared to the rest of the industry, they may be a little more expensive than some other FinOps tools, but that's to be expected because they have...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Cloudability?

See all answers

What do you like most about CloudCheckr ?

The recommendation section is pretty helpful.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for CloudCheckr ?

Pricing is feature-tiered under the MSP licensing, and I would say the pricing was quite competitive and fair. It was neither inexpensive nor too costly compared to competition, yet it provides goo...

See all answers

What needs improvement with CloudCheckr ?

Areas where CloudCheckr can be improved include simplifying the user experience, as some areas seem complex to my teammates, who felt overwhelmed by the many dashboards available. Another area is d...

See all answers

Comparisons

Apptio One vs Cloudability

Compared 11% of the time

VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth vs Cloudability

Compared 11% of the time

AWS Cost Explorer vs Cloudability

Compared 7% of the time

Finout vs Cloudability

Compared 6% of the time

Harness vs Cloudability

Compared 4% of the time

More Cloudability Competitors

Flexera Cloud Cost Management vs CloudCheckr

Compared 6% of the time

AWS Trusted Advisor vs CloudCheckr

Compared 4% of the time

IBM Turbonomic vs CloudCheckr

Compared 4% of the time

VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth vs CloudCheckr

Compared 4% of the time

IBM Cloud App Management vs CloudCheckr

Compared 4% of the time

More CloudCheckr Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cloudability

March 2026

Download Cloudability product report

Buyer's Guide

CloudCheckr

March 2026

Download CloudCheckr product report

Also Known As

No data available

CloudCheckr CMx High Security, CloudCheckr CMP

Overview

Cloudability is a financial management tool for monitoring and analyzing every cloud expense across any organization. It brings transparency to how and where organizations spend money on cloud resources, giving them the power to reap the most value from cloud usage possible. It aggregates expenditures into accessible and comprehensive reports, helps identify new opportunities for reducing spend and increasing cloud efficiency, offers budget alerts and recommendations via SMS and email, provides APIs for connecting cloud billing and usage data to any business or financial system, and more.

Apptio

CloudCheckr CMx High Security is a cloud management platform that provides complete visibility into cost and security issues. The primary use cases are day-to-day operations, cloud management, identifying open vulnerabilities and issues from a security perspective, and cost management and optimization.

The solution is praised for its stability, simplicity, ease of use, scalability, excellent technical support, and granular reporting. CloudCheckr CMx High Security provides priority-level data on security issues and vulnerabilities, making it easy to identify critical issues that need immediate attention.

Spot - A Flexera company

Sample Customers

Adobe, Uber, Pega, imgur, Pixable, Blackboard, Keboola, Avalara

Accenture, Logitech, Ingram, Cloudar, Infor, DXC, Cornell University, DLT, Lumen, Lightstream, Choice Hotels, B-Tech, SmileShark, PTP, Explicity, JCH Technology, Siemens Mobility

Buyer's Guide

CloudCheckr vs. Cloudability

March 2026

Free Report: CloudCheckr vs. Cloudability

Find out what your peers are saying about CloudCheckr vs. Cloudability and other solutions. Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

884,797 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our CloudCheckr vs. Cloudability report.

See our list of best Cloud Cost Management vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Cost Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.