No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

CloudCheckr pros and cons

Vendor: Spot - A Flexera company

3.9 out of 5

15 reviews
85% willing to recommend

Leave a review Why PeerSpot?

Pros & Cons summary

CloudCheckr CMx High Security is user-friendly, integrating seamlessly with AWS, Azure, and GCP, allowing multi-cloud management and cost visibility. It offers immediate security insights and actionable recommendations for cloud platform optimization. Financially, it can cut cloud expenses by up to 25%. However, integration with Azure and Google Cloud needs improvement, and reporting capabilities are limited. Additionally, customer support requires enhancement and has received negative feedback from users.

Buyer's Guide

Get pricing advice, tips, use cases and valuable features from real users of this product.

Prominent pros & cons

PROS

CloudCheckr CMx High Security is praised for its simplicity, making it easy for users to understand and operate even without extensive cloud knowledge.

Integration with AWS, Azure, and GCP is seamless, allowing for multi-cloud management and complete visibility into costs, which is highly appreciated by users.

CloudCheckr provides immediate visibility into security issues and vulnerabilities through on-the-go data and prioritization of findings, enhancing security management.

With its granular reporting and detailed recommendations, CloudCheckr is effective in financially optimizing cloud platforms and helping users decide on potential optimizations.

CloudCheckr significantly impacts cost savings, with reports indicating up to a 25% reduction in cloud spend and a positive return on investment within months of deployment.

CONS

CloudCheckr CMx High Security needs improved integration with Azure and Google Cloud as its performance is currently slow in these areas.

The reporting and analytics capabilities are limited, requiring enhancements.

There are many features that still need to be implemented in CloudCheckr CMx High Security.

Customer support from CloudCheckr received negative feedback.

CloudCheckr's support for Azure could be enhanced as it feels incomplete.

CloudCheckr Pros review quotes

Sr PreSales Cloud Architect at a outsourcing company with 10,001+ employees

Feb 2, 2026

I have seen a return on investment of 100%, with significant cost avoidance and measurable savings within the first few months of deployment.

Read full review

KS

Dev Ops Engineer at a construction company with 11-50 employees

Jan 2, 2026

CloudCheckr has enabled an average cost saving of approximately 25% from the last year, and this occurred while also increasing the scale of production.

Read full review

DSRE Director Of Dev Ops/Operations (Management Executive) at a outsourcing company with 51-200 employees

Sep 23, 2026

CloudCheckr offers excellent features, with the ease of scale through cloud operations being the most valuable to us because we need to be able to transition through those well and with the least amount of resistance as possible.

Read full review

Free Report: CloudCheckr Reviews and More

Learn what your peers think about CloudCheckr. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: October 2026.

920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Antonio Tirado Peña

Directo de TI at Instituto de Innovación Ciencia y Empresa

Jul 28, 2026

The only way I have to see the costs is via CloudCheckr.

Read full review

reviewer2846058

Top Engineer at a tech vendor with 5,001-10,000 employees

May 25, 2026

CloudCheckr has positively impacted our organization as we've cut AWS spend by around 25% over two years.

Read full review

MJ

MuhammadJunaid8

Consultant at Silk Engineering

Oct 21, 2026

The Cost Allocation feature of CloudCheckr is the first priority of the customer.

Read full review

Associate Director, ITSM & Onboarding at a computer software company with 201-500 employees

Mar 6, 2024

The recommendation section is pretty helpful.

Read full review

Enterprise Cloud Architect at Peritem Consultants Ltd

Nov 3, 2022

The most valuable feature of CloudCheckr CMx High Security is granular reporting. Additionally, the user interface is easy to use.

Read full review

reviewer2264310

Assistant Vice President, Sr. Software Engineer at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees

Aug 24, 2023

The solution is scalable for our purposes.

Read full review

Shrikant Pareek

Associate Director at Searce Inc

Jun 26, 2022

The best feature I like about CloudCheckr CMx High Security is its simplicity. I love that it's not rocket science to use the solution. Even if you're not familiar with the cloud, you can easily figure out how to use CloudCheckr CMx High Security. You can use AWS, you can use Azure, and you can use GCP with the solution because the integration is quite simple. You can also use multi-cloud with it, and you could see the billing part. You'll have complete visibility into your cost which I love about the solution. I also love that data on any security issues and vulnerabilities are available on the go with CloudCheckr CMx High Security. You don't need to do anything different. Just run the scan and you'll have all these open findings in the tool, in terms of the priority level, so if it's critical, it will tell you, "It's critical," and you need to fix it right away.

Read full review

Show 4 more reviews (out of 14)

CloudCheckr Cons review quotes

Sr PreSales Cloud Architect at a outsourcing company with 10,001+ employees

Feb 2, 2026

I was not satisfied with the customer support from CloudCheckr.

Read full review

KS

Dev Ops Engineer at a construction company with 11-50 employees

Jan 2, 2026

Some aspects could be made more customizable, such as the dashboard and UI.

Read full review

DSRE Director Of Dev Ops/Operations (Management Executive) at a outsourcing company with 51-200 employees

Sep 23, 2026

CloudCheckr needs to be better integratable across multiple cloud environments in a hyper-cloud model.

Read full review

Free Report: CloudCheckr Reviews and More

Learn what your peers think about CloudCheckr. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: October 2026.

920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Antonio Tirado Peña

Directo de TI at Instituto de Innovación Ciencia y Empresa

Jul 28, 2026

The interface could be improved because it is too dense and overloaded with too many charts and too much information on each screen.

Read full review

reviewer2846058

Top Engineer at a tech vendor with 5,001-10,000 employees

May 25, 2026

CloudCheckr could enhance its Azure support, as it honestly feels an afterthought.

Read full review

MJ

MuhammadJunaid8

Consultant at Silk Engineering

Oct 21, 2026

Some limitations are faced sometimes depending on the dependency, service availability, or any service limitation.

Read full review

Associate Director, ITSM & Onboarding at a computer software company with 201-500 employees

Mar 6, 2024

The reporting and analytic capabilities are very limited.

Read full review

Enterprise Cloud Architect at Peritem Consultants Ltd

Nov 3, 2022

CloudCheckr CMx High Security is complex. There are a lot of menus, and if you do not know what you are looking for you can get lost. However, the interface is self-explanatory. It's easy to understand where to go to get what you want.

Read full review

reviewer2264310

Assistant Vice President, Sr. Software Engineer at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees

Aug 24, 2023

The solution must improve its user interface.

Read full review

Shrikant Pareek

Associate Director at Searce Inc

Jun 26, 2022

What needs to be improved in CloudCheckr CMx High Security is integration. All the clouds are going quite fast, for example, all the cloud providers: Microsoft, Google, etc. CloudCheckr CMx High Security is good with AWS, no doubt about it, but with Azure and Google Cloud, I find that the solution is slow in that direction. If the vendor planned for CloudCheckr CMx High Security to be automated just for AWS, then it does make sense. If not, if the vendor is also targeting good integration with Google and Microsoft, then CloudCheckr CMx High Security integration needs improvement, in particular, it has to be faster. At the moment, its integration with Azure is not as good as its integration with AWS. With GCP, integration is nowhere.

Read full review

Show 4 more reviews (out of 14)

Related questions

207

When evaluating Cloud Management solutions, what aspects of it are the most important to look for?

155

Scalr vs BMC CLM

202

What is the difference between a multi-cloud vs hybrid cloud management platform?

326

What are the advantages and disadvantages of on-premise solutions vs cloud-hosted environment?

235

Which cloud IaaS/PaaS platform would you recommend learning to a newbie?

237

What is Unified Cloud Security? Can you define the scope and use cases of the term?

141

vCloud Director versus HP Operations Orchestration?

169

What are Pros and Cons of Cloud-based Patch Management?

175

How to host/use WhereScape RED on cloud?

298

What are your recommended best practices and tools to prevent cloud jacking in your organization?