Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Cloudability vs IBM Turbonomic comparison

Apptio and IBM are both solutions in the Cloud Cost Management category. Apptio is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.1, while IBM is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.5. Apptio holds a 13.7% mindshare in CCM, compared to IBM’s 13.6% mindshare. Additionally, 75% of Apptio users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 98% of IBM users who would recommend it.
Cloudability
Read 14 Cloudability reviews
  • 1,601 Views
  • 1,079 Comparison Views
75% willing to recommend
IBM Turbonomic
Read 205 IBM Turbonomic reviews
  • 2,649 Views
  • 1,289 Comparison Views
98% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 2, 2025

Cloudability and IBM Turbonomic compete in cloud resource management. IBM Turbonomic appears to have an advantage with its advanced automation capabilities and predictive analysis, enhancing system performance and efficiency.

Features: Cloudability offers a Reserved Instance Planner and excels in AWS integration, presenting users with valuable insights and intuitive dashboards for centralized data management. IBM Turbonomic's strength lies in its automation features that automatically adjust resource allocations, predictive analysis that improves system utilization, and resource optimization, maintaining workload efficiency without the need for constant manual intervention.

Room for Improvement: Cloudability could benefit from a simplified interface and expanding its rightsizing model to alleviate complexity for new users. Enhancements in API documentation and extending data analysis windows are also necessary. IBM Turbonomic would improve by modernizing its GUI for better intuitiveness and incorporating more advanced automation features, especially for integrating with third-party systems and cloud-native tools.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Cloudability is mainly designed for Public Cloud environments providing easy integration but requires more consistent technical support. In contrast, IBM Turbonomic supports Hybrid and On-premises environments, offering versatility despite its complex deployment. While Turbonomic has traditionally had a strong reputation for technical support, there are recent indications of inconsistency.

Pricing and ROI: Cloudability's usage-based pricing may be costly for small to medium businesses, with its ROI heavily dependent on scale despite potential savings from its analysis. IBM Turbonomic comes with flexible licensing options that suit varied enterprise needs, and while its cost is initially higher, the significant savings from resource optimization and efficiency justify the investment under its new pricing model.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Cloudability vs. IBM Turbonomic Report (Updated: April 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Cloudability vs. IBM Turbonomic
April 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 852,098 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
6.8
Users achieved significant cost savings with Cloudability, noting improved financial commitment and engineering efforts over three years.
Sentiment score
7.2
IBM Turbonomic offers quick ROI by reducing hardware costs, optimizing resources, and decreasing operational expenses through automation and efficiency.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
3.8
Cloudability's support is mixed, with dedicated TAMs and quick responses but lacks phone support and shows inconsistency.
Sentiment score
8.9
IBM Turbonomic's customer service is highly rated for its responsiveness, knowledge, and effectiveness, despite some mixed post-acquisition experiences.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.3
Cloudability is adaptable and scalable, managing complex environments well, though users desire enhanced features and detailed data controls.
Sentiment score
6.9
IBM Turbonomic is scalable, seamlessly integrating with various environments while its licensing supports expansion, focusing on additional requirements.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
7.6
Cloudability provides stable performance with minimal issues, supporting effective cost management in single and multi-cloud environments.
Sentiment score
7.4
IBM Turbonomic is praised for stability and robust performance, with minor update issues swiftly resolved by support.
 

Room For Improvement

Cloudability needs intuitive setup, enhanced analytics, improved API, better billing accuracy, UI enhancements, resource support, and sustainability metrics integration.
IBM Turbonomic needs an improved interface, better reporting, clearer documentation, more integrations, and a stable, mobile-compatible platform.
 

Setup Cost

Enterprise users appreciate Cloudability's straightforward pricing, though opinions on affordability vary; setup is easy and updates are seamless.
IBM Turbonomic offers flexible, competitive pricing models, providing value through resource optimization and reducing hardware expenses effectively.
 

Valuable Features

Cloudability offers dynamic dashboards, rightsizing, and automation, enabling efficient AWS integration, cost management, and forecasting for multi-cloud environments.
IBM Turbonomic enhances efficiency through automation, capacity management, reporting, and planning, optimizing resource allocation and infrastructure decisions.
 

Categories and Ranking

Cloudability
Ranking in Cloud Cost Management
3rd
Average Rating
7.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.4
Number of Reviews
14
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
IBM Turbonomic
Ranking in Cloud Cost Management
1st
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.4
Number of Reviews
205
Ranking in other categories
Cloud Migration (5th), Cloud Management (4th), Virtualization Management Tools (4th), IT Financial Management (1st), IT Operations Analytics (4th), Cloud Analytics (1st), AIOps (5th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Cloud Cost Management category, the mindshare of Cloudability is 13.7%, up from 10.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of IBM Turbonomic is 13.6%, down from 14.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Cloud Cost Management
 

Featured Reviews

Vijay More - PeerSpot reviewer
Helps to understand and manage spending across clouds, but has dashboard limitations
Cloudability offers valuable insights into data engineering and analytics platforms. With access to the same data Cloudability utilizes, one could recreate similar dashboards on their own data platform. This implies that Cloudability's role could be replaceable with some organizational effort, provided they have the necessary data sources and expertise. However, for organizations looking to streamline processes without investing extensive time, money, and resources into building their solution, Cloudability serves as a convenient option. Moreover, it offers benefits for both single-cloud and multi-cloud users. While it's beneficial for single-cloud users, it becomes particularly advantageous for organizations with multi-cloud environments, as it helps manage costs and optimize resources across different cloud providers.
Read full review
Alex Darby - PeerSpot reviewer
Saves time during workload migration, facilitates sizing of virtual servers, and the support team is helpful
The right-sizing feature is the most captivating one for us. It helped in taking the emotions out of what people think they need, basing it off of real data, and providing them what they actually need. It's not really a special feature, but the support that we received from that team really helped us in our success. There were definitely some customizations that needed to take place to make it successful. This is the most aware of our products, in terms of understanding all of the components from the top down. It is integrated with all of the different modules, all the way down to the core infrastructure. All of it is tied together and there are not many tools that can do that.
Read full review
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Cost Management solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
852,098 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
23%
Computer Software Company
12%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Media Company
6%
Financial Services Firm
14%
Computer Software Company
13%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Insurance Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Cloudability?
The most crucial feature in reducing my cloud costs has been the rightsizing recommendations, along with the dashboards that track reserved instance spending coverage and utilization. As for Clouda...
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cloudability?
I would rate the pricing an eight out of ten, where one is very cheap and ten is very expensive. Pricing is one of the main issues we face. Cloudability is actually expensive, and it's quite diffic...
See all answers
What needs improvement with Cloudability?
The first one is, how to help users, especially practitioners, stick to their commitment plan. For example, how can I use Cloudability to help me optimize my selling plan and my residential plan? T...
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Turbonomic?
It offers different scenarios. It provides more capabilities than many other tools available. Typically, its price is set as a percentage of the consumption of some of our customers' services. The ...
See all answers
What needs improvement with Turbonomic?
The implementation could be enhanced.
See all answers
What is your primary use case for Turbonomic?
We use IBM Turbonomic to automate our cloud operations, including monitoring, consolidating dashboards, and reporting. This helps us get a consolidated view of all customer spending into a single d...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Apptio One vs Cloudability Logo
Apptio One vs Cloudability
Compared 28% of the time
Azure Cost Management vs Cloudability Logo
Azure Cost Management vs Cloudability
Compared 12% of the time
Harness vs Cloudability Logo
Harness vs Cloudability
Compared 10% of the time
VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth vs Cloudability Logo
VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth vs Cloudability
Compared 9% of the time
Densify vs Cloudability Logo
Densify vs Cloudability
Compared 7% of the time
More Cloudability Competitors
VMware Aria Operations vs IBM Turbonomic Logo
VMware Aria Operations vs IBM Turbonomic
Compared 17% of the time
Azure Cost Management vs IBM Turbonomic Logo
Azure Cost Management vs IBM Turbonomic
Compared 12% of the time
VMware vSphere vs IBM Turbonomic Logo
VMware vSphere vs IBM Turbonomic
Compared 8% of the time
Cisco Intersight vs IBM Turbonomic Logo
Cisco Intersight vs IBM Turbonomic
Compared 5% of the time
VMware Aria Automation vs IBM Turbonomic Logo
VMware Aria Automation vs IBM Turbonomic
Compared 5% of the time
More IBM Turbonomic Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Cloudability
May 2025
Cloudability reportDownload Cloudability product report
Buyer's Guide
IBM Turbonomic
May 2025
IBM Turbonomic reportDownload IBM Turbonomic product report
 

Also Known As

No data available
Turbonomic, VMTurbo Operations Manager
 

Interactive Demo

Demo not available
Apptio
IBM
 

Overview

Cloudability is a financial management tool for monitoring and analyzing every cloud expense across any organization. It brings transparency to how and where organizations spend money on cloud resources, giving them the power to reap the most value from cloud usage possible. It aggregates expenditures into accessible and comprehensive reports, helps identify new opportunities for reducing spend and increasing cloud efficiency, offers budget alerts and recommendations via SMS and email, provides APIs for connecting cloud billing and usage data to any business or financial system, and more.

Apptio

IBM Turbonomic offers automation, planning, and right-sizing recommendations to streamline resource management, improve efficiencies, and optimize costs across virtualized environments and cloud platforms.

IBM Turbonomic is valued for its capability to optimize resource allocation and monitor virtual environments efficiently. It facilitates automated decision-making in VM sizing, load balancing, and cost optimization for both on-premises and cloud deployments. Users can leverage insights for workload placement, ensure peak performance assurance, and effectively right-size across VMware and Azure. The ongoing transition to HTML5 aims to improve visual and navigational ease, while expanded reporting features are anticipated. Opportunities for improved training, documentation, and integrations enhance platform usability and functionality.

What Are the Key Features?
  • Automation: Streamlines resource allocation and VM management.
  • Planning Tools: Supports capacity management and growth projections.
  • Right-Sizing: Optimizes VM configurations for efficient resource use.
  • Customizable Dashboards: Provides quick insights into environment health.
  • Reporting Capabilities: Offers valuable data for informed decision-making.
  • Cloud Integration: Ensures cost-effective resource utilization.
What Benefits Should Be Looked For?
  • Performance Enhancement: Improves application performance efficiency.
  • Cost Reduction: Minimizes operational expenses through optimizations.
  • Infrastructure Efficiency: Maximizes use of IT infrastructure resources.

In finance, IBM Turbonomic aids in maintaining platform efficiency during market fluctuations. Healthcare organizations leverage its capability for resource optimization during high-demand periods to enhance patient care support. Retailers use it for planning in peak seasons, ensuring resources align with fluctuating demand to maintain performance continuity.

IBM
 

Sample Customers

Adobe, Uber, Pega, imgur, Pixable, Blackboard, Keboola, Avalara
IBM, J.B. Hunt, BBC, The Capita Group, SulAmérica, Rabobank, PROS, ThinkON, O.C. Tanner Co.
Buyer's Guide
Cloudability vs. IBM Turbonomic
April 2025
Free Report: Cloudability vs. IBM Turbonomic
Find out what your peers are saying about Cloudability vs. IBM Turbonomic and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
852,098 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Cloudability vs. IBM Turbonomic report.
See our list of best Cloud Cost Management vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Cost Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.