No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

CloudQuery vs SAS Access comparison

Why PeerSpot?
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

CloudQuery
Average Rating
9.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.6
Number of Reviews
3
Ranking in other categories
Cloud Data Integration (21st)
SAS Access
Average Rating
9.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.5
Number of Reviews
3
Ranking in other categories
Data Integration (60th)
 

Featured Reviews

Henry Ngeno - PeerSpot reviewer
Operations Manager at a security firm with 10,001+ employees
Centralized visibility has transformed how my teams manage risk, compliance, and cloud resources
CloudQuery can be improved in several areas, particularly regarding the technical expertise required. It is not a platform suitable for layman staff or those lacking proficiency; it demands knowledge in data integration, cloud infrastructure, and SQL. Organizations without the necessary technical capabilities may struggle to utilize the platform effectively. Moreover, this complexity can increase the IT budget due to subscription costs, hosting, and additional maintenance expenses that can accumulate. Another area requiring improvement is the reliability of output, which currently depends heavily on data quality and access permissions. If the data in my cloud infrastructure lacks quality, the information curated will also be inaccurate, creating gaps and undetected issues. Therefore, the platform's reliability and accuracy hinge on maintaining high-quality data stored in the cloud.
Robert Heck - PeerSpot reviewer
Co Owner at Hecht und Heck GmbH
The solution is stable, scalable, and flexible
I rate the solution eight out of ten. The number of people required to maintain the solution is dependent on the other applications running. The solution in itself does not require a lot of maintenance. The solution is flexible and I recommend it when you have more complex applications with special requirements.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"CloudQuery connects well with the role of cloud infrastructure management, providing rapid and impactful changes without delays in execution, ensuring everything related to database and data management functions effectively."
"CloudQuery has positively impacted my organization because instead of navigating through multiple cloud consoles, I can run an SQL query and get, for example, all my S3 buckets that are public, private, or that I need to do something with."
"The AI-generated SQL works well for my team as it gets things right most of the time."
"The most valuable part of SAS/ACCESS is what it is made for: connecting to remote systems that are not part of your physical SAS environment."
"The most valuable feature is you have native access to the external databases."
"The SAS/ACCESS ability to connect creates an elegant simplicity."
"The most valuable aspect of the solution is the ease of access to the data in those databases."
 

Cons

"CloudQuery can be improved in several areas, particularly regarding the technical expertise required."
"CloudQuery really acts as an asset inventory tool, which is great, but I find that somewhat limiting."
"I can't really recall any missing feature or general improvement that is needed. We don't really add too many new kinds of databases and therefore our needs are already met."
"The pricing model needs to be reconsidered and adjusted."
"The primary way that this product can be improved is by adjusting their pricing model."
"The solution can provide access to the newer databases that come out sooner."
"The solution's pricing and licensing are expensive."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"The pricing model is complex and is based on modular packages as well as the size of the applicable environment."
"The solution's pricing and licensing are expensive."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Data Integration solutions are best for your needs.
920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Construction Company
18%
Comms Service Provider
18%
Outsourcing Company
11%
Financial Services Firm
10%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business3
Midsize Enterprise2
Large Enterprise3
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with CloudQuery?
CloudQuery can be improved in several areas, particularly regarding the technical expertise required. It is not a platform suitable for layman staff or those lacking proficiency; it demands knowled...
What is your primary use case for CloudQuery?
My main use case for CloudQuery is helping with cloud infrastructure and managing all my cloud infrastructure, which helps me monitor, have a view, and identify potential strengths and weaknesses, ...
What advice do you have for others considering CloudQuery?
My recommendation to others reading reviews on PeerSpot is that if they seek to leverage cloud infrastructure management and monitoring with ease, CloudQuery is the right choice. It simplifies proc...
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Comparisons

 

Also Known As

No data available
SAS/Access
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
Los Angeles County, West Midlands Police, Credit Guarantee Corporation, Canada Post, Allianz Global Corporate & Specialty
Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), SnapLogic, Informatica and others in Cloud Data Integration. Updated: October 2026.
920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.