CloudSphere vs Red Hat CloudForms comparison

CloudSphere and Red Hat are both solutions in the Cloud Management category. CloudSphere is ranked #43, while Red Hat is ranked #37. CloudSphere holds a 1.5% mindshare in CM, compared to Red Hat’s 1.9% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of CloudSphere users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 66% of Red Hat users who would recommend it.

CloudSphere

Read 5 CloudSphere reviews

2,063 Views
1,300 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Red Hat CloudForms

Read 10 Red Hat CloudForms reviews

1,841 Views
1,823 Comparison Views

66% willing to recommend

CloudSphere

Red Hat CloudForms

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 17, 2024

CloudSphere and Red Hat CloudForms are competitive in the cloud management domain. CloudSphere is favorable in simplicity and customer support while Red Hat CloudForms is strong in features, making it attractive for enterprise solutions.

Features: CloudSphere offers robust cloud management, streamlined compliance management, and multi-cloud support. Red Hat CloudForms provides extensive orchestration, policy-driven security, and dynamic catalog creation capabilities.

Room for Improvement: CloudSphere could enhance feature depth, improve integration capabilities, and address any existing latency issues. Red Hat CloudForms may simplify its deployment, reduce its technical requirement for setup, and streamline its user interface to be more intuitive.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: CloudSphere offers an intuitive deployment process and strong customer support, allowing for fast adaptation. Red Hat CloudForms might require more technical expertise during setup despite offering comprehensive support services.

Pricing and ROI: CloudSphere is cost-effective with a lower initial setup cost and favorable ROI. Red Hat CloudForms demands a higher initial investment but provides long-term benefits through its extensive feature set, attracting those seeking integrated capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed CloudSphere vs. Red Hat CloudForms Report (Updated: June 2026).

Buyer's Guide

CloudSphere vs. Red Hat CloudForms

June 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 900,644 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

CloudSphere

Ranking in Cloud Management

43rd

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Migration (18th)

Red Hat CloudForms

Ranking in Cloud Management

37th

Average Rating

6.4

Reviews Sentiment

5.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2026, in the Cloud Management category, the mindshare of CloudSphere is 1.5%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Red Hat CloudForms is 1.9%, up from 1.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Cloud Management Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Red Hat CloudForms	1.9%
CloudSphere	1.5%
Other	96.6%

Cloud Management

Featured Reviews

Vibhor Gupta

Migration Customer Solution Manager at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees

Great discovery, good support, and generally reliable

The area they need to focus most on is the capability of assessment and the landing zones. It’s lacking right now. Cloud transformation has four to five cases, including planning, discovery, assessment, and the MVC, which is called the minimal viable cloud. That comes with the architecture design or landing zone creation, where we will create resources on the cloud which we are provisioning. If we are moving onto the cloud platform, AWS, or zero GCP, we need an account. We need resources to be able to compute the network. Most organizations have their landing zone process and know how to create the resources account, compute the network layer and the security layer. However, this landing zone creation is not there in CloudSphere as a feature. It cannot create any of the cloud providers' accounts or their network security computing as a part of the orchestration layer. That orchestration layer is missing in this product. It will not discover all the applications, although they also have the catalog. They are constantly announcing their catalog to identify applications based on the service which we are discovering. 50% of the time, the application will discover automatically. However, for the other 50%, we need to find the application based on its running process. That's the automation method that we need to follow and that they call blueprint. We need to create those blueprints and then we need to tag those applications. That is the one process that takes time when we do the discovery. One of the cons of this product is that it will not discover all the applications running. It will not discover SAP or some kinds of applications that are running on those inside the application of the servers as well. When we start the scanning of, for example, 500 servers, it will not handle the scan. We need to differentiate the jobs - for example, one job for 100 servers, a second job for another 100 servers, et cetera. We cannot scan the 1,000 servers together. That causes it to take time. There’s a graph missing. It shows where all the servers have interdependencies; however, when we do actual work, it will not work properly in terms of what we present to the customer.

Read full review

Ilhami Arikan

Cloud Services Automation Technologies Manager at Garanti Teknoloji

A stable solution that helps to provision servers

We use the solution to provision servers. I am impressed with the product's ability to create dynamic catalogs. The solution's provisioning engine needs to be improved. I would rate the solution's stability an eight out of ten. I would rate the product's scalability a seven out of ten and…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The product is helpful for the management, optimization, and utilization of resources."

"CloudSphere is very mature and very effective."

"When I started using CloudSphere, it wasn't mature, and it had multiple issues. For example, my team experienced server issues while using the solution, but recently, I noticed how much CloudSphere has improved. There used to be some latency issues with CloudSphere. It even gave error messages in the past when you select an option such as "the web server is not responding", but it has improved a lot, and now I don't get any errors from CloudSphere. What I like best about CloudSphere is that it has a lot of beneficial features, and it has a single pane for managing multi-cloud environments, which I find very helpful, and it's the main benefit you can get from CloudSphere."

"The scalability of the solution is a godsend."

"We do not need to install any appliances or any agents."

"Provides multiple kinds of services for managing the clouds of multiple customers."

"CloudSphere is a good solution that works well and can integrate with multiple clouds and manage all our customers."

"For the customers I work with, it provides flexibility as far as storage is concerned, so it's security and access."

"The solution is compatible and integrates with various infrastructures or providers."

"The optimization of the solution is quite interesting."

"The stability of the solution is very good, and we haven't had any issues with it."

"The multi-tenancy feature has been very helpful for our clients. It has been working fine and seamlessly for them. Its interface is also very simplified, and it is also an open and easy-to-scale solution."

"The most valuable features of Red Hat CloudForms are the benefit of the collective functionality."

"I am impressed with the product's reports."

"Red Hat CloudForms is a stable product. There is no issue with the stability."

"The integration with other open-source tools is pretty good; it integrates particularly well with Kubernetes and Docker, and they are a very mature product."

More Red Hat CloudForms pros

Cons

"The next feature I would like to have full disclosure of what's being done with the data."

"The main issue I experienced from CloudSphere was recently resolved, but an area for improvement in the solution is that it lacks the functionality of migrating resources from one public cloud to another. If CloudSphere could provide that functionality, that would be very beneficial to users and companies."

"Their customer support leaves a lot to be desired. The standards are not that great."

"One of the cons of this product is that it will not discover all the applications running."

"CloudSphere is not keeping up with the pace of the cloud and there are a number of services that can't be deployed using CloudSphere."

"When we start the scanning of, for example, 500 servers, it will not handle the scan. We need to differentiate the jobs - for example, one job for 100 servers, a second job for another 100 servers, et cetera."

"The solution must have a single management console for the resources and VMs."

"Red Hat CloudForms could improve by allowing more customization of reports. We have to do a lot of coding to accomplish what we want. Additionally, the compatibility with the multi-cloud could improve. The latter versions of the solution removed Google support and the cost comparison between other clouds was high."

"The solution's provisioning engine needs to be improved."

"It is difficult to create a complete dashboard that includes all the needed features or catalogs."

"The problem is that the platform requires it to be maintained and updated. Also, a few cases are still pending with the Red Hat support team since they are not closed yet."

"Our clients had challenges or issues with the updates. Its updates should be better managed. They should provide quicker and more stable updates. Its stability can also be better. We initially faced ease-of-use and compatibility issues while integrating it. We had a lot of compatibility issues with other products. Our clients are concerned about whether it is under IBM or it is still Red Hat. Clients are not very clear about the support, and they're not really happy with it. Currently, they're getting support from Red Hat, but going forward, they're not really clear about what would be the life cycle of the product, which is a concern for them."

"All of the areas of Red Hat CloudForms could improve. It doesn't do half of the things that it says it can do out of the box. It takes configuration to make any of it work, which is not uncommon for solutions similar to this. However, it is frustrating."

"Our clients had challenges or issues with the updates. Its updates should be better managed."

"Because the solution needs to integrate with other products that surround it, there is a lot of configuration required, and this can be quite complex. It's not as easy as it is with, for example, VMware."

More Red Hat CloudForms cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It depends on how that model will be used. It might be anywhere between $4 and $15 per license per month. It’s less expensive than other options."

"The product is very expensive."

"Red Hat CloudForms has a subscript-based pricing model. The cost is approximately $20,000 annually which allows you to use as many users as you want."

"The price of Red Hat CloudForms was not competitive, it was expensive."

"The product's licensing is based on the number of servers."

"It is definitely cheaper than VMware. Everything is included. There is no challenge there."

"Red Hat CloudForms is a bit expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

900,644 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

14%

Construction Company

11%

Logistics Company

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

14%

Manufacturing Company

13%

Construction Company

10%

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	1
Large Enterprise	6

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Large Enterprise	8

Comparisons

Densify vs CloudSphere

Compared 8% of the time

IBM Turbonomic vs CloudSphere

Compared 8% of the time

Skytap Cloud vs CloudSphere

Compared 5% of the time

Connectria IaaS Cloud vs CloudSphere

Compared 5% of the time

NTT Cloud Management Platform vs CloudSphere

Compared 4% of the time

More CloudSphere Competitors

VMware Aria Automation vs Red Hat CloudForms

Compared 9% of the time

Cloudify vs Red Hat CloudForms

Compared 6% of the time

IBM Multicloud Manager vs Red Hat CloudForms

Compared 5% of the time

IBM Service Delivery Manager vs Red Hat CloudForms

Compared 5% of the time

IBM Cloud Automation Manager vs Red Hat CloudForms

Compared 5% of the time

More Red Hat CloudForms Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

CloudSphere

June 2026

Download CloudSphere product report

Buyer's Guide

Red Hat CloudForms

June 2026

Download Red Hat CloudForms product report

Also Known As

HyperCloud

No data available

Overview

CloudSphere offers a unique multi-cloud management solution with features like attack path analysis, cost management, and predictive insights designed to enhance infrastructure reliability.

Providing an agent-less SaaS-based discovery tool, CloudSphere simplifies multi-cloud management with its single-pane interface, ensuring seamless data access in hybrid cloud environments. Its predictive insights and improved infrastructure reliability are valuable for both development and operational teams. However, it could improve in application management, real-time monitoring, and resource migration across clouds. Issues like inefficient large server scans and limitations in CI/CD integration and application discovery can be hindrances for some users.

What are CloudSphere's key features?

Attack Path Analysis: Identifies vulnerabilities to improve security.
Cost Management: Optimizes spending across cloud platforms.
Resource Optimization: Enhances operational efficiency using predictive insights.
Asset Discovery: Agent-less discovery tool assists in managing cloud resources.
Multi-Cloud Management: Single-pane interface aids in auditing and resource utilization.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Enhanced Infrastructure Reliability: Predictive insights boost stability.
Improved Collaboration: Single-pane interface supports cross-cloud operations.
Risk Management: Attack path analytics bolster security measures.
Operational Efficiency: Cost management features refine cloud spending.

CloudSphere is widely used in DevOps to manage test development networks, monitor application behaviors, and assess risk levels. Ideal for those managing inventories across public clouds, it's found in hyper-converged infrastructures in industries like healthcare, supporting hospital management and integrated services.

CloudSphere

Red Hat CloudForms is a robust management platform that integrates seamlessly with open-source technologies like Kubernetes and Docker. It offers flexibility with diverse infrastructures, scalability, and dynamic catalog creation.

Red Hat CloudForms supports service providers in UAE by offering a central console for infrastructure management. Known for its multi-tenancy and streamlined interface, it facilitates seamless integration with infrastructures like Nexus, Solaris, IBM, and VMware. Despite its strengths, challenges such as complexity and user-friendliness have been noted, with users requesting predefined modules, enhanced dashboards, and improved customization. The cost and platform lifecycle remain concerns, especially when compared to competitors like VMware. Permission refinement and provisioning engine improvements are also needed, as well as better cloud service integration and stability.

What features make Red Hat CloudForms stand out?

Seamless Integration: Works well with open-source components like Kubernetes and Docker.
Multi-Tenancy: Allows multiple users with separate environments.
Scalability: Designed to grow with infrastructure needs.
Dynamic Catalog Creation: Offers customized service delivery.
Report Capabilities: Provides in-depth analytics and reporting options.

What benefits and ROI should be evaluated?

Flexibility: Supports diverse infrastructures like VMware and IBM.
Self-Service Provisioning: Reduces time to deploy and manage VMs.
Automated Infrastructure: Automates code for more efficient management.
Integration Opportunities: Works with Ansible Tower for application management.

In industries, Red Hat CloudForms serves as a central hub for service providers, managing and orchestrating platforms like NETGEAR, KVM, Hyper-V, and VMware. Automation of infrastructure code, server management, and cloud infrastructure evaluation are core use cases, with users integrating technologies like Ansible Tower for daily task management and access delegation.

Red Hat

Sample Customers

Affymetrix, Bell Helicopter, Yavapai-Prescott Indian Tribe, Porterville Unified School District, Interact for Health, VirtueCom, Warren Memorial Hospital, Front Porch, RMH Group, Meyers Nave, Intraworks, Information Technology, ETTE, Clackamas Community College

Cox Automotive, Penn State, FICO, G-ABLE, Seneca College, ITandTEL, The Paris Lodron University of Salzburg (PLUS), MyRepublic, Macquarie, The Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, CBTS, Network Data Solutions (NDS)

Buyer's Guide

CloudSphere vs. Red Hat CloudForms

June 2026

Free Report: CloudSphere vs. Red Hat CloudForms

Find out what your peers are saying about CloudSphere vs. Red Hat CloudForms and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

900,644 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our CloudSphere vs. Red Hat CloudForms report.

See our list of best Cloud Management vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.