CloudSphere vs Spacelift comparison

CloudSphere and Spacelift are both solutions in the Cloud Management category. CloudSphere is ranked #43, while Spacelift is ranked #9 with an average rating of 8.4. CloudSphere holds a 1.6% mindshare in CM, compared to Spacelift’s 1.2% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of CloudSphere users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Spacelift users who would recommend it.

CloudSphere

Read 5 CloudSphere reviews

2,254 Views
1,443 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Spacelift

Read 17 Spacelift reviews

2,213 Views
1,372 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

CloudSphere

Spacelift

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 17, 2024

CloudSphere and Spacelift are competing cloud management platforms. Spacelift holds an advantage due to its superior features, despite its higher cost.

Features: CloudSphere offers robust asset discovery, dependency mapping, and a single pane for multi-cloud management. Spacelift shines with advanced infrastructure automation, GitOps for automatic GitHub project changes, and integration with popular DevOps tools like Terraform.

Room for Improvement: CloudSphere could improve by addressing remaining server and latency issues, offering more mature functionalities, and reducing error messages. Spacelift might benefit from simplifying its setup process, enhancing its user interface, and expanding its integration capabilities with more DevOps tools.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: CloudSphere provides a straightforward deployment model with accessible support for smooth implementation. Spacelift, while having a more complex setup, offers responsive and knowledgeable support to ensure quick resolutions.

Pricing and ROI: CloudSphere's competitive setup cost and efficient support enhance its ROI. Spacelift incurs higher initial costs but provides significant ROI through optimized cloud utilization and development processes, justified by its feature-rich value for innovation-focused businesses.

To learn more, read our detailed CloudSphere vs. Spacelift Report (Updated: June 2026).

Buyer's Guide

CloudSphere vs. Spacelift

June 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 904,748 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

CloudSphere

Ranking in Cloud Management

43rd

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Migration (18th)

Spacelift

Ranking in Cloud Management

9th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

AI Software Development (13th)

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2026, in the Cloud Management category, the mindshare of CloudSphere is 1.6%, up from 0.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Spacelift is 1.2%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Cloud Management Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Spacelift	1.2%
CloudSphere	1.6%
Other	97.2%

Cloud Management

Featured Reviews

Vibhor Gupta

Migration Customer Solution Manager at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees

Great discovery, good support, and generally reliable

The area they need to focus most on is the capability of assessment and the landing zones. It’s lacking right now. Cloud transformation has four to five cases, including planning, discovery, assessment, and the MVC, which is called the minimal viable cloud. That comes with the architecture design or landing zone creation, where we will create resources on the cloud which we are provisioning. If we are moving onto the cloud platform, AWS, or zero GCP, we need an account. We need resources to be able to compute the network. Most organizations have their landing zone process and know how to create the resources account, compute the network layer and the security layer. However, this landing zone creation is not there in CloudSphere as a feature. It cannot create any of the cloud providers' accounts or their network security computing as a part of the orchestration layer. That orchestration layer is missing in this product. It will not discover all the applications, although they also have the catalog. They are constantly announcing their catalog to identify applications based on the service which we are discovering. 50% of the time, the application will discover automatically. However, for the other 50%, we need to find the application based on its running process. That's the automation method that we need to follow and that they call blueprint. We need to create those blueprints and then we need to tag those applications. That is the one process that takes time when we do the discovery. One of the cons of this product is that it will not discover all the applications running. It will not discover SAP or some kinds of applications that are running on those inside the application of the servers as well. When we start the scanning of, for example, 500 servers, it will not handle the scan. We need to differentiate the jobs - for example, one job for 100 servers, a second job for another 100 servers, et cetera. We cannot scan the 1,000 servers together. That causes it to take time. There’s a graph missing. It shows where all the servers have interdependencies; however, when we do actual work, it will not work properly in terms of what we present to the customer.

Read full review

G Srivastava

Senior Cloud Engineer at a tech services company with 201-500 employees

Automation of cloud infrastructure has transformed how our team manages Terraform workflows

Spacelift has other features beyond Terraform, including Ansible, Pulumi, Terragrunt, and it also helps with Kubernetes, although we haven't used it for the other tools. We have only used it for Terraform Infrastructure as Code, and it has helped us significantly. One standout feature compared to Terraform Cloud is the ability to apply policies. For example, we want to restrict engineers in our team from building servers with a particular SKU, such as in Azure, where we do not want to run servers with a SKU higher than the standard D4sv5. We can apply those policies in Spacelift, and the RBAC and access policies features are really excellent in Spacelift, which we do not find in any of the other competitor tools. The pricing is also competitive compared to Terraform Cloud. The access policy features allow us to assign specific policies since we have three environments in our company: Dev, QA, and Prod. We assign policies so that anyone can run code from Dev and QA servers, but we assign a policy for specific people, such as managers, to run code in Prod. This is a very good feature from Spacelift that we have implemented for the access policy. Spacelift has positively impacted our organization as a CI/CD tool for application deployment and development. Although we use other CI/CD tools like Azure DevOps and GitHub Actions, there wasn't a specific tool for Terraform Infrastructure as Code until Spacelift came along. It allows us to easily configure our servers and build a number of them on our cloud. While other CI/CD tools have started to include configuration features, Spacelift offers many other benefits that make it an excellent tool to use.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The product is helpful for the management, optimization, and utilization of resources."

"When I started using CloudSphere, it wasn't mature, and it had multiple issues. For example, my team experienced server issues while using the solution, but recently, I noticed how much CloudSphere has improved. There used to be some latency issues with CloudSphere. It even gave error messages in the past when you select an option such as "the web server is not responding", but it has improved a lot, and now I don't get any errors from CloudSphere. What I like best about CloudSphere is that it has a lot of beneficial features, and it has a single pane for managing multi-cloud environments, which I find very helpful, and it's the main benefit you can get from CloudSphere."

"Provides multiple kinds of services for managing the clouds of multiple customers."

"CloudSphere is very mature and very effective."

"The scalability of the solution is a godsend."

"For the customers I work with, it provides flexibility as far as storage is concerned, so it's security and access."

"CloudSphere is a good solution that works well and can integrate with multiple clouds and manage all our customers."

"We do not need to install any appliances or any agents."

"Spacelift has positively impacted our organization because we do not have to detect drift or manage Terraform basics ourselves; Spacelift handles this for us with strong governance and security policies based on GitOps principles, which saves considerable time."

"Spacelift impacted our organization positively in several areas, with time-saving by eliminating the need for coordination runs, a 60 to 70% reduction in infrastructure-related incidents, and a significant drop in weekly deployment coordination from six to eight hours to roughly two hours, freeing up meaningful time for actual feature work and improvements."

"One key feature is the Spacelift policies, which we can attach to deployments to ensure compliance with our standards."

"I appreciate that I just have to connect to my AWS account with my credentials, and Spacelift handles the rest."

"Spacelift has positively impacted my organization in significant ways in terms of building infrastructure as code."

"Spacelift has positively impacted my organization by reducing manpower, as it reduced the efforts of resources in the team, where previously a job done by two or three engineers can now be easily managed by one engineer using Spacelift."

"SpaceLift has positively impacted my organization by reducing a lot of confusion with the integration of Terraform modules, because a lot of our tooling involved direct and indirect Terraform module creations; now it is more streamlined for each and every resource that we control."

"Spacelift has positively impacted my organization because it works well; it allows everybody to collaborate in the same Terraform repo without stepping on each other's toes."

More Spacelift pros

Cons

"CloudSphere is not keeping up with the pace of the cloud and there are a number of services that can't be deployed using CloudSphere."

"The main issue I experienced from CloudSphere was recently resolved, but an area for improvement in the solution is that it lacks the functionality of migrating resources from one public cloud to another. If CloudSphere could provide that functionality, that would be very beneficial to users and companies."

"One of the cons of this product is that it will not discover all the applications running."

"The next feature I would like to have full disclosure of what's being done with the data."

"Their customer support leaves a lot to be desired. The standards are not that great."

"When we start the scanning of, for example, 500 servers, it will not handle the scan. We need to differentiate the jobs - for example, one job for 100 servers, a second job for another 100 servers, et cetera."

"The solution must have a single management console for the resources and VMs."

"Perhaps the learning curve could be a bit steep if someone is completely new to Spacelift and only has experience with plain Terraform."

"Pricing could be a little lower to make it a very robust tool, and it can improve areas in scalability and integrate some open-source tools."

"I think an improvement for Spacelift would be a feature to run multiple stacks."

"Spacelift is good overall, but there are little explanatory aspects, such as navigating particular stacks, that are somewhat difficult to understand for newcomers, especially regarding the process, stack setup, and variable setup for deployments."

"If I had to think of one area where Spacelift could improve, it would be the graph where we orchestrate, as the graph looks very complicated and complex, so perhaps it could be simplified."

"I specifically wish to see improvements in Spacelift's user interface, making it more useful and easier for the team to understand."

"There are a few areas where there is room for improvement, particularly the initial setup and onboarding experience, which has a learning curve around understanding the concept of contexts."

"If you are a small enterprise organization, below 500 people, I would not recommend it."

More Spacelift cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The product is very expensive."

"It depends on how that model will be used. It might be anywhere between $4 and $15 per license per month. It’s less expensive than other options."

"It is a bit expensive product."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

904,748 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

14%

Outsourcing Company

12%

Construction Company

10%

Logistics Company

Financial Services Firm

12%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Educational Organization

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	1
Large Enterprise	6

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	6
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	8

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Spacelift?

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing was that licensing was somewhat unclear when HashiCorp changed their own licensing.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Spacelift?

It would be nice to have out-of-the-box A/B testing with Spacelift because we still use some custom features for that. Out-of-the-box A/B testing is the main thing I would like to add about the nee...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Spacelift?

We manage a lot of AWS deployments with Spacelift configs, so we have a main use case for it. We also use it for versioning and spinning up new environments. Recently we used Spacelift for deployin...

See all answers

Comparisons

Densify vs CloudSphere

Compared 9% of the time

IBM Turbonomic vs CloudSphere

Compared 8% of the time

Skytap Cloud vs CloudSphere

Compared 6% of the time

NTT Cloud Management Platform vs CloudSphere

Compared 5% of the time

Connectria IaaS Cloud vs CloudSphere

Compared 5% of the time

More CloudSphere Competitors

env zero vs Spacelift

Compared 12% of the time

Scalr vs Spacelift

Compared 12% of the time

Cisco UCS Director vs Spacelift

Compared 8% of the time

HPE OneSphere vs Spacelift

Compared 6% of the time

Flexera Cloud Management Platform (CMP) vs Spacelift

Compared 6% of the time

More Spacelift Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

CloudSphere

July 2026

Download CloudSphere product report

Buyer's Guide

Spacelift

June 2026

Download Spacelift product report

Also Known As

HyperCloud

No data available

Overview

CloudSphere offers a unique multi-cloud management solution with features like attack path analysis, cost management, and predictive insights designed to enhance infrastructure reliability.

Providing an agent-less SaaS-based discovery tool, CloudSphere simplifies multi-cloud management with its single-pane interface, ensuring seamless data access in hybrid cloud environments. Its predictive insights and improved infrastructure reliability are valuable for both development and operational teams. However, it could improve in application management, real-time monitoring, and resource migration across clouds. Issues like inefficient large server scans and limitations in CI/CD integration and application discovery can be hindrances for some users.

What are CloudSphere's key features?

Attack Path Analysis: Identifies vulnerabilities to improve security.
Cost Management: Optimizes spending across cloud platforms.
Resource Optimization: Enhances operational efficiency using predictive insights.
Asset Discovery: Agent-less discovery tool assists in managing cloud resources.
Multi-Cloud Management: Single-pane interface aids in auditing and resource utilization.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Enhanced Infrastructure Reliability: Predictive insights boost stability.
Improved Collaboration: Single-pane interface supports cross-cloud operations.
Risk Management: Attack path analytics bolster security measures.
Operational Efficiency: Cost management features refine cloud spending.

CloudSphere is widely used in DevOps to manage test development networks, monitor application behaviors, and assess risk levels. Ideal for those managing inventories across public clouds, it's found in hyper-converged infrastructures in industries like healthcare, supporting hospital management and integrated services.

CloudSphere

The Spacelift orchestration platform combines infrastructure provisioning, configuration, and governance to increase platform team efficiency, accelerate developer velocity, and control costs. It connects to and orchestrates infrastructure as code, version control systems (VCSs), observability tools, control and governance solutions, and cloud providers to help deliver secure infrastructure faster. With Spacelift Intelligence, teams can also understand, design, deploy, and govern infrastructure using natural language, giving developers a fast, governed path to infrastructure without adding to the platform team's backlog.

Infrastructure provisioning: Stacks ensure faster, more secure provisioning by automatically combining source code, current infrastructure state, and configuration. The platform works with any major IaC tool or cloud platform and the VCS provider where your teams store infrastructure code.

Configuration automation: Expand your capabilities beyond Terraform and OpenTofu with a workflow that also manages Ansible playbooks.

Governance to balance speed and control: Reinforce security and compliance with controls over developer/DevOps activity. Provide Golden Paths and define custom policies for third-party security vulnerability scanning tools, while accelerating policy creation with best-practice templates. Detect drift automatically, and restore resources to their expected state with drift remediation.

Integrated workflow: Easily create workflows that combine IaC for provisioning, Ansible for configuration management, Kubernetes for container orchestration, and policies for governance. Blueprint templates allow you to open your infrastructure pipelines to developers without losing control.

Infra Assistant: Your AI infrastructure assistant that can understand, design, deploy, and govern infrastructure in plain language. Ask questions about your infrastructure state that dashboards and reports can't answer. Get expert design guidance before you deploy, create and apply policies with AI assistance and diagnose failures faster with AI-generated context across your stacks, dependencies, and history.

Intent: A no-code, AI-based deployment model for maximum speed. Developers request infrastructure through their LLM via Spacelift MCP. Intent translates those requests into governed infrastructure actions with the same policies, credentials, and visibility as IaC, without requiring Terraform expertise.

Spacelift

Sample Customers

Affymetrix, Bell Helicopter, Yavapai-Prescott Indian Tribe, Porterville Unified School District, Interact for Health, VirtueCom, Warren Memorial Hospital, Front Porch, RMH Group, Meyers Nave, Intraworks, Information Technology, ETTE, Clackamas Community College

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

CloudSphere vs. Spacelift

June 2026

Free Report: CloudSphere vs. Spacelift

Find out what your peers are saying about CloudSphere vs. Spacelift and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

904,748 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our CloudSphere vs. Spacelift report.

See our list of best Cloud Management vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.