CodeSonar vs Invicti Web + API comparison

Why PeerSpot?

AdaCore and Invicti are both solutions in the Application Security Tools category. AdaCore is ranked #35, while Invicti is ranked #13 with an average rating of 7.8. AdaCore holds a 1.0% mindshare in AS, compared to Invicti’s 2.6% mindshare. Additionally, 87% of AdaCore users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 89% of Invicti users who would recommend it.

CodeSonar

Read 7 CodeSonar reviews

4,129 Views
2,849 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

Invicti Web + API

Read 37 Invicti Web + API reviews

13,849 Views
6,509 Comparison Views

89% willing to recommend

CodeSonar

Invicti Web + API

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 6, 2026

Acunetix and CodeSonar are competing in the vulnerability scanning and code analysis category. Acunetix seems to have the upper hand in terms of scalability and integration, while CodeSonar is strong in robust code analysis and adherence to coding standards.

Features: Acunetix is known for its rapid testing of various vulnerabilities, delivering comprehensive reports, and providing user-friendly interactions. It also supports CI/CD integration and offers extensive documentation. CodeSonar excels in robust code analysis, identifying security threats with support for coding standards like MISRA, and ensures code robustness by flagging potential security issues.

Room for Improvement: Acunetix could benefit from more automated macro functionalities, improved false positive handling, and deeper API scanning capabilities. Enhancements in JavaScript handling and a more affordable pricing model are also desired. CodeSonar users suggest enhancing static analysis capabilities, expanding supported programming languages, and providing more flexible licensing models alongside a broader set of coding rules.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Acunetix offers flexible deployment options whether on-premises or in the cloud, although its customer service receives mixed reviews regarding responsiveness and support. CodeSonar primarily offers on-premises and public cloud setups, with customer service generally being praised for its responsiveness and support.

Pricing and ROI: Acunetix has high pricing with additional costs for technical support and licensing constraints like target limits, yet it provides ROI by enhancing application security. CodeSonar is recognized for being costly but offering substantial value through detailed security analysis. Both solutions promise ROI by improving security standards and minimizing potential vulnerabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed CodeSonar vs. Invicti Web + API Report (Updated: November 2026).

Buyer's Guide

CodeSonar vs. Invicti Web + API

November 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 920,929 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

CodeSonar

Ranking in Application Security Tools

35th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Static Code Analysis (10th)

Invicti Web + API

Ranking in Application Security Tools

13th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (9th), Vulnerability Management (29th), DevSecOps (7th)

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2026, in the Application Security Tools category, the mindshare of CodeSonar is 1.0%, down from 1.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Invicti Web + API is 2.6%, up from 2.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Security Tools Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Invicti Web + API	2.6%
CodeSonar	1.0%
Other	96.4%

Application Security Tools

Featured Reviews

Mathieu ALBRESPY

Intigration Developer at ez-Wheel

Nice interface, quick to deploy, and easy to expand

This is the first time I've used this kind of software. It was the only one we could apply to analyze with MISRA rules. At my new company, I tried to use Klocwork. I tried to use it, just once so I cannot compare it exactly with CodeSonar. I also have a plugin for my Visual Studio and I try to make it work. It's not easy, however, I don't think that we have this kind of functionality with CodeSonar. It can do some incremental analysis. However, since this feature is also available on CodeSonar, it would be a good idea to have a plugin on Visual Studio just to have a quick analysis.

Read full review

Rahul Kumar

Senior Engineer - Penetration Tester at a government with 10,001+ employees

Identifies vulnerabilities across bulk web applications but needs better support and cleaner reports

The best feature Acunetix offers is the centralized dashboard and the quality of reports it generates, which includes various options for selecting reports and developer options for directly sharing the reports with developers. The centralized dashboard of Acunetix gives visibility into the security aspects of mass applications; for instance, with more than 200 applications, it provides a valuable overview of findings and necessary fixes, along with a high-level summary that helps us achieve compliance through monthly and sometimes weekly scanning. In terms of reporting, Acunetix is excellent because it can generate different types of reports, such as an executive summary report, detailed reports, and developer reports that can be shared directly with developers. Acunetix positively impacts my organization by helping identify outdated libraries and applications, including legacy applications vulnerable to old attacks based on OWASP Top 10, thus aiding in compliance checks for PCI DSS and OWASP. Acunetix provides a centralized report with compliance-related aspects and a vulnerability timeline, effectively helping reduce vulnerabilities and save time.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"What I like best about CodeSonar is that it has fantastic speed, analysis and configuration times. Its detection of all runtime errors is also very good, though there were times it missed a few. The configuration of logs by CodeSonar is also very fantastic which I've not seen anywhere else. I also like the GUI interface of CodeSonar because it's very user friendly and the tool also shows very precise logs and results."

"It has been able to scale."

"I would suggest trying out automated tools along with CodeSonar on your project, and you will find out that CodeSonar reports many more defects compared to other static analysis tools, so this is a very important tool."

"There is nice functionality for code surfing and browsing."

"CodeSonar has helped our organization because it detects dead and nonusable parts of code to create a more optimized code."

"The solution is very stable and we have used it for a long time with no issues."

"CodeSonar’s most valuable feature is finding security threats."

"The most valuable features of CodeSonar were all the categorized classes provided, and reports of future bugs which might occur in the production code. Additionally, I found the buffer overflow and underflow useful."

More CodeSonar pros

"I find it to be one of the most comprehensive tools, with support for manual intervention."

"Acunetix gives us code-level identification of vulnerabilities and a good understanding of the code-level vulnerability fixes, which is much more helpful for us because we can understand how to fix the vulnerabilities at the code level."

"There is a lot of documentation on their website which makes setting it up and using it quite simple."

"As a team, it's helped us to deliver better security assessments."

"The UI of Invicti Web + API is very friendly, making it one of the best DAST tools I have used, as we don't have much difficulty using it and it is quite stable."

"The solution is paying for itself, as our applications are more secure."

"If an organization has 100 plus applications and wants to use an automated scanner, they should definitely go ahead with Acunetix because it is very cost-effective and will save time compared to focusing on other solutions and performing manual security assessments."

"Overall, it's a very good tool and a very good engine."

More Invicti Web + API pros

Cons

"It was expensive."

"CodeSonar could improve by having better coding rules so we did not have to use another solution, such as MISRA C."

"In a future release, the solution should upgrade itself to the current trends and differentiate between the languages. If there are any classifications that can be set for these programming languages that would be helpful rather than having everything in the generic category."

"The scanning tool for core architecture could be improved."

"It would be beneficial for the solution to include code standards and additional functionality for security."

"It was difficult for us to apply a rule, especially to a part of the code, and not apply it to the rest of the code."

"There could be a shared licensing model for the users."

"In terms of areas for improvement, the use case for CodeSonar was good, but compared to other tools, it seems CodeSonar isn't a sound static analysis tool, and this is a major con I've seen from it. Right now, in the market, people prefer sound static analysis tools, so I would have preferred if CodeSonar was developed into a sound static analysis tool formally, in terms of its algorithms, so then you can see it extensively used in the market because at the moment, here in India, only fifty to sixty customers use CodeSonar. If the product is developed into a sound static analysis tool, it could compete with Polyspace, and from its current fifty customers, that number could go up to a hundred."

More CodeSonar cons

"The solution should work on dealing with the number of false positives it delivers."

"There are quite a few false positives that come out. It's mostly based upon finding XSS vulnerabilities, even though we know that XSS vulnerabilities do not exist within some of the web applications because of some frameworks we're using."

"We want to see how much bandwidth usage it consumes. When we monitor traffic we have issues with the consumption and throttling of the traffic."

"However, it doesn't seem very helpful or useful for scanning web services, and that has what I feel that the organization could work better on that."

"There is room for improvement in the pricing."

"The solution is generally stable, however, there might be room for improvement regarding glitches or bugs."

"The only problem that they have is the price. It is a bit expensive, and you cannot change the number of applications for the whole year."

"We have had issues during upgrades where their scans worked on some apps better with previous versions. Then, we had to work with their tech support, who were great, to get it fixed for the next version."

More Invicti Web + API cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Our organization purchased a license to use the solution."

"Pricing is a bit costly."

"The solution's price depends on the number of licenses needed and the source code for the project."

"The application’s pricing is high compared to other tools."

"When we looked at all other vendors and what they were asking for, to provide a third of what Acunetix was capable of doing, it was an easy decision... But now that it's coming to a cost where it's line with market value, it becomes more of a competition... Acunetix is raising the cost of licensing. It's 3.5 times what we were initially quoted."

"All things considered, I think it has a good price/value ratio."

"When compared with other products, the pricing is a little bit high. But it gives value for the price. It serves the purpose and is worthwhile for the price we pay."

"The cost is based on two types of licenses, ConsultLite, and ConsultPlus, as well as the number of domains that are scanned."

"The costs aren't very expensive. It costs around $3000 or $4000."

"The solution is expensive."

"Implementing Acunetix needs a medium or larger business agency, because you need some money to get Acunetix. It is costly, but if you care about your agency's security, then maybe it's a cost that might help you in the future."

"The pricing and licensing are reasonable to a point. In order to run multiple scans at a time, we are going to have to purchase a 100 count license, which is an overkill. Though, compared to what we were paying for, the cost seems reasonable."

More Invicti Web + API pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

920,929 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

22%

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

Outsourcing Company

Manufacturing Company

12%

Comms Service Provider

11%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	5
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	2

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	18
Midsize Enterprise	7
Large Enterprise	19

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What is your primary use case for Acunetix Vulnerability Scanner?

In a typical enterprise environment, Acunetix is mainly used for visibility, detection, and investigation across network traffic. The main use cases usually fall into a few core areas, with primary...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Acunetix Vulnerability Scanner?

I advise that Acunetix is the best option. Invest time in proper initial configuration and scope definitions. The tool is powerful, but its effectiveness depends heavily on how the authenticated ar...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Acunetix?

Everything is perfect and good, including the pricing and all related aspects.

See all answers

Comparisons

SonarQube vs CodeSonar

Compared 11% of the time

Polyspace Code Prover vs CodeSonar

Compared 7% of the time

Coverity Static vs CodeSonar

Compared 7% of the time

Veracode vs CodeSonar

Compared 6% of the time

Understand vs CodeSonar

Compared 5% of the time

More CodeSonar Competitors

PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional vs Invicti Web + API

Compared 6% of the time

OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing vs Invicti Web + API

Compared 5% of the time

OWASP Zap vs Invicti Web + API

Compared 4% of the time

Checkmarx One vs Invicti Web + API

Compared 3% of the time

HCL AppScan vs Invicti Web + API

Compared 3% of the time

More Invicti Web + API Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Application Security Tools

October 2026

Download CodeSonar product report

Buyer's Guide

Invicti Web + API

October 2026

Download Invicti Web + API product report

Also Known As

No data available

AcuSensor

Overview

CodeSonar offers a potent tool for static code analysis, adept in detecting runtime errors and security vulnerabilities, with a fast deployment process and scalable capabilities. Its quick analysis and efficient web interface provide a strong basis for code quality validation.

CodeSonar specializes in identifying runtime errors, dead code, and security threats while providing features like code surfing and browsing. It offers a highly efficient web interface, though users find initial setup complex and highlight the need for better static analysis, broader language support beyond C and C++, and an improved licensing model. Despite these challenges, its integration with Jenkins and technical guidance support makes it a reliable choice for teams in defense and software quality assessment. Deployment is quick and easy, yet initial costs are a common concern among users.

What are the key features of CodeSonar?

Quick Analysis: Delivers fast runtime error detection and reporting.
GUI Interface: Offers a user-friendly experience for code browsing.
Scalability: Efficiently deploys across various environments.
Security and Code Detection: Identifies vulnerabilities and potential bugs.
Effective Configuration: Simplified log and analysis configuration.

What benefits can be seen in user reviews?

Detection of Code Vulnerabilities: Enhances security with robust threat detection.
Process Integration: Seamlessly integrates with DevOps tools such as Jenkins.
Scalable Deployment: Quickly adaptable in expanding environments.
GUI Usability: Highly efficient for technical teams to navigate.

CodeSonar is primarily implemented in industries like defense and companies prioritizing code quality. Teams utilize its static code analysis and threat detection capabilities, integrating with Jenkins for continuous integration workflows. Security checks post-builds and technical support are common, aiding in effective defect management.

AdaCore

Acunetix is a robust web application security testing tool offering rapid scanning, user-friendly interfaces, and accurate vulnerability detection with minimal false positives. It supports both cloud and on-premises deployment, making it versatile for various security needs.

Acunetix is distinguished by its capability to identify critical vulnerabilities such as cross-site scripting and SQL injection with high precision. It integrates seamlessly with CI/CD tools, supporting continuous scanning and large-scale application management. The centralized dashboard and detailed automated reporting streamline operations. Despite its benefits, users suggest improvements like reducing false positives, flexible pricing, and enhanced API scanning. Better integration with platforms like GitHub and Azure DevOps is sought, alongside more comprehensive customization and faster scanning. Mobile application scanning and improved team collaboration tools are also desired.

What features make Acunetix stand out?

Rapid Scanning: Delivers fast and comprehensive security assessments.
User-Friendliness: Intuitive interface simplifies operations for diverse teams.
Detailed Reporting: Automated reports enhance vulnerability management.
High Accuracy: Detects vulnerabilities with minimal false positives.
CI/CD Integration: Seamless integration supports continuous development processes.

What benefits should users consider when evaluating?

Vulnerability Detection: Critical for identifying potential security threats efficiently.
Flexibility: Supports both cloud and on-premises environments.
Compliance Support: Aids in meeting standards like PCI DSS.
Scalability: Capable of handling large-scale web applications.

Acunetix is widely implemented across industries undertaking web application security assessments, including those requiring penetration testing and vulnerability assessment. It ensures applications meet security protocols and complies with standards while fitting into CI/CD workflows for secure pre-release checks.

Invicti

Sample Customers

Viveris, Micrel Medical Devices, Olympus, SOFTEQ, SONY

Joomla!, Digicure, Team Random, Credit Suisse, Samsung, Air New Zealand

Buyer's Guide

CodeSonar vs. Invicti Web + API

November 2026

Free Report: CodeSonar vs. Invicti Web + API

Find out what your peers are saying about CodeSonar vs. Invicti Web + API and other solutions. Updated: November 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

920,929 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our CodeSonar vs. Invicti Web + API report.

See our list of best Application Security Tools vendors.

We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.