

Control-M and SnapLogic compete in the workload automation and integration platforms category. Control-M seems to have the upper hand due to its comprehensive feature set, community support, and advanced automation capabilities, though it has a higher cost.
Features: Control-M is valued for its robust automation capabilities, including Job Scheduling, Managed File Transfer (MFT), and Custom Integration. It offers a mature toolset, stability, and a user-friendly interface. SnapLogic's strengths lie in its low-code environment, big data transfers, hybrid deployment, and multiple connectors, providing simplicity and fast visual development for business processes.
Room for Improvement: Control-M needs better handling of daylight savings and improvements in its reporting tools, cost models, and API integration. It could also use a more intuitive interface and simplified setup for cloud technologies. SnapLogic can improve transparency in data flow, dashboard capabilities, integration options, and API management, with a call for more user-friendly error messages.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Control-M's on-premises deployment receives mixed reviews regarding customer support, despite helpful technical staff and valuable resources. SnapLogic emphasizes hybrid and cloud deployments and is praised for its drag-and-drop interface and effective customer support with prompt technical assistance.
Pricing and ROI: Control-M is recognized as a costly solution but provides significant value for complex enterprise workloads with high ROI due to centralized operations and time savings. SnapLogic offers competitive licensing models with flexible scaling, generally priced lower than Control-M, attracting businesses seeking cost-effective solutions for straightforward deployments.
The main return on investment with Helix Control-M has been a reduction in downtime and minimization of manual interventions, which has improved our operational efficiency.
You can run a million batch jobs or tasks at night when all of your highly skilled people are at home sleeping.
By implementing automation tools, you can minimize human errors and improve efficiency.
SnapLogic is really helpful and processes in very little time, so it doesn't take much time compared to any legacy tool.
SnapLogic has helped automate manual data transfers significantly and improved our workflow efficiency, reducing integration development timelines considerably, which reflects a good ROI.
They quickly evolve with changing technology trends, easily adopt new features, and incorporate them into the product.
The support is accurate, and BMC is always ready to help with queries and complex incidents.
The technical support is very polite, helpful, and available 24/7.
The technical support from SnapLogic is excellent, and I would give it a complete ten.
Some SMEs are allotted for the organization, so in case of any issue, we have their email IDs to contact them for support, including SMEs and community.
Customer support scales well; as pipeline volume grows, we have been able to add more integrations and users without performance degradation.
Our license doesn't limit our ability to configure Control-M as needed, allowing us to easily create new agents or environments.
I am paying for a top-end tool which rarely experiences issues, with most problems stemming from the applications being managed rather than the tooling itself.
It can absorb more workload wherever needed.
I rate the scalability of SnapLogic as eight out of ten.
Control-M itself is robust, and it would receive a rating of 10.
The downtime is higher compared to AWS.
The testing and development phases need to be more rigorous before releasing patches.
I would rate the stability of SnapLogic as nearly ten out of ten.
But recently, in a year, I haven't found many performance issues in SnapLogic.
They could provide more documentation and tutorials to make the initial setup easier to understand.
We've experienced main problems with MFTE where having one setup means when an error occurs, the entire service goes down.
Documentation should be maintained for all versions since they provided the application.
If the AI capabilities and integrations were more intuitive and easy to learn for new users, it would be greatly beneficial.
They can improve more visuals, with graphical representations, such as how many things can be added, how many users can be added or dropped, and how the back-end nodes can be graphically shown in a better way.
I tend to frequently communicate with SnapLogic to ask for additional features, and they have been responsive.
The licensing cost is very high, and they often consider switching to IBM Workload Scheduler or other options.
Control-M tends to be more expensive compared to other solutions, but users get great value from it.
Control-M is among the highest-priced solutions in the market.
I would say the pricing is on the higher side, but it aligns with the capabilities offered for mid- to large integrations.
There would be only one point of improvement if the price could be lower.
SnapLogic is positioned at around seven or eight out of ten in terms of pricing.
Automation is more advanced, deployment is fast, and version control has been simplified.
The user interface is comprehensive and lets me view all my jobs on one page, monitor everything, and access the job history.
If I have a staff that operates Control-M on Windows Server, they will easily pick it up if they need to run it on Unix or mainframes. It's the same interface, saving time and improving efficiency.
I also like the whole child-parent pipeline feature; it allows me to break up a process into smaller pieces and then have one big pipeline that controls these smaller pipelines.
The drag-and-drop builder and pre-built snaps have helped our team through a very low-code approach, making it easier for us to develop fast pipelines and be more agile compared to the heavier integration platforms we used before.
I find SnapLogic to be user-friendly, especially for beginners with limited experience in data engineering or ETL.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| Control-M | 3.7% |
| SnapLogic | 1.0% |
| Other | 95.3% |

| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 37 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 23 |
| Large Enterprise | 140 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 11 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 5 |
| Large Enterprise | 11 |
Control-M SaaS by BMC is tailored for growing teams, offering essential orchestration for managing hybrid cloud workflows starting at $29,000 annually.
Control-M integrates automation, orchestration, and a user-friendly interface to streamline workflows across banking, DevOps, and cloud environments. Key modules like Managed File Transfer and cross-platform support simplify job monitoring, while Batch Impact Manager enhances scheduling. Despite its capabilities, improvements in output analysis, reporting customization, offline access, and API integration are desired by users.
What are Control-M's key features?Control-M is implemented in industries such as finance and enterprise operations, aiding in automating batch processing across platforms like SAP and Teradata. It integrates with secure file transfers, ERP systems, and databases, whether deployed on-premises or cloud, ensuring seamless operation optimization.
The SnapLogic Intelligent Integration Platform uses AI-powered workflows to automate all stages of IT integration projects – design, development, deployment, and maintenance – whether on-premises, in the cloud, or in hybrid environments. The platform’s easy-to-use, self-service interface enables both expert and citizen integrators to manage all application integration, data integration, API management, B2B integration, and data engineering projects on a single, scalable platform. With SnapLogic, organizations can connect all of their enterprise systems quickly and easily to automate business processes, accelerate analytics, and drive transformation.
We monitor all Process Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.