Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

What is SnapLogic?

Featured SnapLogic reviews

SnapLogic mindshare

As of February 2026, the mindshare of SnapLogic in the Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) category stands at 3.3%, down from 4.6% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
SnapLogic3.3%
Boomi iPaaS8.3%
MuleSoft Anypoint Platform6.8%
Other81.6%
Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)

PeerResearch reports based on SnapLogic reviews

TypeTitleDate
CategoryIntegration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)Feb 8, 2026Download
ProductReviews, tips, and advice from real usersFeb 8, 2026Download
ComparisonSnapLogic vs Microsoft Azure Logic AppsFeb 8, 2026Download
ComparisonSnapLogic vs MuleSoft Anypoint PlatformFeb 8, 2026Download
ComparisonSnapLogic vs Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC)Feb 8, 2026Download
Suggested products
TitleRatingMindshareRecommending
Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC)4.05.1%92%214 interviewsAdd to research
Camunda4.1N/A89%78 interviewsAdd to research
 
 
Key learnings from peers
Last updated Feb 8, 2026

Valuable Features

Room for Improvement

ROI

Pricing

Popular Use Cases

Service and Support

Deployment

Scalability

Stability

Review data by company size

By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business10
Midsize Enterprise4
Large Enterprise11
By reviewers
By visitors reading reviews
Company SizeCount
Small Business86
Midsize Enterprise64
Large Enterprise375
By visitors reading reviews

Top industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
17%
Manufacturing Company
12%
Comms Service Provider
7%
Healthcare Company
7%
Real Estate/Law Firm
7%
Computer Software Company
6%
University
5%
Retailer
4%
Outsourcing Company
4%
Insurance Company
3%
Marketing Services Firm
3%
Consumer Goods Company
3%
Educational Organization
3%
Performing Arts
2%
Energy/Utilities Company
2%
Construction Company
2%
Media Company
2%
Wholesaler/Distributor
2%
Government
2%
Non Profit
2%
Transportation Company
1%
Hospitality Company
1%
Pharma/Biotech Company
1%
Logistics Company
1%
Aerospace/Defense Firm
1%
Recreational Facilities/Services Company
1%
Recruiting/Hr Firm
1%
Agriculture
1%
 
SnapLogic Reviews Summary
Author infoRatingReview Summary
Architect at a transportation company with 1,001-5,000 employees3.0I use SnapLogic mainly for Fintech data migrations due to its strong integration features, low latency, and scalability, though it needs better support, clearer roadmaps, and improvements in HR tech and cloud data processing efficiency.
Technical Specialist App Development at Birlasoft IndiaLtd.4.0I've used SnapLogic for over three years and found it user-friendly, scalable, and effective for integrating systems and automating processes, though some connectors need improvement. It's evolving into AI and API capabilities, which is promising for future use.
Global Head - DevOps and AIOps Startegist at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees3.5I've used SnapLogic to streamline data integrations with its low-code, drag-and-drop tools, improving efficiency and reducing development time, though better documentation and debugging could help; overall, it's stable, scalable, and delivers solid ROI.
Senior Data Analyst at a pharma/biotech company with 10,001+ employees4.5I use SnapLogic for data migration and integration, especially with SAP data, due to its user-friendly interface. While it excels in agility, improving AI capabilities would enhance usability. For enterprise projects, I still prefer DBT.
Head of Data Practice at a tech consulting company with 201-500 employees4.5I primarily use SnapLogic for data integration and some API tasks. I value its reusability and pre-delivered snaps, alongside its effective process control. Compared to MuleSoft, SnapLogic is cheaper and simpler, with responsive support for additional features.
Architect at VTR4.5As a solution architect, I recommended SnapLogic for its efficient connectors and quick data handling, although its limited connector variety and lack of customization present challenges for complex integrations. Despite some limitations, it proved effective for simpler, rapid setups.
Integration developer at Blackwoods2.5I found SnapLogic user-friendly and easier to debug than Boomi, but it lacks comprehensive solutions. The support needs improvement, especially in technical knowledge. While it's a cost-effective option for basic cloud integration, I prefer Boomi for more complex tasks.
Solution Architect at X-Press Feeders1.0We used SnapLogic for building an EDI pipeline for integration, converting EDI to JSON in our company. Despite its utility, SnapLogic requires setup changes for new EDI versions. Previously, we used MapForce and briefly considered Jitterbit before developing an internal tool.