Coralogix vs Devo comparison

Coralogix and Devo are both solutions in the Log Management category. Coralogix is ranked #20 with an average rating of 8.5, while Devo is ranked #28 with an average rating of 8.0. Coralogix holds a 1.2% mindshare in Log Management, compared to Devo’s 0.8% mindshare. Additionally, 93% of Coralogix users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 95% of Devo users who would recommend it.

Coralogix

Read 14 Coralogix reviews

4,162 Views
1,540 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

Devo

Read 23 Devo reviews

3,179 Views
1,590 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Coralogix

Devo

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 18, 2024

Coralogix and Devo offer robust solutions for log analytics and data observability. Devo seems to have the upper hand due to its advanced features and overall user satisfaction, despite Coralogix's affordability.

Features: Coralogix's users like its real-time analytics, indexing, and user-defined pipelines. Devo users favor its scalability, integrated threat hunting, and comprehensive data ingestion capabilities. Devo's broader feature set is preferred by users.

Room for Improvement: Coralogix faces criticism for occasional delays in log processing, a need for better visualization tools, and query performance. Devo users desire improvements in query performance, more intuitive documentation, and log processing speed. Both products have areas needing enhancement, but user reviews suggest Coralogix requires more immediate attention.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Coralogix is praised for seamless deployment options and responsive customer support. Devo users express satisfaction with smooth deployment processes but indicate customer service response times could be improved. Coralogix holds an edge in customer service.

Pricing and ROI: Coralogix stands out for its cost-effective setup and strong ROI as stated by users. Devo's pricing is higher, but users believe the advanced features justify the cost and achieve significant ROI. Coralogix is more affordable, whereas Devo's higher price is validated by its feature-rich offering.

To learn more, read our detailed Coralogix vs. Devo Report (Updated: February 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Coralogix vs. Devo

February 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 881,733 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Coralogix

Ranking in Log Management

20th

Ranking in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)

20th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability (21st), API Management (15th), Streaming Analytics (14th), Anomaly Detection Tools (1st), AI Observability (16th)

Devo

Ranking in Log Management

28th

Ranking in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)

25th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

IT Operations Analytics (11th), AIOps (20th)

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Log Management category, the mindshare of Coralogix is 1.2%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Devo is 0.8%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Log Management Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Coralogix	1.2%
Devo	0.8%
Other	98.0%

Log Management

Featured Reviews

Naveenkumar Lakshman

Presales Engineer at Crayon AS

Centralized monitoring has improved real-time issue tracking and reduced root cause analysis time

One of the best features that Coralogix offers is that it is integration friendly. I can seamlessly work with different cloud providers including AWS, Azure, and GCP. I can monitor Kubernetes or Docker platforms as well, and I can integrate with the DevOps chain including Jenkins and all infrastructure code, Terraform, or Ansible. Coralogix has positively impacted my organization by providing a centralized console to monitor the dashboard, giving me rich flexibility to see different sorts of data that is spread across the logs, metrics, or traces, which are the typical pillars of the observability tool. I have the interface where I can use the drag-and-drop feature, and I can create different types of charts. Mainly, I have the line charts and time series ones that I generally use in many use cases, gauges, tables, pie charts, or markdown widgets. These are the ones generically available, and I can switch between the visualization types. I am getting the underlying query in that and can import and export dashboards built upon the JSON format. I can have my own APIs integrated with my dashboards as well, such as with Terraform, which is useful for scaling across my environments. Regarding root cause analysis, mainly what I can do is correlate across all of the layers because the main logs that I work on are storage-related, including CIFS, NFS, SAN traffic, and the metrics including storage, throughput, or VM resource usage. Being able to view logs, metrics, or traces available, I get all of these in one place, and I can do root cause analysis much quicker.

Read full review

Francisco JavierRomo

Strategic Account Executive at a computer software company with 51-200 employees

Has improved investigative workflows with interactive dashboards and simplified data correlation

The data analytics cloud component focuses on real-time analytics, which is very impressive. The SIEM collects and correlates logs data from different sources and can integrate with ServiceNow, hardware asset management, and software asset management. The security orchestration, automation, and response (SOAR) is another valuable feature. The security data platform serves as the foundation of Devo. Regarding advanced query capabilities, Devo offers several models including query logs, visual query builder, language integrated query, and SQL, with SQL being the most frequently used querying data capability. The single pane of glass that Devo offers is the SOC. The tools in Devo's active ports are for investigating, not just viewing data. They are more interactive than other market solutions. The drill-down reports capabilities allow analysts to click on any element in a widget. When they see a spike in a line chart for a failed login, which could be a true or false attempt, they can click that spike, and a table widget on the same active board instantly populates with raw logs of data for those specific failed logins. This is particularly important for enterprise companies with numerous endpoints and users. The dynamic filtering of inputs significantly reduces the time cybersecurity analysts spend trying to figure out failed logins and identifying false positives.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The solution offers very good convenience filtering."

"A non-tech person can easily get used to it."

"For now, we have not experienced any stability issues."

"The best feature of this solution allows us to correlate logs, metrics and traces."

"In my experience, the best feature Coralogix offers is that the dashboard is pretty good."

"Numerous data monitoring tools are available, but Coralogix somehow fine-tunes our policies and effectively supports our teams."

"The overall stability and reliability of Coralogix are excellent, and I rarely encounter issues."

"Coralogix has positively impacted my organization by providing a centralized console to monitor the dashboard, giving me rich flexibility to see different sorts of data that is spread across the logs, metrics, or traces, which are the typical pillars of the observability tool."

More Coralogix pros

"The alerting is much better than I anticipated. We don't get as many alerts as I thought we would, but that nobody's fault, it's just the way it is."

"The most valuable feature is definitely the ability that Devo has to ingest data. From the previous SIEM that I came from and helped my company administer, it really was the type of system where data was parsed on ingest. This meant that if you didn't build the parser efficiently or correctly, sometimes that would bring the system to its knees. You'd have a backlog of processing the logs as it was ingesting them."

"It centralizes security management within a business, functioning as a core system for a SOC."

"Those 400 days of hot data mean that people can look for trends and at what happened in the past. And they can not only do so from a security point of view, but even for operational use cases. In the past, our operational norm was to keep live data for only 30 days. Our users were constantly asking us for at least 90 days, and we really couldn't even do that. That's one reason that having 400 days of live data is pretty huge. As our users start to use it and adopt this system, we expect people to be able to do those long-term analytics."

"The real-time analytics of security-related data are super. There are a lot of data feeds going into it and it's very quick at pulling up and correlating the data and showing you what's going on in your infrastructure. It's fast. The way that their architecture and technology works, they've really focused on the speed of query results and making sure that we can do what we need to do quickly. Devo is pulling back information in a fast fashion, based on real-time events."

"The most valuable feature is that it has native MSSP capabilities and maintains perfect data separation. It does all of that in a very easy-to-manage cloud-based solution."

"Scalability is one of Devo's strengths."

"Devo provides a multi-tenant, cloud-native architecture. This is critical for managed service provider environments or multinational organizations who may have subsidiaries globally. It gives organizations a way to consolidate their data in a single accessible location, yet keep the data separate. This allows for global views and/or isolated views restricted by access controls by company or business unit."

More Devo pros

Cons

"The user interface is not intuitive, especially when first onboarding, and improvements could be made here."

"It would be helpful if Coralogix could integrate the main modules that any organization requires into a single subscription."

"In terms of documentation, I think there can be more user-friendly documentation that stresses more on day-to-day issues."

"The features we were missing in the past were related to the way we see our metrics and aggregate our data."

"Coralogix's dashboard and search capabilities do not help me in any particular way."

"We want it to work at what it is expected to work at and not really based on the updated configuration which one developer has decided to change."

"Maybe they could make it more user-friendly."

"Coralogix should have some AI capabilities to auto-detect anomalies and provide suggestions."

More Coralogix cons

"One major area for improvement for Devo... is to provide more capabilities around pre-built monitoring. They're working on integrations with different types of systems, but that integration needs to go beyond just onboarding to the platform. It needs to include applications, out-of-the-box, that immediately help people to start monitoring their systems. Such applications would include dashboards and alerts, and then people could customize them for their own needs so that they aren't starting from a blank slate."

"The price is one problem with Devo."

"The biggest area with room for improvement in Devo is the Security Operations module that just isn't there yet. That goes back to building out how they're going to do content and larger correlation and aggregation of data across multiple things, as well as natively ingesting CTI to create rule sets."

"An admin who is trying to audit user activity usually cannot go beyond a day in the UI. I would like to have access to pages and pages of that data, going back as far as the storage we have, so I could look at every command or search or deletion or anything that a user has run. As an admin, that would really help. Going back just a day in the UI is not going to help, and that means I have to find a different way to do that."

"We only use the core functionality and one of the reasons for this is that their security operation center needs improvement."

"The tools in Devo's active ports need enhancement in their investigative capabilities."

"Devo has a lot of cloud connectors, but they need to do a little bit of work there. They've got good integrations with the public cloud, but there are a lot of cloud SaaS systems that they still need to work with on integrations, such as Salesforce and other SaaS providers where we need to get access logs."

"There's room for improvement within the GUI. There is also some room for improvement within the native parsers they support. But I can say that about pretty much any solution in this space."

More Devo cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The cost of the solution is per volume of data ingested."

"The platform has a reasonable cost. I rate the pricing a three out of ten."

"We are paying roughly $5,000 a month."

"Currently, we are at a very minimal cost, which is around $400 per month since we have reduced our usage. Initially, we were at $900 per month."

"I'm not involved in the financial aspect, but I think the licensing costs are similar to other solutions. If all the solutions have a similar cost, Devo provides more for the money."

"It's a per gigabyte cost for ingestion of data. For every gigabyte that you ingest, it's whatever you negotiated your price for. Compared to other contracts that we've had for cloud providers, it's significantly less."

"I rate the pricing a four on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive."

"The way Devo prices things is based on the amount of data, and I wish the tiers had more granularity. Maybe at this point they do, but when we first negotiated with them, there were only three or four tiers."

"Our licensing fees are billed annually and per terabyte."

"I like the pricing very much. They keep it simple. It is a single price based on data ingested, and they do it on an average. If you get a spike of data that flows in, they will not stick it to you or charge you for that. They are very fair about that."

"Devo is a hosted or subscription-based solution, whereas before, we purchased QRadar, so we owned it and just had to pay a maintenance fee. We've encountered this with some other products, too, where we went over to subscription-based. Our thought process is that with subscription based, the provider hosts and maintains the tool, and it's offsite. That comes with some additional fees, but we were able to convince our upper management it was worth the price. We used to pay under 10k a year for maintenance, and now we're paying ten times that. It was a relatively tough sell to our management, but I wonder if we have a choice anymore; this is where the market is."

"Devo was very cost-competitive... Devo did come with that 400 days of hot data, and that was not the case with other products."

More Devo pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Log Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,733 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

10%

Computer Software Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

Financial Services Firm

14%

University

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	6

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	11

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Coralogix?

Numerous data monitoring tools are available, but Coralogix somehow fine-tunes our policies and effectively supports our teams.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Coralogix?

To monitor and manage costs associated with Coralogix, I analyze my trend, looking at how the data is being ingested. Generally, it is charged based on what we store, and therefore there are certai...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Coralogix?

I think Coralogix can be improved with flexible dashboards. Creating specific views, such as saving a dev environment as a separate view rather than adding filters every time, would be great.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Devo?

Compared to Splunk or SentinelOne, it is really expensive. I rate the product’s pricing a nine out of ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Devo?

The single pane of glass that Devo offers could be improved. The tools in Devo's active ports need enhancement in their investigative capabilities. The drill-down reports capabilities, while useful...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Devo?

During my time at MetaBase Q and as a partner integrator of ServiceNow, I had the chance to understand and be part of projects integrating SOCs, NOCs, and Security Operation Centers with Devo. Most...

See all answers

Comparisons

Datadog vs Coralogix

Compared 11% of the time

Splunk Enterprise Security vs Coralogix

Compared 6% of the time

New Relic vs Coralogix

Compared 6% of the time

Logz.io vs Coralogix

Compared 6% of the time

Grafana vs Coralogix

Compared 5% of the time

More Coralogix Competitors

LogRhythm SIEM vs Devo

Compared 9% of the time

Splunk Enterprise Security vs Devo

Compared 7% of the time

IBM Security QRadar vs Devo

Compared 6% of the time

Microsoft Sentinel vs Devo

Compared 4% of the time

Elastic Security vs Devo

Compared 4% of the time

More Devo Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Coralogix

February 2026

Download Coralogix product report

Buyer's Guide

Devo

February 2026

Download Devo product report

Overview

Coralogix is a stateful streaming data platform that provides real-time insights and long-term trend analysis with no reliance on storage or indexing, solving the monitoring challenges of data growth in large-scale systems.

Ingest log, metric, and security data from any source for a single, centralized platform to monitor and alert on your applications. As data is ingested, Coralogix instantly narrows millions of events down to common patterns for deeper insights and faster troubleshooting. Proactive data storage optimization enables up to 70% savings on monitoring costs with better performance.

Coralogix

Devo is the only cloud-native logging and security analytics platform that releases the full potential of all your data to empower bold, confident action when it matters most. Only the Devo platform delivers the powerful combination of real-time visibility, high-performance analytics, scalability, multitenancy, and low TCO crucial for monitoring and securing business operations as enterprises accelerate their shift to the cloud.

Devo

Sample Customers

Payoneer, AGS, Monday.com, Capgemini

United States Air Force, Rubrik, SentinelOne, Critical Start, NHL, Panda Security, Telefonica, CaixaBank, OpenText, IGT, OneMain Financial, SurveyMonkey, FanDuel, H&R Block, Ulta Beauty, Manulife, Moneylion, Chime Bank, Magna International, American Express Global Business Travel

Buyer's Guide

Coralogix vs. Devo

February 2026

Free Report: Coralogix vs. Devo

Find out what your peers are saying about Coralogix vs. Devo and other solutions. Updated: February 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,733 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Coralogix vs. Devo report.

See our list of best Log Management vendors and best Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) vendors.

We monitor all Log Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.