Coralogix vs Instana Dynamic APM comparison

Coralogix and Instana are both solutions in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category. Coralogix is ranked #32 with an average rating of 8.0, while Instana is ranked #19 with an average rating of 8.1. Coralogix holds a 0.9% mindshare in APM, compared to Instana’s 1.0% mindshare. Additionally, 90% of Coralogix users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 84% of Instana users who would recommend it.

Coralogix

Read 9 Coralogix reviews

1,551 Views
1,192 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

Instana Dynamic APM

Read 14 Instana Dynamic APM reviews

2,459 Views
2,042 Comparison Views

84% willing to recommend

Coralogix

Instana Dynamic APM

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 24, 2024

Coralogix and Instana compete in the log analytics and application performance management categories respectively. Instana has the upper hand in performance management features, while Coralogix excels in log analytics capabilities.

Features: Coralogix users value its strong log analytics and real-time monitoring features. Instana is praised for its comprehensive application performance management, automatic root cause analysis, and in-depth application insights.

Room for Improvement: Coralogix users suggest enhancing integration capabilities and improving documentation. Instana users recommend better custom alerting options and more flexible pricing models.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Coralogix is generally praised for its straightforward deployment process and proactive customer support. Instana is noted for its automated deployment features that simplify setup, but some users mention challenges with initial configurations.

Pricing and ROI: Coralogix users find the pricing competitive with good ROI, especially for log management. Instana’s pricing is seen as higher, but users justify the cost due to its advanced feature set and performance benefits.

To learn more, read our detailed Coralogix vs. Instana Dynamic APM Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Coralogix vs. Instana Dynamic APM

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 851,604 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Coralogix

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

32nd

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Log Management (37th), Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) (41st), API Management (30th), Streaming Analytics (19th), Anomaly Detection Tools (1st)

Instana Dynamic APM

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

19th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category, the mindshare of Coralogix is 0.9%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Instana Dynamic APM is 1.0%, down from 1.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

Featured Reviews

reviewer1915599

VP of Engineering at a financial services firm with 51-200 employees

Good capabilities, has a helpful interface and is straightforward to set up

We have asked for a couple of features from the company already. What typically happens is a lot of people - and developers are one of the biggest consumers of this product - go to this product to optimize their investigation process and specific configurations. That increases our data flow at times, so the cost changes. And a lot of changes happen due to that. We have asked the company to auto-revert the changes after a while so that the system works typically. We want it to work at what it is expected to work at and not really based on the updated configuration which one developer has decided to change.

Read full review

Muhammad Jawwad Hassan

IT Consultant at Arcana Info

A really good GUI that is easy for non-technical users to understand

Our company uses the solution for one of our bank clients. We use App Connect middleware to monitor services and applications such as Docker, Kubernetes, MongoDB, and MS SQL Server. We also monitor the bottleneck for all servers. We currently have 20 users at one of our branches. We plan to expand…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"For now, we have not experienced any stability issues."

"Coralogix scales well, and I will rate it nine out of ten."

"The best feature of this solution allows us to correlate logs, metrics and traces."

"A non-tech person can easily get used to it."

"The solution is easy to use and to start with."

"The solution offers very good convenience filtering."

"Numerous data monitoring tools are available, but Coralogix somehow fine-tunes our policies and effectively supports our teams."

"The initial setup is straightforward."

More Coralogix pros

"With auto-discovery, we didn't need to consider much. We just installed the agent on the host and it was able to detect everything from the host level up to the service level, for whatever stack was installed, and that includes containers and dockers."

"Its GUI is really good and it easy to understand for non-technical users."

"The overall capabilities are the most valuable."

"If a key monitored value has crossed a threshold, it sends out an alert. And the solution is able to intelligently find out if something is beyond the range that it normally resides in."

"Sometimes it's able to provide a proper RCA on its own. It's able to correlate different events that occurred and that becomes like an RCA in itself."

"Instana is very fast to implement and deploy because the dashboards are automated and don't need configuration."

"It is a stable solution."

"Visually, it's very good. It provides everything needed for dynamic detection, which is very useful."

More Instana Dynamic APM pros

Cons

"We want it to work at what it is expected to work at and not really based on the updated configuration which one developer has decided to change."

"Coralogix should have some AI capabilities to auto-detect anomalies and provide suggestions. The increasing volume of data and the resulting bandwidth charges are concerns."

"Coralogix should have some AI capabilities to auto-detect anomalies and provide suggestions."

"Maybe they could make it more user-friendly."

"It would be helpful if Coralogix could integrate the main modules that any organization requires into a single subscription."

"From my experience, Coralogix has horrible Terraform providers."

"The documentation of the tool could be improved"

"The user interface is not intuitive, especially when first onboarding, and improvements could be made here."

More Coralogix cons

"We should be able to go back to scenarios during or before the issue. There should be something like a history playback. Such a feature or functionality would be good."

"While it is already quite good, there is room for improvement in terms of providing better functionality"

"Maybe log monitoring could be better."

"New Relic has a better UI in terms of how it presents the data."

"I think that Instana should improve the university and the certification process, so the users can find experts in Instana with their certification module process."

"They could improve the product’s dashboards and provide more dashboard options."

"Sometimes, the issue arises from user changes, such as adjusting firewall settings without proper consideration, leading to compatibility issues within the network monitoring."

"The integration could be improved with more plugins or open API."

More Instana Dynamic APM cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The platform has a reasonable cost. I rate the pricing a three out of ten."

"Currently, we are at a very minimal cost, which is around $400 per month since we have reduced our usage. Initially, we were at $900 per month."

"We are paying roughly $5,000 a month."

"The cost of the solution is per volume of data ingested."

"The solution's pricing is comparable to other products."

"The pricing is $1,200 per year which is a bit high compared to other vendors."

"Pricing is quite competitive. Dynatrace, AppDynamics, and New Relic were all several times more expensive than Instana, both the on-prem and the SaaS versions. Price-wise they are a lot more competitive than anyone else out there."

"Instana Dynamic APM is more affordable for small and medium-sized companies compared to other vendors."

"The solution is less expensive than one of its competitors."

"It's reasonably priced and manageable, especially for individuals who grasp the significance of application monitoring."

"Its pricing isn't a big pain point. Its pricing seems to be better than some of the other competing products in the market, but they also have some of the features and functionalities that are better than Instana."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

851,604 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Healthcare Company

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

30%

Computer Software Company

13%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Coralogix?

Numerous data monitoring tools are available, but Coralogix somehow fine-tunes our policies and effectively supports our teams.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Coralogix?

The pricing is expensive. We need to reduce logs to manage costs. Despite the expense, I believe it is worth the money to have Coralogix as a tool.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Coralogix?

We need to reduce the number of logs generated by our system, which are substantial. We require some form of grouping or categorization of logs to identify them better. Additionally, we find that t...

See all answers

What do you like most about Instana Dynamic APM?

The platform’s most valuable feature is the ability to monitor the performance of containers for request and response analysis.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Instana Dynamic APM?

I rate the pricing a seven out of ten. There are no additional costs associated with the product.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Instana Dynamic APM?

Sometimes, the issue arises from user changes, such as adjusting firewall settings without proper consideration, leading to compatibility issues within the network monitoring.

See all answers

Comparisons

Datadog vs Coralogix

Compared 30% of the time

New Relic vs Coralogix

Compared 11% of the time

Grafana vs Coralogix

Compared 10% of the time

Elastic Search vs Coralogix

Compared 8% of the time

Sentry vs Coralogix

Compared 7% of the time

More Coralogix Competitors

Dynatrace vs Instana Dynamic APM

Compared 48% of the time

Splunk AppDynamics vs Instana Dynamic APM

Compared 18% of the time

IBM Application Performance Management vs Instana Dynamic APM

Compared 9% of the time

Datadog vs Instana Dynamic APM

Compared 9% of the time

New Relic vs Instana Dynamic APM

Compared 4% of the time

More Instana Dynamic APM Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Coralogix

May 2025

Download Coralogix product report

Buyer's Guide

Instana Dynamic APM

May 2025

Download Instana Dynamic APM product report

Overview

Coralogix is a stateful streaming data platform that provides real-time insights and long-term trend analysis with no reliance on storage or indexing, solving the monitoring challenges of data growth in large-scale systems.

Ingest log, metric, and security data from any source for a single, centralized platform to monitor and alert on your applications. As data is ingested, Coralogix instantly narrows millions of events down to common patterns for deeper insights and faster troubleshooting. Proactive data storage optimization enables up to 70% savings on monitoring costs with better performance.

Coralogix

Instana’s Enterprise Observability Platform, powered by automated Application Performance Monitoring, discovers and maps all services, infrastructure, and their inter-dependencies automatically. Instana ingests all observability metrics, traces each request, profiles every process, and updates application dependency maps in real-time to deliver the context and actionable feedback needed by Dev+Ops to optimize application performance, enable innovation, and mitigate risk to help them add value and efficiency to the pipeline. Learn more at https://instana.com.

Instana

Sample Customers

Payoneer, AGS, Monday.com, Capgemini

Daxko Lifts Fitness Studios Through COVID Regulations with Quick Engineering PivotsAltissia Meets SLAs to Support Student DeadlinesImmocloud Unlocks Observability to Modernize Real EstateEnento Group Boosts Service Reliability with Real-Time Visibility into Application Performance Instana’s Observability for Amazon EKS Helps Yara Deliver Digital Farming Solutions

Buyer's Guide

Coralogix vs. Instana Dynamic APM

April 2025

Free Report: Coralogix vs. Instana Dynamic APM

Find out what your peers are saying about Coralogix vs. Instana Dynamic APM and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

851,604 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Coralogix vs. Instana Dynamic APM report.

See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.

We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.