CrowdStrike Falcon vs Panda Adaptive Defense 360 comparison

CrowdStrike and WatchGuard are both solutions in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category. CrowdStrike is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.7, while WatchGuard is ranked #29 with an average rating of 8.9. CrowdStrike holds a 11.1% mindshare in EPP, compared to WatchGuard’s 1.6% mindshare. Additionally, 96% of CrowdStrike users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 95% of WatchGuard users who would recommend it.

CrowdStrike Falcon

Read 126 CrowdStrike Falcon reviews

26,648 Views
19,592 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

Panda Adaptive Defense 360

Read 28 Panda Adaptive Defense 360 reviews

3,252 Views
2,721 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

CrowdStrike Falcon

Panda Adaptive Defense 360

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 9, 2025

Panda Adaptive Defense 360 and CrowdStrike Falcon compete in the endpoint protection solutions category. CrowdStrike Falcon appears to have the upper hand due to its extensive threat intelligence capabilities and advanced security features, despite its higher cost.

Features: Panda Adaptive Defense 360 is valued for its automatic and continuous monitoring capabilities. Users highlight its proactive threat detection and ease of integrating additional security modules. CrowdStrike Falcon stands out with its comprehensive threat intelligence, real-time monitoring, and seamless cloud-based management. Users of CrowdStrike Falcon highly appreciate the detailed reporting and quick threat resolution.

Room for Improvement: Panda Adaptive Defense 360 users suggest improvements in reporting features, enhanced support for macOS environments, and more advanced configuration options. CrowdStrike Falcon users indicate a need for advanced configuration options, better offline protection measures, and faster support response times.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service:Panda Adaptive Defense 360 offers a straightforward deployment process with dedicated customer support. CrowdStrike Falcon provides an easy deployment experience, but some users mention that the support response time could be improved. Both products have strong customer service, although CrowdStrike’s support could be more swift.

Pricing and ROI:Panda Adaptive Defense 360 is seen as cost-effective with a reasonable ROI due to its comprehensive protection at a lower price point. CrowdStrike Falcon, despite being expensive, is deemed worth the investment because of its advanced feature set and higher-end security capabilities that justify its price for many users.

To learn more, read our detailed CrowdStrike Falcon vs. Panda Adaptive Defense 360 Report (Updated: February 2025).

Buyer's Guide

CrowdStrike Falcon vs. Panda Adaptive Defense 360

February 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 845,406 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

CrowdStrike Falcon

Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

2nd

Ranking in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

1st

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

126

Ranking in other categories

Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) (6th), Identity Management (IM) (6th), Threat Intelligence Platforms (2nd), Active Directory Management (2nd), Extended Detection and Response (XDR) (1st), Attack Surface Management (ASM) (1st), Ransomware Protection (1st), Identity Threat Detection and Response (ITDR) (3rd), AI-Powered Cybersecurity Platforms (1st), Continuous Threat Exposure Management (CTEM) (1st)

Panda Adaptive Defense 360

Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

29th

Ranking in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

23rd

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category, the mindshare of CrowdStrike Falcon is 11.1%, up from 9.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Panda Adaptive Defense 360 is 1.6%, up from 1.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

Featured Reviews

Chintan-Vyas

Associate Director at KPMG

Easy to set up with good behavior-based analysis but needs a single-click recovery option

Most organizations are currently looking for a scheduled scan to meet their compliance needs. Other players like Symantec and Trend Micro, FireEye, et cetera, are still providing the signature-based regular scheduled scans also, which is not available in CrowdStrike. That is one parameter that we feel should be there in CrowdStrike. CrowdStrike is only working on the dynamic or the files under execution. CrowdStrike is not scanning the static files. The product could be more accurate in terms of performance. We'd like to have a single-click recovery option. With some machines getting corrupted by malware, we need an easy way to start with a blank slate if things happen. That one feature should be there in the EDR.

Read full review

PaolaLamura

SOC & Incident Manager at Retelit

While being easy to manage and create reports, the tool also offers a good UI

I rate the ease of use and management of Panda Adaptive Defense 360 an eight on a scale of one to ten. The tool's ability to provide information about the vulnerability is the most impactful feature of the product that has an impact on our company's security posture. Speaking about scenarios where the solution effectively prevented the security breach, I would say that our company sees how the tool blocks when our customers accidentally click on some malware, after which it quarantines that file. My company makes a playbook with the SOAR tool that Panda Adaptive Defense 360 uses to block and isolate attacks. In our company's system, if there is a big event that occurs, then to block the endpoint, we use SOAR with Panda Adaptive Defense 360 to block and isolate attacks or threats. The solution's real-time monitoring has improved our company's ability to detect threats if we use it in our company with Panda SIEMFeeder. Only if in my company there is a need to do some research, prepare a report, or if we want to change the policy, so it is not very often that we use the visualization part of the tool in our company. The reporting and analytics part of the tool has helped with the decision-making in our company since we combine different kinds of logs and situations from different ingestion logs, and we can configure a specific alert. In my company, we use the tool's data search functionality if required to check the information we need. Presently, our company uses the configuration alert and SIEMFeeder in our system. I rate the tool a nine out of ten.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The detection is very effective."

"Because it is security product and acts like an AIML smart product, not merely based on daily/weekly updates and signatures."

"The key aspect of CrowdStrike Falcon is its behavioral detection approach."

"We are now able to find the root cause analysis on any threat. We can figure out where the issue came in versus just dealing with where it is at the moment."

"I like the Overwatch feature the most."

"The ability to execute real-time response, or, that you can connect to the agent and see exactly what processes are operating, is the most important feature of this solution."

"This solution consistently releases improvements. They have communicated their next two years of development which is powerful and covers all of our needs."

"The anomaly detection is the most valuable feature."

More CrowdStrike Falcon pros

"The most valuable feature of Panda Security Adaptive Defense is we don't have to have dedicated infrastructure on-premise because it is cloud-based."

"The most valuable feature is the web filter application control."

"Great technical support staff."

"Panda Security solution has a feature to block any unknown process and that is what is best about it."

"The protection from malware is the most important feature. It has some endpoint information about the vehicle of the virus, malware, etc. It is also stable and easy to install, and they also provide good technical support."

"The product so far has been good at protecting us. We haven't faced a breach."

"The most valuable features of Panda Security Adaptive Defense are the useful hardware information it provides, light on resources, controllable from the console, remote scan functionality, and the blocking of a lot of URL malware."

"The patch management module is very important."

More Panda Adaptive Defense 360 pros

Cons

"The Integration with tools, SOC tools, could be better."

"Some of Falcon's features are a bit pricey."

"The performance could be better."

"The UI is not efficient."

"CrowdStrike Falcon sometimes wrongly flags things as malicious. Let's say a user is active on Chrome only. Sometimes, our cross-segmenting will fetch from the backend data and show that it is malicious because of memory or CPU utilization."

"The biggest issue with Falcon as a standalone product is it doesn't have very much reporting."

"I've found that CrowdStrike's technical support could benefit from increased technical expertise."

"The skillsets needed to run CrowdStrike Falcon are extensive if you want to get the most value out of the tool."

More CrowdStrike Falcon cons

"For some urgent updates, I don't like the need for the tool to be frequently restarted."

"Needs a better way to scan the hardware to detect whether it's valid."

"Panda Security Adaptive Defense is stable. However, when updates are being done on the computers we can experience some troubles because the computers need to be restarted. When we start the computers they are not functioning correctly and we have not received proper feedback regarding this random issue."

"The Linux installation is performed on the command line and they need a package installer for that operating system."

"The implementation was difficult."

"Panda Adaptive Defense 360 is not compatible with certain network devices like access points, switches, or routers, which would be an area for improvement."

"Their MacOS support isn't that good."

"The only part I really don't use as much is their firewall. It's a bit superfluous. Most people have their own firewall in place, so they don't really need that part portion of the solution."

More Panda Adaptive Defense 360 cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"CrowdStrike Falcon is one of the more expensive endpoint solutions on the market."

"CrowdStrike Falcon's price is good."

"This solution offers annual subscriptions. The pricing for this solution could be reduced."

"The pricing is not bad. It's on the higher end of the market, but you get what you pay for."

"Our licensing fees were between $50,000 and $60,000 per year, which was pretty expensive for a small business."

"The tool is a little bit expensive compared to other products, but I think it's okay owing to its quality."

"There is no license required to use this solution."

"The licensing model is straightforward. We choose the features we want and we then can download the package we want."

More CrowdStrike Falcon pricing and cost advice

"The solution is priced well for what features it provides."

"I don't think Panda's license is too expensive, but they're charging more than it's worth. It's a yearly license. For 1,000 endpoints, it's around $18,000."

"The price of this solution depends on the number of licenses that you are purchasing."

"Customers need to pay monthly licensing costs for Panda Security Adaptive Defense, which is not expensive."

"There is a license needed to use this solution and it is approximately $30 annually."

"Our licensing fee is 1M Euro per month, so it is about 80 Euro's per user."

"Panda is cloud-only and comes at a reasonable cost. It is a set price per seat."

"The licensing costs are not too high. We pay about 20 Euros a year. It's a reasonable amount to pay."

More Panda Adaptive Defense 360 pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

845,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Computer Software Company

17%

Comms Service Provider

13%

Hospitality Company

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

Comparing CrowdStrike Falcon to Cortex XDR (Palo Alto)

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. CrowdStrike Falcon Both Cortex XDR and Crowd Strike Falcon offer cloud-based solutions that are very scalable, secure, and user-friendly. Cortex XDR by Palo Alto offers ...

See all answers

How does Crowdstrike Falcon compare with Darktrace?

Both of these products perform similarly and have many outstanding attributes. CrowdStrike Falcon offers an amazing user interface that makes setup easy and seamless. CrowdStrike Falcon offers a cl...

See all answers

How does Microsoft Defender for Endpoint compare with Crowdstrike Falcon?

The CrowdStrike solution delivers a lot of information about incidents. It has a very light sensor that will never push your machine hardware to "test", you don't have the usual "scan now" feature ...

See all answers

What do you like most about Panda Security Adaptive Defense?

The most valuable features of the solution stem from the fact that I like the tool's UI, ease of management, ease of making reports, and the ability to export information easily.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Panda Security Adaptive Defense?

Although it is not a cheap solution, it is satisfying and functional. It is worth the money and provides good return on investment.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Panda Security Adaptive Defense?

The software has performance issues due to its requirements on the processor, however, these issues are common with other vendors, not just WatchGuard.

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs CrowdStrike Falcon

Compared 6% of the time

Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response vs CrowdStrike Falcon

Compared 5% of the time

Microsoft Defender XDR vs CrowdStrike Falcon

Compared 4% of the time

Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business vs CrowdStrike Falcon

Compared 3% of the time

Symantec Endpoint Security vs CrowdStrike Falcon

Compared 3% of the time

More CrowdStrike Falcon Competitors

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Panda Adaptive Defense 360

Compared 26% of the time

WatchGuard EPDR vs Panda Adaptive Defense 360

Compared 9% of the time

ESET Endpoint Protection Platform vs Panda Adaptive Defense 360

Compared 9% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs Panda Adaptive Defense 360

Compared 7% of the time

Bitdefender GravityZone EDR vs Panda Adaptive Defense 360

Compared 7% of the time

More Panda Adaptive Defense 360 Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

CrowdStrike Falcon

March 2025

Download CrowdStrike Falcon product report

Buyer's Guide

Panda Adaptive Defense 360

March 2025

Download Panda Adaptive Defense 360 product report

Also Known As

CrowdStrike Falcon, CrowdStrike Falcon XDR, CrowdStrike Falcon Threat Intelligence, CrowdStrike Identity Protection, CrowdStrike Falcon Surface

Panda Security Endpoint Protection, Panda Security for Desktops

Overview

CrowdStrike Falcon provides endpoint protection and threat intelligence using a cloud-based platform for real-time detection and response. Its minimal impact on system performance and ease of deployment are key benefits along with advanced logging and reporting for compliance and forensic analysis.

CrowdStrike Falcon is known for its efficacy in identifying malware, ransomware, and sophisticated cyber threats. The platform's cloud-native architecture and advanced AI capabilities ensure comprehensive endpoint visibility and rapid response times. Users appreciate the lightweight agent and seamless deployment process, along with detailed reporting features. Integration with security tools and efficient customer support are essential features, although some users highlight high pricing, occasional detection delays, and challenges with integration. Frequent alerts and the mobile app's performance are areas for improvement.

What are the key features of CrowdStrike Falcon?

Real-time Threat Detection: Provides immediate threat identification and response.
Lightweight Agent: Minimal impact on system performance.
Cloud-native Architecture: Ensures flexibility and scalability.
Advanced AI Capabilities: Enhances threat detection and prevention.
Comprehensive Endpoint Visibility: Complete insight into endpoint activities.
Detailed Reporting: Facilitates compliance and forensic analysis.
Security Tool Integration: Seamless integration with other tools.
Efficient Customer Support: Robust support services.

What are the benefits or ROI of CrowdStrike Falcon?

Improved Threat Detection: Identifies sophisticated threats, reducing risk.
Enhanced System Performance: Lightweight agent ensures minimal disruption.
Faster Response Times: Swift reaction to incidents minimizes damage.
Better Compliance: Detailed logs meet regulatory requirements.
Streamlined Deployment: Easy to implement with minimal downtime.

In industries like finance, healthcare, and retail, CrowdStrike Falcon is often used for critical security due to its robust threat detection capabilities. Financial firms value its rapid response and detailed reporting for compliance, while healthcare providers appreciate the minimal system performance impact. Retailers benefit from its comprehensive endpoint visibility and integration with other security tools.

CrowdStrike

Advanced Security to Stop Breaches
Unified Endpoint Protection (EPP) and Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) capabilities, with our unique Zero-Trust Application Service and Threat Hunting Service in one single solution, to effectively detect and classify 100% of processes running on all the endpoints within your organization.

Cloud-delivered endpoint prevention, detection, containment and response technologies against advanced threat, zero-day malware, ransomware, phishing, in-memory exploits and malware-less attacks. It also provides IDS, firewall, device control, email protection, URL & content filtering capabilities.

WatchGuard

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Indra, Valea AB, Fineit, Aemcom, Data Solutions INC., Gloucestershire NHS, Golden Star Resources Ltd, Hispania Racing Team, Instituto Dos Museus e da ConserÊo, Escuelas Pias Provincia Emaus, Axiom Housing Association, Municipality of Bjuv, Lesedi Nuclear, Mullsj_ municipality, Eng. skolan Norr AB, Dalakraft AB, Peter Green Haulage Ltd

Buyer's Guide

CrowdStrike Falcon vs. Panda Adaptive Defense 360

February 2025

Free Report: CrowdStrike Falcon vs. Panda Adaptive Defense 360

Find out what your peers are saying about CrowdStrike Falcon vs. Panda Adaptive Defense 360 and other solutions. Updated: February 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

845,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our CrowdStrike Falcon vs. Panda Adaptive Defense 360 report.

See our list of best Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) vendors and best Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vendors.

We monitor all Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.