Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
WatchGuard EPDR Logo

Top 10 WatchGuard EPDR Alternatives

Vendor: WatchGuard
4.2 out of 5
Leave a review

Top WatchGuard EPDR Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to WatchGuard EPDR based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include CrowdStrike Falcon, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, and Fortinet FortiEDR. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.

WatchGuard EPDR surpasses its competitors by offering integrated endpoint protection with advanced threat hunting capabilities, automatic detection, and response, ensuring robust security across devices while simplifying management with real-time visibility and streamlined operations for comprehensive cybersecurity.

WatchGuard Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with WatchGuard, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
WatchGuard EPDR Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon
4.3 out of 5
WatchGuard EPDR Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon
4.3 out of 5
CrowdStrike Falcon excels in EDR features, providing unmatched threat intelligence and real-time response capabilities. In comparison, WatchGuard EPDR offers strong patch management and application control, ideal for comprehensive malware defense. CrowdStrike is suited for advanced detection, while WatchGuard appeals to value-driven security investments.
Download CrowdStrike Falcon vs. WatchGuard EPDR Report
CrowdStrike Falcon offers flexible setup costs, appealing to businesses seeking versatile pricing options, whereas WatchGuard EPDR presents a more structured, straightforward cost model, highlighting stability in budgeting for users.
View comparison
Pricing
CrowdStrike Falcon offers flexible setup costs, appealing to businesses seeking versatile pricing options, whereas WatchGuard EPDR presents a more structured, straightforward cost model, highlighting stability in budgeting for users.
WatchGuard EPDR Logo
WatchGuard EPDR Logo
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
4.1 out of 5
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint excels in support, deployment, and pricing, integrating seamlessly with other Microsoft services and offering cost-effectiveness for existing Microsoft users. In comparison, WatchGuard EPDR stands out for advanced threat hunting and security customization, ideal for those needing in-depth analysis and robust feature sets.
Download Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs. WatchGuard EPDR Report
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint has a lower initial setup cost, whereas WatchGuard EPDR involves a higher upfront investment.
Watch a demo
View comparison
Pricing
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint has a lower initial setup cost, whereas WatchGuard EPDR involves a higher upfront investment.
WatchGuard EPDR Logo
Fortinet FortiEDR
4.0 out of 5
WatchGuard EPDR Logo
Fortinet FortiEDR
4.0 out of 5
Fortinet FortiEDR excels in threat detection and automated response, offering extensive security features. In comparison, WatchGuard EPDR is highly regarded for its seamless integration and easier management. Fortinet FortiEDR provides superior threat analysis, while WatchGuard EPDR is more user-friendly with quicker deployment.
Download Fortinet FortiEDR vs. WatchGuard EPDR Report
Fortinet FortiEDR setup cost is described as moderate and straightforward, while WatchGuard EPDR entails higher initial investment and complexity.
View comparison
Pricing
Fortinet FortiEDR setup cost is described as moderate and straightforward, while WatchGuard EPDR entails higher initial investment and complexity.
WatchGuard EPDR Logo
WatchGuard EPDR Logo
SentinelOne Singularity Complete
4.4 out of 5
SentinelOne Singularity Complete offers robust AI-driven threat detection, while in comparison, WatchGuard EPDR excels in integration and cloud-based capabilities. SentinelOne is noted for its advanced machine learning, whereas WatchGuard stands out for centralized security management and seamless tool integration. SentinelOne's customer service is highly responsive, but WatchGuard's pricing is seen as reasonable.
Download SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs. WatchGuard EPDR Report
SentinelOne Singularity Complete has a higher setup cost, while WatchGuard EPDR offers a more affordable initial setup. SentinelOne provides advanced threat detection, whereas WatchGuard balances cost-effectiveness with robust security features.
View comparison
Pricing
SentinelOne Singularity Complete has a higher setup cost, while WatchGuard EPDR offers a more affordable initial setup. SentinelOne provides advanced threat detection, whereas WatchGuard balances cost-effectiveness with robust security features.
WatchGuard EPDR Logo
HP Wolf Security
3.9 out of 5
WatchGuard EPDR Logo
HP Wolf Security
3.9 out of 5
HP Wolf Security is recognized for strong threat containment and simple management. In comparison, WatchGuard EPDR offers advanced threat detection and real-time response. HP Wolf Security could enhance reporting and analytics, while WatchGuard EPDR needs better integration. HP Wolf Security ensures straightforward deployment, WatchGuard EPDR balances costs with extensive features.
Download HP Wolf Security vs. WatchGuard EPDR Report
The setup cost for HP Wolf Security is higher compared to WatchGuard EPDR, which offers a more budget-friendly initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
The setup cost for HP Wolf Security is higher compared to WatchGuard EPDR, which offers a more budget-friendly initial investment.
WatchGuard EPDR Logo
WatchGuard EPDR Logo
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks
4.2 out of 5
Cortex XDR integrates seamlessly with other Palo Alto Networks products and offers precise threat detection, making it ideal for environments utilizing these solutions. In comparison, WatchGuard EPDR enables centralized management and delivers strong endpoint protection, suitable for organizations seeking streamlined deployment and comprehensive security measures.
Download Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks vs. WatchGuard EPDR Report
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks has a higher setup cost, while WatchGuard EPDR offers a more affordable setup. The significant difference lies in their initial investment required for implementation.
View comparison
Pricing
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks has a higher setup cost, while WatchGuard EPDR offers a more affordable setup. The significant difference lies in their initial investment required for implementation.
WatchGuard EPDR Logo
WatchGuard EPDR Logo
Microsoft Defender XDR
4.2 out of 5
Microsoft Defender XDR offers seamless integration within Microsoft products, providing strong protection and real-time response. In comparison, WatchGuard EPDR excels with advanced threat detection and robust endpoint protection. Tech buyers may favor Microsoft's ease of deployment or WatchGuard's superior security features.
Download Microsoft Defender XDR vs. WatchGuard EPDR Report
Microsoft Defender XDR setup cost is relatively higher, making it less accessible for small businesses, whereas WatchGuard EPDR is more affordable and easier to implement.
View comparison
Pricing
Microsoft Defender XDR setup cost is relatively higher, making it less accessible for small businesses, whereas WatchGuard EPDR is more affordable and easier to implement.
WatchGuard EPDR Logo
WatchGuard EPDR Logo
Huntress Managed EDR
4.7 out of 5
Huntress Managed EDR is ideal for SMBs with its simplicity, cost-effectiveness, and 24/7 monitoring. In comparison, WatchGuard EPDR is suitable for those needing comprehensive management with features like patch management and integration with network systems, offering real-time insights and various licensing options.
Download Huntress Managed EDR vs. WatchGuard EPDR Report
Huntress Managed EDR requires an initial setup fee, while WatchGuard EPDR offers a setup cost advantage at no charge.
View comparison
Pricing
Huntress Managed EDR requires an initial setup fee, while WatchGuard EPDR offers a setup cost advantage at no charge.
WatchGuard EPDR Logo
Tanium
3.9 out of 5
WatchGuard EPDR Logo
Tanium
3.9 out of 5
Tanium offers comprehensive endpoint visibility and control, appealing to large networks needing extensive scalability. In comparison, WatchGuard EPDR emphasizes integrated protection and detection, appealing to buyers prioritizing seamless deployment and cost efficiency with advanced threat response capabilities.
Download Tanium vs. WatchGuard EPDR Report
Tanium has a higher setup cost compared to WatchGuard EPDR, making it a more premium choice. In contrast, WatchGuard EPDR offers a more cost-effective setup, appealing to budget-conscious users.
View comparison
Pricing
Tanium has a higher setup cost compared to WatchGuard EPDR, making it a more premium choice. In contrast, WatchGuard EPDR offers a more cost-effective setup, appealing to budget-conscious users.
WatchGuard EPDR Logo
WatchGuard EPDR Logo
Fortinet FortiClient
4.0 out of 5
Fortinet FortiClient is known for strong endpoint protection, VPN support, and easy deployment. In comparison, WatchGuard EPDR excels in advanced threat detection and automated response. Fortinet FortiClient is cost-effective with quick ROI, while WatchGuard EPDR justifies a higher cost with enhanced features and security.
Download Fortinet FortiClient vs. WatchGuard EPDR Report
Fortinet FortiClient has an affordable setup cost, whereas WatchGuard EPDR tends to be more expensive with higher initial expenses. Fortinet FortiClient offers economical start-up pricing, while WatchGuard EPDR includes significant primary fees.
View comparison
Pricing
Fortinet FortiClient has an affordable setup cost, whereas WatchGuard EPDR tends to be more expensive with higher initial expenses. Fortinet FortiClient offers economical start-up pricing, while WatchGuard EPDR includes significant primary fees.
WatchGuard EPDR Logo
WatchGuard EPDR Logo
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform
3.9 out of 5
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform offers robust central management, integration, and encryption, appealing to organizations needing comprehensive security. In comparison, WatchGuard EPDR excels in patch management and malware detection, ideal for businesses seeking advanced control and protection across Windows and Linux systems.
Download Trellix Endpoint Security Platform vs. WatchGuard EPDR Report
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform requires a higher initial setup cost, whereas WatchGuard EPDR offers a more budget-friendly setup.
View comparison
Pricing
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform requires a higher initial setup cost, whereas WatchGuard EPDR offers a more budget-friendly setup.
WatchGuard EPDR Logo
Trend Vision One
4.3 out of 5
WatchGuard EPDR Logo
Trend Vision One
4.3 out of 5

Trend Vision One offers centralized visibility and comprehensive security management, integrating endpoint, email, and network capabilities. It emphasizes threat detection, real-time monitoring, and quick attack tracing, providing robust security enhancements for users.

Download Trend Vision One vs. WatchGuard EPDR Report
It would be nice if it was a little bit cheaper, but I think it has a fair price. It is comparable to others in the market.
The price is reasonable. It's not exorbitant. CrowdStrike and other players are on the higher side.
Watch a demo
View comparison
Pricing
It would be nice if it was a little bit cheaper, but I think it has a fair price. It is comparable to others in the market.
The price is reasonable. It's not exorbitant. CrowdStrike and other players are on the higher side.
WatchGuard EPDR Logo
WatchGuard EPDR Logo
Symantec Endpoint Security
3.8 out of 5
Symantec Endpoint Security is valued for comprehensive threat protection and robust customization, with suggestions for improved resource consumption. In comparison, WatchGuard EPDR excels with integrated endpoint detection and response but has room for better documentation. Symantec offers good value, while WatchGuard's advanced features justify its cost.
Download Symantec Endpoint Security vs. WatchGuard EPDR Report
Symantec Endpoint Security has a lower setup cost, while WatchGuard EPDR's setup cost is higher. Symantec Endpoint Security focuses on affordability, contrasted by WatchGuard EPDR's premium setup expense.
View comparison
Pricing
Symantec Endpoint Security has a lower setup cost, while WatchGuard EPDR's setup cost is higher. Symantec Endpoint Security focuses on affordability, contrasted by WatchGuard EPDR's premium setup expense.
WatchGuard EPDR Logo
WatchGuard EPDR Logo
Check Point Harmony Endpoint
4.4 out of 5
Check Point Harmony Endpoint offers comprehensive security with features like Zero-Day Protection and Anti-Ransomware, excelling in integration. In comparison, WatchGuard EPDR provides advanced detection and application control, appealing for its ease of deployment and reasonable pricing.
Download Check Point Harmony Endpoint vs. WatchGuard EPDR Report
Check Point Harmony Endpoint offers a straightforward setup with competitive costs, while WatchGuard EPDR involves a more complex process potentially leading to higher expenses. The contrast is clear in terms of initial pricing structures and setup complexity.
View comparison
Pricing
Check Point Harmony Endpoint offers a straightforward setup with competitive costs, while WatchGuard EPDR involves a more complex process potentially leading to higher expenses. The contrast is clear in terms of initial pricing structures and setup complexity.
WatchGuard EPDR Logo
WatchGuard EPDR Logo
Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business
4.0 out of 5
Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business is recognized for its comprehensive threat management and cost-effectiveness. In comparison, WatchGuard EPDR excels with AI-driven threat detection and advanced features, leading tech buyers to consider it a worthwhile investment despite its higher cost.
Download Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business vs. WatchGuard EPDR Report
Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business has a low setup cost, while WatchGuard EPDR is noted for its higher setup expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business has a low setup cost, while WatchGuard EPDR is noted for its higher setup expenses.
WatchGuard EPDR Logo
WatchGuard EPDR Logo
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform
4.1 out of 5
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform appeals with its affordability and robust support, ideal for enterprise environments needing quick deployment and ease of use. In comparison, WatchGuard EPDR excels with superior advanced features and granular control, fitting enterprises prioritizing long-term ROI over initial cost.
Download ESET Endpoint Protection Platform vs. WatchGuard EPDR Report
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform has lower setup costs, while WatchGuard EPDR offers more affordable long-term pricing.
View comparison
Pricing
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform has lower setup costs, while WatchGuard EPDR offers more affordable long-term pricing.
WatchGuard EPDR Logo
WatchGuard EPDR Logo
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security
4.1 out of 5
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security impresses tech buyers with its advanced threat detection, automated responses, and competitive pricing. In comparison, WatchGuard EPDR excels in superior threat hunting, seamless integration, and efficient customer service, making it worth the higher cost for enhanced capabilities.
Download Trend Vision One Endpoint Security vs. WatchGuard EPDR Report
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security has a setup cost reviewed as affordable and straightforward, while WatchGuard EPDR is noted for a higher setup cost and complexity.
View comparison
Pricing
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security has a setup cost reviewed as affordable and straightforward, while WatchGuard EPDR is noted for a higher setup cost and complexity.
WatchGuard EPDR Logo
Cynet
4.4 out of 5
WatchGuard EPDR Logo
Cynet
4.4 out of 5
Cynet is favored for its competitive pricing and robust customer support. In comparison, WatchGuard EPDR is chosen for its advanced features that justify a higher price. Cynet excels in ease of deployment, while WatchGuard EPDR offers extensive documentation to aid in setup.
Download Cynet vs. WatchGuard EPDR Report
Cynet features a one-time setup fee that users find moderately high while WatchGuard EPDR offers a lower setup cost with straightforward deployment, making it a more budget-friendly option for initial implementation.
View comparison
Pricing
Cynet features a one-time setup fee that users find moderately high while WatchGuard EPDR offers a lower setup cost with straightforward deployment, making it a more budget-friendly option for initial implementation.
WatchGuard EPDR Logo
WatchGuard EPDR Logo
Intercept X Endpoint
4.2 out of 5

Intercept X Endpoint is noted for its advanced threat detection and intuitive management, making deployment straightforward. In comparison, WatchGuard EPDR excels with strong behavioral analysis and automated responses. Intercept X Endpoint offers cost-effective protection, while WatchGuard EPDR's extensive features justify its higher cost.

Download Intercept X Endpoint vs. WatchGuard EPDR Report
Setup costs for Intercept X Endpoint are perceived as higher, while WatchGuard EPDR is noted for having lower initial setup expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
Setup costs for Intercept X Endpoint are perceived as higher, while WatchGuard EPDR is noted for having lower initial setup expenses.
WatchGuard EPDR Logo
WatchGuard EPDR Logo
Bitdefender Total Security
4.4 out of 5
Bitdefender Total Security focuses on features like parental controls, VPN, and multi-layer ransomware protection. In comparison, WatchGuard EPDR excels with endpoint detection and response technology. Bitdefender appeals to families, while WatchGuard suits businesses needing advanced threat detection and response capabilities.
Download Bitdefender Total Security vs. WatchGuard EPDR Report
Bitdefender Total Security has minimal setup costs, while WatchGuard EPDR involves higher initial expenses, highlighting the primary difference in initial investment between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Bitdefender Total Security has minimal setup costs, while WatchGuard EPDR involves higher initial expenses, highlighting the primary difference in initial investment between the two solutions.
WatchGuard EPDR Logo
WatchGuard EPDR Logo
Microsoft Defender for Business
3.9 out of 5
Microsoft Defender for Business excels in integration with Microsoft products, providing cost benefits. In comparison, WatchGuard EPDR impresses with cloud-based management and endpoint protection. A tech buyer might choose Microsoft Defender for integration or WatchGuard for cloud solutions.
Download Microsoft Defender for Business vs. WatchGuard EPDR Report
Microsoft Defender for Business offers a straightforward setup without additional costs, while WatchGuard EPDR requires a more complex setup with potential extra expenses. The contrast lies in setup simplicity and associated costs between the two options.
View comparison
Pricing
Microsoft Defender for Business offers a straightforward setup without additional costs, while WatchGuard EPDR requires a more complex setup with potential extra expenses. The contrast lies in setup simplicity and associated costs between the two options.
WatchGuard EPDR Logo
WatchGuard EPDR Logo
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint
3.9 out of 5
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint offers comprehensive threat detection and real-time analytics, appealing to those needing robust security. In comparison, WatchGuard EPDR's integration of EPP and EDR capabilities and ease of use make it attractive for tech buyers seeking a seamless deployment and efficient user experience.
Download VMware Carbon Black Endpoint vs. WatchGuard EPDR Report
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint's setup cost is noted for its complexity, while WatchGuard EPDR is recognized for its straightforward installation process.
View comparison
Pricing
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint's setup cost is noted for its complexity, while WatchGuard EPDR is recognized for its straightforward installation process.
WatchGuard EPDR Logo
WatchGuard EPDR Logo
Bitdefender GravityZone EDR
4.2 out of 5
Bitdefender GravityZone EDR excels in system integration and ease of deployment. In comparison, WatchGuard EPDR offers advanced threat detection and comprehensive reporting tools. Bitdefender GravityZone EDR is noted for seamless integration, while WatchGuard EPDR's strength lies in sophisticated security features and thorough reporting.
Download Bitdefender GravityZone EDR vs. WatchGuard EPDR Report
Bitdefender GravityZone EDR has a straightforward initial setup process with low associated costs, while WatchGuard EPDR's setup incurs higher costs despite offering extensive configuration options.
View comparison
Pricing
Bitdefender GravityZone EDR has a straightforward initial setup process with low associated costs, while WatchGuard EPDR's setup incurs higher costs despite offering extensive configuration options.
WatchGuard EPDR Logo
WatchGuard EPDR Logo
Cisco Secure Endpoint
4.3 out of 5
Cisco Secure Endpoint offers comprehensive threat detection and cost-effective APT protection. In comparison, WatchGuard EPDR provides advanced automated detection and response. Cisco excels in customer service, while WatchGuard's higher cost justifies its advanced features. Cisco suits budget-conscious buyers, whereas WatchGuard appeals to those seeking feature-rich solutions.
Download Cisco Secure Endpoint vs. WatchGuard EPDR Report
Cisco Secure Endpoint is praised for its relatively low setup cost, while WatchGuard EPDR is noted for having a higher initial investment required.
View comparison
Pricing
Cisco Secure Endpoint is praised for its relatively low setup cost, while WatchGuard EPDR is noted for having a higher initial investment required.
WatchGuard EPDR Logo
WatchGuard EPDR Logo
Norton Small Business
4.3 out of 5
Norton Small Business excels in cost-effectiveness and ease of deployment. In comparison, WatchGuard EPDR provides advanced threat detection and automated response capabilities, making it ideal for businesses needing sophisticated protection. Norton offers simplicity for budget-conscious buyers, while WatchGuard requires more IT resources and offers enhanced security.
Download Norton Small Business vs. WatchGuard EPDR Report
Norton Small Business has no setup cost, making it cost-effective for startups, whereas WatchGuard EPDR requires an initial setup investment, which could be a consideration for budget-conscious businesses.
View comparison
Pricing
Norton Small Business has no setup cost, making it cost-effective for startups, whereas WatchGuard EPDR requires an initial setup investment, which could be a consideration for budget-conscious businesses.
WatchGuard EPDR Logo
Malwarebytes Teams
4.0 out of 5
WatchGuard EPDR Logo
Malwarebytes Teams
4.0 out of 5
Malwarebytes Teams offers intuitive usability and strong ransomware protection, ideal for smaller businesses needing straightforward security. In comparison, WatchGuard EPDR provides advanced reporting and automation, appealing to organizations requiring detailed system insights and control. Pricing varies based on features and deployment.
Download Malwarebytes Teams vs. WatchGuard EPDR Report
Malwarebytes Teams has a lower setup cost, while WatchGuard EPDR requires a higher setup investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Malwarebytes Teams has a lower setup cost, while WatchGuard EPDR requires a higher setup investment.
WatchGuard EPDR Logo
WatchGuard EPDR Logo
ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform
4.6 out of 5
ThreatLocker excels with zero-trust capabilities, robust application control, and proactive support, offering strong security advancements. In comparison, WatchGuard EPDR shines with ease of use in antivirus and malware detection, appealing to those seeking superior patch management and automation integration.
Download ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform vs. WatchGuard EPDR Report
ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform incurs substantial upfront costs, whereas WatchGuard EPDR offers a more budget-friendly setup, highlighting a significant cost difference between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform incurs substantial upfront costs, whereas WatchGuard EPDR offers a more budget-friendly setup, highlighting a significant cost difference between the two solutions.
WatchGuard EPDR Logo
WatchGuard EPDR Logo
Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response
3.9 out of 5
Cybereason excels in automated detection, investigative capabilities, and alert management. In comparison, WatchGuard EPDR offers comprehensive threat intelligence and risk management tools but has average detection accuracy. Cybereason's flexible integrations and smooth deployment appeal to tech buyers, while WatchGuard EPDR's affordability might attract budget-conscious users.
Download Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response vs. WatchGuard EPDR Report
Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response is praised for its affordable setup cost, while WatchGuard EPDR users note higher initial expenses but commend its extensive feature set.
View comparison
Pricing
Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response is praised for its affordable setup cost, while WatchGuard EPDR users note higher initial expenses but commend its extensive feature set.
WatchGuard EPDR Logo
WatchGuard EPDR Logo
Datto Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)
3.8 out of 5
Datto EDR offers comprehensive threat detection and response, appealing to users prioritizing ease of deployment. In comparison, WatchGuard EPDR excels with advanced AI-driven analytics and threat hunting, making it ideal for those seeking superior features and long-term value despite a higher price.
Download Datto Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vs. WatchGuard EPDR Report
Datto Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) involves moderate setup costs, whereas WatchGuard EPDR is associated with higher initial expenses, highlighting a significant cost difference between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Datto Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) involves moderate setup costs, whereas WatchGuard EPDR is associated with higher initial expenses, highlighting a significant cost difference between the two solutions.
WatchGuard EPDR Logo
WatchGuard EPDR Logo
Trend Micro Worry-Free Services Suites
4.2 out of 5
Trend Micro Worry-Free Services Suites excels in comprehensive endpoint protection, cloud security integration, and ease of use. In comparison, WatchGuard EPDR is valued for advanced threat detection and automated responses. A tech buyer might choose Trend Micro for cost-effectiveness, while WatchGuard appeals with sophisticated security capabilities.
Download Trend Micro Worry-Free Services Suites vs. WatchGuard EPDR Report
Trend Micro Worry-Free Services Suites has a moderate setup cost attractive for SMBs, while WatchGuard EPDR incurs a higher setup cost that reflects its advanced security features.
View comparison
Pricing
Trend Micro Worry-Free Services Suites has a moderate setup cost attractive for SMBs, while WatchGuard EPDR incurs a higher setup cost that reflects its advanced security features.
WatchGuard EPDR Logo
NetWitness NDR
4.0 out of 5
WatchGuard EPDR Logo
NetWitness NDR
4.0 out of 5
NetWitness NDR excels in comprehensive monitoring and deep network traffic visibility. In comparison, WatchGuard EPDR offers integrated endpoint protection and extensive security across multiple devices. NetWitness NDR's setup cost is high but provides advanced features. WatchGuard EPDR's competitive pricing offers strong value and straightforward deployment.
Download NetWitness NDR vs. WatchGuard EPDR Report
The setup cost for NetWitness NDR is significantly higher, reflecting its enterprise-grade functionality, while WatchGuard EPDR offers a more affordable solution with user-friendly deployment.
View comparison
Pricing
The setup cost for NetWitness NDR is significantly higher, reflecting its enterprise-grade functionality, while WatchGuard EPDR offers a more affordable solution with user-friendly deployment.
WatchGuard EPDR Logo
WatchGuard EPDR Logo
BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity
4.0 out of 5
BlackBerry Cylance offers AI-driven protection and lightweight performance, appealing for zero-day threat mitigation. In comparison, WatchGuard EPDR provides strong patch management and remote control, attracting those needing efficient automation and comprehensive IT support with competitive pricing.
Download BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity vs. WatchGuard EPDR Report
BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity's setup cost is higher than WatchGuard EPDR's, making the latter more cost-effective from an initial investment perspective.
View comparison
Pricing
BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity's setup cost is higher than WatchGuard EPDR's, making the latter more cost-effective from an initial investment perspective.
WatchGuard EPDR Logo
WatchGuard EPDR Logo
Seqrite Endpoint Security
3.8 out of 5
Seqrite Endpoint Security offers competitive pricing, antivirus, malware protection, and application control, making it attractive for cost-conscious buyers. In comparison, WatchGuard EPDR features AI-driven threat detection and integration capabilities, appealing to those prioritizing advanced threat prevention and versatility despite higher costs.
Download Seqrite Endpoint Security vs. WatchGuard EPDR Report
Seqrite Endpoint Security has a lower initial setup cost, making it more budget-friendly, while WatchGuard EPDR offers more comprehensive features despite a higher setup cost.
View comparison
Pricing
Seqrite Endpoint Security has a lower initial setup cost, making it more budget-friendly, while WatchGuard EPDR offers more comprehensive features despite a higher setup cost.
WatchGuard EPDR Logo
WatchGuard EPDR Logo
GravityZone Business Security
4.3 out of 5
GravityZone Business Security excels in customer service and ease of deployment, making it ideal for quick setup and support needs. In comparison, WatchGuard EPDR offers comprehensive features and performance, providing strong ROI despite a higher setup cost. GravityZone’s reporting needs improvement, whereas WatchGuard EPDR’s complexity requires simplification.
Download GravityZone Business Security vs. WatchGuard EPDR Report
GravityZone Business Security offers a lower initial setup cost compared to WatchGuard EPDR, making it more cost-effective for businesses looking to minimize upfront expenses. On the other hand, WatchGuard EPDR includes comprehensive features that can justify its higher setup cost.
View comparison
Pricing
GravityZone Business Security offers a lower initial setup cost compared to WatchGuard EPDR, making it more cost-effective for businesses looking to minimize upfront expenses. On the other hand, WatchGuard EPDR includes comprehensive features that can justify its higher setup cost.
WatchGuard EPDR Logo
WatchGuard EPDR Logo
Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert
4.1 out of 5
Kaspersky's pricing and support appeal to budget-conscious buyers. In comparison, WatchGuard's advanced features and integration options justify higher costs for some. Kaspersky excels in intuitive tools and robust detection, while WatchGuard is praised for automation and comprehensive training programs.
Download Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert vs. WatchGuard EPDR Report
Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert has a higher initial setup cost, while WatchGuard EPDR is praised for its more affordable setup fees.
View comparison
Pricing
Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert has a higher initial setup cost, while WatchGuard EPDR is praised for its more affordable setup fees.
WatchGuard EPDR Logo
WatchGuard EPDR Logo
Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response
3.9 out of 5
Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response offers advanced threat hunting, automated response, and robust integration. In comparison, WatchGuard EPDR combines endpoint protection, detection, and response with zero-trust app execution. Kaspersky focuses on scalability, while WatchGuard EPDR emphasizes enhanced reporting and intuitive alert management.
Download Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response vs. WatchGuard EPDR Report
Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response requires significant setup time while WatchGuard EPDR is noted for a more streamlined and quicker initial configuration. Kaspersky offers comprehensive installation support, whereas WatchGuard emphasizes its user-friendly deployment process.
View comparison
Pricing
Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response requires significant setup time while WatchGuard EPDR is noted for a more streamlined and quicker initial configuration. Kaspersky offers comprehensive installation support, whereas WatchGuard emphasizes its user-friendly deployment process.
WatchGuard EPDR Logo
ESET Inspect
3.8 out of 5
WatchGuard EPDR Logo
ESET Inspect
3.8 out of 5
ESET Inspect excels in threat detection and reporting, appealing to those prioritizing analytics, while WatchGuard EPDR, with its intuitive management and integration capabilities, offers robust threat hunting. In comparison, WatchGuard EPDR garners preference for its support services and comprehensive feature set, justifying higher costs with better long-term value.
Download ESET Inspect vs. WatchGuard EPDR Report
ESET Inspect has a moderate setup cost, while WatchGuard EPDR is more expensive, reflecting its comprehensive feature set.
View comparison
Pricing
ESET Inspect has a moderate setup cost, while WatchGuard EPDR is more expensive, reflecting its comprehensive feature set.
WatchGuard EPDR Logo
ConnectWise SIEM
4.3 out of 5
WatchGuard EPDR Logo
ConnectWise SIEM
4.3 out of 5
ConnectWise SIEM is favored for its comprehensive data analytics and high customization. In comparison, WatchGuard EPDR stands out due to its advanced endpoint security features, which many users find worth the investment despite its higher cost.
Download ConnectWise SIEM vs. WatchGuard EPDR Report
ConnectWise SIEM's setup cost is higher, reflecting its advanced features, while WatchGuard EPDR offers a more budget-friendly setup cost, making it accessible for smaller organizations seeking robust endpoint and security management solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
ConnectWise SIEM's setup cost is higher, reflecting its advanced features, while WatchGuard EPDR offers a more budget-friendly setup cost, making it accessible for smaller organizations seeking robust endpoint and security management solutions.
WatchGuard EPDR Logo
ESET EDR/XDR
4.3 out of 5
WatchGuard EPDR Logo
ESET EDR/XDR
4.3 out of 5

ESET PROTECT Elite is an all-in-one prevention, detection & response combining enterprise-grade XDR with complete multilayered protection.

Download ESET EDR/XDR vs. WatchGuard EPDR Report
I rate the solution’s pricing a six or seven out of ten..
View comparison
Pricing
I rate the solution’s pricing a six or seven out of ten..
WatchGuard EPDR Logo
WatchGuard EPDR Logo
OpenText Core Endpoint Protection​
3.9 out of 5
OpenText Core Endpoint Protection is praised for its affordability, simplicity, and AI-powered security, appealing to those seeking cost-effective solutions. In comparison, WatchGuard EPDR offers comprehensive threat detection and integration features, ideal for enterprises prioritizing advanced security capabilities despite higher costs.
Download OpenText Core Endpoint Protection​ vs. WatchGuard EPDR Report
OpenText Core Endpoint Protection has a higher initial setup cost compared to WatchGuard EPDR, which offers a more budget-friendly installation.
View comparison
Pricing
OpenText Core Endpoint Protection has a higher initial setup cost compared to WatchGuard EPDR, which offers a more budget-friendly installation.
WatchGuard EPDR Logo
WatchGuard EPDR Logo
Kaspersky Total Security
4.1 out of 5
Kaspersky Total Security is praised for its comprehensive protection and ease of setup. In comparison, WatchGuard EPDR excels in advanced threat detection and response capabilities. Kaspersky's user-friendly suite contrasts WatchGuard's precise detection mechanisms, making each appealing to different business needs.
Download Kaspersky Total Security vs. WatchGuard EPDR Report
Kaspersky Total Security has a lower setup cost compared to WatchGuard EPDR, highlighting its affordability. While WatchGuard EPDR might be pricier to setup, it offers a different set of features that could justify the higher initial expense.
View comparison
Pricing
Kaspersky Total Security has a lower setup cost compared to WatchGuard EPDR, highlighting its affordability. While WatchGuard EPDR might be pricier to setup, it offers a different set of features that could justify the higher initial expense.
WatchGuard EPDR Logo
Sophos Endpoint
4.1 out of 5
WatchGuard EPDR Logo
Sophos Endpoint
4.1 out of 5
Sophos Endpoint offers seamless AI integration and centralized management. In comparison, WatchGuard EPDR provides effective patch management and detailed reporting. Sophos excels in ease of use, while WatchGuard impresses with affordability and ROI, appealing to buyers seeking competitive pricing and robust protection.
Download Sophos Endpoint vs. WatchGuard EPDR Report
Sophos Endpoint involves lower initial setup costs compared to WatchGuard EPDR, which translates to savings from the start. WatchGuard EPDR, however, provides a potentially better value with its comprehensive initial offerings.
View comparison
Pricing
Sophos Endpoint involves lower initial setup costs compared to WatchGuard EPDR, which translates to savings from the start. WatchGuard EPDR, however, provides a potentially better value with its comprehensive initial offerings.
WatchGuard EPDR Logo
WatchGuard EPDR Logo
Trend Micro Smart Protection
4.0 out of 5
Trend Micro Smart Protection excels in robust support and competitive pricing. In comparison, WatchGuard EPDR is known for its comprehensive feature set. Trend Micro Smart Protection benefits from straightforward deployment, while WatchGuard EPDR offers advanced threat hunting capabilities. Trend Micro Smart Protection presents favorable setup costs, whereas WatchGuard EPDR provides extensive features justifying higher costs.
Download Trend Micro Smart Protection vs. WatchGuard EPDR Report
Trend Micro Smart Protection setup cost is lower, while WatchGuard EPDR offers a higher initial investment with more comprehensive features included.
View comparison
Pricing
Trend Micro Smart Protection setup cost is lower, while WatchGuard EPDR offers a higher initial investment with more comprehensive features included.
WatchGuard EPDR Logo
WatchGuard EPDR Logo
SonicWall Capture Client
4.0 out of 5
SonicWall Capture Client is valued for ease of deployment and comprehensive protection capabilities. In comparison, WatchGuard EPDR excels in advanced threat detection and network security integration. SonicWall is cost-effective, while WatchGuard's feature set justifies its higher price despite its resource consumption.
Download SonicWall Capture Client vs. WatchGuard EPDR Report
SonicWall Capture Client has a lower setup cost, while WatchGuard EPDR requires a higher initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
SonicWall Capture Client has a lower setup cost, while WatchGuard EPDR requires a higher initial investment.
WatchGuard EPDR Logo
WatchGuard EPDR Logo
Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)
3.7 out of 5
Trellix EDR is favored for its advanced analytics and real-time threat detection, making it ideal for organizations needing detailed forensic capabilities. In comparison, WatchGuard EPDR is praised for its comprehensive security suite and cost-effectiveness, appealing to those seeking an all-in-one solution.
Download Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vs. WatchGuard EPDR Report
Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) requires a moderate setup cost and WatchGuard EPDR has a comparatively higher setup cost.
View comparison
Pricing
Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) requires a moderate setup cost and WatchGuard EPDR has a comparatively higher setup cost.
WatchGuard EPDR Logo
WatchGuard EPDR Logo
Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security
4.1 out of 5
Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security excels in cost-effectiveness, straightforward deployment, and responsive customer service. In comparison, WatchGuard EPDR stands out with its comprehensive feature set, superior threat intelligence, and perceived higher value despite a higher price point, appealing to tech buyers seeking advanced capabilities.
Download Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security vs. WatchGuard EPDR Report
Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security has a higher setup cost, while WatchGuard EPDR is more cost-effective in terms of initial setup. The pricing difference reflects their unique features and capabilities, which cater to different security requirements.
View comparison
Pricing
Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security has a higher setup cost, while WatchGuard EPDR is more cost-effective in terms of initial setup. The pricing difference reflects their unique features and capabilities, which cater to different security requirements.
WatchGuard EPDR Logo
Avast Business Hub
4.1 out of 5
WatchGuard EPDR Logo
Avast Business Hub
4.1 out of 5
Avast Business Hub's pricing, ease of use, and strong support appeal to smaller businesses. In comparison, WatchGuard EPDR's advanced features and thorough threat management cater to those needing comprehensive security. Some buyers prefer Avast's simpler deployment, while others value WatchGuard's extensive capabilities.
Download Avast Business Hub vs. WatchGuard EPDR Report
Avast Business Hub boasts a low setup cost, making it budget-friendly, while WatchGuard EPDR offers a higher initial expense but includes extensive features.
View comparison
Pricing
Avast Business Hub boasts a low setup cost, making it budget-friendly, while WatchGuard EPDR offers a higher initial expense but includes extensive features.
WatchGuard EPDR Logo
WatchGuard EPDR Logo
Ivanti Endpoint Security for Endpoint Manager
4.2 out of 5
Both Ivanti Endpoint Security for Endpoint Manager and WatchGuard EPDR offer robust solutions for endpoint security. Ivanti excels in device control and patch management, whereas WatchGuard's strengths lie in advanced threat hunting and seamless integration. In comparison, Ivanti's deployment is easy but demands support, while WatchGuard's intuitive deployment and superior customer service enhance usability.
Download Ivanti Endpoint Security for Endpoint Manager vs. WatchGuard EPDR Report
Ivanti Endpoint Security for Endpoint Manager offers a moderate initial setup cost, while WatchGuard EPDR features a notably lower setup expense, highlighting a cost-effective option in this comparison.
View comparison
Pricing
Ivanti Endpoint Security for Endpoint Manager offers a moderate initial setup cost, while WatchGuard EPDR features a notably lower setup expense, highlighting a cost-effective option in this comparison.
WatchGuard EPDR Logo
WatchGuard EPDR Logo
WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection
4.0 out of 5
WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection offers cost-effective solutions with features like real-time threat intelligence and automated response. In comparison, WatchGuard EPDR provides extensive protection and advanced threat hunting, justifying its higher price. WatchGuard EPDR's superior customer service and comprehensive benefits cater to more resource-intensive needs.
Download WatchGuard EPDR vs. WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection Report
WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection has a straightforward setup cost, while WatchGuard EPDR reports a higher initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection has a straightforward setup cost, while WatchGuard EPDR reports a higher initial investment.

Related categories

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)
Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)
Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)