BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity vs WatchGuard EPDR comparison

BlackBerry and WatchGuard are both solutions in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category. BlackBerry is ranked #26 with an average rating of 8.3, while WatchGuard is ranked #10 with an average rating of 8.8. BlackBerry holds a 1.2% mindshare in EPP, compared to WatchGuard’s 2.1% mindshare. Additionally, 85% of BlackBerry users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 96% of WatchGuard users who would recommend it.

BlackBerry Cylance Cybersec...

Read 44 BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity reviews

2,960 Views
2,664 Comparison Views

85% willing to recommend

WatchGuard EPDR

Read 37 WatchGuard EPDR reviews

5,078 Views
3,809 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

BlackBerry Cylance Cybersec...

WatchGuard EPDR

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 2, 2025

BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity and WatchGuard EPDR are prominent players in the cybersecurity space, specifically in endpoint protection solutions. BlackBerry Cylance seems to have the edge in advanced AI-driven threat detection, while WatchGuard EPDR excels in ease of use and flexible deployment options.

Features: BlackBerry Cylance offers AI and machine learning-based virus protection without reliance on signature-based methods, providing robust zero-day threat protection. It is lightweight with minimal system impact and includes a centralized dashboard for easy management. WatchGuard EPDR provides comprehensive endpoint protection with strong patch management, application control, and website control. Users appreciate its reliability and ease of use.

Room for Improvement: BlackBerry Cylance could improve its user interface and reporting features, address false positives, enhance integration options, and offer better training resources. Users seek improved technical support response times. WatchGuard EPDR could benefit from enhanced DNS security features, better management of false positives, and more comprehensive integration options, alongside improved visualization of data control features and remote monitoring enhancements.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: BlackBerry Cylance allows deployment in public cloud, on-premises, and hybrid environments but experiences with technical support vary. Users report mixed experiences with customer support responsiveness and expertise. WatchGuard EPDR emphasizes public cloud deployment, with customer service rated highly for effectiveness and technical support, especially through managed service providers.

Pricing and ROI: BlackBerry Cylance is seen as slightly expensive compared to competitors but offers solid ROI by reducing security breach incidents. Pricing is subscription-based, varying per endpoint. WatchGuard EPDR's pricing is considered competitive, with options for different packages and add-ons. It offers favorable ROI due to an improvement in security measures, reducing time dedicated to vulnerability management.

To learn more, read our detailed BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity vs. WatchGuard EPDR Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity vs. WatchGuard EPDR

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

BlackBerry Cylance Cybersec...

Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

26th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

4.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

WatchGuard EPDR

Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

10th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) (13th)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category, the mindshare of BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity is 1.2%, down from 1.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of WatchGuard EPDR is 2.1%, up from 1.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
WatchGuard EPDR	2.1%
BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity	1.2%
Other	96.7%

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

Featured Reviews

Sooraj Makkancherrry

Security Operations Manager at Philips

Doesn't have daily updates, which is important for healthcare IT

I face challenges with the exclusion policy - it still scans folders we told it not to, causing issues. When we contact support, they tell us to update the latest agent, but we can't do that immediately due to medical device protocols and validation testing. I wish support would try to understand our issues better instead of giving this standard response. The machine learning feature they use often tells us to upgrade the agent or add things to the exclusion list, which isn't unacceptable. It's a very good and new technology as a tool and antivirus. But sometimes, it doesn't work properly with our medical devices and products, quarantining files it shouldn't even after we add them to exclusions. This is tricky for us.

Read full review

Norlia Jalani

Section Head, Information Technology at a transportation company with 201-500 employees

Using cloud-based console for software inventory management and email alerts

I have no idea if I use some automation functions. I can't find any disadvantages; maybe that is because many companies haven't used it. I would prefer to see some features such as AI in antivirus solutions. I appreciate reporting, but it could be better with monthly reporting or auto-generated monthly reports.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It actively monitors the behavior and activity of processes and will, without hesitation, terminate at root anything it determines to be suspect."

"It handles situations that the other threat management tools wouldn't find. It has worked well covering the weaker sides of the other products that we're integrating."

"Centralized dashboard online which can be used for managing a huge product."

"Has good RAM capacity for the power I need"

"We are quite security-focused. Blackberry Protect as an endpoint solution for our service really delivers what we are expecting."

"The solution runs in the background, and I do not need to care about it."

"It is a good endpoint solution. It is very easy to manage and detect the threat immediately. It will take the necessary actions."

"The platform's most valuable features are the malware detection capabilities."

More BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity pros

"It is stable, and the performance is good."

"It is easy to manage."

"The most valuable features of the solution stem from the fact that I like the tool's UI, ease of management, ease of making reports, and the ability to export information easily."

"We have control over our devices, specifically USB ports, allowing us to block or control the traffic."

"It allows us to stop activation windows."

"The detection capabilities for malicious activities are effective."

"The product's most valuable features are the zero-trust application service and its capability to detect threats and attacks."

"I would give the overall solution a rating of ten out of ten."

More WatchGuard EPDR pros

Cons

"I face challenges with the exclusion policy - it still scans folders we told it not to, causing issues. When we contact support, they tell us to update the latest agent, but we can't do that immediately due to medical device protocols and validation testing. I wish support would try to understand our issues better instead of giving this standard response. The machine learning feature they use often tells us to upgrade the agent or add things to the exclusion list, which isn't unacceptable."

"It needs real analysis of quarantined files. The EDR product isn't showing much right now."

"The company that sells us the licenses sometimes doesn't know how to do certain things."

"While you are working, you are finding these things that were supposed to be waived have come back to being blocked. That's frustrating."

"The initial deployment was quite complicated."

"The product does not do a lot of reporting on what it is taking care of. Enhanced reporting would be a welcome improvement."

"It is hard to manage."

"The process of whitelisting a script that you want to be able to run can be a little bit difficult, or awkward."

More BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity cons

"WatchGuard EPDR does have areas for improvement. One significant gap is the lack of a virtual patching feature integrated into the endpoint security. This would be particularly useful for endpoints running operating systems that are no longer supported, such as Windows 7."

"They need to expand their offering of add-ons to enhance capabilities further."

"Improvements could be made in terms of how the reporting is structured."

"The categories in the web filtering should be more comprehensive."

"It needs some improvements in the DNS security feature. Currently, it does not have full DNS security. It only has semi-DNS security, which can be improved. It is an important feature for us, and it would be really good if they can improve the DNS security feature. Our group has some plans to change to Cisco AMP, which has features such as DNS, Umbrella. We are trying to learn about Cisco AMP and compare it with Panda."

"t would help if it would monitor the network better."

"They need to offer a clear dashboard so you can see everything everywhere all at once."

"Panda Adaptive Defense 360 is not compatible with certain network devices like access points, switches, or routers, which would be an area for improvement."

More WatchGuard EPDR cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Review closely how many endpoints you actually need before buying into a pricing level. Deal and deal with the VAR of your choice."

"The licensing part of the product is too expensive compared to other solutions in the market."

"The tool is not that expensive."

"My company is on a yearly CylancePROTECT subscription. Price-wise, the solution is slightly expensive, so I'd rate it as eight out of ten."

"Our licensing cost for the solution is around $4,000 for six months. There are no costs in addition to the standard licensing fees."

"We would just add more if there are new users, but right now you just need one license for per user."

"It is expensive, but not unreasonable."

"The product cost is about $5, per user, per month."

More BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity pricing and cost advice

"The price is excellent."

"The product is available at a high price."

"The licensing costs are not too high. We pay about 20 Euros a year. It's a reasonable amount to pay."

"Our licensing fee is 1M Euro per month, so it is about 80 Euro's per user."

"Customers need to pay monthly licensing costs for Panda Security Adaptive Defense, which is not expensive."

"I don't think Panda's license is too expensive, but they're charging more than it's worth. It's a yearly license. For 1,000 endpoints, it's around $18,000."

"The solution's pricing is better compared to other products."

"There is a license needed to use this solution and it is approximately $30 annually."

More WatchGuard EPDR pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

Government

Comms Service Provider

12%

Computer Software Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

Hospitality Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	33
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	13

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	26
Midsize Enterprise	8
Large Enterprise	2

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Blackberry Protect?

It is a good endpoint solution. It is very easy to manage and detect the threat immediately. It will take the necessary actions.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Blackberry Protect?

The price is reasonable for us at the moment. I rate the overall solution an eight out of ten.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Blackberry Protect?

See all answers

What do you like most about WatchGuard EPDR?

The product's most valuable features are the zero-trust application service and its capability to detect threats and attacks.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for WatchGuard EPDR?

The price of the solution is okay. It's all right.

See all answers

What needs improvement with WatchGuard EPDR?

I would not be able to say what areas of WatchGuard EPDR have improved, as I do not work with the product myself so much anymore. I just used to assist with installation and deployment, especially ...

See all answers

Comparisons

CrowdStrike Falcon vs BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity

Compared 9% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity

Compared 7% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity

Compared 6% of the time

VMware Carbon Black Endpoint vs BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity

Compared 6% of the time

Cisco Secure Endpoint vs BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity

Compared 6% of the time

More BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity Competitors

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs WatchGuard EPDR

Compared 11% of the time

ESET Endpoint Protection Platform vs WatchGuard EPDR

Compared 7% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs WatchGuard EPDR

Compared 6% of the time

Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business vs WatchGuard EPDR

Compared 4% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs WatchGuard EPDR

Compared 3% of the time

More WatchGuard EPDR Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity

January 2026

Download BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity product report

Buyer's Guide

WatchGuard EPDR

January 2026

Download WatchGuard EPDR product report

Also Known As

Blackberry Protect

Panda Adaptive Defense 360

Overview

BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity leverages AI and machine learning for efficient malware detection and zero-day threat protection, offering robust endpoint security with high detection accuracy and low false positive rates.

BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity delivers advanced threat protection with AI-driven algorithms and machine learning. Its lightweight design ensures low system resource usage, making it both efficient and effective. It's recognized for centralized management, easy deployment, and a clean interface, providing comprehensive endpoint protection against diverse threats. The integration of features like CylanceOPTICS and behavioral monitoring enhances security insights. While the system excels in malware detection, enhancements are needed in areas like user interface design, reporting, deeper threat analysis, and integration with third-party systems. Support and pricing improvements could also increase competitiveness.

What are the key features of BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity?

AI and Machine Learning: Utilizes cutting-edge technology for malware and threat detection.
Zero-Day Protection: Safeguards against emerging threats without the need for constant updates.
Centralized Management: Simplifies deployment and management across devices.
CylanceOPTICS: Provides advanced security insights and behavioral monitoring.
Low Resource Usage: Ensures efficient operation with minimal system impact.

What benefits should users expect from BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity?

High Detection Accuracy: Reduces risk with minimal false positives.
Efficient Resource Management: Enhances performance with its lightweight design.
Proactive Threat Defense: Protects against a wide range of threats with centralized management.
Advanced Insights: Offers unique features for detailed security analysis.

Organizations deploy BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity for threat analytics, log management, and endpoint protection. As an antivirus replacement, it protects against zero-day malware, ransomware, and various threats. Its AI algorithms detect anomalies, minimizing risks in both internet-connected and isolated environments. Many businesses incorporate it into wider security strategies, appreciating its centralized management and proactive defense capabilities.

BlackBerry

EDR for continuous monitoring that prevents the execution of unknown processes. Behavioral analysis and detection of IoAs (indicators of attack) scripts, macros, etc.
Automatic detection and response for targeted attacks and in-memory exploits. Endpoint protection capabilities such as URL filtering, device control and managed firewall.
Zero-Trust Application and Threat Hunting features delivered as managed services. Lightweight agent and easy-to-use Cloud-based console with detailed reporting.

WatchGuard

Sample Customers

Panasonic, Noble Energy, Apria Healthcare Group Inc., Charles River Laboratories, Rovi Corporation, Toyota, Kiewit

Indra, Valea AB, Fineit, Aemcom, Data Solutions INC., Gloucestershire NHS, Golden Star Resources Ltd, Hispania Racing Team, Instituto Dos Museus e da ConserÊo, Escuelas Pias Provincia Emaus, Axiom Housing Association, Municipality of Bjuv, Lesedi Nuclear, Mullsj_ municipality, Eng. skolan Norr AB, Dalakraft AB, Peter Green Haulage Ltd

Buyer's Guide

BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity vs. WatchGuard EPDR

December 2025

Free Report: BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity vs. WatchGuard EPDR

Find out what your peers are saying about BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity vs. WatchGuard EPDR and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity vs. WatchGuard EPDR report.

See our list of best Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) vendors.

We monitor all Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.