OpenText Core Endpoint Protection vs WatchGuard EPDR comparison

OpenText and WatchGuard are both solutions in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category. OpenText is ranked #49 with an average rating of 6.5, while WatchGuard is ranked #11 with an average rating of 8.8. OpenText holds a 0.8% mindshare in EPP, compared to WatchGuard’s 2.0% mindshare. Additionally, 89% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 96% of WatchGuard users who would recommend it.

OpenText Core Endpoint Prot...

Read 31 OpenText Core Endpoint Protection reviews

1,804 Views
1,606 Comparison Views

89% willing to recommend

WatchGuard EPDR

Read 35 WatchGuard EPDR reviews

4,776 Views
3,725 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

OpenText Core Endpoint Prot...

WatchGuard EPDR

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 19, 2025

OpenText Core Endpoint Protection and WatchGuard EPDR compete in the endpoint security category. WatchGuard EPDR has a slight upper hand due to its comprehensive feature set, outstanding customer service, and superior detection tools.

Features: OpenText Core Endpoint Protection provides robust endpoint security with real-time threat intelligence, advanced malware protection, and zero-trust application service. WatchGuard EPDR enhances its suite with integrated endpoint detection and response, patch management, and application control, offering a more dynamic approach to security.

Room for Improvement: OpenText Core Endpoint Protection could improve by expanding its feature set, providing more advanced detection tools, and integrating patch management. WatchGuard EPDR may benefit from better pricing transparency, enhanced user interface customization, and reducing the learning curve for new users.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText Core Endpoint Protection offers a streamlined deployment process and responsive customer service. WatchGuard EPDR matches in deployment efficiency and excels in ongoing support, providing tailored assistance that improves user experience.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText Core Endpoint Protection is recognized for its competitive costs and solid ROI, appealing to cost-conscious buyers. WatchGuard EPDR, while more costly upfront, delivers significant ROI through rich features, making it appealing to organizations valuing advanced security despite higher initial expenses.

To learn more, read our detailed OpenText Core Endpoint Protection vs. WatchGuard EPDR Report (Updated: August 2025).

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Core Endpoint Protection vs. WatchGuard EPDR

August 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 865,295 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

OpenText Core Endpoint Prot...

Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

49th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

5.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

WatchGuard EPDR

Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

11th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) (13th)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category, the mindshare of OpenText Core Endpoint Protection is 0.8%, down from 0.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of WatchGuard EPDR is 2.0%, up from 1.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

Featured Reviews

Urs Schuerch

Information Technology Engineer at Ingenias AG

A tool that offers good UI and documentation

Webroot Business Endpoint Protection had sent me a physical installation medium, which was very easy to obtain and deploy. It was also easy to configure, and it had a nice UI. I didn't have any problems with the product. I think that Webroot Business Endpoint Protection is very transparent about the pricing models offered to users. The tool also maintains transparency about the features and specifications. Previously, when I compared the two products with Webroot Business Endpoint Protection, I saw that with Trend Micro, it is very difficult to transparently find out what it offers and how much it charges for it.

Read full review

PaolaLamura

SOC & Incident Manager at Retelit

While being easy to manage and create reports, the tool also offers a good UI

I rate the ease of use and management of Panda Adaptive Defense 360 an eight on a scale of one to ten. The tool's ability to provide information about the vulnerability is the most impactful feature of the product that has an impact on our company's security posture. Speaking about scenarios where the solution effectively prevented the security breach, I would say that our company sees how the tool blocks when our customers accidentally click on some malware, after which it quarantines that file. My company makes a playbook with the SOAR tool that Panda Adaptive Defense 360 uses to block and isolate attacks. In our company's system, if there is a big event that occurs, then to block the endpoint, we use SOAR with Panda Adaptive Defense 360 to block and isolate attacks or threats. The solution's real-time monitoring has improved our company's ability to detect threats if we use it in our company with Panda SIEMFeeder. Only if in my company there is a need to do some research, prepare a report, or if we want to change the policy, so it is not very often that we use the visualization part of the tool in our company. The reporting and analytics part of the tool has helped with the decision-making in our company since we combine different kinds of logs and situations from different ingestion logs, and we can configure a specific alert. In my company, we use the tool's data search functionality if required to check the information we need. Presently, our company uses the configuration alert and SIEMFeeder in our system. I rate the tool a nine out of ten.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It is pretty unintrusive. It doesn't take over the system like McAfee or Norton. It doesn't use a whole lot of resources. McAfee and Norton use a lot of resources."

"Webroot's tech support is pretty good; they've given me some pointers."

"The ease of use of the centralized admin console is its best asset."

"It is an easy-to-use and easy-to-configure product."

"The feature we found most valuable is the AI functionality for maintaining endpoint security. This is very powerful."

"The main reason we had Webroot is that it was cost-effective for our clients."

"Doesn't consume resources or affect the computer performance at all."

"The initial setup was straightforward. It took five minutes. I installed the solution myself."

More OpenText Core Endpoint Protection pros

"Panda Security solution has a feature to block any unknown process and that is what is best about it."

"I've found it's got excellent web protection."

"It is easy to manage."

"The most valuable feature is the web filter application control."

"It allows us to stop activation windows."

"The detection capabilities for malicious activities are effective."

"It's very easy to deploy, we don't have any problem or issues. It's most full automatic. It basically takes the assumption that everything is supposed to be a suspect; files, processes, URL accesses, and so on."

"The product so far has been good at protecting us. We haven't faced a breach."

More WatchGuard EPDR pros

Cons

"Webroot Business Endpoint Protection needs to improve its ability to detect threats."

"The reporting is the weakest part of the Webroot console. Frequently, I export to Excel to massage something into it to pass on to others."

"There needs to be more advanced analytics. It would make it a more powerful antivirus solution within the marketplace."

"An updated UI would be nice, but is not hardly used."

"Their customer support should be better. We started having some issues with it, and we didn't get the required support."

"The solution could improve by providing better ransomware protection."

"Technical support is not the best. It's hard to get a hold of them if we need help. It's something that definitely needs improvement."

More OpenText Core Endpoint Protection cons

"Needs a better way to scan the hardware to detect whether it's valid."

"Panda Security Adaptive Defense can improve by including the intrusion and prevention system not only on their most expensive platform. Additionally, it blocks software that is legitimate from users. They complain and then we have to manually unblock the software, by hash, or we receive a message. Some of the prevention features are not available and this might cause us to need a separate firewall or something to protect the company."

"The software has performance issues due to its requirements on the processor, however, these issues are common with other vendors, not just WatchGuard."

"They could have more reports."

"It needs some improvements in the DNS security feature. Currently, it does not have full DNS security. It only has semi-DNS security, which can be improved. It is an important feature for us, and it would be really good if they can improve the DNS security feature. Our group has some plans to change to Cisco AMP, which has features such as DNS, Umbrella. We are trying to learn about Cisco AMP and compare it with Panda."

"The AV and scanning features could be a little bit better."

"The only part I really don't use as much is their firewall. It's a bit superfluous. Most people have their own firewall in place, so they don't really need that part portion of the solution."

"They need to expand their offering of add-ons to enhance capabilities further."

More WatchGuard EPDR cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"From a pricing standpoint, I would rate it a four out of five."

"We evaluate other options using multiple choices, best value, management and functionality."

"Our strategy was to overestimate the complexity and cost. It turned out that Webroot's assurance was justified."

"Get a trial, then a multi-year license."

"I rate the product's pricing a three on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive. There are no costs in addition to the product's standard licensing fees."

"The solution doesn't cost too much. It's about 30 Euros a year for each endpoint. It's pretty affordable for us and for many other companies."

"It is relatively cheap."

"I can't recall the exact pricing, but I believe there is a monthly fee of $20-30 per user."

More OpenText Core Endpoint Protection pricing and cost advice

"Our licensing fee is 1M Euro per month, so it is about 80 Euro's per user."

"I don't think Panda's license is too expensive, but they're charging more than it's worth. It's a yearly license. For 1,000 endpoints, it's around $18,000."

"The price of this solution depends on the number of licenses that you are purchasing."

"Panda is cloud-only and comes at a reasonable cost. It is a set price per seat."

"The licensing is subscription-based and priced well compared to other endpoint security solutions."

"There is a license needed to use this solution and it is approximately $30 annually."

"Customers need to pay monthly licensing costs for Panda Security Adaptive Defense, which is not expensive."

"The price is excellent."

More WatchGuard EPDR pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,295 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Real Estate/Law Firm

14%

Computer Software Company

14%

Comms Service Provider

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

14%

Comms Service Provider

12%

Hospitality Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Webroot Business Endpoint Protection?

I haven't observed any of the instabilities in the solution. It is a stable solution.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Webroot Business Endpoint Protection?

Webroot Business Endpoint Protection is probably on the cheaper side, so I would rate their pricing a one or a two out of ten.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Webroot Business Endpoint Protection?

Webroot Business Endpoint Protection needs to improve its ability to detect threats. It does not do what it's advertised to do. Real-time threat detection also doesn't work as it should.

See all answers

What do you like most about WatchGuard EPDR?

The product's most valuable features are the zero-trust application service and its capability to detect threats and attacks.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for WatchGuard EPDR?

I think the pricing is normal because we subscribe for three years. Regarding pricing, I am not sure because I did not compare it with other antivirus; maybe it is pricey.

See all answers

What needs improvement with WatchGuard EPDR?

I have no idea if I use some automation functions. I can't find any disadvantages; maybe that is because many companies haven't used it. I would prefer to see some features such as AI in antivirus ...

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs OpenText Core Endpoint Protection

Compared 18% of the time

HP Wolf Security vs OpenText Core Endpoint Protection

Compared 13% of the time

Huntress Managed EDR vs OpenText Core Endpoint Protection

Compared 10% of the time

Malwarebytes Teams vs OpenText Core Endpoint Protection

Compared 10% of the time

Trend Vision One Endpoint Security vs OpenText Core Endpoint Protection

Compared 3% of the time

More OpenText Core Endpoint Protection Competitors

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs WatchGuard EPDR

Compared 17% of the time

ESET Endpoint Protection Platform vs WatchGuard EPDR

Compared 10% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs WatchGuard EPDR

Compared 7% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs WatchGuard EPDR

Compared 5% of the time

Bitdefender GravityZone EDR vs WatchGuard EPDR

Compared 5% of the time

More WatchGuard EPDR Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Core Endpoint Protection

August 2025

OpenText Core Endpoint Protection report

Download OpenText Core Endpoint Protection product report

Buyer's Guide

WatchGuard EPDR

July 2025

Download WatchGuard EPDR product report

Also Known As

Webroot SecureAnywhere Business Endpoint Protection

Panda Adaptive Defense 360

Overview

OpenText Core Endpoint Protection offers cloud-managed endpoint security with AI integration, providing real-time protection and lightweight performance. It ensures low system impact, seamless cloud integration, and cost-effective security solutions for various devices.

OpenText Core Endpoint Protection is a comprehensive endpoint security platform utilized by managed-service providers for antivirus and firewall functionality across servers, workstations, and mobile devices. It employs AI for robust threat detection, integrating with cloud applications for real-time updates. Multi-layered security features include malware protection, network defense, and DNS protection. Although connectivity and threat reporting need improvement, this platform extensively supports remote device management and integrates efficiently with Active Directory policies.

What are the key features of OpenText Core Endpoint Protection?

Cloud Management: Centralized admin console for easy oversight
AI Integration: Enhanced threat detection capabilities
Lightweight Performance: Minimal impact on system resources
Real-time Threat Database: Constant updates for effective protection
Web Control Interface: Monitors and controls web traffic

What benefits are associated with OpenText Core Endpoint Protection?

Ease of Setup and Maintenance: Facilitates quick deployment and upkeep
Seamless Cloud Integration: Simplifies scalability and operation
Cost-Effectiveness: Affordable pricing with comprehensive features
Mobile Security Capabilities: Supports remote device management

OpenText Core Endpoint Protection finds application in industries requiring stringent data protection and peace of mind over device security. Managed-service providers implement this for comprehensive antivirus and firewall features, safeguarding multi-device networks. It is particularly useful for DNS protection and integrating with Active Directory policies, enabling secure yet flexible operations across sectors.

OpenText

EDR for continuous monitoring that prevents the execution of unknown processes. Behavioral analysis and detection of IoAs (indicators of attack) scripts, macros, etc.
Automatic detection and response for targeted attacks and in-memory exploits. Endpoint protection capabilities such as URL filtering, device control and managed firewall.
Zero-Trust Application and Threat Hunting features delivered as managed services. Lightweight agent and easy-to-use Cloud-based console with detailed reporting.

WatchGuard

Sample Customers

Mytech Partners

Indra, Valea AB, Fineit, Aemcom, Data Solutions INC., Gloucestershire NHS, Golden Star Resources Ltd, Hispania Racing Team, Instituto Dos Museus e da ConserÊo, Escuelas Pias Provincia Emaus, Axiom Housing Association, Municipality of Bjuv, Lesedi Nuclear, Mullsj_ municipality, Eng. skolan Norr AB, Dalakraft AB, Peter Green Haulage Ltd

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Core Endpoint Protection vs. WatchGuard EPDR

August 2025

Free Report: OpenText Core Endpoint Protection vs. WatchGuard EPDR

Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText Core Endpoint Protection vs. WatchGuard EPDR and other solutions. Updated: August 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

865,295 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our OpenText Core Endpoint Protection vs. WatchGuard EPDR report.

See our list of best Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) vendors.

We monitor all Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.