


CrowdStrike Falcon and Sweet Security are competitors in the cybersecurity market. CrowdStrike Falcon demonstrates superiority in terms of comprehensive features and proven security performance, while Sweet Security offers competitive pricing and efficient deployment, appealing to cost-effective buyers.
Features: CrowdStrike Falcon stands out with threat intelligence, EDR capabilities, and real-time cybersecurity threat protection. It offers a wide range of threat detection and response capabilities. Sweet Security integrates well with existing systems and provides niche cybersecurity protection, delivering a versatile security application.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Sweet Security offers a simple deployment process with supportive documentation and accessible customer service. CrowdStrike Falcon provides a smooth deployment, but it may involve a more complex setup. Both prioritize support, but Sweet Security's rapid setup benefits smaller teams.
Pricing and ROI: CrowdStrike Falcon has a higher setup cost, justified by its extensive features. Sweet Security offers a budget-friendly option with a strong ROI for organizations with limited resources. The difference lies in CrowdStrike’s upfront investment versus Sweet Security's competitive pricing.
After implementing SentinelOne, it takes about five to seven minutes.
Our ability to get in and review our vulnerability stance, whether daily, monthly, weekly, or whatever it might be, has drastically improved over our prior provider.
It has saved us more than 50% of our time.
There is a 60 to 70 percent reduction in false positives, allowing us to disregard those.
Based on our experience and industry benchmarks, I can say that we have seen around a thirty to forty percent improvement in time spent on endpoint security operations.
CrowdStrike Falcon saves time and offers good value for money, especially for enterprise companies, because it can stop breaches.
The ROI is that we are not waiting for a breach but being proactive rather than reactive.
Having a reliable team ready and willing to assist with any issues is essential.
Throughout the migration, they remained available for several hours without complaint, providing assistance at every step.
In my experience, I have never encountered a junior person or someone without knowledge coming into support from SentinelOne.
On a scale of one to ten, I would rate the technical support as a 10 because they resolve many issues for us.
The CrowdStrike team is very efficient; I would rate them ten out of ten.
They could improve by initiating calls for high-priority cases instead of just opening tickets.
They are there immediately, providing us with the best technical people, solving any issue we had.
They gave me a trial period, did multiple follow-ups, and were reviewing themselves the findings to actually understand how their product is performing.
I would rate customer support a nine out of ten because they maintain a competitive price, offer trial periods, provide follow-up, are very responsive, and are effectively hands-on in assisting and offering prompt service and support.
The SentinelOne Singularity Cloud exhibits high scalability.
We've automated in our MDM so any device that we start in our MDM automatically installs SentinelOne.
It is scalable. I would rate it a ten out of ten for scalability.
It has adequate coverage and is easy to deploy.
In terms of scalability, I find CrowdStrike to be stable, and I have not encountered any limitations with it.
There's no scalability limitation from CrowdStrike itself, as it just requires agent deployment.
We don't need to scale it since it's all SaaS.
We are a robust enterprise with thousands of assets in the cloud or tens of thousands.
The user interface that I see doesn't make me very confident that I will be able to extract information in case I had hundreds or thousands of Kubernetes clusters or hundreds or thousands of hosts.
SentinelOne Singularity Cloud is incredibly reliable.
The only downtime we had was when switching from V1 to V2 but it was smooth.
I would rate it a ten out of ten for stability.
I have never seen instability in the CrowdStrike tool.
We are following N-1 versions across our environment, which is stable.
The biggest issue occurred when every computer worldwide experienced a blue screen.
I would rate the stability of Sweet Security a ten out of ten.
We have never had any issues with stability.
Sweet Security is stable, as I find that user experience does not tend to reveal many production problems, and when they do occur, they are resolved quickly.
If notifications are available, then it will be more helpful, easy, and time-saving.
Alerts should be directly tied to compliance standards and have a clear role in the overall compliance process.
The Infrastructure as Code service available in PingSafe and the services available in AWS cloud security can be merged so that we can get the security data directly from AWS cloud in PingSafe.
Simplifying the querying process, such as using double quote queries or directly obtaining logs based on IP addresses or usernames, would be beneficial.
Another concern is CrowdStrike's GUI. It changes annually, making it hard to work and find options.
Threat prevention should be their first priority.
The next great thing that Sweet Security can do is to turn toward IAC, how it is handled and enforced, to tackle potential breaches of policy before they really happen.
Maybe they can just show the actual signal and not show that there is a lot of vulnerabilities, but indicate which are important.
The main areas for improvement are related to how Sweet Security needs to be customized.
With very little negotiation involved, we just let them know what we could pay and they were willing to meet us at slightly above what we paid with Sophos, which was still very fair for what we were looking at.
If you want to buy just EDR, the price is less. XDR is a little bit more expensive.
It should not be based on subscription. It should be based on the number of servers that I am scanning.
For example, the basic plan starts at a certain price per endpoint per year, while advanced plans with more features cost higher.
It is expensive compared to SentinelOne, but as the market leader, it is worth it.
The licensing cost and setup costs are affordable.
They're not cheap, but they're not as expensive compared to other companies.
Sweet Security contains very similar features at a much better pricing.
Sweet Security's pricing is quite fair and cost-effective by many users.
This tool has been helpful for us. It allows us to search for vulnerabilities and provides evidence directly on the screen.
The cloud misconfiguration feature gave us almost zero false positives.
PingSafe has sped up the process by 80% to 90%.
I can investigate by accessing the customer's host based on the RTR environment and utilize host search to know details for the past seven days, including logins, processes, file installations, malicious processes, and network connections.
The real-time analytics aspect of CrowdStrike performs well because we get all logs in real-time, with no delay, allowing us to take action immediately.
Being an EDR solution, it helps us identify attacks in real-time.
Sweet Security's reporting tools enhance our insights into potential vulnerabilities and threats as they serve as our eyes and ears inside AWS, telling us what we are doing wrong so we can fix it.
Sweet Security enabled teams to see each detection of activity upon every request made from the application level towards the infrastructure, making it much easier and reducing the time for an analyst to understand what is really happening.
I really love the feature within Sweet Security platform that allows you to visualize the specific packages or functions that are being loaded to the memory and are actually being executed by the operational system.


| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 52 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 23 |
| Large Enterprise | 58 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 56 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 33 |
| Large Enterprise | 63 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 3 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 3 |
| Large Enterprise | 3 |
SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security offers a streamlined approach to cloud security with intuitive operation and strong integration capabilities for heightened threat detection and remediation efficiency.
Singularity Cloud Security stands out for its real-time detection and response, effectively minimizing detection and remediation timelines. Its automated remediation integrates smoothly with third-party tools enhancing operational efficiency. The comprehensive console ensures visibility and support for forensic investigations. Seamless platform integration and robust support for innovation are notable advantages. Areas for development include improved search functionality, affordability, better firewall capabilities for remote users, stable agents, comprehensive reporting, and efficient third-party integrations. Clarity in the interface, responsive support, and real-time alerting need enhancement, with a call for more automation and customization. Better scalability and cost-effective integration without compromising capabilities are desired.
What are SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security's standout features?
What benefits should users expect from SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security?
SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security is deployed in industries needing robust cloud security posture management, endpoint protection, and threat hunting. Utilized frequently across AWS and Azure, it assists in monitoring, threat detection, and maintaining compliance in diverse environments while providing real-time alerts and recommendations for proactive threat management.
CrowdStrike Falcon provides cutting-edge endpoint detection with automatic alerts, real-time monitoring, and seamless integration capabilities. Cloud-native architecture and AI-driven processes ensure scalable protection and efficient threat remediation.
CrowdStrike Falcon is recognized for its robust EDR and threat intelligence features that enhance security and streamline operations. Its lightweight agent minimizes system impact while offering real-time monitoring and detailed reporting. This platform uses cloud-native architecture for scalable, consistent protection, significantly reducing administrative demands. AI and machine learning empower precise threat hunting and behavioral analysis, which mitigates false positives and boosts cybersecurity efficiency. Users seek improvements in integration with other systems, reporting functions, and compatibility with specific operating systems. While the solution handles malware mitigation and threat response efficiently, suggestions for on-demand scanning, enhanced visibility, and better dashboard features are noted.
What are the key features of CrowdStrike Falcon?In technology sectors, CrowdStrike Falcon commonly supports endpoint protection and threat response initiatives, allowing companies to replace traditional antivirus systems with more advanced solutions. In finance, it secures sensitive data across multiple platforms, ensuring compliance. In healthcare, real-time security analysis protects patient data on critical devices like servers and laptops, utilizing AI to enhance cybersecurity defenses.
Sweet Security offers advanced cybersecurity measures designed to protect enterprise-level networks from complex threats, providing efficient monitoring and robust protection capabilities.
Focused on sophisticated threat detection and network security, Sweet Security provides an enterprise-grade solution for cybersecurity challenges. It integrates seamlessly with existing systems, offering real-time analytics and threat intelligence. Its comprehensive approach ensures high-level data protection and security management, allowing organizations to focus on core functionalities.
What features make Sweet Security stand out?Implementation of Sweet Security across industries like finance, healthcare, and e-commerce demonstrates its versatility and effectiveness. In finance, it safeguards sensitive financial data; in healthcare, it ensures patient data privacy; and in e-commerce, it protects online transactions from fraud, making it an invaluable asset in today's digital landscape.
We monitor all Identity Threat Detection and Response (ITDR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.