Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager vs ManageEngine PAM360 comparison

CyberArk and ManageEngine are both solutions in the Privileged Access Management (PAM) category. CyberArk is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.8, while ManageEngine is ranked #12 with an average rating of 7.3. CyberArk holds a 2.6% mindshare in PAM, compared to ManageEngine’s 3.2% mindshare. Additionally, 86% of CyberArk users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 83% of ManageEngine users who would recommend it.
CyberArk Endpoint Privilege...
Read 38 CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager reviews
  • 3,967 Views
  • 1,190 Comparison Views
86% willing to recommend
ManageEngine PAM360
Read 6 ManageEngine PAM360 reviews
  • 1,618 Views
  • 1,618 Comparison Views
83% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 6, 2024

CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager and ManageEngine PAM360 compete in the privileged access management market. Based on user feedback, CyberArk stands out for its support and pricing satisfaction, while ManageEngine PAM360 is noted for its feature offerings and value.

Features: CyberArk is recognized for comprehensive security controls, ease of automation, and simplified deployment. ManageEngine PAM360 is valued for its broad feature set, extensive integration options, and scalability. Users prefer ManageEngine for its versatility.

Room for Improvement: CyberArk could improve reporting capabilities, integration with existing systems, and customization flexibility. ManageEngine PAM360 users highlight the need for better user accessibility, streamlined updates, and more intuitive interfaces.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: CyberArk benefits from simplified deployment processes and strong customer support. ManageEngine PAM360, while slightly more complex to deploy, offers commendable post-deployment support and responsive service.

Pricing and ROI: CyberArk offers competitive initial setup costs with positive ROI feedback. ManageEngine PAM360's pricing is higher, yet the extensive features are seen as offering excellent value over time. Users view CyberArk as cost-effective initially, while ManageEngine presents long-term value.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager vs. ManageEngine PAM360 Report (Updated: December 2025).
Buyer's Guide
CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager vs. ManageEngine PAM360
December 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

CyberArk Endpoint Privilege...
Ranking in Privileged Access Management (PAM)
4th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
38
Ranking in other categories
Endpoint Compliance (4th), Anti-Malware Tools (5th), Application Control (3rd), Ransomware Protection (5th)
ManageEngine PAM360
Ranking in Privileged Access Management (PAM)
12th
Average Rating
7.4
Reviews Sentiment
8.1
Number of Reviews
6
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Privileged Access Management (PAM) category, the mindshare of CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is 2.6%, down from 3.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ManageEngine PAM360 is 3.2%, down from 4.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Privileged Access Management (PAM) Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager2.6%
ManageEngine PAM3603.2%
Other94.2%
Privileged Access Management (PAM)
 

Featured Reviews

Sumit Chavan - PeerSpot reviewer
Sumit Chavan
Lead Consultant at a tech vendor with 501-1,000 employees
Helps secure the infrastructure and control users with admin rights
There are many features that are currently missing. A customization option is required for certain policies. For instance, if we need to stop PowerShell scripting, we have to create a different policy for that. Being able to create a sub-level policy within a top-level policy would be good. Currently, no user-based policy option is available inside the EPM console. We can only create computer-based policies. The database is available, but there is a drawback in not being able to create local groups on the EPM console. We only have to depend on Active Directory. This limits infrastructure security as we depend on the Active Directory team to manage user groups. If they remove any users, we lose control. If we could create groups locally and block them or set specific policies, we would have more control. Local endpoint management is missing from the EPM site. Moreover, there is an issue with policies not running as expected when we make enhancements. We have to find multiple ways to whitelist applications or enhance policies.
Read full review
Md Abdul Hakim - PeerSpot reviewer
Md Abdul Hakim
System Engineer at Corporate Projukti Limited
Remote session recording enhances server access tracking while dashboard needs improvement
PAM360 stands out due to its remote session recording capabilities, which allow us to track who accessed which server and identify any changes. The automation system is very smart, although its interface is not as sophisticated as those of Dynatrace or FortiFEM. A critical advantage is its flexibility and security, providing stability across our client interactions.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager has significantly improved our security posture by preventing virus incidents and restricting users from downloading unwanted applications."
"The solution is scalable."
"The biggest benefit of CyberArk EPM for our customers is control over privileged access for endpoints. Endpoints are often the starting point for attackers to enter and move within a network. CyberArk EPM bridges the gap between security and operations teams. Operations teams are happy because work isn't stopped due to admin rights issues, while security teams are satisfied that full admin rights aren't given to all users."
"CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is entirely cloud-based, so no further upkeep is required."
"CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager helped us reduce the time for regulatory processes to approximately two to four months, completing the solution and training."
"We were able to reduce the number of privileged accounts by 50%, which helped to simplify our privileged access management environment."
"Our setup process is moving to the cloud, which is very good. It reduces complexity."
"The department management aspect of the solution is the most valuable aspect."
More CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager pros
"PAM360 stands out due to its remote session recording capabilities, which allow us to track who accessed which server and identify any changes."
"ManageEngine PAM360 is an easy-to-use solution with competitive pricing compared to brands like Delinea and CyberArk."
"Deployment is very quick, and only a one-time installation process is required for ManageEngine PAM360."
"We can use it remotely as well."
"Our clients use this solution for the rotation of keys and passwords. It is a part of logs."
"PAM360 stands out due to its remote session recording capabilities, which allow us to track who accessed which server and identify any changes."
 

Cons

"The main issues I experience are related to deployment, which requires dependency on other solutions like AD or SCCM."
"The price of the product is an area of concern where improvements are required. The product's price should be made more flexible."
"CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager could be improved by simplifying the administration process, specifically when setting up policies and applications."
"While CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is a great tool, I believe the functionality could be wider. If it could work not only with permissions but also involve pure EDR tasks or User and Entity Behavior Analytics, it would be great."
"The management of Privilege Access is not satisfactory."
"Despite newer versions and functionalities, CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager lacks sufficient knowledgeable support staff, resulting in longer wait times for assistance."
"Can be improved by allowing computers to be excluded from policies."
"Without knowledge, you are not able to find some items as they are really hidden within the UI."
More CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager cons
"PAM360's dashboard needs improvement for clearer presentations, similar to ManageEngine products like AD audit plus and Password Manager Plus, which offer a clearer picture."
"If you want a cost effective solution and very competitive pricing, you should go with this product."
"There could be improvement in latency and accessing resources for the product."
"I don't see any features associated with multi-factor authentication in ManageEngine PAM360."
"PAM360's dashboard needs improvement for clearer presentations, similar to ManageEngine products like AD audit plus and Password Manager Plus, which offer a clearer picture."
"It should have better documentation about how to install, work and configure."
"I would rate the scalability at five out of ten. It's average."
"ManageEngine PAM360 could benefit from more automation activities and a user interface change."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"licensing for this solution is based on the number of APV (privileged users), and the number of sessions that you want to record."
"I believe it's quite a reasonably priced solution. It's not very common to use CyberArk because it's a niche solution, but customers who are willing to control administrative accounts are willing to pay this money."
"The solution requires an annual license to use it. There can be some extra costs in some cases."
"The price of CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is expensive. The solution is priced based on the number of accounts onboarded and the number of concurrent sessions. Everyone else is included in the price, such as support."
"The tool's pricing is reasonable for customers."
"The professional services for one eight-hour day would be $1,800."
"It is an expensive solution."
"I think that it was in the range of $200,000 that had to get approved."
More CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager pricing and cost advice
"The product is less expensive than one of its competitors."
"Though I don't have the exact numbers related to the cost of the solution, I can say that it costs somewhere around INR 7,00,000 for ten licenses."
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Privileged Access Management (PAM) solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
14%
Manufacturing Company
11%
Computer Software Company
10%
Government
8%
Manufacturing Company
14%
Computer Software Company
13%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Government
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business17
Midsize Enterprise9
Large Enterprise18
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Looking for recommendations and a pros/cons template for software to detect insider threats
This is an inside-out --- outside-in --- inside-in question, as an insider can be an outsider as well. There is no short answer other than a blend of a PAM tool with Behavioral Analytics and Endpo...
See all answers
What do you like most about CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager?
The most valuable feature of the solution is its performance.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager?
I believe it's quite a reasonably priced solution. It's not very common to use CyberArk because it's a niche solution, but customers who are willing to control administrative accounts are willing t...
See all answers
What needs improvement with ManageEngine PAM360?
ManageEngine PAM360 could benefit from more automation activities and a user interface change. Although the support is really good, there's still room for improvement in automation.
See all answers
What is your primary use case for ManageEngine PAM360?
Our primary use case for ManageEngine PAM360 ( /products/manageengine-pam360-reviews ) involved securing our organization’s devices, implementing access policies, and managing privileged access eff...
See all answers
What advice do you have for others considering ManageEngine PAM360?
On a scale from one to ten, I would rate ManageEngine PAM360 as nine. It's a really good tool.
See all answers
 

Comparisons

CrowdStrike Falcon vs CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon vs CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager
Compared 11% of the time
BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management vs CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager Logo
BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management vs CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager
Compared 9% of the time
CyberArk Privileged Access Manager vs CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager Logo
CyberArk Privileged Access Manager vs CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager
Compared 8% of the time
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager Logo
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager
Compared 8% of the time
Ivanti Endpoint Security for Endpoint Manager vs CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager Logo
Ivanti Endpoint Security for Endpoint Manager vs CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager
Compared 3% of the time
More CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager Competitors
ARCON Privileged Access Management vs ManageEngine PAM360 Logo
ARCON Privileged Access Management vs ManageEngine PAM360
Compared 19% of the time
CyberArk Privileged Access Manager vs ManageEngine PAM360 Logo
CyberArk Privileged Access Manager vs ManageEngine PAM360
Compared 16% of the time
WALLIX Bastion vs ManageEngine PAM360 Logo
WALLIX Bastion vs ManageEngine PAM360
Compared 8% of the time
Delinea Secret Server vs ManageEngine PAM360 Logo
Delinea Secret Server vs ManageEngine PAM360
Compared 7% of the time
Fudo PAM vs ManageEngine PAM360 Logo
Fudo PAM vs ManageEngine PAM360
Compared 5% of the time
More ManageEngine PAM360 Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager
January 2026
CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager reportDownload CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager product report
Buyer's Guide
Privileged Access Management (PAM)
January 2026
ManageEngine PAM360 reportDownload ManageEngine PAM360 product report
 

Also Known As

Viewfinity
PAM360
 

Overview

CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager, a critical and foundational endpoint control addresses the underlying weaknesses of endpoint defenses against a privileged attacker and helps enterprises defend against these attacks through removing local admin rights, enforcing least privilege, and implementing foundational endpoint security controls across all Windows, macOS and Linux endpoints from hybrid to cloud environments.

Click here for a free 30 day trial: CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager free trial

CyberArk

Comprehensive privileged access management solution
Privilege misuse is a top cybersecurity threat today that often results in expensive losses and can even cripple businesses. It's also one of the most popular attack vectors among hackers, because when successfully carried out, it provides free access to an enterprise's underbelly, often without raising any alarms until the damage is done.

ManageEngine PAM360 empowers enterprises looking to stay ahead of this growing risk with a robust privileged access management (PAM) program that ensures no privileged access pathway to mission-critical assets is left unmanaged, unknown, or unmonitored.

PAM360 is a comprehensive solution for businesses looking to incorporate PAM into their overall security operations. With PAM360's contextual integration capabilities, you can build a central console where different parts of your IT management system interconnect for deeper correlation of privileged access data and overall network data, facilitating meaningful inferences and quicker remedies.

ManageEngine
Buyer's Guide
CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager vs. ManageEngine PAM360
December 2025
Free Report: CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager vs. ManageEngine PAM360
Find out what your peers are saying about CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager vs. ManageEngine PAM360 and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager vs. ManageEngine PAM360 report.
See our list of best Privileged Access Management (PAM) vendors.

We monitor all Privileged Access Management (PAM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.