CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager vs Symantec Directory comparison

The compared CyberArk and Broadcom solutions aren't in the same category. CyberArk is ranked #4 in PAM , with an average rating of 8.8, and holds a 2.4% mindshare in the category. Broadcom is ranked #3 in DS , and holds a 25.5% mindshare. Additionally, 86% of CyberArk users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Broadcom users who would recommend it.

CyberArk Endpoint Privilege...

Read 38 CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager reviews

4,393 Views
1,274 Comparison Views

86% willing to recommend

Symantec Directory

Read 2 Symantec Directory reviews

230 Views
99 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

CyberArk Endpoint Privilege...

Symantec Directory

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager and Symantec Directory based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about CyberArk, One Identity, Okta and others in Privileged Access Management (PAM).

To learn more, read our detailed Privileged Access Management (PAM) Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Privileged Access Management (PAM)

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 884,873 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

CyberArk Endpoint Privilege...

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Endpoint Compliance (5th), Privileged Access Management (PAM) (4th), Anti-Malware Tools (5th), Application Control (3rd), Ransomware Protection (5th)

Symantec Directory

Average Rating

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Directory Servers (3rd)

Mindshare comparison

While both are Security Software solutions, they serve different purposes. CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is designed for Privileged Access Management (PAM) and holds a mindshare of 2.4%, down 3.5% compared to last year.
Symantec Directory, on the other hand, focuses on Directory Servers, holds 25.5% mindshare, up 1.8% since last year.

Privileged Access Management (PAM) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager	2.4%
CyberArk Privileged Access Manager	11.4%
Delinea Secret Server	4.9%
Other	81.3%

Privileged Access Management (PAM)

Directory Servers Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Symantec Directory	25.5%
Ping Identity Platform	34.9%
Oracle OUD	20.3%
Other	19.299999999999997%

Directory Servers

Featured Reviews

Padmanabha Hegde

Manager at a computer software company with 1,001-5,000 employees

MFA boosts protection and has blocking capabilities but dependency on other solutions complicates deployment

The main issues I experience are related to deployment, which requires dependency on other solutions like AD or SCCM. These tools need to be defined and synced with the client or agent and master, sometimes needing manual checks. The agent may have problems syncing, which complicates deployment, especially when users leave the organization, however, agents remain licensed since the server still maintains licenses. Additionally, compared to other endpoint managers like Thycotic, CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager lacks recording capabilities, which limits its functionality for critical applications. A feature that records activity, even when bypassing CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager, would be beneficial.

Read full review

it_user558261

Annalyst Programmer at a energy/utilities company with 5,001-10,000 employees

We use it for internal-facing and external-facing website security.

The most valuable feature of this product is the enterprise-based security and the reliability that it comes with. Most of the people in this industry are using this product, so you are a victim of it since you need to use what everybody else is using and adopt it to your basic criteria.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature of CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is its high performance, it's the best identity security platform. The security is good. It's easy to showcase the feature and capabilities and compare it with other competitors. It competes well with other solutions. Additionally, it is a complete solution."

"Their customer support was excellent."

"Users can scale the solution."

"We did immediately begin to see results when using CyberArk."

"We can do both server and endpoint protection."

"The most valuable feature is that their database is completely encrypted and protected with multiple layers."

"It identifies the original source, and all instances of malicious applications in the environment."

"In terms of ROI, deploying CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager has secured the infrastructure, which saves money, time, and resources."

More CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager pros

"The most valuable feature of this product is the enterprise-based security and the reliability that it comes with."

"Technical support has been excellent."

Cons

"The main issues I experience are related to deployment, which requires dependency on other solutions like AD or SCCM."

"CyberArk is a pretty heavy solution."

"The management of Privilege Access is not satisfactory."

"Technical support is slow to respond when we run into issues."

"My recommendation for improvement is to add functionality for when users request access to an application. There's a pop-up UI, but it's not very customizable. I suggest creating a UI where we can write scripts or use SDKs to enhance it. This could automatically create tickets in a system like ServiceNow when users request an application. If a manager approves, we could automatically push policies to those users."

"CyberArk has some performance issues. For example, servers could not handle the solution when we first took CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager."

"The turnaround time of the support team is an area of concern where improvements are required."

"The product is expensive."

More CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager cons

"The configuration management could be better. It’s not very straightforward and is awkward to work with."

"Something that is contributing to global development like social media. I know there is something today but if they could make it easier; instead of trying to figure things out."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The tool's pricing is reasonable for customers."

"Although I do not deal directly with the pricing, CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is costly compared to other solutions. However, it offers beneficial features."

"The solution's pricing is reasonable compared to other vendors' products."

"We pay about $17 per user."

"I think that it was in the range of $200,000 that had to get approved."

"CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is slightly expensive, but costs can be negotiated to become more competitive."

"The price of CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is expensive. The solution is priced based on the number of accounts onboarded and the number of concurrent sessions. Everyone else is included in the price, such as support."

"I feel that the price of the product is nominal. It must be around 10 to 15 USD per installation. I rate the product price an eight to nine out of ten, where one is high price, and ten is low price."

More CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager pricing and cost advice

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Privileged Access Management (PAM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

884,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

13%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Computer Software Company

Government

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	17
Midsize Enterprise	9
Large Enterprise	18

No data available

Questions from the Community

Looking for recommendations and a pros/cons template for software to detect insider threats

This is an inside-out --- outside-in --- inside-in question, as an insider can be an outsider as well. There is no short answer other than a blend of a PAM tool with Behavioral Analytics and Endpo...

See all answers

What do you like most about CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager?

The most valuable feature of the solution is its performance.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager?

I believe it's quite a reasonably priced solution. It's not very common to use CyberArk because it's a niche solution, but customers who are willing to control administrative accounts are willing t...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

CrowdStrike Falcon vs CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager

Compared 7% of the time

BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management vs CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager

Compared 7% of the time

CyberArk Privileged Access Manager vs CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager

Compared 6% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager

Compared 6% of the time

Ivanti Endpoint Security for Endpoint Manager vs CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager

Compared 5% of the time

More CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager Competitors

Ping Identity Platform vs Symantec Directory

Compared 49% of the time

ILANTUS Compact Identity vs Symantec Directory

Compared 28% of the time

More Symantec Directory Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager

March 2026

CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager report

Download CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager product report

Buyer's Guide

Ping Identity Platform vs. Symantec Directory

March 2026

Download Symantec Directory product report

Also Known As

Viewfinity

CA Directory

Overview

CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager, a critical and foundational endpoint control addresses the underlying weaknesses of endpoint defenses against a privileged attacker and helps enterprises defend against these attacks through removing local admin rights, enforcing least privilege, and implementing foundational endpoint security controls across all Windows, macOS and Linux endpoints from hybrid to cloud environments.

Click here for a free 30 day trial: CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager free trial

CyberArk

CA Directory is an easy-to-manage directory service with superior performance for read and write operations, transparent and distributed replication across any number of servers and automatic recovery for seamless failover and failback. With these market-leading capabilities, CA Directory provides a mature, standards-based platform for your application infrastructure that allows you to reduce your costs while still delivering superior user experience and improved business agility.

Broadcom

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

DBS

Buyer's Guide

Privileged Access Management (PAM)

March 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about CyberArk, One Identity, Okta and others in Privileged Access Management (PAM). Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

884,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.

We monitor all Privileged Access Management (PAM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.