CylanceOPTICS vs Rapid7 InsightIDR comparison

BlackBerry and Rapid7 are both solutions in the Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) category. BlackBerry is ranked #50 with an average rating of 6.5, while Rapid7 is ranked #23 with an average rating of 7.8. BlackBerry holds a 0.6% mindshare in EDR, compared to Rapid7’s 1.2% mindshare. Additionally, 80% of BlackBerry users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 96% of Rapid7 users who would recommend it.

CylanceOPTICS

Read 13 CylanceOPTICS reviews

1,007 Views
997 Comparison Views

80% willing to recommend

Rapid7 InsightIDR

Read 32 Rapid7 InsightIDR reviews

6,954 Views
2,017 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

CylanceOPTICS

Rapid7 InsightIDR

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 9, 2024

Rapid7 InsightIDR and CylanceOPTICS are two prominent cybersecurity solutions. CylanceOPTICS seems to have the upper hand due to its advanced feature set, despite higher pricing.

Features: Rapid7 InsightIDR integrates smoothly with other tools, provides real-time alerts, and delivers comprehensive threat detection. CylanceOPTICS offers AI-driven threat detection, minimal system impact, and high accuracy in identifying anomalies.

Room for Improvement: Users feel Rapid7 InsightIDR could benefit from less complex reporting, enhanced threat intelligence, and simplified interfaces. CylanceOPTICS users see room for improvement in user training resources, streamlined deployment processes, and better documentation.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Rapid7 InsightIDR is praised for its straightforward deployment process and responsive customer service. CylanceOPTICS faces criticisms for a steeper learning curve and less intuitive setup.

Pricing and ROI: Rapid7 InsightIDR offers competitive pricing and satisfactory ROI. CylanceOPTICS, although more expensive, is justified by its advanced feature set, providing substantial ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed CylanceOPTICS vs. Rapid7 InsightIDR Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

CylanceOPTICS vs. Rapid7 InsightIDR

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,733 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

CylanceOPTICS

Ranking in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

50th

Average Rating

7.4

Reviews Sentiment

5.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Rapid7 InsightIDR

Ranking in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

23rd

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) (14th), User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) (8th), Threat Deception Platforms (4th), Extended Detection and Response (XDR) (18th)

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) category, the mindshare of CylanceOPTICS is 0.6%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Rapid7 InsightIDR is 1.2%, up from 1.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Rapid7 InsightIDR	1.2%
CylanceOPTICS	0.6%
Other	98.2%

Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

Featured Reviews

GauthamVakapalli

Account Manager at Teksalah

Provides reliable threat detection and response but requires better regional support

One improvement I suggest for CylanceOPTICS is more robust marketing efforts from their side. Many customers gravitate towards popular EDRs like CrowdStrike or Sophos, largely due to better marketing, despite BlackBerry Cylance being a superior product. The lack of marketing from distributors or vendors is a critical area where they are falling short. Apart from marketing, it would be beneficial for CylanceOPTICS to establish a dedicated team in GCC since I coordinate with the UK team to handle support. Whenever a ticket is raised by one of our customers, we have to wait for responses which can take a whole day due to the time zone differences, and a local team could expedite this process. In terms of scalability, CylanceOPTICS is indeed easy to scale, but one issue I face is related to visibility; while it is scalable, the security teams struggle with limited visibility as we need to gather data from multiple sources.

Read full review

SohailHyder

Head Of Cyber Security at Super Secure

Has supported compliance needs for mid-sized organizations but lacks customization and advanced integration

If we pitch Rapid7 InsightIDR against solutions such as SIEMs from Splunk or LogRhythm, it is not as customizable as a SIEM solution is. This is where it can improve if we keep in front the feature sets of a complete SIEM solution. Most common in the market is QRadar, but it is depleting now. It has been taken over by some other products such as Splunk and LogRhythm. If we compare these things with Rapid7 InsightIDR, then there are definitely some gaps that need to be filled. Data retention is also one concern because Rapid7 InsightIDR is cloud-based and operates on a subscription model. Whatever data you want to retain, it has to be paid for separately or it has a cost. Other solutions that are on-premises can have their own infrastructure or they provide some data retention for a month or in some capacity-wise, they provide that solution to them which makes them more attractive.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It is a bit early in our evaluation process to give proper feedback, although so far, the overall feedback is good."

"This feature is something people should be looking into; the threat monitoring in CylanceOPTICS is very good, and while CrowdStrike has similar features, CylanceOPTICS is more cost-effective."

"It's pretty unintrusive"

"The most valuable feature is the ability to respond to zero-day and unknown threats."

"You can use the solution to query certain things."

"CylanceOPTICS is pretty stable."

"Cylance is not a signature-based protection solution and instead works proactively using AI and ML models to patrol for malicious behavior."

"The solution has a high level of trust in the industry."

More CylanceOPTICS pros

"Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten. As a cloud tool, the product is highly scalable."

"Rapid7's reporting is more robust than Tenable's."

"Integration with threat modeling from the Metasploit and InsightIDR repositories."

"The log aggregation and storage provided by InsightIDR has shown no issues with scalability; aggregating over one hundred millions events daily."

"We were able to identify criminals attempting to login from China and put a stop on their IP locations."

"The incident case management is the most valuable feature. Even though there's always something I find I would like to add to that feature, the ability to quickly sort through all the logs, network and endpoint data, etc., and add it to an incident case as part of the investigation, is nice. Having it automatically timeline that additional data into the original incident timeline, and correlate it to other notable events and activities on the network, results in a huge improvement in our overall confidence that we've quickly traced down the right source of an issue."

"If you were on other solutions, you would notice that they use agents from third-party, from open-source, from a native OS, or from other tools. Here, however, it is an agent from Rapid7 itself. This adds to the solution's overall capabilities."

"The ability to ingest Office 365 log files, then process them into events and display them on a map."

More Rapid7 InsightIDR pros

Cons

"The product's technical support is slow."

"The technical support could be improved although it's probably better than you get with a lot of the other traditional antivirus solutions"

"Our customers would like to see more automation with respect to how threats are handled once they have been detected."

"The reporting is very weak and not very good at all."

"It takes more time to investigate or dig up and understand what's going on."

"Too many false positives are reported."

"The detection component is something that they have to work on."

"One minor issue that somebody mentioned was that they didn't like their management console."

More CylanceOPTICS cons

"The product allows us to make only 30 custom rules."

"The APIs can be further improved in Rapid7."

"The main problem lies in the processes within the client's operating systems."

"One thing that springs to mind is easier API integration with ITSMs. We are evaluating a new ITSM and I would like to have InsightIDR create a ticket when an attack is identified, and the ticket would be closed in InsightIDR when the ITSM resolution is completed. This would take out the "single point of failure" we currently have, if the email recipient is somehow absent, in recording the risk appetite for the incident and the actions taken to mitigate or not."

"The solution needs improvement in threat intelligence. Increasing the depth of intelligence to help users understand more about threats is a possibility. My suggestion is to expand access to other websites or resources."

"The interface for doing investigation needs to be enhanced with minor improvements that would make it more useful."

"Needs a better ability to customize the check within the console."

"Sometimes, it is hard to get the right queries to use. Currently, the tool lacks a pre-made set of queries."

More Rapid7 InsightIDR cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"CylanceOPTICS is probably priced equal to other EDRs in the market."

"We pay for the number of endpoints we have and that is about it. On a monthly basis, the licensing cost is $55 per user."

"The pricing for CylanceOPTICS is very good; I would rate it around a nine on a scale of one to ten, with ten being the lowest. It's one of the most affordable options I've seen."

"I would rate the pricing a three out of five."

"Licensing is by endpoint and amount of retention time (at least ours is). Default retention was one year, but we are able to push the retention further if needed. There's also a provide-your-own-S3 option for longer retention if you don't want to pay for the additional retention years in your Rapid7 agreement."

"Rapid7 InsightIDR charges us based on the endpoints we connect to."

"Rapid7 InsightIDR is priced very well and is cost-effective."

"It is on a yearly basis. For our own company, for about 250 users, it was 16,000 euros a year."

"I rate Rapid7 InsightIDR's price a four on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive."

"The pricing of the solution depends on the user. But there is a yearly licensing cost."

"Rapid7 InsightIDR is a cheaply priced product. On a scale of one to ten, where one is very expensive, and ten is very cheap, I rate the product's price at seven or eight."

"It is a reasonably priced solution."

More Rapid7 InsightIDR pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,733 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

Comms Service Provider

Computer Software Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	7
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	4

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	20
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	6

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Blackberry Optics?

I would rate the stability a nine out of ten. I would give it a close ten as possible because, like SentinelOne, I've seen incompatibility. Whereas Cylance, I've seen none.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Blackberry Optics?

In terms of cost, I find CylanceOPTICS to be reasonable; it's not overly expensive, nor is it at the lower end of the market—it's positioned in the medium range.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Blackberry Optics?

See all answers

What SOC product do you recommend?

For tools I’d recommend: -SIEM- LogRhythm -SOAR- Palo Alto XSOAR Doing commercial w/o both (or at least an XDR) is asking to miss details that are critical, and ending up a statistic. Also, rememb...

See all answers

What do you like most about Rapid7 InsightIDR?

During simulations or demonstrations, the tool generates alerts, providing details such as the specific application, its origin, and potential threats. For instance, it can identify if an applicati...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Rapid7 InsightIDR?

The product pricing is very cheap.

See all answers

Comparisons

CrowdStrike Falcon vs CylanceOPTICS

Compared 15% of the time

Cisco Secure Endpoint vs CylanceOPTICS

Compared 12% of the time

WatchGuard EPDR vs CylanceOPTICS

Compared 9% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs CylanceOPTICS

Compared 9% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs CylanceOPTICS

Compared 8% of the time

More CylanceOPTICS Competitors

Rapid7 InsightVM vs Rapid7 InsightIDR

Compared 5% of the time

Microsoft Sentinel vs Rapid7 InsightIDR

Compared 5% of the time

Splunk Enterprise Security vs Rapid7 InsightIDR

Compared 5% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Rapid7 InsightIDR

Compared 4% of the time

Darktrace vs Rapid7 InsightIDR

Compared 3% of the time

More Rapid7 InsightIDR Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

CylanceOPTICS

February 2026

Download CylanceOPTICS product report

Buyer's Guide

Rapid7 InsightIDR

January 2026

Download Rapid7 InsightIDR product report

Also Known As

No data available

InsightIDR

Overview

Our cloud-native BlackBerry® Optics provide visibility, on-device threat detection and remediation across your organization. In milliseconds. And our EDR approach effectively and efficiently hunts threats while eliminating response latency. It’s the difference between a minor security event—and one that’s widespread and uncontrolled.

BlackBerry

Parsing hundreds of trivial alerts. Managing a mountain of data. Manually forwarding info from your endpoints. Forget that. InsightIDR instantly arms you with the insight you need to make better decisions across the incident detection and response lifecycle, faster.

Rapid7

Sample Customers

Cerdant, Washoe County School District

Liberty Wines, Pioneer Telephone, Visier

Buyer's Guide

CylanceOPTICS vs. Rapid7 InsightIDR

December 2025

Free Report: CylanceOPTICS vs. Rapid7 InsightIDR

Find out what your peers are saying about CylanceOPTICS vs. Rapid7 InsightIDR and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,733 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our CylanceOPTICS vs. Rapid7 InsightIDR report.

See our list of best Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vendors.

We monitor all Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.