Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

D3 Security vs Everbridge Control Center comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

D3 Security
Ranking in Security Incident Response
6th
Average Rating
9.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.5
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) (16th), AI-Powered Security Automation (4th)
Everbridge Control Center
Ranking in Security Incident Response
15th
Average Rating
9.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Security Incident Response category, the mindshare of D3 Security is 4.7%, up from 1.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Everbridge Control Center is 1.5%, up from 1.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Security Incident Response Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
D3 Security4.7%
Everbridge Control Center1.5%
Other93.8%
Security Incident Response
 

Featured Reviews

Muhammad Aamir Riaz - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Manager Security Operation Center at The Bank of Punjab
Useful for automation and reporting and has open API for seamless integration
It was easy to integrate the tool with our infrastructure because all the APIs are pre-built. We just created a drag-and-drop prompt to integrate the solution with our infrastructure. I rate the overall solution a ten out of ten. Everyone needs to evaluate this solution according to their organization's needs because it can integrate well, but this depends on the technology you already have in your organization. It is an automation tool for detection and response, and while integration is possible, using legacy products could create issues. Some legacy products are closed systems and do not expose their APIs to other vendors. In such cases, you could run into problems. If you are considering this solution, check which APIs are available before you proceed. Otherwise, you may get the solution, but you must spend time on integrations. They provide integration support, but it's not automatic; it will take time.
TW
Assistant Director Emergency Preparedness at Prime Healthcare Services
Provides useful statistics, improves productivity, and works very well
We've recently been doing some work on it and looking at the statistics. One of the key features is the number of responses to messages that have been sent so that we can pinpoint specifically who may or may not be using it appropriately or using it at all when they respond. Fortunately, the numbers have been very low, so we've been able to contact people directly about how it's used and what they're supposed to do, which is really simple—you just type 'yes', and text the message response. So, I've enjoyed the statistics and the ability to see those types of things.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"It is an out-of-the-box automated integration with our 20 departments. We perform L1 LiveOps automatically through the portal."
"The solution's valuable feature is its GUI. It has more than 450 connectors, which are excellent for connecting devices and automating integration. The solution has all the features we need. We deployed it in our environment, and it's fully integrated. Thanks to their open APIs, the seamless integration makes everything work well together."
"The notifications or the simple ability to notify a large number of people at one time by typing a single message, as opposed to having to type that message multiple times, has been the key benefit."
 

Cons

"The reporting, especially custom reporting, needs to be improved. Additionally, it would be better if it could be hosted on Linux."
"Reporting needs improvement. MTTR and MTTD metrics aren't directly available in playbooks and require manual effort to achieve."
"It could be more user-friendly for searching statistics. While dealing with the statistics, the statistics could be a little bit more streamlined and a little bit more user-friendly to use. I've had to hunt and peck to find some of that, but overall, once I learned a system, it's usable."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Security Incident Response solutions are best for your needs.
881,707 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Comms Service Provider
27%
Computer Software Company
18%
University
10%
Outsourcing Company
8%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with D3 Security?
The reporting, especially custom reporting, needs to be improved. Additionally, it would be better if it could be hosted on Linux.
What is your primary use case for D3 Security?
We use the tool for automation and reporting. It helps to automate our playbooks.
What advice do you have for others considering D3 Security?
It was easy to integrate the tool with our infrastructure because all the APIs are pre-built. We just created a drag-and-drop prompt to integrate the solution with our infrastructure. I rate the ov...
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Comparisons

No data available
 

Interactive Demo

Demo not available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

S&P Global, Scotiabank, Cybereason, Cummins
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about ServiceNow, Proofpoint, Trellix and others in Security Incident Response. Updated: January 2026.
881,707 professionals have used our research since 2012.