No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Progress Semaphore vs data.world Enterprise comparison

Why PeerSpot?
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 3, 2026

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

data.world Enterprise
Ranking in Metadata Management
9th
Average Rating
7.6
Reviews Sentiment
2.2
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Progress Semaphore
Ranking in Metadata Management
11th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2026, in the Metadata Management category, the mindshare of data.world Enterprise is 2.2%, up from 2.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Progress Semaphore is 2.7%, up from 2.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Metadata Management Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
data.world Enterprise2.2%
Progress Semaphore2.7%
Other95.1%
Metadata Management
 

Featured Reviews

JohnBosco Obi - PeerSpot reviewer
Data Analyst at Africa Initiative
Data discovery has transformed analyst autonomy and now needs better bulk editing and UI control
The first improvement I would like for data.world Enterprise is an improvement in communication with users. Most times, new versions roll out without prior information to users, and even though frequent updates respond to issues, they often introduce new bugs. It would be beneficial to send out notifications to users whenever an update is coming, either via email or in-app, so that they can prepare and expect changes. I also find that some areas of the product interface are overly complex, and interface customization needs improvement for users to choose where buttons should be and the layout they prefer. Another improvement needed is the absence of a bulk edit feature in the platform itself. For example, when searching for data and needing to do some edits, you cannot do bulk edits within data.world Enterprise. Instead, you have to export and make your changes in a Python or SQL environment, or use Excel to validate and edit before importing the dataset back for analysis. If data.world Enterprise could incorporate a data-wrangling tool on its service, allowing changes to be made directly, that would be a great improvement.
Use Progress Semaphore?
Leave a review
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Metadata Management solutions are best for your needs.
920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with data.world Enterprise?
There should be improvements in ease of use. When I first used data.world Enterprise, I had an issue with setting visibility while creating a page, leading to the entire organization being notified...
What is your primary use case for data.world Enterprise?
data.world Enterprise is used for documentation related to AI products created for our client named Prologis, where we document everything, such as chatbots and RAG chatbots, and share that documen...
What advice do you have for others considering data.world Enterprise?
data.world Enterprise is deployed using Amazon Web Services, allowing access directly by typing the URL and logging in through our SSO. My advice for others looking into using data.world Enterprise...
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

AP, Square Panda, Aceable
HP, Amgen, Merck, KPMG, Thomson Reuters
Find out what your peers are saying about Collibra, Informatica, Alation and others in Metadata Management. Updated: October 2026.
920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.