Databricks vs IBM Watson Studio comparison

Databricks and IBM are both solutions in the Data Science Platforms category. Databricks is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.3, while IBM is ranked #12 with an average rating of 8.4. Databricks holds a 18.2% mindshare in Data Science Platforms, compared to IBM’s 1.9% mindshare. Additionally, 96% of Databricks users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of IBM users who would recommend it.

Databricks

Read 88 Databricks reviews

14,742 Views
10,545 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

IBM Watson Studio

Read 14 IBM Watson Studio reviews

1,997 Views
1,233 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Databricks

IBM Watson Studio

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 5, 2024

Databricks and IBM Watson Studio compete in data science and analytics. Databricks seems to have an advantage in performance for large-scale data processing and Spark integration, while IBM Watson Studio excels in AI capabilities and offers a comprehensive suite of data science tools.

Features: Databricks is known for its ease in running large-scale analytics, built-in optimization recommendations, and support for collaboration in notebooks. It integrates seamlessly with Spark and offers notable machine learning capabilities. The scalability and support for multiple programming languages enhance its versatility with cloud integrations. IBM Watson Studio stands out for its AI capabilities, built-in data science tools like SPSS Modeler, and use of Jupyter notebooks, making it powerful for machine learning and data integration tasks.

Room for Improvement: Databricks could improve by expanding advanced visualization and machine learning libraries, enhancing ETL tool integration, and providing more user-friendly documentation and interfaces for popular BI tools. IBM Watson Studio could enhance its intuitive user experience, ease of deployment, and support for new AI features. Users often cite navigation challenges, desiring a more integrated interface.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Databricks offers versatile deployment options with support for public, private, and hybrid clouds. It provides comprehensive documentation, though technical support experiences vary. IBM Watson Studio also supports cloud and on-premises deployments. Its documentation is praised for clarity, with users reporting reliability that reduces the need for frequent technical support.

Pricing and ROI: Databricks operates on a pay-as-you-go model, seen as costly for extensive data usage but flexible and offering positive ROI by reducing infrastructure costs. IBM Watson Studio is viewed as reasonably priced for its features, although complex workloads may incur higher costs. Its pricing is generally considered straightforward, delivering beneficial ROI for large-scale data projects.

To learn more, read our detailed Databricks vs. IBM Watson Studio Report (Updated: March 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Databricks vs. IBM Watson Studio

March 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 845,406 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Databricks

Ranking in Data Science Platforms

1st

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Data Warehouse (7th), Streaming Analytics (1st)

IBM Watson Studio

Ranking in Data Science Platforms

12th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

AI Development Platforms (10th)

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Data Science Platforms category, the mindshare of Databricks is 18.2%, down from 19.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of IBM Watson Studio is 1.9%, down from 2.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Data Science Platforms

Featured Reviews

ShubhamSharma7

Data Engineer at a engineering company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Capability to integrate diverse coding languages in a single notebook greatly enhances workflow

Databricks offers various courses that I can use, whether it's PySpark, Scala, or R. I can leverage all these courses in a single notebook, which is beneficial for clients as they can access various tools in one place whenever needed. This is quite significant. I usually work with PySpark based on client requirements. After coding, I feed the Databricks notebooks into the ADF pipeline for updates. Databricks' capability to process data in parallel enhances data processing speed. Furthermore, I can connect our Databricks notebook directly with Power BI and other visualization tools like Qlik. Once we develop code, it allows us to transform raw data into visualizations for clients using analysis diagrams, which is very helpful.

Read full review

Abilio Duarte

Senior Solutions Architect at Self-employed

A highly robust and well-documented platform that simplifies the complex world of AI

The main challenge lies in visibility and ease of use. Providing training sessions can be immensely helpful in helping users navigate and understand the tool's potential. This approach would empower users to explore and make the most of the tools and technologies at their disposal. Another area where IBM could enhance its offering is by providing more visibility to end users regarding the vast potential that Watson offers.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Databricks is a unified solution that we can use for streaming. It is supporting open source languages, which are cloud-agnostic. When I do database coding if any other tool has a similar language pack to Excel or SQL, I can use the same knowledge, limiting the need to learn new things. It supports a lot of Python libraries where I can use some very easily."

"Databricks integrates well with other solutions."

"I would rate them ten out of ten."

"I haven't heard about any major stability issues. At this time I feel like it's stable."

"Databricks serves as a single platform that can handle numerous end-to-end machine learning tasks."

"Databricks has improved my organization by allowing us to transform data from sources to a different format and feed that to the analytics, business intelligence, and reporting teams. This tool makes it easy to do those kinds of things."

"The most valuable aspect of the solution is its notebook. It's quite convenient to use, both terms of the research and the development and also the final deployment, I can just declare the spark jobs by the load tables. It's quite convenient."

"When we have a huge volume of data that we want to process with speed, velocity, and volume, we go through Databricks."

More Databricks pros

"Watson Studio is very stable."

"Watson Studio is the most complete tool for AI projects."

"It is a stable, reliable product."

"IBM Watson Studio consistently automates across channels."

"The solution is very easy to use."

"The scalability of IBM Watson Studio is great."

"The most important thing is that it's a multi-faceted solution. It's a kind of specialist, not a generalist. It can produce very specific information for the customer. It's totally different from Google or any search engine that produces generic information. It's specialty is that it's all on video."

"The main benefit is the ease of use. We see a lot of engineers in our site and customers that really like the way the tools are able to work with the people."

More IBM Watson Studio pros

Cons

"As a data engineer, I see cluster failure in our Databricks user databases as a major issue."

"I would like it if Databricks adopted an interface more like R Studio. When I create a data frame or a table, R Studio provides a preview of the data. In R Studio, I can see that it created a table with so many columns or rows. Then I can click on it and open a preview of that data."

"The integration of data could be a bit better."

"Databricks' performance when serving the data to an analytics tool isn't as good as Snowflake's."

"It would be better if it were faster. It can be slow, and it can be super fast for big data. But for small data, sometimes there is a sub-second response, which can be considered slow. In the next release, I would like to have automatic creation of APIs because they don't have it at the moment, and I spend a lot of time building them."

"The product should provide more advanced features in future releases."

"This solution only supports queries in SQL and Python, which is a bit limiting."

"The solution could be improved by adding a feature that would make it more user-friendly for our team. The feature is simple, but it would be useful. Currently, our team is more familiar with the language R, but Databricks requires the use of Jupyter Notebooks which primarily supports Python. We have tried using RStudio, but it is not a fully integrated solution. To fully utilize Databricks, we have to use the Jupyter interface. One feature that would make it easier for our team to adopt the Jupyter interface would be the ability to select a specific variable or line of code and execute it within a cell. This feature is available in other Jupyter Notebooks outside of Databricks and in our own IDE, but it is not currently available within Databricks. If this feature were added, it would make the transition to using Databricks much smoother for our team."

More Databricks cons

"The solution's interface is very slow at times."

"So a better user interface could be very helpful"

"It's sometimes easy to get lost given the number of images the solution opens up when you click on the mouse and the amount of different tabs."

"We would like to see it less as one big, massive product, but more based on smaller services that we can then roll out to consumers."

"Some of the solutions are really good solutions but they can be a little too costly for many."

"Watson Studio would be improved with a clearer path for the deployment of docker images."

"One area that could be improved is the backup and restoration of the database and the overall database configuration."

"More features in data virtualization would be helpful. The solution could use an interactive dashboard that could make exploration easier."

More IBM Watson Studio cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The cost for Databricks depends on the use case. I work on it as a consultant, so I'm using the client's Databricks, so it depends on how big the client is."

"We have only incurred the cost of our AWS cloud services. This is because during this period, Databricks provided us with an extended evaluation period, and we have not spent much money yet. We are just starting to incur costs this month, I will know more later on the full cost perspective."

"The solution is a good value for batch processing and huge workloads."

"The solution uses a pay-per-use model with an annual subscription fee or package. Typically this solution is used on a cloud platform, such as Azure or AWS, but more people are choosing Azure because the price is more reasonable."

"Databricks' cost could be improved."

"Databricks uses a price-per-use model, where you can use as much compute as you need."

"I rate the price of Databricks as eight out of ten."

"The price of Databricks is reasonable compared to other solutions."

More Databricks pricing and cost advice

"The pricing is generally reasonable and straightforward but can vary significantly depending on the specific workloads in use."

"IBM Watson Studio is a reasonably priced product"

"Watson Studio's pricing is reasonable for what you get."

"IBM Watson Studio is an expensive solution."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Science Platforms solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

845,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

17%

Computer Software Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

Healthcare Company

Financial Services Firm

15%

Computer Software Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Educational Organization

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

Which do you prefer - Databricks or Azure Machine Learning Studio?

Databricks gives you the option of working with several different languages, such as SQL, R, Scala, Apache Spark, or Python. It offers many different cluster choices and excellent integration with ...

See all answers

How would you compare Databricks vs Amazon SageMaker?

We researched AWS SageMaker, but in the end, we chose Databricks. Databricks is a Unified Analytics Platform designed to accelerate innovation projects. It is based on Spark so it is very fast. It...

See all answers

Which would you choose - Databricks or Azure Stream Analytics?

Databricks is an easy-to-set-up and versatile tool for data management, analysis, and business analytics. For analytics teams that have to interpret data to further the business goals of their orga...

See all answers

What do you like most about IBM Watson Studio?

Stability-wise, it is a great tool.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for IBM Watson Studio?

The pricing of Watson Studio is justified by the benefits and power it offers.

See all answers

What needs improvement with IBM Watson Studio?

One area that could be improved is the backup and restoration of the database and the overall database configuration. There were also challenges with programming the network extension in the last p...

See all answers

Comparisons

Dataiku vs Databricks

Compared 11% of the time

Microsoft Power BI vs Databricks

Compared 9% of the time

Dremio vs Databricks

Compared 8% of the time

Informatica PowerCenter vs Databricks

Compared 7% of the time

Tableau vs Databricks

Compared 5% of the time

More Databricks Competitors

Microsoft Azure Machine Learning Studio vs IBM Watson Studio

Compared 15% of the time

Azure OpenAI vs IBM Watson Studio

Compared 14% of the time

Google Vertex AI vs IBM Watson Studio

Compared 14% of the time

Amazon Comprehend vs IBM Watson Studio

Compared 4% of the time

SAS Visual Analytics vs IBM Watson Studio

Compared 3% of the time

More IBM Watson Studio Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Databricks

March 2025

Download Databricks product report

Buyer's Guide

IBM Watson Studio

March 2025

Download IBM Watson Studio product report

Also Known As

Databricks Unified Analytics, Databricks Unified Analytics Platform, Redash

Watson Studio, IBM Data Science Experience, Data Science Experience, DSx

Overview

Databricks is utilized for advanced analytics, big data processing, machine learning models, ETL operations, data engineering, streaming analytics, and integrating multiple data sources.

Organizations leverage Databricks for predictive analysis, data pipelines, data science, and unifying data architectures. It is also used for consulting projects, financial reporting, and creating APIs. Industries like insurance, retail, manufacturing, and pharmaceuticals use Databricks for data management and analytics due to its user-friendly interface, built-in machine learning libraries, support for multiple programming languages, scalability, and fast processing.

What are the key features of Databricks?

User-friendly interface: Simplifies operations and usability.
Built-in machine learning libraries: Facilitates machine learning tasks.
Support for multiple programming languages: Enhances flexibility.
Scalability: Efficiently handles growing data needs.
Fast processing: Improves performance and speed.
Automated optimization: Reduces manual efforts.
Data visualization: Provides insightful visuals.
Collaborative features: Enhances teamwork.
Delta Lake performance: Boosts data management.
Seamless cluster management: Simplifies system operations.

What are the benefits or ROI to look for in Databricks reviews?

Efficiency in handling large datasets: Ensures smooth processing.
Interactive workspace environment: Improves user collaboration.
Integration with platforms: Provides connectivity benefits.
Performance optimization: Enhances overall system performance.
Support for data governance and security: Ensures data integrity and protection.

Databricks is implemented in insurance for risk analysis and claims processing; in retail for customer analytics and inventory management; in manufacturing for predictive maintenance and supply chain optimization; and in pharmaceuticals for drug discovery and patient data analysis. Users value its scalability, machine learning support, collaboration tools, and Delta Lake performance but seek improvements in visualization, pricing, and integration with BI tools.

Databricks

IBM Watson Studio provides tools for data scientists, application developers and subject matter experts to collaboratively and easily work with data to build and train models at scale. It gives you the flexibility to build models where your data resides and deploy anywhere in a hybrid environment so you can operationalize data science faster.

IBM

Sample Customers

Elsevier, MyFitnessPal, Sharethrough, Automatic Labs, Celtra, Radius Intelligence, Yesware

GroupM, Accenture, Fifth Third Bank

Buyer's Guide

Databricks vs. IBM Watson Studio

March 2025

Free Report: Databricks vs. IBM Watson Studio

Find out what your peers are saying about Databricks vs. IBM Watson Studio and other solutions. Updated: March 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

845,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Databricks vs. IBM Watson Studio report.

See our list of best Data Science Platforms vendors.

We monitor all Data Science Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.