No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

DataDome vs Link11 comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 18, 2026

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

DataDome
Ranking in Bot Management
4th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
4.4
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
AI Security (19th)
Link11
Ranking in Bot Management
10th
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.4
Number of Reviews
10
Ranking in other categories
CDN (19th), Web Application Firewall (WAF) (34th), Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection (23rd), API Security (22nd)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the Bot Management category, the mindshare of DataDome is 8.9%, down from 13.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Link11 is 7.9%, up from 6.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Bot Management Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
DataDome8.9%
Link117.9%
Other83.2%
Bot Management
 

Featured Reviews

reviewer2817090 - PeerSpot reviewer
Sr. Executive Engineer at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
Automated bot detection has protected logins and preserved accurate analytics insights
The best features in DataDome include AI-powered bot detection, which is crucial for real-time protection and high accuracy with low friction. It offers protection against multiple attack types, full visibility, and an analytics dashboard that supports scalability and performance. The AI-powered real-time bot detection feature is relied upon daily as it eliminates the need for constant manual intervention, saving us from manually digging through logs and writing custom rules to address sudden traffic spikes, login failures, and slower response times. With fewer security incidents, reduced infrastructure load, and cleaner analytics, I noticed an improved user experience and time saved across teams during high-risk times.
SS
Senior Director of Engineering - Information Security at Apna
Offers flexibility with a kill switch for bypassing Reblaze if needed and provides a reliable Layer 7 defense against attacks
There is still some room for improvement when it comes to bot management from Reblaze because they are relatively new compared to other vendors in the town. AWS WAF, the Web Application Firewall from AWS, has a vast database of bad IP addresses due to its long-standing presence in this business. Reblaze, being a new entrant, is still building its database of bad IP addresses and malicious systems. So, Reblaze needs to work on that aspect. But other than that, I don't think scaling Reblaze has been an issue. There were some initial glitches, but they were all sorted out. So currently, I would say that the bot management and the database are areas they should focus on for further improvement.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The most valuable feature of DataDome is the traffic analysis."
"The biggest positive impact of using DataDome has been stability, efficiency, and trust in our traffic all at the same time."
"Reblaze has just made things simpler for us."
"Provides mobile app security."
"The technical support is quite good, as soon as you have an issue you call or send an email and they respond very quickly, and they also provide you with contact details of the CEO."
"Reblaze has definitely saved us money; we have estimated that it saves up to €500,000 a year."
"The feature I find most valuable is the user-friendly dashboard. It is easy to understand how everything works and it allows you to make decisions quickly and efficiently."
"It is a highly resilient product that can handle significantly larger workloads and high volumes of traffic with ease."
"Reblaze provides us with a solution we can count on."
"We like the website protection, it's really good, and the dashboard is really simple to use."
 

Cons

"Needed improvements could focus on specific aspects that impact my workflow, enabling even more streamlined processes."
"DataDome does not catch legitimate IPs during traffic analysis, even when the traffic exceeds the threshold value."
"Up to now the only cons I could find is sometimes getting change management back on track, because it's a company that evolves, and sometimes I don't have the same needs that they have. But besides that, up until now, I am really pleased with their service and I've also recommended them to some of my clients."
"They have an interface that you have to adjust to. That is a bit of a downfall because I expect an interface to be very intuitive for someone who knows little about security. But if you know about security, the interface is wonderful."
"The WAF features are not as granular as we would expect from a WAF system. There should be more granularity and in-depth rules, out-of-the-box."
"It would be beneficial if it had a workflow or a feature that could fine-tune settings based on high-level requirements."
"The next release should have next-generation automation."
"There is room for improvement in helping us understand session management."
"I would like to have seen more automated reports. Maybe it has been improved in the last year and I'm just not aware of it. But from a managerial point of view, you want a summary report, a weekly report: How many attacks were blocked? How much bandwidth was saved due to the caching mechanism? What were the top-ten attacks that were tested on the network, etc? I could most likely have found all that data if I logged in to the system and ran different reports. It would be very helpful to get a management report on a weekly basis."
"Up to now the only cons I could find is sometimes getting change management back on track, because it's a company that evolves, and sometimes I don't have the same needs that they have."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"I believe that for the six instances we have right now, it's costing us $16,000 per month."
"On a monthly basis we pay $750."
"There is still some room for improvement when it comes to bot management from Reblaze because they are relatively new compared to other vendors in the town."
"We found the cost to be a bit on the higher side, starting at approximately three to four thousand dollars for a small configuration."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Bot Management solutions are best for your needs.
893,221 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
9%
Financial Services Firm
9%
University
9%
Comms Service Provider
7%
Financial Services Firm
13%
Comms Service Provider
11%
Construction Company
8%
Performing Arts
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business5
Midsize Enterprise3
Large Enterprise2
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with DataDome?
The solution catches and perfectly blocks traffic from malicious IPs. DataDome does not catch legitimate IPs during traffic analysis, even when the traffic exceeds the threshold value.
What is your primary use case for DataDome?
We are DataDome in SOC for cybersecurity. We use the solution to perform traffic analysis on any website or server to see whether there is a lot or little traffic.
What advice do you have for others considering DataDome?
Using the solution depends on your purpose. DataDome is a good tool for analyzing traffic in a SOC project. It is easy for a new user to learn to use the solution for the first time. Overall, I rat...
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Comparisons

 

Also Known As

DataDome Bot Protect with Agent Trust
Reblaze
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Rakuten, TripAdvisor, Adevinta, Classmates, BlaBlaCar, Veepee, ...
CBC, Hermes, Gartner
Find out what your peers are saying about Imperva, Akamai, Cloudflare and others in Bot Management. Updated: April 2026.
893,221 professionals have used our research since 2012.