Deep Instinct Prevention Platform vs Malwarebytes Teams comparison

Deep Instinct and Malwarebytes are both solutions in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category. Deep Instinct is ranked #30 with an average rating of 10.0, while Malwarebytes is ranked #28 with an average rating of 8.5. Deep Instinct holds a 1.0% mindshare in EPP, compared to Malwarebytes’s 1.8% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Deep Instinct users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 90% of Malwarebytes users who would recommend it.

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Feb 15, 2026

Malwarebytes Teams and Deep Instinct Prevention Platform compete in the cybersecurity sector, providing endpoint protection solutions. Deep Instinct seems to have the upper hand due to its advanced predictive capabilities and lower false-positive rates.

Features: Malwarebytes Teams offers strong protection capabilities, an easy-to-use interface, and robust malware detection and removal features. It provides a straightforward deployment process, a reliable engine, and comprehensive threat scanning. Deep Instinct excels in advanced predictive capabilities, high accuracy, and low false-positive rates. It provides compatibility across multiple operating systems and a unified deployment model simplifying endpoint management.

Room for Improvement: Malwarebytes Teams could enhance its reporting features, reduce false positives, and improve integration with other security solutions. There is also a need for better resource management. Deep Instinct needs to expand Linux support, improve incident reporting, and provide more detailed logging. Enhancements in ease of deployment and patch management for specific OS environments are also needed.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Malwarebytes Teams demonstrates versatility in deployment across public, private, and hybrid clouds. Users generally report satisfaction with technical support, though complex issues can face delays. Deep Instinct has a simpler deployment process due to its single-agent approach, with some system integration challenges. Customer service is praised for thoroughness and responsiveness, with room for better user feedback engagement.

Pricing and ROI: Malwarebytes Teams is competitively priced but seen as slightly high without automatic entitlement to new features on premium licenses. Despite this, pricing aligns with the market offering middle-range value. Deep Instinct's pricing is more premium, justified by its advanced capabilities and reduced operational overhead, making it cost-effective for larger deployments. Favorable pricing for non-profits adds to its appeal. Both solutions show a positive ROI through effective security functions and reduced risk exposure.

To learn more, read our detailed Deep Instinct Prevention Platform vs. Malwarebytes Teams Report (Updated: April 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Deep Instinct Prevention Platform vs. Malwarebytes Teams

April 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 893,221 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Net...

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category, the mindshare of Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks is 3.6%, down from 3.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Deep Instinct Prevention Platform is 1.0%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Malwarebytes Teams is 1.8%, down from 1.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks	3.6%
Malwarebytes Teams	1.8%
Deep Instinct Prevention Platform	1.0%
Other	93.6%

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

Featured Reviews

ABHISHEK_SINGH

Senior Process Expert at A.P. Moller - Maersk

Gained full visibility and streamlined threat detection through behavior-based insights and AI integration

Initially, we got to have a lot of false positives when we onboarded, but nowadays it's quite smooth. We have fine-tuned our security policies and allowed different levels of policies to get rid of those false positives. Currently, we are getting a fairly good amount of incidents that are not false positives or benign, but actionable items. The process is streamlined. In the initial days, the operations used to get involved in a lot of benign and other activities, but now the process is streamlined. We are leveraging the auto-detection and remediation plans. The operations teams are now more involved in other business roles as well, not just looking into the logs and fetching out what's happening there. They have fixed a lot of things. Initially, they didn't have IAC code drift detection, cloud posture management, or security posture management, but they have those now. They purchased different vendors and did a merger with that. They have now Prisma Cloud that gets integrated and now they are working with Cortex Cloud. Everything that was negative has now been addressed, and the product altogether looks to be in a very better and mature shape now. Currently, it's more or less detecting the workloads with AI-based best practices. Since most organizations are consuming AI agents and other things, we are looking forward to seeing what other feature enhancements Palo Alto can support in that.

Read full review

Tom Foal

CTO at Klaatu IT Security Ltd

Stops ransomware before it executes and reduces response time for the team

A potential area of improvement for Deep Instinct Prevention Platform is their focus on file uploads and large data storage, backups, and other related areas. It is difficult to think of what they could improve, but low information provided by the system when it detects something is one area, particularly in scripting. Deep Instinct Prevention Platform detects malicious scripts but it needs better measures, perhaps signing scripts, so we can be sure that a script is created by a client, not by some malware. It is really about helping us triage incidents effectively, so a bit more help with the analysis of incidents, particularly what the Deep Instinct Prevention Platform agent has discovered, would be beneficial. We need to know what it has spotted that makes it suspect malware.

Read full review

reviewer2594097

Chief Executive Officer at a wholesaler/distributor with 11-50 employees

Exceptional malware protection with regular updates and behavior-based detection

There are no built-in backups or integrated backup options, which could be an opportunity. The free version is effective, however, the paid version is pricey compared to it. Other customers have mentioned issues with false positives. It lacks enterprise-level management and more enterprise functionality. CrowdStrike and SentinelOne are much more enterprise-grade solutions. Malwarebytes has limited integration with cybersecurity tools and lacks enterprise integrations because it is not an enterprise product.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Threat identification and detection are the most valuable features of this solution."

"Its interface and pricing are most valuable, and it is better than other vendors in terms of security."

"I like that the product has behavior-based detection which offers many benefits over signature-based detection."

"The solution's stability is generally good."

"The initial setup is easy."

"The stability of this product is very good."

"The most valuable aspect of Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks for me is its integration with AI detection, where we get to know the behavioral detection based on users, traffic patterns, and different services that we consume."

"It is a simple platform to use."

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks pros

"The most important thing is that it is for prevention. It prevents attacks of any type of malware. Normally, what we've seen in other products is that they are not for prevention. They isolate a possible threat that they don't understand or know about, and then they check it with our database to see if it needs any correction or elimination. This means that the threat is already inside a customer's base, whereas Deep Instinct prevents a threat from getting in. Prevention is basically done by an agent in each installation, PCU, or product. An agent has its own intelligence to be able to detect if it should stop a threat or not. It has been taught. It is like a brain that has been taught to react according to any possible threat. Deep Instinct is very light. It doesn't take too much CPU attention or memory. It doesn't slow down the performance. You don't really realize any change in the performance, which makes it very different from other solutions. They are usually heavy for the users."

"Deep Instinct’s prevention-first approach to stopping unknown ransomware and malware is the reason why we purchased the product."

"It has given us a more structured approach for detecting and preventing threats, with machine learning-based detection and prevention whose engines, even in older versions, are able to pick viruses and malware, supported by many online use cases for detecting different viruses and malware that have been out for many years."

"Deep Instinct Prevention Platform stops all malware, including zero-days in 20 milliseconds, and I have never managed to get anything past it, which means I do not have to get out of bed whenever something happens at the client because we know anything bad has been stopped."

"The user interface is a good feature; it shows which process has been accessed and the flow, and the detections for PowerShell are also pretty good, as is the active scripts detection feature."

"The support is very good, they reply and respond very quickly."

"It's just a single agent that has everything in it... With the EDR solutions, you have to install it, then you have another service history installed, and you have behavioral analytics, etc. With this, everything is in a single small "box," a small agent that has pretty much got everything."

"Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."

More Deep Instinct Prevention Platform pros

"The most valuable feature is its ability to customize for different groups."

"We don't have to spend any time remediating bad things happening: Not viruses nor ransomware."

"It's very versatile and thorough."

"The product keeps our company safe."

"It is intuitive and easy to use. For the most part, it does a good job of catching things. It is good at stopping stuff. I did a couple of tests with a password cracker. I tried to load that on, and Malwarebytes didn't let me do that, which was pretty good. It has a rollback feature that I haven't seen with any other company. If one of your endpoints are hit with mass ransomware, you could actually roll it back. I watched a demo of them do that, and it was pretty sweet."

"Provides successful ransomware shut down operations."

"The most valuable features of Malwarebytes are the agents, user experience, efficiency of the findings, and MDR features."

"This solution helps us by providing central management of anti-malware and anti-exploit functionality."

More Malwarebytes Teams pros

Cons

"In terms of areas of improvement, we have not completed our review of the product. We're also looking at other products. So, it's a little bit hard to tell what could be different because we have not completed the review of this product, but based on our experience so far, its implementation is quite complex."

"We had a problem with getting our older endpoints up to date, but their newest updates have been really good."

"There is also no recovery feature; if some endpoint is under attack there must be the possibility of recovering it or restoring it to a normal state."

"Cortex XDR could improve its sales support team, including better commission structures and referral programs."

"Data privacy is a matter of concern. You have to be careful with data privacy, it can be sensitive and Cortex can have most of your access."

"It is not very strong in terms of endpoint management. It should have additional features like DLP, encryption, or advanced device control. Currently, Cortex is good in terms of the security of the endpoints, but it is not as good as other vendors in terms of the management of the endpoint."

"The downsides of Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks are that in many incidents, when I enter the causality chain, there are numerous logs."

"Currently, if you use Palo Alto endpoint protection as the only solution it's very complicated to remove pre-existing threats."

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks cons

"Reporting on incidents needs improvement."

"They have a manual, but it is not excessive."

"It would be nice if there were options where, if I have to do SIEM integration, I could do so from the UI: Just pick and choose what SIEM solutions the customers use and have options to have out-of-the-box connection facility."

"Due to the nature of deep learning, it’s sometimes difficult to determine why the AI model has blocked a specific file, although this has improved over time."

"When things get done automatically, I would appreciate more logging of what's happening in the background... we should be able to backtrack from the log that gets uploaded to our cloud instance and see, forensically, what the root cause was."

"I would like to see improvement in the user interface so that the user has more control."

"I would like to see improvement in the user interface so that the user has more control. For example, it would be good if a user could change their grouping if they want to be part of another group. Or if I want to right-click and scan a specific file that I just imported, that would be helpful. Sometimes you just want to do an extra scan to make sure you're safe."

"I think it's probably the administration, especially the administration platform, which could be improved in the solution. It's clunky and hard to navigate, especially for inexperienced technicians."

More Deep Instinct Prevention Platform cons

"The technical support could be improved; we find we have to make several requests before an issue is looked into."

"If they want to compete with bigger players, they should consider adding items like threat detection and website warnings."

"Strictly in terms of cyber security, the release cycle should be quarterly, at most. It shouldn't be more frequent than that because, for one thing, keeping up with tech support is difficult."

"The EPP solution lacks the sophisticated artificial intelligence required for automating reports and letting you know about things in real-time."

"I would like to see a little more detail in the log. So, when an event occurs, I'd like to know not just when it happened and on what device, but what activity was taking place on the machine at the time so that we can drill down. If we get a false positive, we have to do a lot of research and go back and forth with our end-users to know why it was a false positive. So, having a little more detail around detections and events would probably be my most asked feature."

"Malwarebytes is too simplistic. From a SOC IR perspective, it doesn't give you very much data around it."

"The stability and performance of the solution are areas with shortcomings that need improvement."

"The product is a little bit more expensive than the other brands."

More Malwarebytes Teams cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Cortex XDR is a costly solution."

"Cortex XDR’s pricing is very reasonable."

"I don't have any issues with the pricing. We are satisfied with the price."

"The return on investment is from the user side because we have seen the performance of it increase the delivery time of the product if we are using too many web-based and on-premise applications. In indirect ways, we saw the return of investment in terms of performance and user satisfaction increase."

"The pricing seems fair, and I do like the licensing model. You use wherever they are, and it is elastic."

"If one wishes to work with another team or large number of users at a future point, he must purchase a license for them."

"We didn't have to pay any additional fee for the cloud instance. It just came with the renewal, which was nice."

"The cost depends on your chosen license type, like Pro or other licenses."

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks pricing and cost advice

"Their pricing is very competitive. It is good, fair, and a lot cheaper than what we were doing with Cylance."

"We are a nonprofit. The MSP had provides pretty decent nonprofit rates for us. This was one of the key factors that made us choose Deep Instinct over its competitors who were significantly more expensive."

"There are no additional costs on the price, and our company has a support contract, which bundles in those services anyway."

"If I include the false positive rate and the detection rate in the comparison, Deep Instinct is worth its price."

"In comparison to the other products out there, it's exceptionally competitively priced. When you consider the lower administrative overhead that it facilitates, it's an absolute value."

"Its pricing is too high, but that is not because of the product. It is expensive because of the cost of the console. You need a console to control the whole thing, but the console is expensive. You have to split this cost among all possible users. Normally, to be able to make it economically attractive, you need at least 1,000 agents, PCs, or users. If you have a customer with 300 to 500 agents, PCs, or users, it becomes too pricey."

"There is a need for customers of the product to pay towards the licensing costs of the tool."

"One thing about their licensing program that I like is that just one covers the server as well as on the endpoint as well as mobile devices. There is no complexity in calculating how many SKUs I need for mobile, for laptop, for desktop, and for servers. It's very simple and that makes it much easier to budget."

More Deep Instinct Prevention Platform pricing and cost advice

"We expect to pay $1,000 USD a month, depending on the number of users."

"On a scale of one to ten, where one is a low price and ten is a high price, I rate the product's pricing a seven."

"I believe the retail price is between $40 and $50 per copy."

"The licensing is per seat, with clients being a little less expensive than servers. If we need more licenses, we can accomplish that within a day. As Malwarebytes adds new features to their product, such as DNS filtering and a patching module, they want to charge us more even though we're a premium user, which isn't ideal."

"I rate the tool's pricing a five out of ten."

"It is expensive."

"Its licensing is annual. There are no additional costs beyond the standard licensing fee."

"Yearly, it is around $50 per client."

More Malwarebytes Teams pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

893,221 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

12%

Construction Company

12%

Comms Service Provider

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

Construction Company

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

11%

University

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	45
Midsize Enterprise	21
Large Enterprise	48

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	11
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	5

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	22
Midsize Enterprise	8
Large Enterprise	6

Questions from the Community

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. Sentinel One

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. SentinelOne SentinelOne offers very detailed specifics with regard to risks or attacks. ...

See all answers

Comparing CrowdStrike Falcon to Cortex XDR (Palo Alto)

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. CrowdStrike Falcon Both Cortex XDR and Crowd Strike Falcon offer cloud-based solutions th...

See all answers

How is Cortex XDR compared with Microsoft Defender?

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is a cloud-delivered endpoint security solution. The tool reduces the attack surface,...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Deep Instinct?

The price for Deep Instinct Prevention Platform is reasonable. It is about the same price as any other antivirus.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Deep Instinct?

A potential area of improvement for Deep Instinct Prevention Platform is their focus on file uploads and large data s...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Deep Instinct?

Deep Instinct Prevention Platform is basically a stopper that prevents any malware, including zero-days. The main ben...

See all answers

What do you like most about Malwarebytes?

Ten times a day, improved signatures will be downloaded, so it is very up-to-date in terms of malware experience.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Malwarebytes?

I really hate the automatic rebilling without officially confirming it with me. It's an annoyance and they should at ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Malwarebytes?

It takes up too much space when it's trying to run in the background.

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 9% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Endpoint vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 5% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 4% of the time

Cortex XSIAM vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 3% of the time

Symantec Endpoint Security vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 3% of the time

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks Competitors

SentinelOne Singularity Endpoint vs Deep Instinct Prevention Platform

Compared 9% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Deep Instinct Prevention Platform

Compared 7% of the time

BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity vs Deep Instinct Prevention Platform

Compared 6% of the time

Morphisec vs Deep Instinct Prevention Platform

Compared 5% of the time

VMware Carbon Black Endpoint vs Deep Instinct Prevention Platform

Compared 5% of the time

More Deep Instinct Prevention Platform Competitors

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Malwarebytes Teams

Compared 6% of the time

HP Wolf Security vs Malwarebytes Teams

Compared 5% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Malwarebytes Teams

Compared 5% of the time

Symantec Endpoint Security vs Malwarebytes Teams

Compared 5% of the time

Kaspersky Small Office Security vs Malwarebytes Teams

Compared 3% of the time

More Malwarebytes Teams Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

May 2026

Download Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks product report

Buyer's Guide

Deep Instinct Prevention Platform

May 2026

Deep Instinct Prevention Platform report

Download Deep Instinct Prevention Platform product report

Buyer's Guide

Malwarebytes Teams

April 2026

Download Malwarebytes Teams product report

Also Known As

Cyvera, Cortex XDR, Palo Alto Networks Traps

No data available

Overview

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks provides advanced threat detection with AI-driven endpoint protection and seamless integration, ensuring multi-layered security and automatic threat response.

Cortex XDR is designed to safeguard endpoints against malware and suspicious activities. It offers advanced threat detection and response capabilities using behavioral analysis, AI, and machine learning. It seamlessly integrates with security infrastructures, providing endpoint security, firewall integration, and enhanced visibility in both cloud-based and on-premises environments.

What are the key features of Cortex XDR?

Advanced Threat Detection: Uses AI and machine learning for proactive threat identification.
Multi-layered Security: Combines various security measures for comprehensive protection.
Endpoint Protection: Safeguards against malware and exploits.
Behavioral Analysis: Monitors suspicious activity for early detection.
Automatic Threat Response: Automates responses to neutralize threats.

What benefits should users expect?

Ease of Use: Simplifies security management with intuitive design.
Resource Efficiency: Minimizes impact on system resources.
Integration Capabilities: Works well with existing security setups.
Reduced Analyst Workload: Automates processes to decrease manual intervention.

Organizations in diverse sectors deploy Cortex XDR to protect against malware, leveraging its advanced threat detection capabilities. Its integration with existing security infrastructures appeals to those seeking comprehensive protection in both cloud and on-premises environments, providing enhanced visibility and threat intelligence.

Palo Alto Networks

Deep Instinct Prevention Platform offers a prevent-first solution with a focus on detecting zero-day threats, featuring user-friendly deployment and robust cross-platform functionality. It integrates well with other security tools to enhance threat detection capabilities.

Deep Instinct leverages deep learning for advanced malware and ransomware prevention. Its lightweight design and easy deployment make it a favored choice for endpoint protection. While praised for its compatibility and minimal updates, challenges exist with Linux support, high resource use in ransomware detection, and the need for better control in administration. Organizations implementing Deep Instinct enjoy real-time prevention against threats like phishing and zero-day exploits.

What are the key features?

Prevent-First Approach: Focusing on preventing threats before they occur.
Deep Learning: Utilizing deep learning for superior malware detection.
User-Friendly Interface: Easy to navigate and deploy across platforms.
Minimal Updates: Requires fewer updates, ensuring consistent protection.
Cross-Platform Functionality: Supports multiple platforms for wider applicability.

What benefits should you consider?

Excellent Accuracy: High accuracy in detecting threats with minimal false positives.
Resource Efficiency: Optimized for low resource consumption during operation.
Integration Capability: Seamlessly integrates with other security strategies.
Real-Time Prevention: Offers real-time responses to emerging threats.

Deep Instinct finds implementation in industries needing robust endpoint protection, adopted by security consultants and resellers for client solutions. It serves managed services aiming to replace traditional antiviruses and safeguards against malware and phishing attacks.

Deep Instinct

Malwarebytes Teams provides advanced threat protection and efficient detection and removal capabilities, featuring cloud-based management and robust endpoint security. It operates on Windows and Mac, emphasizing threat interception and the cloud-management interface.

Offering comprehensive protection, Malwarebytes Teams is recognized for its customizable and user-friendly interface. The anti-exploit feature effectively intercepts threats in Office applications, while frequent updates maintain security standards. Efficient scanning, threat response, and rollback features are highly valued, as is its ability to integrate seamlessly into diverse environments. Remote accessibility and cloud management enhance its robust endpoint protection.

What are the key features of Malwarebytes Teams?

Comprehensive Threat Protection: Advanced detection and removal for malware.
Cloud-Based Management: Manage security conveniently from the cloud.
Anti-Exploit Feature: Protects against threats in Office applications.
Efficient Scanning: Quick and effective threat detection.
Threat Response and Rollback: Swift response with rollback capabilities.

What benefits and ROI should users look for?

Enhanced Security: Continuous updates and strong endpoint protection.
Integration Flexibility: Works well with existing environments.
Reporting Capabilities: Offers effective reporting and monitoring.
Remote Accessibility: Manage security from any location.

Malwarebytes Teams is widely implemented in cybersecurity across industries for endpoint security. Organizations deploy it for malware detection, intrusion protection, and compliance scanning, relying on its antivirus capabilities and ransomware rollback. It serves as a secondary tool alongside primary systems to enhance security on both Windows and Mac environments, particularly valued for monitoring usage behaviors without controlling endpoints.

Malwarebytes

Sample Customers

CBI Health Group, University Honda, VakifBank

Information Not Available

Knutson Construction

Buyer's Guide

Deep Instinct Prevention Platform vs. Malwarebytes Teams

April 2026

Free Report: Deep Instinct Prevention Platform vs. Malwarebytes Teams

Find out what your peers are saying about Deep Instinct Prevention Platform vs. Malwarebytes Teams and other solutions. Updated: April 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

893,221 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Deep Instinct Prevention Platform vs. Malwarebytes Teams report.

See our list of best Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) vendors.

We monitor all Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.