The pricing of this tool has almost zero setup cost, and the implementation is straightforward. The licensing is very competitively priced, better than all other solutions.
Deep Instinct Prevention Platform is obviously more expensive than Bitdefender, which is the one I primarily prefer. So, because of the issue with the installation process, I haven't really evaluated it much further. So, at the moment, I consider BitDefender to be a better value for money. For pricing of this solution, from a re-seller point of view, I was looking at $1.50 per user.
There are no additional costs on the price, and our company has a support contract, which bundles in those services anyway. The cost is something I can't split out exactly for each desktop or each endpoint.
Learn what your peers think about Deep Instinct Prevention Platform. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: January 2026.
Its pricing is too high, but that is not because of the product. It is expensive because of the cost of the console. You need a console to control the whole thing, but the console is expensive. You have to split this cost among all possible users. Normally, to be able to make it economically attractive, you need at least 1,000 agents, PCs, or users. If you have a customer with 300 to 500 agents, PCs, or users, it becomes too pricey.
We are a nonprofit. The MSP had provides pretty decent nonprofit rates for us. This was one of the key factors that made us choose Deep Instinct over its competitors who were significantly more expensive.
25 Year Managed Security Service Veteran at a tech services company with 11-50 employees
Reseller
Dec 24, 2018
I think the pricing is a huge value. In comparison to the other products out there, it's exceptionally competitively priced. When you consider the lower administrative overhead that it facilitates, it's an absolute value.
Pricing and licensing are very straightforward. It's two SKUs, one is for the console and the other is for the client. One thing about their licensing program that I like is that just one covers the server as well as on the endpoint as well as mobile devices. There is no complexity in calculating how many SKUs I need for mobile, for laptop, for desktop, and for servers. It's very simple and that makes it much easier to budget. You know how much you're spending and how you're securing your environment with that technology.
Regional Technical Manager at a retailer with 201-500 employees
Real User
Nov 11, 2018
The pricing is okay. * Compared to Symantec, the pricing is a bit more expensive. * Compared to Sophos Intercept X, the price is about the same or slightly cheaper. * Compared to Carbon Black, it's much cheaper. If I include the false positive rate and the detection rate in the comparison, Deep Instinct is worth its price.
Senior Consultant at a tech services company with 11-50 employees
Reseller
Nov 6, 2018
Because we are doing the MSSP model for Deep Instinct, we are able to get even very few licenses. Users can sign up even if they have a small office or, of course, a big office. It's really scalable and elastic in that sense.
Deep Instinct PREVENTS >99% of UNKNOWN threats like ransomware and zero-days before they land inside your environment – not after. With both an agentless and agent-based approach, we ensure file-based and fileless attacks are prevented. To achieve this, Deep Instinct is pioneering the use of deep learning AI to prevent threats in <20ms, without requiring calls to the cloud for threat intelligence. Our ability to scale to the needs of the enterprise is unprecedented as is our delivery...
The price for Deep Instinct Prevention Platform is reasonable. It is about the same price as any other antivirus.
The pricing of this tool has almost zero setup cost, and the implementation is straightforward. The licensing is very competitively priced, better than all other solutions.
There is a need for customers of the product to pay towards the licensing costs of the tool.
Deep Instinct Prevention Platform is obviously more expensive than Bitdefender, which is the one I primarily prefer. So, because of the issue with the installation process, I haven't really evaluated it much further. So, at the moment, I consider BitDefender to be a better value for money. For pricing of this solution, from a re-seller point of view, I was looking at $1.50 per user.
There are no additional costs on the price, and our company has a support contract, which bundles in those services anyway. The cost is something I can't split out exactly for each desktop or each endpoint.
Their pricing is very competitive. It is good, fair, and a lot cheaper than what we were doing with Cylance.
Its pricing is too high, but that is not because of the product. It is expensive because of the cost of the console. You need a console to control the whole thing, but the console is expensive. You have to split this cost among all possible users. Normally, to be able to make it economically attractive, you need at least 1,000 agents, PCs, or users. If you have a customer with 300 to 500 agents, PCs, or users, it becomes too pricey.
We are a nonprofit. The MSP had provides pretty decent nonprofit rates for us. This was one of the key factors that made us choose Deep Instinct over its competitors who were significantly more expensive.
We are satisfied with the pricing.
I think the pricing is a huge value. In comparison to the other products out there, it's exceptionally competitively priced. When you consider the lower administrative overhead that it facilitates, it's an absolute value.
Pricing and licensing are very straightforward. It's two SKUs, one is for the console and the other is for the client. One thing about their licensing program that I like is that just one covers the server as well as on the endpoint as well as mobile devices. There is no complexity in calculating how many SKUs I need for mobile, for laptop, for desktop, and for servers. It's very simple and that makes it much easier to budget. You know how much you're spending and how you're securing your environment with that technology.
The pricing is a little bit expensive but we are satisfied with DI's performance. CPU consumption during scanning is under five percent.
The pricing is okay. * Compared to Symantec, the pricing is a bit more expensive. * Compared to Sophos Intercept X, the price is about the same or slightly cheaper. * Compared to Carbon Black, it's much cheaper. If I include the false positive rate and the detection rate in the comparison, Deep Instinct is worth its price.
Because we are doing the MSSP model for Deep Instinct, we are able to get even very few licenses. Users can sign up even if they have a small office or, of course, a big office. It's really scalable and elastic in that sense.