Deep Instinct Prevention Platform vs OPSWAT Filescan Sandbox comparison

Deep Instinct and OPSWAT are both solutions in the Anti-Malware Tools category. Deep Instinct is ranked #17 with an average rating of 9.0, while OPSWAT is ranked #24 with an average rating of 8.0. Deep Instinct holds a 0.9% mindshare in Anti-Malware Tools, compared to OPSWAT’s 1.2% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Deep Instinct users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of OPSWAT users who would recommend it.

Deep Instinct Prevention Pl...

Read 20 Deep Instinct Prevention Platform reviews

2,176 Views
805 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

OPSWAT Filescan Sandbox

Read 1 OPSWAT Filescan Sandbox review

745 Views
738 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Deep Instinct Prevention Pl...

OPSWAT Filescan Sandbox

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Deep Instinct Prevention Platform and OPSWAT Filescan Sandbox based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, SentinelOne, Check Point Software Technologies and others in Anti-Malware Tools.

To learn more, read our detailed Anti-Malware Tools Report (Updated: January 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Anti-Malware Tools

January 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Deep Instinct Prevention Pl...

Ranking in Anti-Malware Tools

17th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) (36th)

OPSWAT Filescan Sandbox

Ranking in Anti-Malware Tools

24th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Anti-Malware Tools category, the mindshare of Deep Instinct Prevention Platform is 0.9%, down from 1.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OPSWAT Filescan Sandbox is 1.2%, up from 0.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Anti-Malware Tools Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Deep Instinct Prevention Platform	0.9%
OPSWAT Filescan Sandbox	1.2%
Other	97.9%

Anti-Malware Tools

Featured Reviews

Tom Foal

CTO at Klaatu IT Security Ltd

Stops ransomware before it executes and reduces response time for the team

A potential area of improvement for Deep Instinct Prevention Platform is their focus on file uploads and large data storage, backups, and other related areas. It is difficult to think of what they could improve, but low information provided by the system when it detects something is one area, particularly in scripting. Deep Instinct Prevention Platform detects malicious scripts but it needs better measures, perhaps signing scripts, so we can be sure that a script is created by a client, not by some malware. It is really about helping us triage incidents effectively, so a bit more help with the analysis of incidents, particularly what the Deep Instinct Prevention Platform agent has discovered, would be beneficial. We need to know what it has spotted that makes it suspect malware.

Read full review

reviewer2390334

Cyber Security Engineer at a security firm with 11-50 employees

An easily integratable solution that helps scan files

I recommend leveraging the data and using case transcripts to understand how the tool can address your needs. Additionally, testing the solution in your environment can be helpful. If we keep it updated and ensure that the engines and the latest definitions are up-to-date, the solution functions without problems. It continues scanning without any delays. I rate the product an 8 out of 10. With OPSWAT Filescan Sandbox, we can scan various file types, including IOCs, Python compressors, and QR codes from images. All the configuration settings are user-dependent and can be modified over time. It's highly configurable—you can easily navigate to the console, click on any option, and quickly adjust settings, including the default size.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Good detections for PowerShell. and good user interface."

"When we were looking at Carbon Black and Sophos, the prevention pieces weren't as strong when compared to DI, which is why we decided to go with DI... I would rather have a product that does the prevention up front and saves me the effort of having to wipe someone's workstation."

"Deep Instinct's detection rate is close to 100 percent."

"It has given us a more structured approach for detecting and preventing threats. It has machine learning-based detection and prevention. Their engines, in even older versions, are able to pick these viruses and malware. They have posted a lot of use cases online for detecting different viruses and malware that have been out for many years."

"The most valuable feature is its ability to detect and eradicate ransomware using non-signature-based methods."

"Deep Instinct Prevention Platform stops all malware, including zero-days in 20 milliseconds, and I have never managed to get anything past it, which means I do not have to get out of bed whenever something happens at the client because we know anything bad has been stopped."

"The detection rate is very high. In all the testing with around 20 partners in different environments, quite a lot of them had installed with other anti-malware applications, like Sophos. This software can co-exist with those applications in the same machine. This is impressive."

"The most important thing is that it is for prevention. It prevents attacks of any type of malware. Normally, what we've seen in other products is that they are not for prevention. They isolate a possible threat that they don't understand or know about, and then they check it with our database to see if it needs any correction or elimination. This means that the threat is already inside a customer's base, whereas Deep Instinct prevents a threat from getting in. Prevention is basically done by an agent in each installation, PCU, or product. An agent has its own intelligence to be able to detect if it should stop a threat or not. It has been taught. It is like a brain that has been taught to react according to any possible threat. Deep Instinct is very light. It doesn't take too much CPU attention or memory. It doesn't slow down the performance. You don't really realize any change in the performance, which makes it very different from other solutions. They are usually heavy for the users."

More Deep Instinct Prevention Platform pros

"What I find most valuable about it is the design interface."

Cons

"The Management Console is not localized."

"Due to the nature of deep learning, it’s sometimes difficult to determine why the AI model has blocked a specific file, although this has improved over time."

"The main area for improvement in Deep Instinct Prevention Platform is Arm support, which is not implemented yet."

"The interface on the endpoint could be a little more descriptive and more valuable. It doesn't always tell you the data you need to see. Improvement there would be very helpful."

"The Deep Instinct client stops working when you have two servers and you add high availability or Windows Failover Cluster mode. It doesn't work in a clustered mode. I haven't yet had time to go back and talk with their support and get it fixed. It would be good if they can make the installation independent of an actual user. Currently, its installation is dependent on the actual user being logged in. For example, a computer has to be logged in for the installation to happen. If it is not logged in, then on the cloud platform, it is going to show that the client is offline. On the management side of the cloud platform, we would like to have the administrators segregated by logical entities. We have told them that on their cloud management platform, we would like to be able to segregate clients into different logical entities or organizations so that the administrators are able to manage only those entities that are within their designated organization."

"When things get done automatically, I would appreciate more logging of what's happening in the background... we should be able to backtrack from the log that gets uploaded to our cloud instance and see, forensically, what the root cause was."

"I think it's probably the administration, especially the administration platform, which could be improved in the solution. It's clunky and hard to navigate, especially for inexperienced technicians."

"If they can bring some additional, complementary solutions, like network scanning and the like, that will help. If they had some sort of a firewall which could help detect DDoS attacks and other things, it would be an improvement"

More Deep Instinct Prevention Platform cons

"There's a size limitation, allowing us to scan only small files."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"If I include the false positive rate and the detection rate in the comparison, Deep Instinct is worth its price."

"Its pricing is too high, but that is not because of the product. It is expensive because of the cost of the console. You need a console to control the whole thing, but the console is expensive. You have to split this cost among all possible users. Normally, to be able to make it economically attractive, you need at least 1,000 agents, PCs, or users. If you have a customer with 300 to 500 agents, PCs, or users, it becomes too pricey."

"In comparison to the other products out there, it's exceptionally competitively priced. When you consider the lower administrative overhead that it facilitates, it's an absolute value."

"One thing about their licensing program that I like is that just one covers the server as well as on the endpoint as well as mobile devices. There is no complexity in calculating how many SKUs I need for mobile, for laptop, for desktop, and for servers. It's very simple and that makes it much easier to budget."

"The pricing is a little bit expensive but we are satisfied with DI's performance."

"There are no additional costs on the price, and our company has a support contract, which bundles in those services anyway."

"We are a nonprofit. The MSP had provides pretty decent nonprofit rates for us. This was one of the key factors that made us choose Deep Instinct over its competitors who were significantly more expensive."

"Pricing and licensing are very straightforward. It's two SKUs, one is for the console and the other is for the client."

More Deep Instinct Prevention Platform pricing and cost advice

"The tool is free, but there's a size limitation, allowing us to scan only small files."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Anti-Malware Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

15%

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

Outsourcing Company

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

Energy/Utilities Company

University

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	11
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	5

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Deep Instinct?

The product offers integration capabilities and is also easy to use.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Deep Instinct?

The price for Deep Instinct Prevention Platform is reasonable. It is about the same price as any other antivirus.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Deep Instinct?

See all answers

What do you like most about OPSWAT Filescan Sandbox?

What I find most valuable about it is the design interface.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for OPSWAT Filescan Sandbox?

The tool is free, but there's a size limitation, allowing us to scan only small files.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for OPSWAT Filescan Sandbox?

We use the product to scan files.

See all answers

Comparisons

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Deep Instinct Prevention Platform

Compared 9% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Deep Instinct Prevention Platform

Compared 7% of the time

Morphisec vs Deep Instinct Prevention Platform

Compared 7% of the time

Huntress Managed EDR vs Deep Instinct Prevention Platform

Compared 6% of the time

More Deep Instinct Prevention Platform Competitors

VirusTotal vs OPSWAT Filescan Sandbox

Compared 24% of the time

MetaDefender vs OPSWAT Filescan Sandbox

Compared 13% of the time

VMRay vs OPSWAT Filescan Sandbox

Compared 8% of the time

Resec for Kiosks vs OPSWAT Filescan Sandbox

Compared 8% of the time

Datto AV vs OPSWAT Filescan Sandbox

Compared 5% of the time

More OPSWAT Filescan Sandbox Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Deep Instinct Prevention Platform

January 2026

Deep Instinct Prevention Platform report

Download Deep Instinct Prevention Platform product report

Buyer's Guide

Anti-Malware Tools

January 2026

Download OPSWAT Filescan Sandbox product report

Overview

Deep Instinct PREVENTS >99% of UNKNOWN threats like ransomware and zero-days before they land inside your environment – not after. With both an agentless and agent-based approach, we ensure file-based and fileless attacks are prevented. To achieve this, Deep Instinct is pioneering the use of deep learning AI to prevent threats in <20ms, without requiring calls to the cloud for threat intelligence. Our ability to scale to the needs of the enterprise is unprecedented as is our delivery of the industry’s lowest false positive rate of <0.1%.

The Deep Instinct Prevention Platform combines industry-leading static analysis based on the only deep learning framework dedicated to cybersecurity and includes two solutions:

Deep Instinct Prevention for Applications is a flexible, containerized and highly scalable solution, deployed via API or ICAP, to scan million so files per day and prevent malicious files from entering storage environments.

Deep Instinct for Endpoints complements EDR solutions by preventing threats pre-execution, minimizing false positives, improving the productivity of SOC teams, and increasing the efficiency of the security stack.

To learn more, visit: https://www.deepinstinct.com.

Deep Instinct

OPSWAT Filescan Sandbox offers advanced malware analysis for cybersecurity professionals, delivering enhanced security insights through sandbox technology. Its robust framework supports reliable protection against emerging threats.

OPSWAT Filescan Sandbox integrates seamlessly into security workflows to provide in-depth analysis and reporting on potential malware threats. It efficiently utilizes sandbox technology to evaluate suspicious files in a controlled environment, ensuring threats are accurately identified and neutralized. Users appreciate its quick adaptability and strong integration capabilities with existing security systems, imparting a comprehensive layer of defense.

What are the standout features of OPSWAT Filescan Sandbox?

Advanced Malware Analysis: Performs thorough examinations of files to detect malware behavior.
Seamless Integration: Easily connects with existing security infrastructures.
Customizable Detection: Provides options for tailoring detection parameters to fit specific requirements.

What benefits and ROI should users consider?

Enhanced Security: Improves threat detection accuracy, reducing vulnerability exposure.
Operational Efficiency: Streamlines security processes, saving time and resources.
Scalability: Accommodates growing needs without loss of performance or security.

Telecommunications and finance industries, where data protection is crucial, often implement OPSWAT Filescan Sandbox to meet stringent compliance and security standards. Its adaptability makes it a preferred choice for deploying comprehensive security protocols.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, SentinelOne, Check Point Software Technologies and others in Anti-Malware Tools. Updated: January 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Anti-Malware Tools vendors.

We monitor all Anti-Malware Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.