

Idira Privileged Access Manager and Delinea Runtime Authorization are competitors in the realm of securing privileged access. Based on comparative analysis, Delinea seems to have the upper hand due to its emphasis on cloud integration and adaptive security.
Features:Idira offers comprehensive management of privileged accounts, session monitoring, and integration of various identity systems. Its key strengths include thorough session monitoring, integration flexibility, and automated credential management. Delinea excels in runtime authorization, seamless integration with cloud-native applications, and features such as Just-In-Time access and adaptive security mechanisms.
Room for Improvement:Idira could improve its plugin connectivity, session recording capabilities, and device support. It would also benefit from streamlining user interfaces and integrating with more systems. Delinea should focus on reducing complexity in change management processes, improving reporting customizations, and enhancing support for complex integrations. Better documentation and setup procedures could further improve user experience.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service:Idira supports a diverse range of deployment options, with a focus on strong on-premises presence, and garners positive feedback on customer support, although response times and support processes can be improved. Delinea is effective in cloud and hybrid cloud environments, offering seamless cloud deployment. It is praised for responsive support but reports instances of delayed non-critical issue assistance. Both products can enhance deployment ease and customer engagement.
Pricing and ROI:Idira's comprehensive feature set results in higher costs, which smaller companies might find expensive, though the pricing is justified by security benefits and ROI through enhanced compliance and efficiency. Delinea's pricing model is competitive with reasonable license fees, offering economic benefits through reduced access management time, although setup and licensing costs might be high for some users.
I can definitely say that it saved us time, and a lot of it. Probably months worth of time in engineering and IT support.
The onboarding of temporary privileged access accelerated significantly, allowing us to release consultants much faster than before, saving considerable money.
We need fewer employees now because StrongDM saves our time by eliminating manual work.
The return on investment lies in improved security infrastructure, addressing over-privileged access, and reducing the risk of credential compromise, which is a major source of data breaches.
The end users have the authority to reconcile the password or verify it before using session isolation, which is one of the unique features that can be enabled through Privileged Session Manager, preventing any attacks from happening within the organization when connected with sessions through CyberArk Privileged Access Manager.
CyberArk Privileged Access Manager has helped customers save on costs primarily by reducing the number of engineering and information security personnel.
They responded quickly to issues and were readily available for calls rather than waiting for email confirmations.
The technical support is responsive and knowledgeable.
They also have very good documentation, where they often ask us to refer to a particular document but can provide excellent on-call support.
CyberArk has been exceptional in coming back to us with immediate responses.
It could be forever until you talk to someone who knows what they are doing.
Based on the issue resolution and support quality, I rate the support 10 out of 10.
If a larger organization such as Microsoft or Dell adopted it, there would be more privileged accounts, showing the product's potential to grow if issues in maintenance and crashing are resolved.
StrongDM's scalability is impressive; it is highly available, and we never perceived any latency issues.
StrongDM has very large and good scalability, capable of providing a million data in a second, showcasing its great scalability.
The CPM can reportedly handle up to 50,000 accounts independently without issue.
I would rate it a ten out of ten for scalability.
They had 40,000 passwords in this one safe, and it was saving the last ten iterations of each password object. That means they had 400,000 password objects in this safe. They exceeded the limit.
The gateway sometimes crashes, and you are unable to retrieve passwords.
StrongDM is very stable; I cannot recall experiencing a glitch.
I rate the stability of the product five out of ten because crashes sometimes happen when we are working on it.
Proper fine-tuning and expertise ensure the product performs well.
Overall, the stability of the solution is high.
It has a large customer base and positive feedback within my network.
StrongDM has limited MFA and passwordless options, relying heavily on time-based one-time passwords (OTP) or Duo, lacking support for true passwordless setups like biometrics or hardware YubiKeys, and it does not support per-session MFA.
It would be beneficial to have better control and alignment between frequent updates and improved communication regarding possible negative effects on existing customer bases.
It is difficult to find documentation or materials to review how it works, and there is less product material available in the market.
They want everything to be on the cloud, but even in the SaaS version of CyberArk Privileged Access Manager, they need to deploy some servers on-premises.
We cannot generate a plug-in for web-based applications.
If they want clients to move to the cloud, they need to support them in real-time.
The setup cost was free, with technical staff aiding our onboarding, requiring us only to cover the license fee.
It was mentioned that while the product is rapidly gaining features, it might become cost-prohibitive for wider usage.
My thoughts on the pricing of StrongDM is that it is expensive.
CyberArk is expensive compared to other products I know.
CyberArk is comparatively expensive compared to other PAM solutions, such as Delinea, especially during renewal.
CyberArk's SaaS solution is particularly expensive.
One of the most powerful tools in StrongDM is audit logging.
Just-in-Time Access is the primary feature that works well and makes life easier for us here at LivePerson.
The best features for us are the centralized access control and the detailed audit logging, which allow us to provide temporary privileged access without managing VPNs ourselves.
CyberArk Privileged Access Manager helps ensure data privacy because we now know who is using which credentials and at what time.
It keeps a record of activities, allowing me to easily fetch screen recordings to detect any misuse and see who did what and what happened.
It can integrate with Splunk, SNMP, and other solutions and technologies.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Idira Privileged Access Manager | 8.5% |
| StrongDM | 2.2% |
| Other | 89.3% |


| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 5 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 3 |
| Large Enterprise | 9 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 59 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 43 |
| Large Enterprise | 175 |
Delinea Runtime Authorization offers advanced privileged access management with features like session logging and centralized access management, ensuring secure and efficient operations.
Designed for environments requiring secure privileged access, Delinea Runtime Authorization centralizes session logging and audit trails, integrates with SSO and MFA, and supports just-in-time access without credential exposure. It enhances security and compliance with seamless deployment across cloud environments, inheriting role-based controls and self-service options. Despite potential improvements needed in reporting, setup complexity, and integrations, it remains integral for managing secure access to servers, databases, and Kubernetes clusters.
What are the key features of Delinea Runtime Authorization?Used extensively in industries like finance, healthcare, and technology, Delinea Runtime Authorization helps manage privileged access by eliminating shared credentials and ensuring secure access across infrastructures. It supports compliance needs and enhances security for remote access management, particularly for environments requiring stringent security measures and efficient operational processes.
CyberArk Privileged Access Manager safeguards privileged accounts through password management, credential rotation, and session recording. With seamless integration and real-time monitoring, it ensures robust security across platforms.
CyberArk Privileged Access Manager is recognized for its extensive capabilities in managing and securing privileged accounts. It offers vital functionalities such as automatic password rotation, real-time session monitoring, and cross-platform integration through APIs and custom connectors. Users find the flexibility in workflows and granular access controls beneficial, particularly in protecting access across cloud and on-prem infrastructures. However, improvements in its interface, installation process, plugin support, and integration with third-party tools are often suggested. Pricing is a concern for many, along with the need for better dashboard reporting, user provisioning, and enhanced documentation. Organizations leverage this tool for encrypting and monitoring critical account activities and automating password management to bolster security.
What are the key features of CyberArk Privileged Access Manager?
What benefits or ROI should users expect?
CyberArk Privileged Access Manager finds substantial use in industries such as finance, healthcare, and technology, where the protection of privileged accounts is critical. These sectors rely on its capabilities to manage application credentials securely and provide safe access for developers, administrators, and vendors across various infrastructures.
We monitor all Privileged Access Management (PAM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.