No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Devo vs Logz.io comparison

Why PeerSpot?
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 18, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
6.2
Devo provided improved ROI through cost savings and efficiency, despite some concerns over costs and support challenges.
Sentiment score
8.7
Logz.io enhances ROI by streamlining monitoring, reducing costs, and improving system reliability, response accuracy, and customer satisfaction.
Devo gives value to the end user and is saving compared to other products in the same category.
Principal Consultant at Syntx Sdn Bhd
In terms of return on investment with Devo, I'd say it has been costly due to the need for support and the overtime required for issues experienced at the beginning of the project.
Senior Consultant and Technical Lead at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees
We achieve early identification of security incidents that could potentially breach the customer environment, which would have been costly.
Principal Technology Architect at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
The accuracy of responses has also enhanced, leading to money savings and improved uptime, resulting in happier customers and overall positive metrics, indicating we have seen a return on investment.
Associate Director at Husk Power Systems
The biggest ROI comes from the reduced troubleshooting effort, less time spent managing logging infrastructure, and faster issue resolution.
DevOps Engineer at Veefin
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
6.2
Customer service is responsive and proactive, but needs improvement in onboarding, documentation, and regional service consistency.
Sentiment score
6.1
Logz.io's customer service is praised for responsiveness, though some suggest improved bug handling and consistent follow-up communication.
I rate the customer support a nine out of ten because of their timely technical guidance and responsiveness during the deployment and troubleshooting periods.
Cyber Security Engineer Ii (Vulnerability & Threat Management) at FICO
Both response time and support quality need attention.
Team Lead Soc at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
Technical support from Devo is helpful.
Principal Consultant at Syntx Sdn Bhd
The team is very responsive and knowledgeable whenever we need their assistance.
DevOps Engineer at Veefin
I have not had to reach out for customer support from Logz.io, as it has been very easy to set up and work with.
Associate Director at Husk Power Systems
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
6.9
Praised for scalability, Devo efficiently manages large logs, easily expands use, but multi-tenancy features need development.
Sentiment score
6.8
Logz.io is praised for scalability and flexibility, handling growth efficiently, though minor issues and cost concerns exist.
Devo is a unified SIEM solution designed to handle growing log volumes and enterprise-scale monitoring requirements.
Cyber Security Engineer Ii (Vulnerability & Threat Management) at FICO
Devo's scalability has its challenges.
Senior Consultant and Technical Lead at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees
Regarding Devo's scalability, its horizontal scalability is quite good with no significant hassle.
Principal Technology Architect at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
Logz.io handles the growing log volumes and additional services very well without requiring major architectural changes from our side.
DevOps Engineer at Veefin
Logz.io has managed our organization's growth well; we have actually scaled down slightly to optimize for cost, which has worked well.
Associate Director at Husk Power Systems
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
7.5
Devo offers reliable performance with minimal outages, praised for proactive alerts and quick incident resolution, ensuring business continuity.
Sentiment score
8.4
Logz.io is stable, handling large data, with effective support, positive user feedback, and aligning well with SLAs.
It is stable and reliable for our security operations.
Cyber Security Engineer Ii (Vulnerability & Threat Management) at FICO
 

Room For Improvement

Devo needs enhancements in support, performance, AI, customization, and documentation, focusing on data management and UI configuration.
Logz.io users seek improved access control, AI features, pricing, and dashboard customization for enhanced functionality and scalability.
It's hard for us to keep pace since our original use case was 250 to 500 megabytes a day, and then it became two terabytes a day.
Senior Consultant and Technical Lead at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees
Integrating custom parsing and mapping for non-standard logs is essential due to compatibility challenges with various technologies.
Principal Technology Architect at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
This is particularly evident when dealing with failed login attempts and determining true versus false positives.
Strategic Account Executive at a computer software company with 51-200 employees
Their features align with offerings from Elastic Stack and other prominent tools, including functionalities available from Prometheus or Grafana, providing centralized logging and other capabilities in the UI.
Associate Director at Husk Power Systems
Logz.io can be improved by adding more AI-assisted root cause analysis and by improving log retention flexibility.
DevOps Engineer at Veefin
 

Setup Cost

Devo offers competitive, simple data ingestion-based pricing with extensive features and flexibility, despite some limitations in tier options.
Logz.io's pricing receives mixed reviews; it's seen as both expensive and cost-effective, with transparency and flexible features appreciated.
The pricing could be simpler, and while the initial setup cost for a new instance is a bit expensive, the licensing can currently be user-based or driven by log volume, which is better if there is expansion of our user base.
Principal Technology Architect at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
The pricing of the product is reasonable if we compare it with other Gartner leading products like Splunk, LogRhythm, Microsoft Sentinel, Google SecOps.
Team Lead Soc at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
Organizations that start with clear logging standards and retention policies can integrate applications, cloud resources, and Kubernetes workloads early to maximize the observability benefits.
DevOps Engineer at Veefin
While their pricing is quite good compared to the industry, from my company's perspective, we expect better value.
Associate Director at Husk Power Systems
 

Valuable Features

Devo excels in real-time analytics, large data handling, customization, and third-party integration, enhancing security operations with advanced features.
Logz.io offers scalable log management, AI insights, integrations, and supports data interpretation with usage-based billing, enhancing productivity.
When they see a spike in a line chart for a failed login, which could be a true or false attempt, they can click that spike, and a table widget on the same active board instantly populates with raw logs of data for those specific failed logins.
Strategic Account Executive at a computer software company with 51-200 employees
When the analyst uses queries to search, it pulls the data quickly, in a second, which aids us greatly with the investigation.
Cyber Security Engineer Ii (Vulnerability & Threat Management) at FICO
It utilizes 400 days of hot data, allowing queries to run very fast and yield results quicker than other tools in terms of security and SIEM capability.
Senior Cloud Engineer at a tech services company with 201-500 employees
Having logs from all the services and infrastructure in one place reduces our troubleshooting time and also improves incident response.
DevOps Engineer at Veefin
The best features Logz.io offers, particularly in log management, include the AI integration, which immediately conducts root cause analysis based on issues without needing a lot of manual setup.
Associate Director at Husk Power Systems
 

Categories and Ranking

Devo
Ranking in Log Management
21st
Ranking in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)
16th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.5
Number of Reviews
30
Ranking in other categories
IT Operations Analytics (7th), AIOps (17th)
Logz.io
Ranking in Log Management
30th
Ranking in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)
33rd
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
10
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2026, in the Log Management category, the mindshare of Devo is 1.4%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Logz.io is 1.2%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Log Management Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Devo1.4%
Logz.io1.2%
Other97.4%
Log Management
 

Featured Reviews

Usama Khan - PeerSpot reviewer
Team Lead Soc at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
Advanced threat hunting has improved SOC visibility and now supports faster incident response
Devo can improve in how its connectors enhance integration with third-party tools. Devo's architecture works by having you deploy a relay server in the data center of the client side and Devo SIEM is basically on the AWS cloud. There are specific ports which are enabled on the relay server, which are 514 and 13000, 13151, 152. However, when we talk about databases and custom integrations, there are not default ports in the relay server. No default ports are defined. For JDBC drivers, the port number is 1433, but it is not in the relay server. You have to add it manually. For Oracle RDBMS, the port is 1521, and it is also not there by default. I would appreciate more third-party integrations including Fortinet and others. Machine learning models can also be improved. Playbooks in the SOAR can also be improved. Regarding playbooks for automation, we utilize playbooks for automation in SOAR for automated IOC blocking on a firewall, on a web application firewall, on DNS security, etc. The only option for us to run the playbook is to schedule the job for it. However, if I want to manually run the playbook, there is no option for doing so. This needs improvement.
Arkajyoti Misra - PeerSpot reviewer
Associate Director at Husk Power Systems
AI-driven observability has reduced investigation time and now improves uptime and customer trust
As for improvements needed in Logz.io, I think cost or pricing is always a consideration, especially since I come from a startup and an Indian company, making us look for products that provide better value for money. Compared to the market, their pricing appears decent but might need reevaluation as we scale further to remain competitive. The main concern for me is pricing, as feature-wise, I believe Logz.io is on par with other tools available in the market; however, it is not as widely discussed. Their features align with offerings from Elastic Stack and other prominent tools, including functionalities available from Prometheus or Grafana, providing centralized logging and other capabilities in the UI, so while the product direction is solid, improved pricing would immensely benefit us. I believe we have covered almost everything regarding improvements needed for Logz.io.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Log Management solutions are best for your needs.
920,929 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
16%
Outsourcing Company
11%
Construction Company
10%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Comms Service Provider
18%
Construction Company
11%
Outsourcing Company
9%
Financial Services Firm
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business11
Midsize Enterprise6
Large Enterprise15
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business5
Midsize Enterprise2
Large Enterprise7
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Devo?
In terms of improvements, I think Devo falls short with their support model, as they rely mainly on their support team in Spain. Although they do have a support team in North America, they lack kno...
What is your primary use case for Devo?
Devo is the bank's centralized log management platform that my team and I rely on the most. For centralized log management in our day-to-day work, one of the biggest data users would be our Red Hat...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Logz.io?
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing indicates that we feel we could extract more value from it. While their pricing is quite good compared to the industry, from my company's persp...
What needs improvement with Logz.io?
As for improvements needed in Logz.io, I think cost or pricing is always a consideration, especially since I come from a startup and an Indian company, making us look for products that provide bett...
What is your primary use case for Logz.io?
My main use case for Logz.io is to better understand the logs that we have, providing smarter observability. We generally use the Elastic Stack, and Logz.io integrates very well with it, and they e...
 

Comparisons

 

Also Known As

No data available
Logz
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

United States Air Force, Rubrik, SentinelOne, Critical Start, NHL, Panda Security, Telefonica, CaixaBank, OpenText, IGT, OneMain Financial, SurveyMonkey, FanDuel, H&R Block, Ulta Beauty, Manulife, Moneylion, Chime Bank, Magna International, American Express Global Business Travel
Dish Network, The Economist, Forbes, Holler, Kenshoo, OneSpan, Siemens, Sisense, Unity, ZipRecruiter
Find out what your peers are saying about Devo vs. Logz.io and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.
920,929 professionals have used our research since 2012.