Elastic Security vs Logz.io comparison

Read 8 Logz.io reviews

871 Views
613 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

Elastic Security

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 18, 2024

Elastic Security and Logz.io are competing products in the field of security and logging services. Elastic Security offers robust pricing and support options, while Logz.io stands out with its extensive features that users feel justify the cost.

Features: Elastic Security is praised for its powerful integration capabilities, flexible search functionality, and robust pricing. Logz.io is noted for its comprehensive monitoring features, seamless scalability, and advanced analytics.

Room for Improvement: Elastic Security users point to the need for better documentation, more intuitive configuration, and faster deployment. Logz.io users mention a desire for enhanced alerting mechanisms, quicker customer support responses, and cost optimization.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Elastic Security is seen as complex to deploy but benefits from a strong customer service team. Logz.io offers a more straightforward deployment process, but users sometimes report delays in support response.

Pricing and ROI: Elastic Security offers competitive setup costs and is often viewed as delivering good ROI. Logz.io, while slightly more expensive upfront, is considered by users to provide substantial value over time due to its rich feature set.

To learn more, read our detailed Elastic Security vs. Logz.io Report (Updated: March 2025).

Elastic Security vs. Logz.io

Download the complete report

Helped 845,406 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Elastic Security

Ranking in Log Management

7th

Ranking in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)

5th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) (16th), Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) (6th), Extended Detection and Response (XDR) (8th)

Logz.io

Ranking in Log Management

20th

Ranking in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)

24th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Log Management category, the mindshare of Elastic Security is 3.5%, down from 6.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Logz.io is 0.4%, down from 0.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Log Management

Featured Reviews

Gajewski Marek

Chief Technology Officer & Co-founder at CS2

Provides good anomaly detection and connectivity reporting

We previously used Splunk but switched to Elastic Security because Splunk was more expensive. Feature-wise, both tools are pretty much the same. They have almost the same functions. Elastic Security has a much better AI assistant that allows you to ask questions like a normal person. With Elastic Security, I can also predict the price and how much it will cost. Splunks's pricing depends on how much data we use and the different add-ons I have to add. The pricing is much better with Elastic Security.

Read full review

Derrick Brockel

Senior Manager of Operations at a comms service provider with 10,001+ employees

The solution is a consistent logging platform that provides excellent query mechanisms

We can query a lot of data points and build dashboards. The vendor is good at adjusting their models. Most companies want us to forecast our yearly use and pay it upfront on day one. With Logz.io, we commit to use 14 TB in a year. However, they measure us every month and give us a monthly bill. Depending on our monthly usage, we pay for 14 TB divided by 12 months or a little extra. It's a little bit more like AWS. Other solutions do not do it. They want their money upfront. We really like the dashboards. We have 36 sub-accounts. Each sub-account is an app, and we could put restrictions on that app. Previously, there were capacity restrictions on the sub-accounts. If we have a sub-account of 1 TB and use only 100 GB, we waste 900 GB that day. We could not share it between sub-accounts. Now, they provide an overhead volume. We do a reserve, and any sub-account could use anything over the reserve. It utilizes our footprint better.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Just the ability to do a lot more than just up-down is nice, which a lot of people take for granted."

"The tool's functionality is good for overall security and incident response times."

"ELK documentation is very good, so never needed to contact technical support."

"The most valuable feature is the ability to collect authentication information from service providers."

"The solution is quite stable. The performance has been good."

"The most valuable thing is that this solution is widely used for work management and research. It's easy to jump into the security use case with the same technology."

"The stability of the solution is good."

"It's very customizable, which is quite helpful."

More Elastic Security pros

"We use the tool to track the dev and production environment."

"The visualizations in Kibana are the most valuable feature. It's much more convenient to have a visualization of logs. We can see status really clearly and very fast, with just a couple of clicks."

"InsightOne is the main reason why we use LogMeIn. This is mostly because of log data that we are pushing tools and logs in general."

"The other nice thing about Logz.io is their team. When it comes to onboarding, their support is incredibly proactive. They bring the brand experience from a customer services perspective because their team is always there to help you refine filters and tweak dashboards. That is really a useful thing to have. Their engagement is really supportive."

"The tool is simple to setup where it is just plug and play. The tool is reliable and we never had any performance issues."

"The query mechanism for response codes and application health is valuable."

"We use the product for log collection and monitoring."

"It is massively useful and great for testing. We can just go, find logs, and attach them easily. It has a very quick lookup. Whereas, before we would have to go, dig around, and find the server that the logs were connected to, then go to the server, download the log, and attach it. Now, we can just go straight to this solution, type in the log ID and server ID, and obtain the information that we want."

Cons

"Elastic sometimes does not correctly identify threats or anomalies. It might not classify an issue as malicious or critical accurately."

"It would be better if Elastic Security had less storage for data. My customers do not like this. Other vendors have local support in different countries, but Elastic Security doesn't. I would like to have Operational Technology (OT) security in the next release."

"The biggest challenge has been related to the implementation."

"The solution should generate an automatic product that integrates with ELK Stack to use artificial intelligence."

"The problem with ELK is it's difficult to administer. When you have a problem, it can be very, very difficult to rebuild indexes."

"We set up a cron job to delete old logs so that we wouldn't hit a disk space issue. Such a feature should be available in the UI, where old logs can be deleted automatically. (Don’t know if this feature is already there)."

"The solution needs to be more reactive to investigations. We need to be able to detect and prevent any attacks before it can damage our infrastructure. Currently, this solution doesn't offer that."

"I would like more ways to manage permissions and restrict access to certain users."

More Elastic Security cons

"The price can be cheaper and they should have better monitoring."

"I would like them to improve how they manage releases. Some of our integrations integrate specifically with set versions. Logz.io occasionally releases an update that might break that integration. On one occasion, we found out a little bit too late, then we had to roll it back."

"The product needs improvement from a filtering perspective."

"The solution needs to improve its data retention. It should be greater than seven days. The product needs to improve its documentation as well."

"Capacity planning could be a little bit of a struggle."

"When it comes to reducing our troubleshooting time, it depends. When there are no bugs in Logz.io, it reduces troubleshooting by 5 to 10 percent. When there are bugs, it increases our troubleshooting time by 200 percent or more."

"I would like granularity on alerting so we can get tentative alerts and major alerts, then break it down between the two."

"The solution needs to expand its access control and make it accessible through API."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Affordable but with additional costs"

"When compared to other products, the price is average or on the low side."

"I can say that the product is cheaply priced."

"The tool's pricing is flexible and comes at unit cost. You don't have to pay for everything."

"The solution is free."

"Compared to other tools, Elastic Security is a cheaper solution."

"This is an open-source product, so there are no costs."

"The price is reasonable. It probably costs the same as ArcSight and LogRhythm SIEM. FortiSIEM might cost less than Elastic Security. There are no hidden or additional costs."

More Elastic Security pricing and cost advice

"The tool is an open source product."

"The product's pricing is cheaper than other solutions."

"The product is a little expensive."

"You pay for what you need, and that is a good model. They are also quite happy to talk to you about your uses and your use case. They will even go as far as suggesting things that you don't need to do in order to save you money. At one point, I was quite surprised at how cheap it could be if we wanted it to be or how much they would help us manage our costs."

"At the time it was set up, we thought Logz.io was very reasonable for what we were getting in terms of how much time and hosting costs it was saving us, because you don't have to run the servers for it anymore."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Log Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

845,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

17%

Government

10%

Financial Services Firm

Comms Service Provider

Computer Software Company

19%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Comms Service Provider

12%

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

Datadog vs ELK: which one is good in terms of performance, cost and efficiency?

With Datadog, we have near-live visibility across our entire platform. We have seen APM metrics impacted several times lately using the dashboards we have created with Datadog; they are very good c...

What do you like most about Elastic Security?

Elastic provides the capability to index quickly due to the reverse indexes it offers. This data is crucial as it contains critical information. The reverse index allows fast data indexing because ...

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Elastic Security?

Elastic Security is considered cost-effective, especially at lower EPS levels. However, a direct comparison was not made due to different pricing structures.

What do you like most about Logz.io?

The query mechanism for response codes and application health is valuable.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Logz.io?

The product is a little expensive. We're pushing 17 TB. It costs us one and a half million dollars a year.

What needs improvement with Logz.io?

Capacity planning could be a little bit of a struggle. The product must add some AI capabilities to learn from previous behaviors. Instead of us setting thresholds, the tool should learn the thresh...

Wazuh vs Elastic Security

Comparisons

Compared 23% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Elastic Security

Compared 9% of the time

IBM Security QRadar vs Elastic Security

Compared 7% of the time

Splunk Enterprise Security vs Elastic Security

Compared 6% of the time

Microsoft Sentinel vs Elastic Security

Compared 5% of the time

More Elastic Security Competitors

Datadog vs Logz.io

Compared 29% of the time

Coralogix vs Logz.io

Compared 21% of the time

Grafana Loki vs Logz.io

Compared 15% of the time

Amazon OpenSearch Service vs Logz.io

Compared 11% of the time

Graylog vs Logz.io

Compared 9% of the time

More Logz.io Competitors

Product Reports

Elastic Security

Download Elastic Security product report

Download Logz.io product report

Also Known As

Elastic SIEM, ELK Logstash

Logz

Overview

Elastic Security is a robust, open-source security solution designed to offer integrated threat prevention, detection, and response capabilities across an organization's entire digital estate. Part of the Elastic Stack (which includes Elasticsearch, Logstash, and Kibana), Elastic Security leverages the power of search, analytics, and data aggregation to provide real-time insight into threats and vulnerabilities. It is a comprehensive platform that supports a wide range of security needs, from endpoint protection to cloud and network security, making it a versatile choice for organizations looking to enhance their cybersecurity posture.

Elastic Security combines the features of a security information and event management (SIEM) system with endpoint protection, allowing organizations to detect, investigate, and respond to threats in real time. This unified approach helps reduce complexity and improve the efficiency of security operations.

Additional offerings and benefits:

The platform utilizes advanced analytics, machine learning algorithms, and anomaly detection to identify threats and suspicious activities.
It offers extensive integration options with other tools and platforms, facilitating a more cohesive and comprehensive security ecosystem.
With Kibana, users gain access to powerful visualization tools and dashboards that provide real-time insight into security data.

Finally, Elastic Security benefits from a global community of users who contribute to its threat intelligence, helping to enhance its detection capabilities. This collaborative approach ensures that the solution remains on the cutting edge of cybersecurity, with up-to-date information on the latest threats and vulnerabilities.

Elastic

Logz.io is a leading cloud-native observability platform that enables engineers to use the best open source tools in the market without the complexity of operating, managing, and scaling them. Logz.io offers four products: Log Management built on ELK, Infrastructure Monitoring based on Prometheus, Distributed Tracing based on Jaeger, and an ELK-based Cloud SIEM. These are offered as fully managed, integrated cloud services designed to help engineers monitor, troubleshoot and secure their distributed cloud workloads more effectively. Engineering driven companies like Siemens, Unity and ZipRecruiter use Logz.io to simplify monitoring and security workflows, increasing developer productivity, reducing time to resolve issues, and increasing the performance and security of their mission-critical applications.

Sample Customers

Texas A&M, U.S. Air Force, NuScale Power, Martin's Point Health Care

Dish Network, The Economist, Forbes, Holler, Kenshoo, OneSpan, Siemens, Sisense, Unity, ZipRecruiter

Elastic Security vs. Logz.io