Devo vs NNT Log Tracker Enterprise comparison

Devo and Netwrix are both solutions in the Log Management category. Devo is ranked #18 with an average rating of 8.3, while Netwrix is ranked #55. Devo holds a 1.4% mindshare in Log Management, compared to Netwrix’s 0.9% mindshare. Additionally, 92% of Devo users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Netwrix users who would recommend it.

Devo

Read 26 Devo reviews

6,972 Views
3,625 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

NNT Log Tracker Enterprise

Read 4 NNT Log Tracker Enterprise reviews

2,712 Views
1,709 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Devo

NNT Log Tracker Enterprise

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 18, 2024

NNT Log Tracker Enterprise and Devo compete in the log management solutions category, each with distinct highlights. Devo tends to have the upper hand due to its advanced analytics and scalability, while NNT is preferred for its strong security features.

Features: NNT Log Tracker Enterprise focuses on robust security, regulatory compliance, and operational efficiency. Devo emphasizes real-time data analytics, scalability, and advanced user insights.

Room for Improvement: NNT Log Tracker Enterprise could improve in reporting capabilities, integration flexibility, and user interface. Devo needs enhancements in documentation, search functionality, and user experience.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: NNT Log Tracker Enterprise deployment is complex but is supported by responsive customer service. Devo offers a smoother deployment process, though its customer service is considered less proactive.

Pricing and ROI: NNT Log Tracker Enterprise is viewed as cost-effective with a good return on investment in security contexts. Devo, though more expensive, is seen as justifying the higher cost with its powerful features and data analytics ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed Devo vs. NNT Log Tracker Enterprise Report (Updated: June 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Devo vs. NNT Log Tracker Enterprise

June 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 908,800 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Devo

Ranking in Log Management

18th

Ranking in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)

18th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

IT Operations Analytics (7th), AIOps (13th)

NNT Log Tracker Enterprise

Ranking in Log Management

55th

Ranking in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)

53rd

Average Rating

8.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Log Management category, the mindshare of Devo is 1.4%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of NNT Log Tracker Enterprise is 0.9%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Log Management Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Devo	1.4%
NNT Log Tracker Enterprise	0.9%
Other	97.7%

Log Management

Featured Reviews

Usama Khan

Team Lead SOC at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

Advanced threat hunting has improved SOC visibility and now supports faster incident response

Devo can improve in how its connectors enhance integration with third-party tools. Devo's architecture works by having you deploy a relay server in the data center of the client side and Devo SIEM is basically on the AWS cloud. There are specific ports which are enabled on the relay server, which are 514 and 13000, 13151, 152. However, when we talk about databases and custom integrations, there are not default ports in the relay server. No default ports are defined. For JDBC drivers, the port number is 1433, but it is not in the relay server. You have to add it manually. For Oracle RDBMS, the port is 1521, and it is also not there by default. I would appreciate more third-party integrations including Fortinet and others. Machine learning models can also be improved. Playbooks in the SOAR can also be improved. Regarding playbooks for automation, we utilize playbooks for automation in SOAR for automated IOC blocking on a firewall, on a web application firewall, on DNS security, etc. The only option for us to run the playbook is to schedule the job for it. However, if I want to manually run the playbook, there is no option for doing so. This needs improvement.

Read full review

Jagganath Tendle

Senior Infra Manager at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

Great for PCI compliance but issues with stability and large amounts of data

I mainly use this solution to meet PCI compliance The automation of compliance reports and the correlation of the log have been major improvements. The most valuable feature is the predefined reports for PCI compliance. The correlation suite needs to be improved. I also think they need to…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Devo has a really good website for creating custom configurations."

"Devo helps us to unlock the full power of our data because they have more than 450 parsers, which means that we can ingest pretty much any type of log data."

"The strength of Devo is not only in that it is pretty intuitive, but it gives you the flexibility and creativity to merge feeds. The prime examples would be using the synthesis or union tables that give you phenomenal capabilities... The ability to use a synthesis or union table to combine all those feeds and make heads or tails of what's going on, and link it to go down a thread, is functionality that I hadn't seen before."

"Even if it's a relatively technical tool or platform, it's very intuitive and graphical. It's very appealing in terms of the user interface. The UI has a graphically interface with the raw data in a table. The table can be as big as you want it, depending on your use case. You can easily get a report combining your data, along with calculations and graphical dashboards. You don't need a lot of training, because the UI is relatively very intuitive."

"With Devo, we can eliminate swivel chair analysis among tools for a streamlined workflow that gives us the most direct path to the root cause."

"The most valuable feature is definitely the ability that Devo has to ingest data. From the previous SIEM that I came from and helped my company administer, it really was the type of system where data was parsed on ingest. This meant that if you didn't build the parser efficiently or correctly, sometimes that would bring the system to its knees. You'd have a backlog of processing the logs as it was ingesting them."

"Overall, Devo is awesome, but it's got some room to grow."

"The alerting is much better than I anticipated. We don't get as many alerts as I thought we would, but that nobody's fault, it's just the way it is."

More Devo pros

"This is a very easy-to-use interface with a quick ramp-up time."

"If you want to deploy a SIEM and you want it to be simple, and not deal with much maintenance or help from the OEM, then I would say that NNT is the one."

"The automation of compliance reports and the correlation of the log have been major improvements."

"Customer Service: The service we've seen from NNT to date has been extraordinarily good."

"File integrity monitoring is a very important function."

"The FIM features in the Change Tracker and the Log Tracker are the most valuable."

"The Change Tracker tool is very good and will reduce your overall workload."

"The most valuable feature is the predefined reports for PCI compliance."

Cons

"I would like to have the ability to create more complex dashboards."

"Technical support needs to be more direct. For example, when we submit a ticket, the support team will delegate a task to the operations team, for example, or various other teams."

"Some basic reporting mechanisms have room for improvement."

"Where Devo has room for improvement is the data ingestion and parsing. We tend to have to work with the Devo support team to bring on and ingest new sources of data."

"However, the incident and threat detection is not what we had hoped for."

"There's always room to reduce the learning curve over how to deal with events and machine data. They could make the machine data simpler."

"There's room for improvement within the GUI. There is also some room for improvement within the native parsers they support. But I can say that about pretty much any solution in this space."

"One major area for improvement for Devo... is to provide more capabilities around pre-built monitoring."

More Devo cons

"There are some issues with the stability - the correlation engine has failed multiple times, and the reports sometimes take too long, so we have to involve the tech team to get them."

"The correlation suite needs to be improved."

"I would like to see the integration of AI technology, so rather than manually monitoring the logs, the tool will understand it and take care of it."

"It is able to identify the vulnerability, however, they need an option to auto-mitigate."

"Only one minor deployment issue came up and it was resolved quickly. No other areas of improvement come to mind yet."

"For the NNT Log Tracker and Change Tracker, they have to make their knowledge base available online because there is very little information available on the internet."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It's a per gigabyte cost for ingestion of data. For every gigabyte that you ingest, it's whatever you negotiated your price for. Compared to other contracts that we've had for cloud providers, it's significantly less."

"Devo is a hosted or subscription-based solution, whereas before, we purchased QRadar, so we owned it and just had to pay a maintenance fee. We've encountered this with some other products, too, where we went over to subscription-based. Our thought process is that with subscription based, the provider hosts and maintains the tool, and it's offsite. That comes with some additional fees, but we were able to convince our upper management it was worth the price. We used to pay under 10k a year for maintenance, and now we're paying ten times that. It was a relatively tough sell to our management, but I wonder if we have a choice anymore; this is where the market is."

"I rate the pricing a four on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive."

"I'm not involved in the financial aspect, but I think the licensing costs are similar to other solutions. If all the solutions have a similar cost, Devo provides more for the money."

"[Devo was] in the ballpark with at least a couple of the other front-runners that we were looking at. Devo is a good value and, given the quality of the product, I would expect to pay more."

"It's very competitive. That was also a primary draw for us. Some of the licensing models with solutions like Splunk and Sentinel were attractive upfront, but there were so many micro-charges and services we would've had to add on to make them what we wanted. We had to include things like SOAR and extended capabilities, whereas all those capabilities are completely included with the Devo platform. I haven't seen any additional fee."

"We have an OEM agreement with Devo. It is very similar to the standard licensing agreement because we are charged in the same way as any other customer, e.g., we use the backroom."

"Pricing is based on the number of gigabytes of ingestion by volume, and it's on a 30-day average. If you go over one day, that's not a big deal as long as the average is what you expected it to be."

More Devo pricing and cost advice

"NNT's pricing is moderate - I would rate their pricing two-and-a-half out of ten."

"Consider both their on-premises solution and their hosted solution. Both are reasonably priced."

"We have selected a perpetual license along with support."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Log Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

908,800 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

15%

Construction Company

10%

Outsourcing Company

Manufacturing Company

Construction Company

23%

Manufacturing Company

Outsourcing Company

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	10
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	12

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Devo?

The pricing of the product is reasonable if we compare it with other Gartner leading products like Splunk, LogRhythm, Microsoft Sentinel, Google SecOps. Its licensing model is basically on per-day ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Devo?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Devo?

I am using Devo myself. Basically, I work at an MSSP, and we provide services to the organization for Security Operation Centers. In our Security Operation Center, we provide the service of SIEM vi...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Splunk Enterprise Security vs Devo

Compared 8% of the time

LogRhythm SIEM vs Devo

Compared 7% of the time

New Relic vs Devo

Compared 4% of the time

IBM Security QRadar vs Devo

Compared 3% of the time

Trellix Helix Connect vs Devo

Compared 2% of the time

More Devo Competitors

IBM Security QRadar vs NNT Log Tracker Enterprise

Compared 14% of the time

Splunk Enterprise Security vs NNT Log Tracker Enterprise

Compared 13% of the time

BMC AMI Command Center for Security vs NNT Log Tracker Enterprise

Compared 6% of the time

SIEMStorm vs NNT Log Tracker Enterprise

Compared 5% of the time

NetWitness Platform vs NNT Log Tracker Enterprise

Compared 3% of the time

More NNT Log Tracker Enterprise Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Devo

August 2026

Download Devo product report

Buyer's Guide

Log Management

July 2026

Download NNT Log Tracker Enterprise product report

Overview

Devo offers powerful visual analytics, real-time data querying, and log integration capabilities within a cloud-native, multi-tenant architecture, supporting extended data retention ideal for long-term analysis and compliance.

Devo is recognized for its Activeboards, which facilitate visual analytics. High-speed search capabilities and real-time analytics enable efficient data manipulation and querying. Its multi-tenant architecture supports effective data segregation and customization tailored to distinct business needs, enhancing its value for handling complex log integrations. With extended data retention of 400 days and a cloud-native architecture, Devo is a robust platform for long-term analysis and compliance requirements. Though opportunities exist to improve browser stability on large searches, SOAR integrations, and its parser capabilities, Devo remains essential for incident response and security monitoring, offering centralized data storage and analysis.

What are Devo's most important features?

Activeboards: Facilitate visual analytics and data exploration.
High-Speed Search: Enables fast data querying and manipulation.
Real-Time Analytics: Supports instant insights and decision-making.
Multi-Tenant Architecture: Allows effective data segregation and customization.
Extended Data Retention: Offers 400-day log retention for compliance and analysis.
Complex Log Integration: Handles intricate data sources effortlessly.

What benefits and ROI should organizations look for in reviews?

Visual Insights: Enhance understanding through interactive dashboards.
Performance Efficiency: Saves time with high-speed data search and real-time results.
Customization Flexibility: Fits specific business requirements with multi-tenant architecture.
Long-Term Compliance: Ensures alignment with extended data retention needs.
Centralized Monitoring: Enables comprehensive incident response and security monitoring.

Devo is extensively used in industries focused on incident response and digital forensics, centralizing data for security monitoring across hybrid environments. Organizations benefit from its ability to store and analyze aggregated logs, creating alerts and dashboards to enhance visibility for network and endpoint activities in multi-domain settings.

Devo

NNT Log Tracker Enterprise offers a comprehensive approach to log and event management, providing real-time monitoring and alerting while ensuring compliance and security across networks.

It efficiently manages log data, delivering valuable insights and improving security and compliance protocols. With robust features tailored for seamless integration, it aids organizations in maintaining a secure network environment. Its flexibility allows it to be adapted to varied IT infrastructures, enhancing reliability and performance while reducing risk.

What are the key features of NNT Log Tracker Enterprise?

Real-Time Monitoring: Provides continuous monitoring of network activity for timely threat detection and response.
Compliance Support: Assists in meeting compliance standards through detailed logging and reporting functions.
Scalability: Capable of scaling with business growth to handle increasing data volume effortlessly.
Customizable Alerts: Allows setting of specific thresholds and conditions to receive immediate alerts on critical events.
Integration Capabilities: Easily integrates with existing infrastructure to enhance current IT security measures.

What benefits should users expect when assessing NNT Log Tracker Enterprise?

Increased Efficiency: Streamlines log management processes, saving time and resources on manual tasks.
Enhanced Security: Proactively identifies risks and vulnerabilities, contributing to a strong security posture.
Cost Savings: Reduces expenditures on compliance and crisis management through efficient threat detection.
Improved Decision Making: Offers actionable insights for better strategic planning and risk management.

In industries like finance and healthcare, NNT Log Tracker Enterprise is implemented to protect sensitive data while ensuring compliance with stringent regulations. Its capability to monitor and analyze data in real time is particularly valued in dynamic sectors, providing the agility necessary to respond to emerging threats swiftly.

Netwrix

Sample Customers

United States Air Force, Rubrik, SentinelOne, Critical Start, NHL, Panda Security, Telefonica, CaixaBank, OpenText, IGT, OneMain Financial, SurveyMonkey, FanDuel, H&R Block, Ulta Beauty, Manulife, Moneylion, Chime Bank, Magna International, American Express Global Business Travel

Wonga, WHSmith

Buyer's Guide

Devo vs. NNT Log Tracker Enterprise

June 2026

Free Report: Devo vs. NNT Log Tracker Enterprise

Find out what your peers are saying about Devo vs. NNT Log Tracker Enterprise and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

908,800 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Devo vs. NNT Log Tracker Enterprise report.

See our list of best Log Management vendors and best Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) vendors.

We monitor all Log Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.