Diamanti vs Kubernetes comparison

Diamanti and Kubernetes are both solutions in the Container Management category. Diamanti is ranked #21, while Kubernetes is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.4. Diamanti holds a 0.7% mindshare in CM, compared to Kubernetes’s 6.1% mindshare. Additionally, 98% of Kubernetes users are willing to recommend the solution.

Diamanti

306 Views
223 Comparison Views

Kubernetes

Read 79 Kubernetes reviews

2,696 Views
2,669 Comparison Views

98% willing to recommend

Diamanti

Kubernetes

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Diamanti and Kubernetes based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Red Hat, Amazon Web Services (AWS), Kubernetes and others in Container Management.

To learn more, read our detailed Container Management Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Container Management

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Diamanti

Ranking in Container Management

21st

Average Rating

0.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Data Storage for Kubernetes (7th)

Kubernetes

Ranking in Container Management

3rd

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Container Management category, the mindshare of Diamanti is 0.7%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Kubernetes is 6.1%, up from 4.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Container Management Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Kubernetes	6.1%
Diamanti	0.7%
Other	93.2%

Container Management

Featured Reviews

Use Diamanti?

Leave a review

Leonardo Brito

Site Reliability Engineer at Tiendanube

Migration to managed containers has accelerated microservice deployments and reduced downtime

I am using add-ons for EKS Kubernetes that stand out to me. The useful add-ons help with administrating multiple clusters and accounts in AWS. My company uses Kubernetes for microservices within the organization. I advise others to look into using Kubernetes and not to pursue other options. Kubernetes is something I want to emphasize before we wrap up. I have given this review an overall rating of 80.

Read full review

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Container Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Computer Software Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	26
Midsize Enterprise	10
Large Enterprise	47

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about Kubernetes?

There are many good features. I feel that the scale-out features, like replica sets, are very good. The number of running containers can be autoscaled.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Kubernetes?

I have had a good experience with pricing, but the setup costs are high.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Kubernetes?

Kubernetes can be improved, though I cannot specify exactly how at this time.

See all answers

Comparisons

VMware Tanzu Platform vs Diamanti

Compared 21% of the time

Rancher Labs vs Diamanti

Compared 18% of the time

Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform vs Diamanti

Compared 16% of the time

More Diamanti Competitors

VMware Tanzu Platform vs Kubernetes

Compared 19% of the time

Nutanix Kubernetes Platform (NKP) vs Kubernetes

Compared 12% of the time

Portainer vs Kubernetes

Compared 10% of the time

HashiCorp Nomad vs Kubernetes

Compared 7% of the time

NGINX Ingress Controller vs Kubernetes

Compared 4% of the time

More Kubernetes Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Container Management

December 2025

Download Diamanti product report

Buyer's Guide

Kubernetes

January 2026

Download Kubernetes product report

Also Known As

No data available

Overview

Diamanti appliance is purpose-built for containerized applications that combines the ease of hyperconverged infrastructure with the unparalleled performance and efficiency of bare-metal containers. Diamanti addresses the unique requirements of containerized applications, ensuring network interoperability and persistent storage. Diamanti virtualizes network and storage for containers using a built-in PCIe converged I/O controller in every appliance to guarantee application performance without code changes or customization. The PCIe architecture delivers order-of-magnitude latency improvement compared with traditional shared-storage systems and software overlays.

Diamanti

Kubernetes (K8s) is an open-source system for automating deployment, scaling, and management of containerized applications.
It groups containers that make up an application into logical units for easy management and discovery. Kubernetes builds upon 15 years of experience of running production workloads at Google, combined with best-of-breed ideas and practices from the community.

Kubernetes

Sample Customers

Kubernetes, Mesosphere, NBC Universal, Red Hat

China unicom, NetEase Cloud, Nav, AppDirect

Find out what your peers are saying about Red Hat, Amazon Web Services (AWS), Kubernetes and others in Container Management. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Container Management vendors.

We monitor all Container Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.