

Digital Guardian and ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform are competitive solutions in endpoint protection. Digital Guardian appears to lead in adoption, thanks to its robust data protection capabilities, while ThreatLocker is favored for its Zero Trust approach, appealing strongly to organizations prioritizing stringent security measures.
Features: Digital Guardian offers advanced data loss prevention, behavioral analytics, and real-time visibility features, making it ideal for enterprises needing comprehensive data protection. ThreatLocker provides a Zero Trust model that rigorously controls application permissions and access, focuses on unauthorized application execution, and uses features like ring-fencing and allowlisting for enhanced security.
Room for Improvement: Digital Guardian could benefit from simplification in its deployment process, improvement in interoperability with other IT systems, and enhancement in user interface design for better user experience. ThreatLocker can improve by providing more granular control options, expanding its reporting capabilities, and enhancing integration with additional third-party applications.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: ThreatLocker is designed for quick deployment, minimizing operational disruptions, and is backed by exceptional responsive support. In contrast, Digital Guardian's deployment, while customizable, can be complex and may require additional resources and time for complete integration.
Pricing and ROI: Digital Guardian typically requires higher upfront costs but delivers significant ROI by reducing potential data breach expenses. ThreatLocker offers a cost-effective pricing model with a focus on immediate security enhancements, appealing to organizations looking for quick deployment and budget-conscious solutions.
If something were to happen without ThreatLocker, the cost would be huge, and thus, having it is definitely worth it.
The main return on investment is peace of mind, knowing that with ThreatLocker on any endpoint, it will almost always block all malicious code or exploits, even zero-day exploits.
It keeps malware, Trojans, and ransomware at bay.
For vendor support, such as Fortra support, I would rate it a seven because all the support comes from different parts that sometimes have challenges meeting time zones, and sometimes they reroute to distributors and rely on partners.
They have been very responsive, helpful, and knowledgeable.
I would rate their customer support a ten out of ten.
Their support is world-class.
Regarding scalability, it is a 10 out of 10.
I started off with just the servers, and within a month and a half, I set up the entire company with ThreatLocker.
It seems to primarily operate on the endpoints rather than at a central location pushing out policies.
I would rate it a ten out of ten for scalability.
For five years, we have not had a problem.
Once deployed, it downloads the policies locally, so even if the computer doesn't have internet, it doesn't matter.
It has been very stable, reliable, and accessible.
The issue is that it works only with users or companies with more than 500 users.
Controlling the cloud environment, not just endpoints, is crucial.
This is problematic when immediate attention is needed.
Comprehensive 24-hour log monitoring is a valuable enhancement for both business and enterprise-level users.
After conversations with other partners, it became clear we underpriced it initially, which caused most of our issues.
We are moving towards the Unified solution, where they basically bundle everything together, providing us better stability with the ability to bring in new product offerings without having to go back to the customer and say, 'This is going to cost you.'
I had a really good deal at the time, and it continues to be cost-effective.
Digital Guardian can easily integrate with this data classification solution and has a very granular level of configuration and policy tuning.
ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform's ability to block access to unauthorized applications has been excellent.
It protects our customers.
The major benefit is fewer breaches overall, as nothing can be run without prior approval. This helps my company protect its data and secure itself effectively.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform | 2.6% |
| Digital Guardian | 1.6% |
| Other | 95.8% |

| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 10 |
| Large Enterprise | 3 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 32 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 4 |
| Large Enterprise | 3 |
Digital Guardian is proud to be part of Fortra’s comprehensive cybersecurity portfolio, and one of the Data Protection family of products. Fortra simplifies today’s complex cybersecurity landscape by bringing complementary products together to solve problems in innovative ways. These integrated, scalable solutions address the fast-changing challenges you face in safeguarding your organization. With the help of the powerful protection from Digital Guardian and others, Fortra is your relentless ally, here for you every step of the way throughout your cybersecurity journey.
ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform empowers organizations with application control, selective elevation, and ring-fencing to enhance security and prevent unauthorized access.
ThreatLocker provides comprehensive security management using application allowlisting to ensure only approved software operates across servers and workstations. The platform's centralized management simplifies security processes by consolidating multiple tools, and its robust capabilities align with zero-trust strategies by actively blocking unauthorized applications and ensuring compliance. Users note intuitive features such as mobile access, helpful training resources, and responsive support, which effectively reduce operational costs and help desk inquiries. The managed service providers prefer ThreatLocker to maintain network integrity by preventing malicious scripts and unauthorized access attempts. However, users identify room for growth in training and support flexibility, the interface, and certain technical challenges like network saturation from policy updates.
What are the most important features?Organizations utilize ThreatLocker for application allowlisting, ensuring only authorized software operates to prevent unauthorized access efficiently. Deployed across servers and workstations, its features support zero-trust principles and are favored by managed service providers for application management and network integrity.
We monitor all Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.