No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

DuploCloud vs Red Hat OpenShift comparison

Why PeerSpot?
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

DuploCloud
Ranking in Agile and DevOps Services
13th
Average Rating
4.6
Number of Reviews
3
Ranking in other categories
AI Observability Services (2nd)
Red Hat OpenShift
Ranking in Agile and DevOps Services
1st
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
76
Ranking in other categories
PaaS Clouds (3rd), Server Virtualization Software (3rd), Container Management (5th), Hybrid Cloud Computing Platforms (2nd)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2026, in the Agile and DevOps Services category, the mindshare of DuploCloud is 1.7%, down from 1.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Red Hat OpenShift is 6.0%, down from 19.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Agile and DevOps Services Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Red Hat OpenShift6.0%
DuploCloud1.7%
Other92.3%
Agile and DevOps Services
 

Featured Reviews

Arka Sarkar - PeerSpot reviewer
Technical Solution Support Development Engineer at Ericsson Global
Self-service cloud automation has transformed our compliant microservice delivery speed
The most objective critique I can give of any low-code abstraction tool is feature latency. Major cloud providers such as AWS and Azure release dozens of new services, instance types, or deep granular configurations every single year. Because DuploCloud sits as a translation layer between the engineer and the cloud provider, there is naturally a slight lag before those brand-new features show up in DuploCloud portal or in its custom Terraform provider. If our team wants to experiment with a newly launched AWS machine learning instance type or a highly specific EKS feature, sometimes we have to wait for DuploCloud to build it into their UI or find a temporary workaround via native cloud consoles. While DuploCloud is designed to make standard compliant infrastructure setups incredibly fast, sometimes edge cases can happen. The platform does a fantastic job of automating the ninety percent use case, but if an application requires a highly exotic legacy network topology and unconventional Kubernetes Ingress configuration, fighting against the platform's rigid safety guardrails can sometimes feel restrictive, which we faced in one of our testing projects last year. The UI simplifies everything, so when we actually needed to inject the raw, highly complex native Kubernetes YAML modifications, the escape hatch to override standard rules can sometimes have a learning curve, which we have already faced. Streamlining how advanced overrides to default settings work without breaking the compliance engine would be a great user experience improvement. The platform actively monitors for compliance drifts and logs system configuration perfectly. However, the searchability, filtering, and reporting element inside the administrative audit log UI could be more intuitive.
AA
Operation Director at Zaintech
Platform has transformed our cloud into a secure, unified home for diverse modern applications
One of the best features of Red Hat OpenShift is that it has the catalog, the application catalog, and the operator hub, which allows us to deploy things easily and straightforward without going into a lot of hassles. This is one of the main things, in addition to having integration with ACM and ACS, where we can have the ability to manage multiple clusters and to secure them, deploy them, manage them, run GitOps and day-two operations, as well as upgrades and other functionality which is made easy using these tools. Red Hat OpenShift also provides virtualization capabilities, and I am currently working with Zain to make a project where we will convert F5 appliances to virtual machines and to manage them through Red Hat virtualization, OVE. Red Hat OpenShift is a unique platform because it provides the features for both worlds, containerization, and VMs at the same time, requiring you to learn one skillset in order to manage all of this at the same time. In the beginning, our cloud depended only on virtual machines, so I introduced this to our management to start to work with microservices and with containerization. This was adapted in our cloud, providing us the capability to sell more of these features and to reduce the hardware requirement by about thirty percent, following the trends of using containerization for all modern applications. In addition, it reduced the time to develop and to deploy a new application; all we need is using Jenkins for CI/CD. Once we commit any code, it gets triggered, and it will implement the new container in a very flexible and easy way, within seconds. This decreased the time to market and increased agility, allowing us to capture new opportunities very fast.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"We managed our own infrastructure previously."
"Their initial onboarding and migration service was great."
"When using DuploCloud's graphical interface, we can do the exact same thing safely in under ten to fifteen minutes without needing a dedicated DevOps engineer."
"Security is also an important part of this solution. By default, things are running with limited privileges and securely confined to their own resources. This way, different users and projects can all use the same infrastructure."
"Provides support throughout the whole platform."
"The solution offers ease with which we can define how to run applications and configure them. It's much more convenient than creating a virtual machine and configuring application servers, making the process faster and simpler."
"Our go-to-market and our deployment for any application, the time is reduced perhaps by eight times, because the things that we used to do in days now take a couple of minutes to be done."
"The security features of OpenShift are strong when in use of role-based access."
"Self-provisioning support saves a lot of time and unnecessary work from the system administrator who can use this time to run and monitor the infrastructure. For the developer, this means less time waiting for the provisioning and excellent flexibility for development, testing, and production. Also, in such systems it is easy for developers to monitor applications even after deployment."
"Key features are WildFly, because it standardizes infrastructure and the git repository and docker. Git is essential for source code and Docker for infrastructure."
"Valuable features include auto-recreate of pod if pod fails; fast rollback, with one click, to previous version."
 

Cons

"There seems to be significant effort toward vendor lock-in."
"The platform does a fantastic job of automating the ninety percent use case, but if an application requires a highly exotic legacy network topology and unconventional Kubernetes Ingress configuration, fighting against the platform's rigid safety guardrails can sometimes feel restrictive, which we faced in one of our testing projects last year."
"After nearly two months of onboarding, we never reached a working production environment."
"The product’s integration with Windows containers and other third-party products needs improvement."
"The software-defined networking part of it caused us quite a bit of heartburn. We ran into a lot of problems with the difference between on-prem and cloud, where we had to make quite a number of modifications... They've since resolved it, so it's not really an issue anymore."
"With OpenShift, I can only manage a particular area. I can't manage other Kubernetes clusters."
"The solution needs to support the new features in Kubernetes more quickly."
"Further needed improvements in Red Hat OpenShift include that getting the providers will be a little bit tricky in the console."
"Red Hat OpenShift is very expensive."
"My team has found some bugs in OpenShift due to continuous integration, and this is an area for improvement in the platform. RedHat should fix the bugs. Another area for improvement in OpenShift is that upgrading clusters can be challenging, resulting in downtime. Application support also needs improvement in OpenShift because the platform doesn't support all applications in the cloud. I'd like upgraded storage in the next release of OpenShift, especially when I need to do a DR exercise. It would also be good if the platform allows mirroring with another cluster, or more portability in terms of moving applications to another cluster."
"For some reason there have been some DNS issues."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"This solution is fairly expensive but comes at an average cost compared to other solutions in the market."
"Depending on the extent of the product use, licenses are available for a range of time periods, and are renewable at the end of the period."
"OpenShift is really good when we need to start, but once we get to a certain scale, it becomes too expensive."
"The pricing for OpenShift includes support and licensing, which costs approximately $400."
"The product has reasonable pricing."
"The cost is quite high."
"The pricing is standard; the solution isn't particularly expensive or affordable."
"My company makes payments towards the licensing costs attached to OpenShift."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Agile and DevOps Services solutions are best for your needs.
916,771 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Insurance Company
13%
Construction Company
13%
Manufacturing Company
11%
Comms Service Provider
11%
Financial Services Firm
17%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Outsourcing Company
9%
Government
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business19
Midsize Enterprise7
Large Enterprise58
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for DuploCloud?
It is important to read the billing terms closely and verify that the Marketplace listing matches your signed order form. Ours specified quarterly invoicing with two free months; we were billed mon...
What needs improvement with DuploCloud?
There should be transparent, contract-consistent billing, right-sized environments for startup workloads, and support SLAs that are actually met. A testing and validation process should be followed...
What is your primary use case for DuploCloud?
I undertook the migration of our production application to AWS, with DuploCloud handling DevOps, infrastructure setup, and ongoing support.
How does OpenShift compare with Amazon AWS?
Open Shift makes managing infrastructure easy because of self-healing and automatic scaling. There is also a wonderful dashboard mechanism to alert us in case the application is over-committing or ...
Which would you recommend - Pivotal Cloud Foundry or OpenShift?
Pivotal Cloud Foundry is a cloud-native application platform to simplify app delivery. It is efficient and effective. The best feature is how easy it is to handle external services such as database...
What needs improvement with OpenShift?
One area for improvement in Red Hat OpenShift is during upgrades, as there is currently no option to revert to a previous version if vulnerabilities or issues arise. I believe that providing such a...
 

Also Known As

DuploCloud - DevSecOps Automation Platform / DevOps-as-a-Service
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
UPS, Cathay Pacific, Hilton
Find out what your peers are saying about DuploCloud vs. Red Hat OpenShift and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.
916,771 professionals have used our research since 2012.