You need to sign in or sign up before continuing.

DX Performance Management vs IBM Tivoli NetCool comparison

The compared Broadcom and IBM solutions aren't in the same category. Broadcom is ranked #2 in DXNO , with an average rating of 9.0, and holds a 25.4% mindshare in the category. IBM is ranked #14 in NMA , and holds a 3.9% mindshare. Additionally, 96% of Broadcom users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 83% of IBM users who would recommend it.

DX Performance Management

Read 32 DX Performance Management reviews

5,323 Views
266 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

IBM Tivoli NetCool

Read 13 IBM Tivoli NetCool reviews

3,118 Views
2,681 Comparison Views

83% willing to recommend

DX Performance Management

IBM Tivoli NetCool

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

DX Performance Management

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Infrastructure Capacity Planning (1st), Network Monitoring Software (38th), DX NetOps (2nd)

IBM Tivoli NetCool

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Network Management Applications (14th)

Mindshare comparison

While both are Network Management solutions, they serve different purposes. DX Performance Management is designed for DX NetOps and holds a mindshare of 25.4%, down 36.8% compared to last year.
IBM Tivoli NetCool, on the other hand, focuses on Network Management Applications, holds 3.9% mindshare, up 2.3% since last year.

DX NetOps Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
DX Performance Management	25.4%
AppNeta by Broadcom	28.4%
DX Spectrum	27.0%
Other	19.200000000000003%

DX NetOps

Network Management Applications Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
IBM Tivoli NetCool	3.9%
Cisco DNA Center	7.2%
DX Spectrum	5.5%
Other	83.4%

Network Management Applications

Featured Reviews

reviewer1810893

Senior IT Operations Specialist at a financial services firm with 5,001-10,000 employees

Flexibility and detailed performance stats enable effective network monitoring

Spectrum is very good at monitoring all network faults and configurations. It enables me to take action based on network issues. The Performance Management provides detailed network performance stats, including CPU, memory, and interface bandwidth. Additionally, Spectrum is flexible and allows me to organize and treat devices uniquely without impacting other devices.

Read full review

Petar Ganev

Senior Enterprise Monitoring Engineer at Commerzbank

Reliable for enterprise monitoring but no longer actively developed

There are problems with the latest security requirements because many things have changed in recent years, and now the security audits are very strict. And we need to switch to something else. We need to patch it constantly. Moreover, it is a very old tool and a little bit difficult to support. Otherwise, they work okay.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The ability to very quickly and graphically navigate around, being able to zoom in to a timeframe, apply it to all the other panels - things of that nature - are all very intuitive."

"I can get it to run a report showing, for instance, what root drives are in the critical range in terms of being full, like 90 percent full, and disseminate that information to the other areas of the organization."

"One feature I like about CA Performance Management is the certification of the devices."

"We have been able to get a little bit better at seeing more things in real time and more just in time, so we're less reactionary."

"Considering all these factors, it's really a good and easy product for analyzing your network performance, health status, and the quality of services."

"We're able to present data from multiple back-end collection sources into a single dashboard for the users. So they don't have to go to multiple locations to get data about a particular item, or device."

"Scalability is the reason we bought the product to begin with; it was designed from the ground up for carrier-grade services, and we are in effect an MSP ourselves, so we were really interested in looking at something to be able to handle the multi-tenancy and scale as large as possible, and this was the only solution that we really considered at that level."

"The solution's performance itself is very good because it is a vertical database that loads very fast in comparison to other products."

More DX Performance Management pros

"The feature I have found most valuable with NetCool is how it collaborates all the alarms, and then it does a predictive analysis, providing a consolidated alarm view and management."

"Anything is possible with Tivoli. It's quite a robust system."

"The Netcool solution is great, and it's very easy to use."

"The solution has very good integration capabilities."

"It's very easy to use."

"The tool had many built-in automation capabilities."

"The tool is much easier to manage than running scripts and figuring out how many endpoints have been exceeded."

"The solution is a complete package; it has various useful elements including inventory management and incident management packaged inside it, and anything is possible with Tivoli since it is quite a robust system that offers a lot of useful integration capabilities."

More IBM Tivoli NetCool pros

Cons

"For CA PM, there should be a way of easily migrating the reports coming from eHealth going to CA Performance Center, since CA PC is replacing eHealth."

"It seems like we escalate more than I would like to. If anything, they should look at how the tier support goes in place."

"There are some issues. We started supporting UTA and began to see both major and minor problems."

"CA PM can be complex to build and configure. Creating the folders / groups / sites required establishing many rule sets."

"It would be helpful if CA provided online training for its customers."

"This solution is not very scalable."

"This may be available by now but for server space, when it comes to the disk file system, I'd like to see that graphically represented, or the trend, rather than what I'm seeing now."

"Even though we can see when something is not available, it would also be it would be nice if some sort of alerting took place to that you could know immediately if something went down."

More DX Performance Management cons

"Customization and integration that you need to do to make the product fit your needs is very complex. It is not a product that somebody could easily pick up without any prior training or experience."

"The installation could be simplified, and technical support could be faster."

"The solution does not have any AI capabilities."

"The product is pretty costly. It's definitely not the least expensive option."

"The solution is not user-friendly."

"I think the UI should be updated and made more presentable and eye-catching. Compared to NCE in Huawei, NSN in Nokia, the UiPath and Ubiquiti, it feels very old legacy."

"In terms of improvement, I would like to see more AIOps, Artificial Intelligent Operations in the next release. IBM develops new features for Power BI or Cognos Analytics, which is good. As of now, we use Cognos Analytics, we are not using Power BI. They have the Insight concept but we don't like that."

"It was a bit expensive to purchase but the benefits outweigh all the cons by far."

More IBM Tivoli NetCool cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"They should provide more scalable licensing for the product."

"I like the licensing model because it's device-based."

"We were looking at other vendors in the marketplace for NetFlow, and CA just beat everybody else in price, cost, and the size to implement. "

"We purchase a license to use the solution every three years and we have multiple contracts. They have been increasing the price annually. We have a baseline for three years and then we need to pay the difference from the baseline, and we are in the process of negotiating a new price for all the licenses we need. The price overall is affordable."

"The tool's pricing is based on the number of network devices."

"Do your homework and know how many devices you will be managing out of the gate. Be sure to project what your growth will be each year."

"Licensing fees are paid on a yearly basis."

"The price of the product is too expensive."

"Customers are required to pay a licensing fee."

"It costs around 100k for every ten servers, which is lower than similar products from other vendors."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which DX NetOps solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Outsourcing Company

23%

Construction Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

Outsourcing Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	5
Large Enterprise	25

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	6
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	5

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with DX Performance Management?

Spectrum's topology view sometimes does not rebuild automatically when a device is shut down and reconnected. It requires manual discovery and rebuilding of the topology, which I hope can be improved.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for DX Performance Management?

I have used Spectrum for monitoring all network faults, configurations, and troubleshooting network issues. It provides network performance stats, such as CPU, memory, and interface bandwidth detai...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering DX Performance Management?

I would recommend this solution based on its functionality, flexibility, customizability, and ease of use. Overall, I would rate the solution an eight out of ten. I am just a customer and not a par...

See all answers

What is the best network monitoring software for large enterprises?

I have worked from 1973 with all kind of systems in large enterprises across the world. And have experience with all kind of software in monitoring from infra to end to end, it depends on the funct...

See all answers

Comparisons

Centreon vs DX Performance Management

Compared 6% of the time

Zabbix vs DX Performance Management

Compared 6% of the time

DX Spectrum vs DX Performance Management

Compared 5% of the time

Icinga vs DX Performance Management

Compared 5% of the time

ScienceLogic vs DX Performance Management

Compared 4% of the time

More DX Performance Management Competitors

OpenText Network Node Manager vs IBM Tivoli NetCool

Compared 12% of the time

DX Spectrum vs IBM Tivoli NetCool

Compared 11% of the time

DataMiner vs IBM Tivoli NetCool

Compared 9% of the time

NetMaster Network Intelligence vs IBM Tivoli NetCool

Compared 8% of the time

SolarWinds Network Configuration Manager vs IBM Tivoli NetCool

Compared 3% of the time

More IBM Tivoli NetCool Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

DX Performance Management

October 2026

Download DX Performance Management product report

Buyer's Guide

IBM Tivoli NetCool

October 2026

Download IBM Tivoli NetCool product report

Also Known As

CA Performance Management

Tivoli NetCool

Overview

DX Performance Management provides crucial network visibility and performance monitoring, offering device certification, integration with key tools, and efficient network analytics through advanced features.

DX Performance Management is a comprehensive solution for network performance, health, and capacity monitoring. It facilitates baselining, trending, and real-time visibility, aiding in capacity planning and incident alerting. It integrates with services like NetFlow, NFA, and ADA, supporting multiple device types. Its database performance allows for efficient analysis with scalability across different device counts, while customizable dashboards provide a single-pane-of-glass view for network insights.

What are the key features of DX Performance Management?

Device Certification: Ensures network devices meet specific standards and requirements through thorough certification processes.
Integration: Seamlessly connects with NetFlow, NFA, ADA, Spectrum, and CAPC for robust network insights.
Report Generation: Offers automated report generation for enhanced network analysis.
Customizable Dashboards: Provides a tailored view of network performance metrics on a single screen.
Advanced Alerting: Monitors network conditions with sophisticated alerting mechanisms for proactive responses.
Scalability: Adapts to growing network demands with efficient performance across multiple device counts.
Multi-Tenancy: Supports various tenants within the same infrastructure, ensuring resource optimization.
Historical Data Analysis: Delivers past performance data for in-depth trend analysis and decision support.

Which benefits and ROI should users expect from using DX Performance Management?

Efficiency: Enhances network analysis through fast database performance and customizable interfaces.
Decision-Making: Improves decision support via comprehensive visibility and detailed performance metrics.
Scalability: Offers a flexible solution capable of growing with network demands.
Customization: Allows tailoring of reports and dashboards to meet specific analytical needs.
Integration: Provides seamless connectivity with other network management tools and service desks.

Network service providers implement DX Performance Management to deliver in-depth insights, monitoring routers and switches for SNMP data collection, aiding CPU, memory, and interface utilization analysis. It's integrated with network fault management and service desks, providing comprehensive performance analytics.

Broadcom

IBM Tivoli NetCool is an advanced event management and network monitoring tool that efficiently processes alarms, offers extensive integration, and provides reliable customization capabilities. It is a comprehensive solution for network operations, catering to complex environments with vast data needs.

IBM Tivoli NetCool features a robust architecture that prioritizes critical alerts through effective event correlation and analysis. It offers seamless integration with numerous systems and provides custom dashboards for enhanced control. Users benefit from its scalability and predictive analysis, while its comprehensive documentation supports implementation. Despite its strengths, challenges like its complex licensing model, high costs, and requirement for expertise in integration are notable. Additionally, modernizing its interface and enhancing AI capabilities could improve user experience.

What are the most important features of IBM Tivoli NetCool?

Event Correlation & Analysis: Prioritizes critical alerts efficiently.
Integration Capabilities: Seamlessly connects with numerous systems.
Customization Flexibility: Offers extensive dashboard customization.
Automation: Streamlines operational tasks effectively.
Scalability: Adapts to growing network demands.
Performance Management: Provides insight into network performance.

What benefits can users expect when using IBM Tivoli NetCool?

Operational Efficiency: Enhances alarm management and IT element monitoring.
Robust Reliability: Ensures stable performance in network operations.
Ease of Use: Simplifies workflows with comprehensive documentation.
Predictive Analysis: Anticipates network issues before they occur.

IBM Tivoli NetCool is frequently deployed in industries like telecommunications, finance, and healthcare, where it performs essential roles in event management and network monitoring. As a manager of managers, it consolidates device oversight, providing an integrated view crucial for mobile operators, financial firms, and hospitals.

IBM

Sample Customers

Jack Henry & Assoc, Target, CenturyLink, Bell Canada, BrightHouse Networks, Telus, Unisys, Verizon, Southern California Edison, GEICO, Fidelity Investments, Wells Fargo, American Family Insurance Group, Deutsche Telekom AG

Claranet, Consolidated Communications, Telus, €sterreichische Bundesbahnen (€BB), Telekom Srbija, Bendigo Community Telco, Capgemini, Schweizerische Bundesbahnen (SBB)

We monitor all DX NetOps reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.