Dynatrace vs ITRS Geneos comparison

Dynatrace and ITRS are both solutions in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category. Dynatrace is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.7, while ITRS is ranked #34 with an average rating of 5.0. Dynatrace holds a 10.2% mindshare in APM, compared to ITRS’s 1.2% mindshare. Additionally, 95% of Dynatrace users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 96% of ITRS users who would recommend it.

Dynatrace

Read 349 Dynatrace reviews

28,252 Views
20,906 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

ITRS Geneos

Read 57 ITRS Geneos reviews

4,056 Views
3,083 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

Dynatrace

ITRS Geneos

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 24, 2024

Dynatrace and ITRS Geneos are leading products in the IT monitoring space. Dynatrace stands out with better pricing and support satisfaction, making it a strong competitor despite ITRS Geneos's feature richness and superior user reviews.

What features are offered by Dynatrace in comparison to ITRS Geneos?

Dynatrace offers AI-driven performance monitoring, comprehensive cloud-native capabilities, and streamlined deployment. ITRS Geneos features deep customizability, real-time monitoring precision, and specialized financial services support.

What areas of improvement can be found in Dynatrace in comparison to ITRS Geneos?

Dynatrace users mention a steep learning curve, desire more flexible customization options, and need better documentation. ITRS Geneos requires an easier initial configuration, a more modern interface, and enhanced integration capabilities.

How is the ease of deployment and customer service of Dynatrace in comparison to ITRS Geneos?

Dynatrace is praised for its straightforward deployment and responsive customer service. ITRS Geneos has complex deployment but is supported by robust customer service, albeit sometimes slower than desired.

What setup costs and ROI can be seen with Dynatrace in comparison to ITRS Geneos?

Dynatrace pricing is competitive, offering quicker ROI through streamlined operations. ITRS Geneos has higher setup costs but justifies the investment with its powerful, specialized monitoring features.

To learn more, read our detailed Dynatrace vs. ITRS Geneos Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Dynatrace vs. ITRS Geneos

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 866,088 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Dynatrace

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

2nd

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

349

Ranking in other categories

Log Management (11th), Mobile APM (2nd), Container Monitoring (2nd), AIOps (3rd)

ITRS Geneos

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

34th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Network Monitoring Software (69th), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (49th)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category, the mindshare of Dynatrace is 10.2%, down from 12.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ITRS Geneos is 1.2%, down from 1.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Dynatrace	10.2%
ITRS Geneos	1.2%
Other	88.6%

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

Featured Reviews

Anand_Kumar

Enterprise Architect at DXC Technology

Provides a comprehensive view by integrating with other monitoring systems

There may be an issue since there are many tools like Splunk involved in network monitoring. From an IP perspective, Dynatrace is performing well. If they want to develop in network monitoring, they can, as it's part of their product line. It's not rocketry, so they can accomplish it. If I, as an SI, look at it from an enterprise perspective, considering the cost from the client, I prefer not to go with multiple systems, as they don't provide a complete 360-degree view. They need to improve on claims about being an enterprise system. The definition of enterprise is loosely used, however, from a holistic security perspective, including infrastructure, network, ports, software, applications, transactions, and databases, there are areas lacking, especially in network monitoring tools.

Read full review

Sanket

Chief Manager at a marketing services firm with 501-1,000 employees

With the help of the solution, we can predict and prevent failures

Currently, the most valuable thing for an individual is a mobile device. Since that is where people are currently tracking everything, we have multiple applications or apps that are for various products. I would like ITRS Geneos to develop an app, where instead of going to specific login terminals or logging into laptops or desktops to check alerts, we can have visibility in the app itself. Using the ITRS Geneos app, we could see the error message during our travels or wherever we are. I would like to see the capacity of messages for forecasting increased. Since the NSE is the number one derivative stock exchange in the work for three consecutive years, the number of messages is important. We use the capacity planner in ITRS to forecast our data needs for the next two months. The planner is important because the volume of data we produce is becoming more and more volatile compared to when we first started using ITRS Geneos in 2014.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"One aspect of development is the concept of continuous improvements. There are key screens in our applications. We get identification, through Dynatrace on its own, that these are our top ten slow preforming screens."

"The most valuable features for me are the dashboard panels because they enable you to monitor multiple applications in one single site."

"The most valuable feature is the monitoring of application performance."

"We have used PurePath data (response times) to improve and tune application performance."

"Integration within the CI/CD pipeline helps avoid problems in production by detecting application faults upfront."

"You get a good insight into what is going on inside your code."

"A feature that's one of the highlights of Dynatrace is the AI. The second most valuable feature is OneAgent. Between infrastructures, applications, operating systems, you can deploy with just a single agent and can practically install and forget about it."

"Given the full-stack approach, you are able to view from the end user perspective, almost down to the bare metal."

More Dynatrace pros

"Real-time log monitoring with desktop alerts is valuable as it tells us immediately when there is an issue."

"One of the best aspects of Geneos is that it has a broad scope and can cover a lot of use cases. You can write your own scripts to monitor really specific things. And the rules that you can put in place can be quite complex for the alerts."

"The NetProbe carries over 100 samplers which are capable of monitoring hardware, OS, and the application layer."

"The solution's log monitoring and alerting mechanisms are very user-friendly and easy to plug and play."

"The ability to completely tailor and customize what it's monitoring is one of its strongest points. A lot of other monitoring tools are good at certain things, but one of my colleagues described it as the “Swiss Army Knife” of monitoring tools. It can do anything you want."

"The great advantage of this tool is real-time monitoring."

"One of the most valuable features is that it can be configured by non-developers. It doesn't require development expertise to configure it."

"I always appreciate Geneos's stability and ease of use."

More ITRS Geneos pros

Cons

"The container platform could include more value-added features."

"The web interface, in some cases, is a little ambiguous to use."

"AppMon is lacking the AI that can be found in Dynatrace Managed."

"Dynatrace could be improved by having a fully functional applications and infrastructure monitoring feature. Their existing stack, which is SNMP-based, does not have full infrastructure monitoring, whereas if we compare it with other solutions like New Relic or Datadog, they have moved into infrastructure monitoring. The second improvement I would suggest is in regards to the cost. So far, Dynatrace is the most expensive APM that we sell, even compared to New Relic. I think they can improve a little bit in terms of the license pricing."

"Right now, there is a log analysis feature. This is maybe a little more deeper than the log analytics in comparison to other tools, like Splunk or Sumo Logic. If Dynatrace can come up with this replay feature, that would be great."

"We would like to see an AI tool that detects issues with our site in real time."

"The pricing model of Dynatrace is somewhat confusing."

"I would like to see internal synthetic tests in the next release, which is already on the roadmap."

More Dynatrace cons

"I would also like to see suggested guidelines to accomplish a monitoring task. The issue is that ITRS is so flexible that there is more than one way to complete a task, each with benefits and disadvantages."

"Their cloud monitoring solution needs to be improved. I have already given them the feedback that it's not capable of meeting the latest technology needs."

"They have the Webslinger solution where you can see when something is alerting. It's a little bit cumbersome."

"Data visualization – real time and historical – is a weakness."

"The deployment method for upgrading is a bit tricky. It takes a little bit of manual effort. If that could be a bit more automated, it would help us a lot."

"ITRS have started to make some major changes that we haven't taken on board yet, in the creation of dashboards and more visibility of the metrics that we collect. At the moment, that's something that's lacking, but I know they have addressed it. Still, it’s not that easy to create stuff to help with visibility and dashboarding in Geneos."

"It needs to be easier to configure, especially with the JMX plugins."

"Currently, it is difficult to monitor secure websites using SSL or with SSO enabled."

More ITRS Geneos cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We have a three-year contract. We have 30 licenses for the full stack and 3 licenses for the DEM unit."

"Pricing is based on the number of servers monitored, so for big applications, it is a bit expensive."

"I feel the price is good for what the product does."

"The product is pricey, but it is feature-rich, which is why we probably haven't looked away from it."

"There are additional Professional Services costs which ensure the solution is configured with meaningful names so you're getting the most money for your investment."

"Dynatrace is bit costly and not easily affordable."

"Its price is quite high. Although it is worth it, it would be better if its price is reduced. They base their prices around licensing. Their prices are based on agent licensing and consumption licensing. Both of these can be a bit cheaper, but if they are the best in the market, as I consider them to be, I assume that their prices will be higher. They are delivering the product for that price."

"There was also some complexity in the adoption rate of it because of how costly the licensing is."

More Dynatrace pricing and cost advice

"The pricing is fairly market-related. They have been very lenient because we have been working with them for so long. An example is that we're currently migrating some of our services to AWS, and they've given us a grace period for some of the things to help with the migration and not to grow additional costs while we are migrating, but it's still on par with the market."

"It is expensive. They have to look at the model around when we move to cloud and how that's going to work. The licensing cost does pay off because of the improvements in support to our business."

"You will get the best price if you get a single global deal."

"Pricing is the touchy subject, even here. Upper management always wants us to find a cheaper solution. But we have so much integrated with ITRS... It's expensive, but it does its job very well. And you set it and go."

"The product is priced quite high. There are pricing options for customers based on the size of the environment and plug-ins used by the monitoring system."

"Based on feedback from colleagues and friends working in the financial sector, Geneos is relatively costly. Many companies have been switching from Geneos to Dynatrace, Sysdig, or other monitoring tools in the past two years because of the price."

"The pricing seems reasonable. We're happy enough with it."

"When I first came in, their pricing was very high. ITRS had a high expectation of what their price should be based on perceived value. I think they have been realizing, more recently, that there are other competitors, so their pricing is a lot better. Licensing for on-premise is okay, however I feel there is quite some work to be done for cloud and containers. We're still working with them to try and work out what that pricing should look like."

More ITRS Geneos pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

866,088 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

24%

Computer Software Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Financial Services Firm

73%

Computer Software Company

University

Construction Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	77
Midsize Enterprise	50
Large Enterprise	286

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	6
Midsize Enterprise	12
Large Enterprise	39

Questions from the Community

Any advice about APM solutions?

The key is to have a holistic view over the complete infrastructure, the ones you have listed are great for APM if you need to monitor applications end to end. I have tested them all and have not f...

See all answers

What cloud monitoring software did you choose and why?

While the environment does matter in the selection of an APM tool, I prefer to use Dynatrace to manage the entire stack. Both production and Dev/Test. I find it to be quite superior to anything els...

See all answers

Any advice about APM solutions?

There are many factors and we know little about your requirements (size of org, technology stack, management systems, the scope of implementation). Our goal was to consolidate APM and infra monitor...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ITRS Geneos?

The pricing is high. Licensing fees might be around 500$ per server monthly.

See all answers

What needs improvement with ITRS Geneos?

ITRS Geneos is a legacy system. It predicts or provides proactive measures once an issue is resolved. It doesn't offer any predictive capabilities or root cause analysis. They throw a lot of data i...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for ITRS Geneos?

ITRS offers multiple products, including upgrades for synthetic monitoring and a SaaS platform. Geneos is used for infrastructure monitoring, covering KPIs such as CPU, memory, processes, network l...

See all answers

Comparisons

Datadog vs Dynatrace

Compared 11% of the time

Splunk Enterprise Security vs Dynatrace

Compared 6% of the time

Azure Monitor vs Dynatrace

Compared 5% of the time

Splunk AppDynamics vs Dynatrace

Compared 5% of the time

Elastic Stack vs Dynatrace

Compared 2% of the time

More Dynatrace Competitors

Splunk AppDynamics vs ITRS Geneos

Compared 14% of the time

Grafana vs ITRS Geneos

Compared 13% of the time

Datadog vs ITRS Geneos

Compared 8% of the time

Splunk Enterprise Security vs ITRS Geneos

Compared 8% of the time

Prometheus Group vs ITRS Geneos

Compared 7% of the time

More ITRS Geneos Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Dynatrace

April 2025

Download Dynatrace product report

Buyer's Guide

ITRS Geneos

August 2025

Download ITRS Geneos product report

Also Known As

No data available

Geneos

Overview

Dynatrace is an AI-powered software intelligence monitoring platform that accelerates digital transformation and simplifies cloud complexities. Dynatrace is an entirely automated full-stack solution that provides data and answers about the performance of your applications and deep insight into every transaction throughout every application, including the end-user experience. By modernizing and automating enterprise cloud operations, users can deliver an optimal digital experience with higher quality software to customers faster.

Dynatrace offers an all-in-one automated artificial intelligence solution that brings together application performance, cloud and infrastructure, and digital experience monitoring. Dynatrace accelerates performance-driven results through operations, development, and business teams with a shared metrics platform. In addition, users are provided a full-stack monitoring experience with three patented technologies:

Smartscape - visualization mechanism that maps the totality of everything working in your environment and detects any casual dependencies between your applications, processes, websites, services, hosts, cloud infrastructure, and networks.
OneAgent - a technology that analyzes, gathers ,and unifies all business performance metrics throughout every layer of your technology stack.
PurePath Technology - code-level context and timings are captured from the mainframe to the cloud for all end-to-end transactions.

What does Dynatrace offer?

Dynatrace redefines how organizations monitor their digital ecosystems. The solution offers:

Cloud Automation: With AI engine Davis®, users can see the exact reason for problems and facilitate quick auto-remediation and intelligent cloud orchestration.
Application Security: With automated application vulnerability management, users can deliver applications faster and more securely.
Infrastructure Monitoring: Convenient broad visibility across your environments is provided with streamlined, automated infrastructure monitoring.
Digital Experience Monitoring (DEM): Optimize your applications, provide better support, and improve user experience with a combination of Real User Monitoring (RUM), Session Replay, and synthetic monitoring throughout your environment.
Applications and Microservices: For complex cloud environments, Dynatrace can automatically provide visibility and root-cause answers. It can also monitor microservices.
Digital Business Analytics: Get AI-powered, real-time answers to analytical business queries with KPIs and metrics that are already flowing through applications.

Reviews from Real Users

Dynatrace is the only solution that provides answers to organizations based on deep insight into each user, transaction, and organization's environment.

Barry P., a managing performance engineer at Medica Health Plans, writes, "With Dynatrace, we have synthetic checks and real-user monitoring of all of our websites, places where members and providers can interact with us over the web. We monitor the response times of those with Dynatrace, and it's all integrated into one place."

A consultant at a tech service company notes, "A feature that's one of the highlights of Dynatrace is the AI. The second most valuable feature is OneAgent. Between infrastructures, applications, operating systems, you can deploy with just a single agent and can practically install and forget about it."

Dynatrace

ITRS Geneos is a real-time monitoring tool designed for managing increasingly complex, hybrid and interconnected IT estates.

Built with financial services and trading organisations in mind, it collects a wide range of data relating to server performance, infrastructure, trading, connectivity and applications, and analyses it to provide relevant information and alerts in real time.

Geneos can give full stack visibility across highly dynamic environments and presents all the information through a single pane of glass and its configurable and customisable dashboards provide end-to-end visibility to both technical and business users.

For more information, please visit https://www.itrsgroup.com/products/geneos

ITRS

Sample Customers

Audi, Best Buy, LinkedIn, CISCO, Intuit, KRONOS, Scottrade, Wells Fargo, ULTA Beauty, Lenovo, Swarovsk, Nike, Whirlpool, American Express

ITRS Geneos is used by over 170 financial institutions, including JPMorgan, HSBC, RBS, Deutsche Bank and Goldman Sachs. Clients range from investment banks to exchanges and brokers.

Buyer's Guide

Dynatrace vs. ITRS Geneos

July 2025

Free Report: Dynatrace vs. ITRS Geneos

Find out what your peers are saying about Dynatrace vs. ITRS Geneos and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

866,088 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Dynatrace vs. ITRS Geneos report.

See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.

We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.