Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
ITRS Geneos Logo

Top 10 ITRS Geneos Alternatives

Vendor: ITRS
4.1 out of 5
Leave a review

Top ITRS Geneos Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to ITRS Geneos based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Dynatrace, Datadog, and Zabbix. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.

ITRS Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with ITRS, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
ITRS Geneos Logo
Dynatrace
4.4 out of 5
ITRS Geneos Logo
Dynatrace
4.4 out of 5
Dynatrace offers comprehensive AI-driven capabilities, auto-discovery, and full-stack monitoring. In comparison, ITRS Geneos excels in real-time monitoring for the financial sector. Users favor Dynatrace for advanced analytics, while ITRS Geneos is preferred for specialized financial features and cost-effectiveness in large-scale deployments.
Download Dynatrace vs. ITRS Geneos Report
Dynatrace has a higher initial setup cost compared to ITRS Geneos, which is known for more affordable installation fees.
View comparison
Pricing
Dynatrace has a higher initial setup cost compared to ITRS Geneos, which is known for more affordable installation fees.
ITRS Geneos Logo
Datadog
4.3 out of 5
ITRS Geneos Logo
Datadog
4.3 out of 5
Datadog's cloud-based solution offers comprehensive features with sharable dashboards and anomaly detection, reducing infrastructure management needs. In comparison, ITRS Geneos provides real-time monitoring and extensive customization, preferred by finance for its stability.
Download Datadog vs. ITRS Geneos Report
Datadog's setup cost is straightforward, whereas ITRS Geneos' initial cost can be complex.
View comparison
Pricing
Datadog's setup cost is straightforward, whereas ITRS Geneos' initial cost can be complex.
ITRS Geneos Logo
Zabbix
4.2 out of 5
ITRS Geneos Logo
Zabbix
4.2 out of 5
Zabbix offers cost-effective open-source flexibility and comprehensive monitoring capabilities. In comparison, ITRS Geneos provides robust features, extensive integration options, and advanced analytics. Zabbix is praised for straightforward deployment, while ITRS Geneos excels in thorough customer service and tailored enterprise functionalities.
Download ITRS Geneos vs. Zabbix Report
Zabbix incurs no initial setup costs, while ITRS Geneos has a higher setup expense. Zabbix is more cost-effective during installation, contrasting with ITRS Geneos, which may burden budgets upfront.
View comparison
Pricing
Zabbix incurs no initial setup costs, while ITRS Geneos has a higher setup expense. Zabbix is more cost-effective during installation, contrasting with ITRS Geneos, which may burden budgets upfront.
ITRS Geneos Logo
New Relic
4.2 out of 5
ITRS Geneos Logo
New Relic
4.2 out of 5
ITRS Geneos is known for real-time monitoring and customizable dashboards, making it suitable for detailed, on-premise monitoring needs. In comparison, New Relic's advanced analytics and broad integrations cater to users needing extensive cloud-based monitoring solutions. ITRS Geneos excels in customer service, while New Relic offers efficient deployment.
Download ITRS Geneos vs. New Relic Report
ITRS Geneos has a higher initial setup cost, making it suitable for larger enterprises, whereas New Relic's setup cost is lower, appealing to smaller businesses.
View comparison
Pricing
ITRS Geneos has a higher initial setup cost, making it suitable for larger enterprises, whereas New Relic's setup cost is lower, appealing to smaller businesses.
ITRS Geneos Logo
Azure Monitor
3.8 out of 5
ITRS Geneos Logo
Azure Monitor
3.8 out of 5
ITRS Geneos offers competitive pricing and robust customer support in IT monitoring, praised for real-time performance and customization. In comparison, Azure Monitor’s superior features, including scalability and Azure service integration, justify its higher cost, making it an appealing choice for comprehensive cloud ecosystems.
Download Azure Monitor vs. ITRS Geneos Report
ITRS Geneos has a higher setup cost compared to Azure Monitor, which offers more budget-friendly setup options.
View comparison
Pricing
ITRS Geneos has a higher setup cost compared to Azure Monitor, which offers more budget-friendly setup options.
ITRS Geneos Logo
Splunk AppDynamics
4.1 out of 5
ITRS Geneos Logo
Splunk AppDynamics
4.1 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics excels in real-time monitoring, transaction tracking, and database monitoring, appealing to tech buyers needing comprehensive analytics and ease of use. In comparison, ITRS Geneos suits financial sectors with real-time capabilities and customization, ideal for industry-specific applications.
Download ITRS Geneos vs. Splunk AppDynamics Report
Splunk AppDynamics involves a significant initial cost, whereas ITRS Geneos offers a more moderate setup expense.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk AppDynamics involves a significant initial cost, whereas ITRS Geneos offers a more moderate setup expense.
ITRS Geneos Logo
Grafana
3.9 out of 5
ITRS Geneos Logo
Grafana
3.9 out of 5
ITRS Geneos excels in enterprise-level monitoring, ideal for financial market data and trading systems. In comparison, Grafana stands out with its open-source, customizable visualizations. ITRS Geneos provides robust customer service, while Grafana offers easier deployment and lower costs. Both deliver strong ROI and unique advantages.
Download Grafana vs. ITRS Geneos Report
ITRS Geneos has a high setup cost, while Grafana offers a considerably lower expense for initial setup. The significant difference in upfront costs reflects their differing approaches to budget and infrastructure management.
View comparison
Pricing
ITRS Geneos has a high setup cost, while Grafana offers a considerably lower expense for initial setup. The significant difference in upfront costs reflects their differing approaches to budget and infrastructure management.
ITRS Geneos Logo
ITRS Geneos Logo
Elastic Observability
4.0 out of 5
ITRS Geneos offers comprehensive monitoring and reliable performance, ideal for detailed analytics and rapid insights. In comparison, Elastic Observability excels in customization and integration, making it suitable for environments requiring large dataset handling and flexible visualization. Each solution meets diverse technical monitoring needs.
Download Elastic Observability vs. ITRS Geneos Report
ITRS Geneos has a higher setup cost compared to Elastic Observability, highlighting a significant difference between the two solutions. Elastic Observability's lower setup cost may be attractive for budget-conscious organizations.
View comparison
Pricing
ITRS Geneos has a higher setup cost compared to Elastic Observability, highlighting a significant difference between the two solutions. Elastic Observability's lower setup cost may be attractive for budget-conscious organizations.
ITRS Geneos Logo
SolarWinds NPM
4.1 out of 5
ITRS Geneos Logo
SolarWinds NPM
4.1 out of 5
SolarWinds NPM offers robust network monitoring with modular pricing for scalability. In comparison, ITRS Geneos excels in real-time financial monitoring. While SolarWinds suits various organizational needs, ITRS provides significant ROI in critical environments, particularly with its unique real-time capabilities.
Download ITRS Geneos vs. SolarWinds NPM Report
SolarWinds NPM has a moderate setup cost, while ITRS Geneos incurs a higher initial investment. This cost difference highlights SolarWinds' appeal for budget-conscious users compared to the premium entry point of ITRS Geneos.
View comparison
Pricing
SolarWinds NPM has a moderate setup cost, while ITRS Geneos incurs a higher initial investment. This cost difference highlights SolarWinds' appeal for budget-conscious users compared to the premium entry point of ITRS Geneos.
ITRS Geneos Logo
ITRS Geneos Logo
PRTG Network Monitor
4.0 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor is chosen for rapid deployment and cost-effectiveness across varied infrastructures. In comparison, ITRS Geneos suits enterprise needs with robust integrations and real-time data access. Tech buyers select PRTG for simplicity, while Geneos appeals for its specialized features and comprehensive monitoring.
Download ITRS Geneos vs. PRTG Network Monitor Report
PRTG Network Monitor may have lower setup costs, making it potentially more affordable, while ITRS Geneos could involve higher initial investment, suggesting a more comprehensive setup.
View comparison
Pricing
PRTG Network Monitor may have lower setup costs, making it potentially more affordable, while ITRS Geneos could involve higher initial investment, suggesting a more comprehensive setup.
ITRS Geneos Logo
Prometheus Group
4.1 out of 5
ITRS Geneos Logo
Prometheus Group
4.1 out of 5
ITRS Geneos excels with real-time monitoring, customizable alerts, and extensive financial industry plugins. In comparison, Prometheus Group offers cost-effective, flexible metric collection, notably in Kubernetes, with seamless Grafana integration, appealing to those seeking open-source solutions and broad adaptability across environments.
Download ITRS Geneos vs. Prometheus Group Report
ITRS Geneos has a higher setup cost compared to Prometheus Group, which offers a more budget-friendly solution, emphasizing a cost-efficient initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
ITRS Geneos has a higher setup cost compared to Prometheus Group, which offers a more budget-friendly solution, emphasizing a cost-efficient initial investment.
ITRS Geneos Logo
Nagios XI
4.0 out of 5
ITRS Geneos Logo
Nagios XI
4.0 out of 5
Nagios XI is favored for its open-source nature and cost-effectiveness, providing customization and integration options. In comparison, ITRS Geneos is preferred for real-time monitoring and high customizability, appealing to industries needing comprehensive dashboards despite its higher price.
Download ITRS Geneos vs. Nagios XI Report
Nagios XI offers a more affordable initial setup cost, making it budget-friendly for smaller enterprises, while ITRS Geneos incurs a higher setup expense, reflecting its advanced capabilities suited for complex, large-scale environments.
View comparison
Pricing
Nagios XI offers a more affordable initial setup cost, making it budget-friendly for smaller enterprises, while ITRS Geneos incurs a higher setup expense, reflecting its advanced capabilities suited for complex, large-scale environments.
ITRS Geneos Logo
ITRS Geneos Logo
ServiceNow IT Operations Management
4.1 out of 5
ITRS Geneos provides real-time monitoring with extensive customization for various systems, ideal for finance. In comparison, ServiceNow IT Operations Management focuses on seamless integration and automation across platforms. Both offer strong customer service but differ in deployment options and pricing strategies.
Download ITRS Geneos vs. ServiceNow IT Operations Management Report
ITRS Geneos offers a lower setup cost compared to ServiceNow IT Operations Management, which might entail higher initial expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
ITRS Geneos offers a lower setup cost compared to ServiceNow IT Operations Management, which might entail higher initial expenses.
ITRS Geneos Logo
ITRS Geneos Logo
Splunk Observability Cloud
4.2 out of 5
ITRS Geneos offers real-time monitoring with customizable dashboards, ideal for financial sectors requiring high uptime. In comparison, Splunk Observability Cloud provides seamless integrations and AI-driven insights, particularly advantageous for those needing comprehensive observability across cloud-native applications.
Download ITRS Geneos vs. Splunk Observability Cloud Report
ITRS Geneos features a lower initial setup cost, while Splunk Observability Cloud offers a more comprehensive setup but at a higher price point.
View comparison
Pricing
ITRS Geneos features a lower initial setup cost, while Splunk Observability Cloud offers a more comprehensive setup but at a higher price point.
ITRS Geneos Logo
LogicMonitor
4.5 out of 5
ITRS Geneos Logo
LogicMonitor
4.5 out of 5
ITRS Geneos excels in managing diverse systems with customizable real-time monitoring, whereas LogicMonitor provides comprehensive features with flexible integration for cloud and hybrid deployments. In comparison, LogicMonitor offers cost-effective scalability while ITRS Geneos provides extensive on-premises support.
Download ITRS Geneos vs. LogicMonitor Report
ITRS Geneos offers flexible setup cost options, while LogicMonitor provides a straightforward pricing structure, emphasizing simplicity in deployment.
View comparison
Pricing
ITRS Geneos offers flexible setup cost options, while LogicMonitor provides a straightforward pricing structure, emphasizing simplicity in deployment.
ITRS Geneos Logo
Nagios Core
4.1 out of 5
ITRS Geneos Logo
Nagios Core
4.1 out of 5
ITRS Geneos offers real-time monitoring for financial services with custom scripts and cross-platform support. In comparison, Nagios Core provides an open-source, flexible setup suited for various environments. Geneos is noted for superior customer support, while Nagios emphasizes cost-effectiveness without licensing fees.
Download ITRS Geneos vs. Nagios Core Report
ITRS Geneos has a high initial setup cost, while Nagios Core offers a more affordable setup. This contrast highlights the significant price difference between the two monitoring solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
ITRS Geneos has a high initial setup cost, while Nagios Core offers a more affordable setup. This contrast highlights the significant price difference between the two monitoring solutions.
ITRS Geneos Logo
ScienceLogic
4.3 out of 5
ITRS Geneos Logo
ScienceLogic
4.3 out of 5
ScienceLogic offers flexibility and extensive customization, ideal for diverse environments. In comparison, ITRS Geneos excels in real-time monitoring and is suited for financial services. ScienceLogic provides robust integration tools, while ITRS Geneos emphasizes application monitoring with fast response times for complex infrastructures.
Download ITRS Geneos vs. ScienceLogic Report
ScienceLogic offers a simpler setup process with minimal upfront costs, whereas ITRS Geneos requires a more complex, potentially costly setup. This distinction in setup costs highlights the difference in initial investment between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
ScienceLogic offers a simpler setup process with minimal upfront costs, whereas ITRS Geneos requires a more complex, potentially costly setup. This distinction in setup costs highlights the difference in initial investment between the two solutions.
ITRS Geneos Logo
ITRS Geneos Logo
SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor
4.0 out of 5

ITRS Geneos excels in providing reliable analytics for financial services. In comparison, SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor offers broader features and ease of use. ITRS Geneos handles large data volumes effectively, while SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor provides user-friendly dashboards and integration with other tools.

Download ITRS Geneos vs. SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor Report
ITRS Geneos has a lower initial setup cost, while SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor requires a higher investment upfront.
View comparison
Pricing
ITRS Geneos has a lower initial setup cost, while SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor requires a higher investment upfront.
ITRS Geneos Logo
ITRS Geneos Logo
BMC TrueSight Operations Management
4.1 out of 5
BMC TrueSight Operations Management provides comprehensive monitoring and predictive analytics, focusing on scalability and complexity reduction. In comparison, ITRS Geneos excels in real-time monitoring and customization but can improve in ease of setup and documentation. Both deliver valuable ROI, justifying their costs.
Download BMC TrueSight Operations Management vs. ITRS Geneos Report
BMC TrueSight Operations Management has a lower setup cost compared to ITRS Geneos, which tends to be more expensive upfront. This price difference is significant for organizations considering initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
BMC TrueSight Operations Management has a lower setup cost compared to ITRS Geneos, which tends to be more expensive upfront. This price difference is significant for organizations considering initial investment.
ITRS Geneos Logo
InfluxDB
4.1 out of 5
ITRS Geneos Logo
InfluxDB
4.1 out of 5
InfluxDB provides cost-effective, scalable solutions ideal for handling real-time analytics and time-series data efficiently. In comparison, ITRS Geneos offers sophisticated monitoring features, suitable for financial enterprises willing to invest in advanced event processing and dashboard capabilities.
Download ITRS Geneos vs. InfluxDB Report
InfluxDB offers lower setup costs than ITRS Geneos, making it more economical for budget-conscious users, while ITRS Geneos provides a more comprehensive setup catering to enterprises with advanced monitoring needs.
View comparison
Pricing
InfluxDB offers lower setup costs than ITRS Geneos, making it more economical for budget-conscious users, while ITRS Geneos provides a more comprehensive setup catering to enterprises with advanced monitoring needs.
ITRS Geneos Logo
WhatsUp Gold
3.9 out of 5
ITRS Geneos Logo
WhatsUp Gold
3.9 out of 5
WhatsUp Gold is favored for its pricing, ease of deployment, and customer support. In comparison, ITRS Geneos excels in feature richness, offering advanced analytics and scalability. WhatsUp Gold appeals to cost-conscious buyers, while ITRS Geneos suits those prioritizing in-depth monitoring and advanced functionality.
Download ITRS Geneos vs. WhatsUp Gold Report
WhatsUp Gold has a higher setup cost compared to ITRS Geneos, which offers a more cost-effective initial setup fee.
View comparison
Pricing
WhatsUp Gold has a higher setup cost compared to ITRS Geneos, which offers a more cost-effective initial setup fee.
ITRS Geneos Logo
BigPanda
3.8 out of 5
ITRS Geneos Logo
BigPanda
3.8 out of 5
BigPanda offers competitive pricing and customer support with efficient incident response and data aggregation for streamlined operations. In comparison, ITRS Geneos excels in comprehensive infrastructure monitoring, appealing to businesses requiring detailed analytics, especially in financial services, despite higher upfront costs and more complex setup.
Download BigPanda vs. ITRS Geneos Report
BigPanda has a lower setup cost compared to ITRS Geneos, offering a budget-friendly option. In contrast, ITRS Geneos, with its higher setup investment, is tailored for those prioritizing advanced features and robust functionality.
View comparison
Pricing
BigPanda has a lower setup cost compared to ITRS Geneos, offering a budget-friendly option. In contrast, ITRS Geneos, with its higher setup investment, is tailored for those prioritizing advanced features and robust functionality.
ITRS Geneos Logo
Flowmon
4.3 out of 5
ITRS Geneos Logo
Flowmon
4.3 out of 5
ITRS Geneos appeals to those needing cost-effective monitoring and financial services analysis. In comparison, Flowmon offers superior analytics and security at a premium, ideal for enterprises prioritizing network threat detection. Geneos's robust support contrasts with Flowmon's seamless cloud deployment.
Download Flowmon vs. ITRS Geneos Report
ITRS Geneos has a higher setup cost compared to Flowmon, highlighting a significant difference in initial financial investment between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
ITRS Geneos has a higher setup cost compared to Flowmon, highlighting a significant difference in initial financial investment between the two solutions.
ITRS Geneos Logo
Catchpoint
4.1 out of 5
ITRS Geneos Logo
Catchpoint
4.1 out of 5
Catchpoint offers real-time monitoring and extensive third-party integrations, making it user-friendly with quick setup. In comparison, ITRS Geneos provides deep analytics and customizable dashboards, valued for in-depth operational insights. Catchpoint excels in straightforward deployment, while ITRS Geneos is cost-effective with enhanced operational visibility.
Download Catchpoint vs. ITRS Geneos Report
Catchpoint incurs higher setup costs compared to ITRS Geneos, making it less budget-friendly upfront.
View comparison
Pricing
Catchpoint incurs higher setup costs compared to ITRS Geneos, making it less budget-friendly upfront.
ITRS Geneos Logo
ITRS Geneos Logo
Grafana Enterprise Stack
4.2 out of 5
ITRS Geneos specializes in real-time monitoring for financial services, excelling in predictive analytics and secure deployments. In comparison, Grafana Enterprise Stack offers extensive visualization and dashboard flexibility, with a broad industry focus accommodating varied IT infrastructures with cloud and on-premises deployment options.
Download Grafana Enterprise Stack vs. ITRS Geneos Report
ITRS Geneos involves a higher initial setup cost compared to Grafana Enterprise Stack, which offers a more budget-friendly setup option. This difference highlights the higher upfront investment needed for ITRS Geneos.
View comparison
Pricing
ITRS Geneos involves a higher initial setup cost compared to Grafana Enterprise Stack, which offers a more budget-friendly setup option. This difference highlights the higher upfront investment needed for ITRS Geneos.
ITRS Geneos Logo
ITRS Geneos Logo
Pico Corvil Analytics
4.5 out of 5
ITRS Geneos offers customizable monitoring ideal for infrastructure management, appealing to users seeking simplicity and value. In comparison, Pico Corvil Analytics provides superior network analytics, attracting enterprises prioritizing depth and willing to invest in complex solutions for detailed insights.
Download ITRS Geneos vs. Pico Corvil Analytics Report
ITRS Geneos incurs a higher initial setup cost, focusing on robust infrastructure monitoring, while Pico Corvil Analytics offers a more cost-effective setup optimized for network performance analysis, highlighting distinct priorities in their pricing strategies.
View comparison
Pricing
ITRS Geneos incurs a higher initial setup cost, focusing on robust infrastructure monitoring, while Pico Corvil Analytics offers a more cost-effective setup optimized for network performance analysis, highlighting distinct priorities in their pricing strategies.
ITRS Geneos Logo
Scout APM
5.0 out of 5
ITRS Geneos Logo
Scout APM
5.0 out of 5

Scout APM is an application performance monitoring solution that simplifies the troubleshooting process by enabling developers to discover and repair performance problems before clients ever notice them. Scout APM uses a developer-based UI with real-time alerting and intuitive tracing logic to identify bottlenecks precisely to the source code. This helps to greatly reduce time and effort needed to debug code and results in greater productivity and improved outcomes.

View comparison
ITRS Geneos Logo
ITRS Geneos Logo
IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager
3.3 out of 5
IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager offers reliable monitoring capabilities and sophisticated alerting, making it a cost-effective choice with strong customer support. In comparison, ITRS Geneos provides advanced configurability and in-depth analytics, justifying its higher price with a faster deployment process and superior value.
Download IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager vs. ITRS Geneos Report
IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager has higher setup costs compared to ITRS Geneos.
View comparison
Pricing
IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager has higher setup costs compared to ITRS Geneos.
ITRS Geneos Logo
ITRS Geneos Logo
CA Unified Communications Monitor
3.3 out of 5
CA Unified Communications Monitor appeals to budget-conscious buyers with effective monitoring and straightforward deployment. In comparison, ITRS Geneos, with its advanced features and comprehensive monitoring, suits enterprises prioritizing performance insights, justifying the higher cost with expert support and in-depth analytics.
Download CA Unified Communications Monitor vs. ITRS Geneos Report
CA Unified Communications Monitor has a noticeably lower setup cost compared to ITRS Geneos, which requires a substantial upfront investment. This cost difference may significantly influence organizations with tight budget constraints.
View comparison
Pricing
CA Unified Communications Monitor has a noticeably lower setup cost compared to ITRS Geneos, which requires a substantial upfront investment. This cost difference may significantly influence organizations with tight budget constraints.

Related categories

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
Network Monitoring Software
IT Infrastructure Monitoring