ITRS Geneos vs Splunk Observability Cloud comparison

ITRS and Splunk are both solutions in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category. ITRS is ranked #34 with an average rating of 5.0, while Splunk is ranked #8 with an average rating of 8.7. ITRS holds a 1.3% mindshare in APM, compared to Splunk’s 1.9% mindshare. Additionally, 96% of ITRS users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 94% of Splunk users who would recommend it.

ITRS Geneos

Read 57 ITRS Geneos reviews

3,211 Views
1,534 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

Splunk Observability Cloud

Read 56 Splunk Observability Cloud reviews

3,129 Views
1,456 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

ITRS Geneos

Splunk Observability Cloud

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 19, 2025

ITRS Geneos and Splunk Observability Cloud are competitors in the monitoring solutions category. ITRS Geneos appears to have an edge in real-time monitoring due to its low-latency and highly customizable solution suited for the financial sector, while Splunk stands out for its data visualization capabilities and integration in cloud environments.

Features: ITRS Geneos supports real-time monitoring with minimal latency, customized plugins for the financial industry, and a lightweight NetProbe for cross-platform deployment. Splunk Observability Cloud excels in data visualization, creating real-time dashboards, and integration with third-party applications for comprehensive infrastructure monitoring.

Room for Improvement: ITRS Geneos could improve its historical logging and make its dashboard configuration more intuitive, alongside strengthening its cloud monitoring. Splunk Observability Cloud could benefit from a streamlined setup process, enhanced machine learning capabilities, and adjustments to address high costs.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: ITRS Geneos is typically deployed on-premises and is noted for excellent customer support, recognized for its quick response and expertise. Splunk offers diverse deployment options including on-premises, cloud, and hybrid setups, with support considered satisfactory but some documentation could be improved.

Pricing and ROI: ITRS Geneos is often deemed expensive, justified by its specialized financial sector capabilities. Splunk Observability Cloud is similarly seen as pricey, and while its features are comprehensive, the high licensing costs are noted as a barrier, impacting long-term scalability.

To learn more, read our detailed ITRS Geneos vs. Splunk Observability Cloud Report (Updated: May 2025).

Buyer's Guide

ITRS Geneos vs. Splunk Observability Cloud

May 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 860,592 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

ITRS Geneos

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

34th

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

69th

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

48th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Splunk Observability Cloud

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

8th

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

6th

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

7th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Monitoring Software (8th), Container Management (7th), Digital Experience Monitoring (DEM) (2nd)

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category, the mindshare of ITRS Geneos is 1.3%, up from 1.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Splunk Observability Cloud is 1.9%, up from 0.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

Featured Reviews

Sanket

Chief Manager at a marketing services firm with 501-1,000 employees

With the help of the solution, we can predict and prevent failures

Currently, the most valuable thing for an individual is a mobile device. Since that is where people are currently tracking everything, we have multiple applications or apps that are for various products. I would like ITRS Geneos to develop an app, where instead of going to specific login terminals or logging into laptops or desktops to check alerts, we can have visibility in the app itself. Using the ITRS Geneos app, we could see the error message during our travels or wherever we are. I would like to see the capacity of messages for forecasting increased. Since the NSE is the number one derivative stock exchange in the work for three consecutive years, the number of messages is important. We use the capacity planner in ITRS to forecast our data needs for the next two months. The planner is important because the volume of data we produce is becoming more and more volatile compared to when we first started using ITRS Geneos in 2014.

Read full review

Lakshmi Padaga

Java Developer at U.S. Bank

Collaborates performance metrics with log data to pinpoint the exact cause of issues and offers error detection

Splunk APM is a robust tool with many capabilities. There are always areas for potential improvement to enhance its functionality and user experience. For Splunk APM, there could be simplified navigation, like streamlining the user interface to make navigation more intuitive for our users, especially those new to APM, which can enhance usability. We can provide more customization options for dashboards and visualizations to help users tailor the platform to their specific needs. There could be more integration capabilities with a wider range of third-party tools and platforms would also be beneficial. By focusing on these areas, Splunk APM can enhance its value proposition, improve user satisfaction, and better meet the evolving needs of organizations monitoring their application performance.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The remarkable feature of Geneos is the dashboard. Geneos' flexible dashboard sets it apart from other monitoring tools. Other solutions have limitations in their dashboard design and can't be customized as much. The Geneos dashboard allows unlimited creativity."

"ITRS uses SNMP to communicate with our devices as well as SNMP net probes installed on our servers."

"I would say that it is an easy-to-use monitoring tool. Amongst the available monitoring tools, it is a really good option."

"The solution's log monitoring and alerting mechanisms are very user-friendly and easy to plug and play."

"ITRS can define rules to alert when certain parameters that you monitor breach a threshold. Rules can be configured to fire recovery actions automatically to clear the alert"

"The NetProbe carries over 100 samplers which are capable of monitoring hardware, OS, and the application layer."

"The clean and colorful UI and easy to use options like snooze and active times."

"Custom script toolkits"

More ITRS Geneos pros

"Splunk APM provides a holistic view of the application. Unlike other APMs, Splunk's service map is quite effective."

"The solution is stable and reliable."

"The most valuable features include user time tracking and the ability to analyze application load times."

"The feature I find most valuable, is the data integration."

"The solution's service map feature allows us to have a holistic overview and to see quickly where the issues are."

"It's beneficial for monitoring performance and infrastructure, especially when deploying applications with multiple versions with Git."

"The most valuable thing that we have seen within our group is the ability to ingest all this raw data and have it organized in a certain way so that different groups can get effective alerting from this massive amount of raw data that is out there."

"Splunk's dashboards are great."

More Splunk Observability Cloud pros

Cons

"I would really like to see something from the Geneos side to set up automated reporting from ITRS. We have to send reporting to management every day. To do that we have to check the dashboard and then we have to report whether everything is fine or not. In the future, I want something, some reporting kind of feature in ITRS, where it can collect all the data and mention what is green, what is amber, what is red in a report."

"ITRS Geneos is not on the cloud at a time when everyone is moving to the cloud."

"The main feature that needs work is the Dashboard designer."

"Geneos' application monitoring could be improved a lot. Products like AppDynamics and Dynatrace provide the process thread-level monitoring, but Geneos lacks these capabilities."

"One thing that could be improved in terms of rapid scaling would be more ability to clone aspects of an implementation. It seems like there are opportunities in this area, where we have repetitive tasks to do when it comes to implementing things on new servers or on new gateways. It would be great if there was an easy way to clone something that had already been done."

"For the solution to stay relevant in the cloud-based monitoring environment Geneos needs more plug-ins with more features. Instead of offering clients workarounds, the solution should have a cloud-based out-of-the-box version."

"At the moment Geneos is excellent and handling real time monitoring, however not great at doing historical reporting."

"I would like to see ITRS integrate its setup editor with a SVN to check-in setup XML after major changes."

More ITRS Geneos cons

"There is a lot of room for improvement with the automation."

"In Splunk Observability Cloud, I notice room for improvement in synthetic monitoring. It does not provide output based on server names."

"There is room for improvement in customer support due to delays and standard feedback responses."

"There's no standard use case available where you can see the utilization of the number of use cases I have."

"In future updates, I would like to see more predefined monitoring query solutions, which could be more effective."

"Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring's data analytics can be improved by including suggestions for various types of continuous monitoring."

"The UI enhancements could be a way to improve the solution in the future."

"Support from Splunk is not very helpful because Splunk doesn't have a dedicated APM; they only have one APM engineer in Korea."

More Splunk Observability Cloud cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"ITRS Geneos is not a cheap tool. It's a moderate price for the banking industry. The reason we are not able to add the ITRS monitoring tool for the non-banking industries, and non-finance industries, is that the pricing is too high."

"The product is priced quite high. There are pricing options for customers based on the size of the environment and plug-ins used by the monitoring system."

"Its price is reasonable. It isn't too expensive, and it isn't too cheap, but it also depends on a company's volume and negotiation."

"It is expensive. They have to look at the model around when we move to cloud and how that's going to work. The licensing cost does pay off because of the improvements in support to our business."

"Given our spend and the amount of service we have in it, the pricing is quite reasonable."

"Pricing is the touchy subject, even here. Upper management always wants us to find a cheaper solution. But we have so much integrated with ITRS... It's expensive, but it does its job very well. And you set it and go."

"The organization is not just purchasing a license for the product, but also managing services and professional services from ITRS. Another factor is if the implementation is going to be in production, non-production, or both."

"The pricing seems reasonable. We're happy enough with it."

More ITRS Geneos pricing and cost advice

"Splunk's infrastructure monitoring costs can be high because our billing is based on data volume measured in terabytes, rather than the number of devices being monitored."

"Splunk APM is expensive."

"The pricing is reasonable."

"This is an expensive solution."

"Splunk Observability Cloud is expensive."

"The solution's pricing is costly."

"Splunk APM is a very cost-efficient solution."

"I am not in that circle, but we are currently licensing based on our queries. That is working out for us. Previously, it was by volume of data, and now, we can store as much data as we want."

More Splunk Observability Cloud pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

860,592 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

74%

Computer Software Company

University

Construction Company

Financial Services Firm

17%

Computer Software Company

15%

Government

Retailer

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about ITRS Geneos?

I would say that it is an easy-to-use monitoring tool. Amongst the available monitoring tools, it is a really good option.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ITRS Geneos?

The pricing is high. Licensing fees might be around 500$ per server monthly.

See all answers

What needs improvement with ITRS Geneos?

ITRS Geneos is a legacy system. It predicts or provides proactive measures once an issue is resolved. It doesn't offer any predictive capabilities or root cause analysis. They throw a lot of data i...

See all answers

What do you like most about SignalFx?

The most valuable feature is dashboard creation.

See all answers

What needs improvement with SignalFx?

Regarding dashboard customization, while Splunk has many dashboard building options, customers sometimes need to create specific dashboards, particularly for applicative metrics such as Java and pr...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for SignalFx?

The solution involves observability in general, such as Application Performance Monitoring, and generally addresses digital applications, web applications, sites, and mobile applications. I worked ...

See all answers

Comparisons

Dynatrace vs ITRS Geneos

Compared 23% of the time

Splunk AppDynamics vs ITRS Geneos

Compared 15% of the time

Grafana vs ITRS Geneos

Compared 14% of the time

Splunk Enterprise Security vs ITRS Geneos

Compared 9% of the time

Elastic Observability vs ITRS Geneos

Compared 2% of the time

More ITRS Geneos Competitors

Observe vs Splunk Observability Cloud

Compared 10% of the time

Sentry vs Splunk Observability Cloud

Compared 9% of the time

SigNoz vs Splunk Observability Cloud

Compared 5% of the time

Dynatrace vs Splunk Observability Cloud

Compared 4% of the time

ThousandEyes vs Splunk Observability Cloud

Compared 4% of the time

More Splunk Observability Cloud Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

ITRS Geneos

June 2025

Download ITRS Geneos product report

Buyer's Guide

Splunk Observability Cloud

June 2025

Download Splunk Observability Cloud product report

Also Known As

Geneos

Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring, Splunk Real User Monitoring (RUM), Splunk Synthetic Monitoring

Overview

ITRS Geneos is a real-time monitoring tool designed for managing increasingly complex, hybrid and interconnected IT estates.

Built with financial services and trading organisations in mind, it collects a wide range of data relating to server performance, infrastructure, trading, connectivity and applications, and analyses it to provide relevant information and alerts in real time.

Geneos can give full stack visibility across highly dynamic environments and presents all the information through a single pane of glass and its configurable and customisable dashboards provide end-to-end visibility to both technical and business users.

For more information, please visit https://www.itrsgroup.com/products/geneos

ITRS

Splunk Observability Cloud offers sophisticated log searching, data integration, and customizable dashboards. With rapid deployment and ease of use, this cloud service enhances monitoring capabilities across IT infrastructures for comprehensive end-to-end visibility.

Focused on enhancing performance management and security, Splunk Observability Cloud supports environments through its data visualization and analysis tools. Users appreciate its robust application performance monitoring and troubleshooting insights. However, improvements in integrations, interface customization, scalability, and automation are needed. Users find value in its capabilities for infrastructure and network monitoring, as well as log analytics, albeit cost considerations and better documentation are desired. Enhancements in real-time monitoring and network protection are also noted as areas for development.

What are the key features?

Log Searching: Efficiently search and analyze logs from various sources.
Data Integration: Seamlessly integrate with multiple environments.
Dashboard Customization: Tailor dashboards to specific monitoring needs.
Monitoring Capabilities: Provides comprehensive insights into application performance.
Security Features: Analyze and address security threats across systems.
Visualization Tools: Enhance data analysis and system performance optimization.

Why consider this for ROI?

Comprehensive Visibility: Gain complete insights into IT infrastructure.
Performance Optimization: Improve overall system performance and efficiency.
Rapid Deployment: Quick setup to meet organization demands swiftly.
Enhanced Security: Strengthen security measures through detailed analytics.

In industries, Splunk Observability Cloud is implemented for security management by analyzing logs from detection systems, offering real-time alerts and troubleshooting for cloud-native applications. It is leveraged for machine data analysis, improving infrastructure visibility and supporting network and application performance management efforts.

Splunk

Sample Customers

ITRS Geneos is used by over 170 financial institutions, including JPMorgan, HSBC, RBS, Deutsche Bank and Goldman Sachs. Clients range from investment banks to exchanges and brokers.

Sunrun, Yelp, Onshape, Tapjoy, Symphony Commerce, Chairish, Clever, Grovo, Bazaar Voice, Zenefits, Avalara

Buyer's Guide

ITRS Geneos vs. Splunk Observability Cloud

May 2025

Free Report: ITRS Geneos vs. Splunk Observability Cloud

Find out what your peers are saying about ITRS Geneos vs. Splunk Observability Cloud and other solutions. Updated: May 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

860,592 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our ITRS Geneos vs. Splunk Observability Cloud report.

See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors, best Network Monitoring Software vendors, and best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors.

We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.