Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Alluvio AppResponse vs ITRS Geneos comparison

Riverbed and ITRS are both solutions in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category. Riverbed is ranked #46 with an average rating of 8.0, while ITRS is ranked #33 with an average rating of 5.0. Riverbed holds a 0.5% mindshare in APM, compared to ITRS’s 1.1% mindshare. Additionally, 93% of Riverbed users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 96% of ITRS users who would recommend it.
Alluvio AppResponse
Read 17 Alluvio AppResponse reviews
  • 1,735 Views
  • 781 Comparison Views
93% willing to recommend
ITRS Geneos
Read 57 ITRS Geneos reviews
  • 4,305 Views
  • 2,798 Comparison Views
96% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 24, 2024

Alluvio AppResponse and ITRS Geneos are two competing products in network and infrastructure monitoring. Alluvio AppResponse seems to have the upper hand in ease of use and customer support, while ITRS Geneos has superior features and customization options, making it preferred for advanced users.

What features are offered by Alluvio AppResponse in comparison to ITRS Geneos?

Alluvio AppResponse offers real-time network monitoring, detailed performance analytics, and a user-friendly interface. ITRS Geneos provides comprehensive infrastructure monitoring, extensive customization options, and advanced feature sets appealing to experienced users.

What areas of improvement can be found in Alluvio AppResponse in comparison to ITRS Geneos?

Alluvio AppResponse can improve its reporting capabilities, expand integration options, and add advanced features. ITRS Geneos needs to enhance simplicity, provide better technical documentation, and make usability enhancements.

How is the ease of deployment and customer service of Alluvio AppResponse in comparison to ITRS Geneos?

Alluvio AppResponse is noted for straightforward deployment and exceptional customer support. ITRS Geneos has a more complex deployment process requiring thorough planning and expertise, though their customer support is highly rated.

What setup costs and ROI can be seen with Alluvio AppResponse in comparison to ITRS Geneos?

Alluvio AppResponse is competitive in pricing, providing a good return on investment, especially for smaller enterprises. ITRS Geneos, although more expensive, is seen as worth the investment for advanced features and customization, indicating higher ROI for complex use cases.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Alluvio AppResponse vs. ITRS Geneos Report (Updated: December 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Alluvio AppResponse vs. ITRS Geneos
December 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Alluvio AppResponse
Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
46th
Ranking in Network Monitoring Software
54th
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.6
Number of Reviews
17
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
ITRS Geneos
Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
33rd
Ranking in Network Monitoring Software
68th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
57
Ranking in other categories
IT Infrastructure Monitoring (45th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category, the mindshare of Alluvio AppResponse is 0.5%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ITRS Geneos is 1.1%, down from 1.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
ITRS Geneos1.1%
Alluvio AppResponse0.5%
Other98.4%
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
 

Featured Reviews

SK
Satyam Kumar
Senior Technical Engineer at a consultancy with 1-10 employees
Identifies and analyzes performance issues quickly using in-built AI and ML
With Alluvio AppResponse, there is an in-built analytical analysis with AI and ML, which identifies and provides data such as the number of TCP retransmits, web access time, total connection time out, total connections established, and server-side errors. The RTCC response time composition chart is crucial because it helps pinpoint the issue's origin, whether from the server, network, or application side. It's a superb product when compared to SolarWinds SAM, which is agent-based, while Alluvio AppResponse captures all traffic from the core switch.
Read full review
Durai CT - PeerSpot reviewer
Durai CT
Head FM Monitoring at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees
A stable, scalable, and flexible monitoring tool
Real-time data is one of the unique features that ITRS Geneos offers. For example, if there is an impact on a particular server and a particular application, I want to see what the impact is or what the CPU or hardware usage information is, as well as the service in the same application. I can see the real-time data and the impact by accessing ITRS Geneos and looking at the tree. I don't want a tool that tells me when something is broken. I want the tool to tell me when something is going to break. That is the difference between ITRS Geneos and other tools. I want proactive monitoring, not reactive. I don't need to be notified after the fact that something has broken. If something is broken, I get a notification by email, and some of my customers are going to call me. ITRS Geneos provides proactive monitoring. The great advantage of this tool is real-time monitoring. ITRS Geneos not only alerts us but also gives us a real-time view of the data. This is the tool's first great advantage. It is also lightweight and flexible and can adapt to monitor even low-latency systems, which is the tool's second advantage. Another great feature of this tool is its good presentation layer, which allows us to build custom dashboards to present to business stakeholders. This gives them a high-level status of what is being monitored. If we compare ITRS Geneos to other tools, we will find that each one specializes in a specific area, but the ITRS Geneos tool is more comprehensive. This is its great advantage.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The most valuable feature of Alluvio AppResponse is the actual response time for measuring performance."
"Riverbed's product is a superb product."
"It's a stable product. Riverbed has invested a significant amount of research and development into it, so it's a solid tool overall."
"With some APM solutions, it can take a long time to check a periodic report, but you can get all the necessary details quickly with AppResponse."
"It provides us with complete visibility of every packet."
"You need a packet capture device to perform any type of network monitoring. It helps ensure that network overloads don't happen with alerts allowing for proactive decisions."
"The most valuable feature is performance monitoring."
"When it comes to the ability to scale up the product, this is suitable for small medium and large environments,"
More Alluvio AppResponse pros
"The solution's log monitoring and alerting mechanisms are very user-friendly and easy to plug and play."
"The Netprobe is so lightweight compared to the agents that most monitoring tools use. It's really superior to the competition. The agent that is used by almost every competitive tool takes a lot more system resources. It's slower and it requires a greater effort and more compromises in terms of security to install on the monitored servers. With Geneos, because it lives outside the code, it is far easier and far less taxing on the monitored systems."
"The flexibility of the product is most valuable. It is highly customizable. If you put your mind to it and think of something you could do, there's a good possibility you can get it integrated within the console, if it's not readily available. The simplicity or ease of customization has been valuable."
"It enables us to monitor application processes, to do log-monitoring on a 24/7 basis, to do server-level monitoring - all the hardware parameters - as well as monitor connectivity across applications to the interfaces."
"Ability to monitor logs for potential issues to prevent app outages before problems get a chance to arise. That's invaluable for our teams in a fast-paced trading environment."
"The built-in plug-ins allow administrators to easily configure monitoring components for market data systems such as Thomson Reuters Enterprise Platform and SRLabs Wombat (formerly NYSE)."
"Custom script toolkits"
"The ability to logically normalize data gathered from multiple types of sources via pre-built plugins is extremely powerful. This functionality, coupled with the ability to import custom data via the Toolkit plugin allows Geneos to be leveraged to monitor every system in the enterprise."
More ITRS Geneos pros
 

Cons

"The initial setup is straightforward, but you have to know a little about the product. It's not for everybody to just plug and play. If you know how the solution is implemented then it is straightforward."
"The recent changes in corporate structure may have caused some decrease in support quality."
"Technical support needs to be more responsive."
"The recent changes in corporate structure may have caused some decrease in support quality."
"Integration between NPM and APM solutions would improve efficiency. There is no agent on the server site related to AppResponse."
"The reporting models need improvement as most of the time, we have to customize the reports manually."
"Need to bring back the NetFlow module for AppResponse."
"The AI features should be addressed in respect of the analysis and intelligence that must be supported and delivered in the tool to predigest the large amounts of data."
More Alluvio AppResponse cons
"The ITA, the post-incident analytics, could be improved."
"For the solution to stay relevant in the cloud-based monitoring environment Geneos needs more plug-ins with more features. Instead of offering clients workarounds, the solution should have a cloud-based out-of-the-box version."
"The deployment method for upgrading is a bit tricky. It takes a little bit of manual effort. If that could be a bit more automated, it would help us a lot."
"Much of the reporting outside of the user interface is very basic and requires much customization to be useful."
"ITRS Geneos cloud monitoring is very weak and can use improvement."
"The main feature that needs work is the Dashboard designer."
"Data visualization – real time and historical – is a weakness."
"I would like to see ITRS integrate its setup editor with a SVN to check-in setup XML after major changes."
More ITRS Geneos cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is costly for small and medium businesses."
"The licensing model is expensive compared to its competitors, but the service it gives to your business, and the data quality, means that it's worth it."
"The price is a little bit high, especially because we have to pay an import tax."
"The solution is no more expensive than other products."
"I can say it's not that cheap because the licensing is a little bit costly"
"ITRS Geneos is not a cheap tool. It's a moderate price for the banking industry. The reason we are not able to add the ITRS monitoring tool for the non-banking industries, and non-finance industries, is that the pricing is too high."
"Given our spend and the amount of service we have in it, the pricing is quite reasonable."
"The licensing cost may seem expensive upfront. However, the service is outstanding, the tool does things that no other tools can do, and the customizability more than makes up for the cost of licensing."
"Based on feedback from colleagues and friends working in the financial sector, Geneos is relatively costly. Many companies have been switching from Geneos to Dynatrace, Sysdig, or other monitoring tools in the past two years because of the price."
"The pricing is fairly market-related. They have been very lenient because we have been working with them for so long. An example is that we're currently migrating some of our services to AWS, and they've given us a grace period for some of the things to help with the migration and not to grow additional costs while we are migrating, but it's still on par with the market."
"When I first came in, their pricing was very high. ITRS had a high expectation of what their price should be based on perceived value. I think they have been realizing, more recently, that there are other competitors, so their pricing is a lot better. Licensing for on-premise is okay, however I feel there is quite some work to be done for cloud and containers. We're still working with them to try and work out what that pricing should look like."
"The pricing seems reasonable. We're happy enough with it."
More ITRS Geneos pricing and cost advice
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
15%
Performing Arts
15%
Manufacturing Company
6%
Media Company
6%
Financial Services Firm
70%
Computer Software Company
5%
Construction Company
3%
Outsourcing Company
2%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business7
Midsize Enterprise4
Large Enterprise10
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business6
Midsize Enterprise12
Large Enterprise39
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Riverbed SteelCentral AppResponse?
The pricing of Riverbed Alluvio AppResponse is really high. Very few customers buy Riverbed because many do not have the sufficient budget. Its pricing is comparatively higher than SolarWinds. Rive...
See all answers
What needs improvement with Riverbed SteelCentral AppResponse?
The reporting models need improvement as most of the time, we have to customize the reports manually. Additionally, a feature similar to SolarWinds AppStack, which provides a holistic view of the i...
See all answers
What is your primary use case for Riverbed SteelCentral AppResponse?
We are the partner of Riverbed. Once any customer buys the Riverbed product, we deploy and configure it to meet their use cases. Alluvio AppResponse can identify if a page or an application is slow...
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ITRS Geneos?
The pricing is high. Licensing fees might be around 500$ per server monthly.
See all answers
What needs improvement with ITRS Geneos?
ITRS Geneos is a legacy system. It predicts or provides proactive measures once an issue is resolved. It doesn't offer any predictive capabilities or root cause analysis. They throw a lot of data i...
See all answers
What is your primary use case for ITRS Geneos?
ITRS offers multiple products, including upgrades for synthetic monitoring and a SaaS platform. Geneos is used for infrastructure monitoring, covering KPIs such as CPU, memory, processes, network l...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

vRealize Network Insight vs Alluvio AppResponse Logo
vRealize Network Insight vs Alluvio AppResponse
Compared 10% of the time
LogicMonitor vs Alluvio AppResponse Logo
LogicMonitor vs Alluvio AppResponse
Compared 6% of the time
Elastic Observability vs Alluvio AppResponse Logo
Elastic Observability vs Alluvio AppResponse
Compared 6% of the time
Splunk AppDynamics vs Alluvio AppResponse Logo
Splunk AppDynamics vs Alluvio AppResponse
Compared 6% of the time
Nagios XI vs Alluvio AppResponse Logo
Nagios XI vs Alluvio AppResponse
Compared 6% of the time
More Alluvio AppResponse Competitors
Dynatrace vs ITRS Geneos Logo
Dynatrace vs ITRS Geneos
Compared 15% of the time
Grafana vs ITRS Geneos Logo
Grafana vs ITRS Geneos
Compared 9% of the time
Splunk AppDynamics vs ITRS Geneos Logo
Splunk AppDynamics vs ITRS Geneos
Compared 9% of the time
Prometheus-AI Platform vs ITRS Geneos Logo
Prometheus-AI Platform vs ITRS Geneos
Compared 6% of the time
Splunk Enterprise Security vs ITRS Geneos Logo
Splunk Enterprise Security vs ITRS Geneos
Compared 5% of the time
More ITRS Geneos Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
January 2026
Alluvio AppResponse reportDownload Alluvio AppResponse product report
Buyer's Guide
ITRS Geneos
January 2026
ITRS Geneos reportDownload ITRS Geneos product report
 

Also Known As

Riverbed AppResponse, OPNET SteelCentral AppResponse, ACE Live, OPNET, AppResponse Xpert
Geneos
 

Overview

Alluvio AppResponse provides fast packet capture and storage that feeds intelligent network and application analysis with fast troubleshooting workflows to speed problem diagnosis and resolution. AppResponse delivers full stack application analysis—from packets to web pages - enabling you observe all network and application interactions as they cross the wire, whether they are encrypted or not. Using powerful, flexible network and application analytics and workflows, AppResponse speeds problem diagnosis and resolution, helping you get to answers fast

Riverbed

ITRS Geneos is a real-time monitoring tool designed for managing increasingly complex, hybrid and interconnected IT estates.

Built with financial services and trading organisations in mind, it collects a wide range of data relating to server performance, infrastructure, trading, connectivity and applications, and analyses it to provide relevant information and alerts in real time.

Geneos can give full stack visibility across highly dynamic environments and presents all the information through a single pane of glass and its configurable and customisable dashboards provide end-to-end visibility to both technical and business users.

For more information, please visit https://www.itrsgroup.com/products/geneos

ITRS
 

Sample Customers

N11.com, OneMain Financial, China Bank, Halkbank, Kaust
ITRS Geneos is used by over 170 financial institutions, including JPMorgan, HSBC, RBS, Deutsche Bank and Goldman Sachs. Clients range from investment banks to exchanges and brokers.
Buyer's Guide
Alluvio AppResponse vs. ITRS Geneos
December 2025
Free Report: Alluvio AppResponse vs. ITRS Geneos
Find out what your peers are saying about Alluvio AppResponse vs. ITRS Geneos and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Alluvio AppResponse vs. ITRS Geneos report.

We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.