The reporting models need improvement as most of the time, we have to customize the reports manually. Additionally, a feature similar to SolarWinds AppStack, which provides a holistic view of the issue with red marks on problematic areas, would enhance Alluvio AppResponse's functionality.
Lead State and Legal Practice at a computer software company with 11-50 employees
Reseller
Top 10
Nov 12, 2024
From a feature set perspective, there are multiple tools that are used, and unfortunately, deeper questions are geared towards actual users. The recent changes in corporate structure may have caused some decrease in support quality.
IT Program Manager at a government with 10,001+ employees
Real User
Nov 2, 2023
Alluvio AppResponse should improve its ability to expand across multiple operating systems. Alluvio AppResponse should include the ability to monitor Linux servers.
If Alluvio AppResponse reduces its cost, it will be more beneficial for customers to monitor their application and network performance. Additionally, integrating more features for application monitoring and focusing more on security threat monitoring would be even better.
Senior Performance and Architecture Analyst at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees
Real User
Top 20
Jun 16, 2021
The AI features should be addressed in respect of the analysis and intelligence that must be supported and delivered in the tool to predigest the large amounts of data.
Find out what your peers are saying about Riverbed, Dynatrace, Splunk and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability. Updated: May 2026.
Solutions Expert at a tech services company with 201-500 employees
Reseller
Oct 14, 2020
I'm not sure if I see room for improvement at this point. It works quite well for us. I'm not sure what other vendors offer, so it's hard for me to look at it and see things that may be missing from the offering. The pricing is on the higher side of things. If they could lower it, that would be ideal.
We often have problems when it comes to integration with products from other vendors. With the products we sell, we are often looking to build holistic solutions. Technical support needs to be more responsive.
There is always room for improvement. I would say improving the user interface is the most important. Also, faster support for some new security features and support for the secure key exchange. There have been a lot of changes in the last few years with the names in Riverbed. SteelCentral used to be called Cascade. Every two years they change the name of the products. Somebody who is new, or even not so new, needs time to remember the names. This is not something crucial to do and when something is good and working well, why should they just rename it?
Application Performance Monitoring and Observability are critical solutions enabling businesses to monitor and optimize application performance. They provide actionable insights to ensure robust, seamless user experiences and drive operational efficiency. As digital landscapes grow complex, Application Performance Monitoring and Observability tools become essential for understanding system behaviors and preempting disruptions. They offer a comprehensive view by correlating metrics, traces,...
The reporting models need improvement as most of the time, we have to customize the reports manually. Additionally, a feature similar to SolarWinds AppStack, which provides a holistic view of the issue with red marks on problematic areas, would enhance Alluvio AppResponse's functionality.
From a feature set perspective, there are multiple tools that are used, and unfortunately, deeper questions are geared towards actual users. The recent changes in corporate structure may have caused some decrease in support quality.
Alluvio AppResponse should improve its ability to expand across multiple operating systems. Alluvio AppResponse should include the ability to monitor Linux servers.
If Alluvio AppResponse reduces its cost, it will be more beneficial for customers to monitor their application and network performance. Additionally, integrating more features for application monitoring and focusing more on security threat monitoring would be even better.
Integration between NPM and APM solutions would improve efficiency. There is no agent on the server site related to AppResponse.
The AI features should be addressed in respect of the analysis and intelligence that must be supported and delivered in the tool to predigest the large amounts of data.
I'm not sure if I see room for improvement at this point. It works quite well for us. I'm not sure what other vendors offer, so it's hard for me to look at it and see things that may be missing from the offering. The pricing is on the higher side of things. If they could lower it, that would be ideal.
We often have problems when it comes to integration with products from other vendors. With the products we sell, we are often looking to build holistic solutions. Technical support needs to be more responsive.
There is always room for improvement. I would say improving the user interface is the most important. Also, faster support for some new security features and support for the secure key exchange. There have been a lot of changes in the last few years with the names in Riverbed. SteelCentral used to be called Cascade. Every two years they change the name of the products. Somebody who is new, or even not so new, needs time to remember the names. This is not something crucial to do and when something is good and working well, why should they just rename it?