Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo

Top 10 Splunk Observability Cloud Alternatives

Vendor: Splunk
4.1 out of 5
Leave a review

Top Splunk Observability Cloud Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Splunk Observability Cloud based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Zabbix, Datadog, and Dynatrace. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions. Splunk Observability Cloud surpasses its competitors by offering real-time, AI-driven analytics, seamless scalability, and comprehensive monitoring for hybrid environments, empowering businesses with deep visibility and rapid troubleshooting to optimize their digital transformation initiatives.

Splunk Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Splunk, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
Zabbix
4.2 out of 5
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
Zabbix
4.2 out of 5
Zabbix offers an open-source monitoring solution with no licensing fees, praised for flexibility and scalability. In comparison, Splunk Observability Cloud requires paid licensing but provides advanced performance monitoring and analytics, appealing for real-time insights despite higher costs.
Download Splunk Observability Cloud vs. Zabbix Report
Zabbix offers a straightforward setup cost, while Splunk Observability Cloud involves more complex pricing elements. Their significant difference lies in the setup cost structure, showcasing distinct initial investment requirements.
View comparison
Pricing
Zabbix offers a straightforward setup cost, while Splunk Observability Cloud involves more complex pricing elements. Their significant difference lies in the setup cost structure, showcasing distinct initial investment requirements.
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
Datadog
4.3 out of 5
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
Datadog
4.3 out of 5
Datadog offers real-time monitoring and comprehensive dashboards with numerous integrations, appealing for its configurability and insights. In comparison, Splunk Observability Cloud excels in data visualization and AI analytics, making it ideal for integrating with AWS and Azure environments.
Download Datadog vs. Splunk Observability Cloud Report
Datadog offers a straightforward setup with lower initial costs, while Splunk Observability Cloud may incur higher setup expenses due to more intricate configurations.
View comparison
Pricing
Datadog offers a straightforward setup with lower initial costs, while Splunk Observability Cloud may incur higher setup expenses due to more intricate configurations.
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
Dynatrace
4.4 out of 5
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
Dynatrace
4.4 out of 5
Dynatrace offers advanced AI features and detailed diagnostics, ideal for those requiring deep insights. In comparison, Splunk Observability Cloud excels in real-time monitoring and a variety of dashlets, appealing to buyers valuing infrastructure and application performance monitoring in diverse environments.
Download Dynatrace vs. Splunk Observability Cloud Report
Dynatrace offers competitive setup costs emphasizing affordability, while Splunk Observability Cloud tends to be higher in initial costs, reflecting its broader capabilities.
View comparison
Pricing
Dynatrace offers competitive setup costs emphasizing affordability, while Splunk Observability Cloud tends to be higher in initial costs, reflecting its broader capabilities.
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
Snyk
4.1 out of 5
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
Snyk
4.1 out of 5
Splunk Observability Cloud excels in log management and real-time monitoring, making it ideal for diverse IT environments. In comparison, Snyk enhances security through comprehensive vulnerability scanning and DevOps integration, appealing to organizations needing strong security woven with development practices.
Download Snyk vs. Splunk Observability Cloud Report
Splunk Observability Cloud's setup cost is relatively high due to its advanced features, whereas Snyk offers a more affordable setup, making it easier for smaller teams to integrate quickly.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk Observability Cloud's setup cost is relatively high due to its advanced features, whereas Snyk offers a more affordable setup, making it easier for smaller teams to integrate quickly.
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
Microsoft Defender for Cloud
4.0 out of 5
Splunk Observability Cloud excels in data integration and scalability, appealing to enterprises seeking robust log searching and customization capabilities. In comparison, Microsoft Defender for Cloud emphasizes security and compliance, ideal for those prioritizing multi-cloud protection and seamless Azure service integration.
Download Microsoft Defender for Cloud vs. Splunk Observability Cloud Report
Splunk Observability Cloud offers flexible setup costs suited for dynamic scaling, while Microsoft Defender for Cloud provides a lower initial setup cost focused on immediate security needs, highlighting a trade-off between scalability and immediate implementation.
Watch a demo
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk Observability Cloud offers flexible setup costs suited for dynamic scaling, while Microsoft Defender for Cloud provides a lower initial setup cost focused on immediate security needs, highlighting a trade-off between scalability and immediate implementation.
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
New Relic
4.2 out of 5
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
New Relic
4.2 out of 5
Splunk Observability Cloud excels in dynamic dashboards and real-time insights, appealing to enterprise needs. In comparison, New Relic's detailed transaction tracing and competitive pricing attract those needing deep application analysis. Splunk provides extensive infrastructure, while New Relic offers precise performance insights.
Download New Relic vs. Splunk Observability Cloud Report
Splunk Observability Cloud offers a higher setup cost, while New Relic provides a more cost-effective initial setup.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk Observability Cloud offers a higher setup cost, while New Relic provides a more cost-effective initial setup.
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
Cribl
4.3 out of 5
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
Cribl
4.3 out of 5
Splunk excels with comprehensive data integration and real-time cloud visibility, ideal for advanced monitoring needs. In comparison, Cribl offers efficient data management with cost-effective solutions. Tech buyers may prefer Splunk for in-depth analytics, while Cribl appeals with budget-friendly data management and integration capabilities.
Download Cribl vs. Splunk Observability Cloud Report
Splunk Observability Cloud requires a substantial upfront investment, while Cribl offers a more cost-effective setup, highlighting significant differences in their financial commitments.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk Observability Cloud requires a substantial upfront investment, while Cribl offers a more cost-effective setup, highlighting significant differences in their financial commitments.
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
Azure Monitor
3.9 out of 5
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
Azure Monitor
3.9 out of 5
Splunk Observability Cloud offers advanced features for data integration and visualization. In comparison, Azure Monitor provides cost-effective, cloud-native advantages, particularly benefiting Azure users. Tech buyers may choose Splunk for in-depth analysis or Azure Monitor for seamless integration within Azure ecosystems.
Download Azure Monitor vs. Splunk Observability Cloud Report
Splunk Observability Cloud features a higher setup cost, contrasting with Azure Monitor's more affordable setup, highlighting a significant cost difference.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk Observability Cloud features a higher setup cost, contrasting with Azure Monitor's more affordable setup, highlighting a significant cost difference.
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
SolarWinds NPM
4.1 out of 5
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
SolarWinds NPM
4.1 out of 5
SolarWinds NPM is favored for modular pricing and suiting on-premises environments with robust alert systems. In comparison, Splunk Observability Cloud deploys rapidly in hybrid settings and excels in handling large data volumes, though it demands justification due to its high cost.
Download SolarWinds NPM vs. Splunk Observability Cloud Report
SolarWinds NPM is praised for lower setup costs, making it budget-friendly, while Splunk Observability Cloud is noted for higher setup expenses, reflecting extensive capabilities.
View comparison
Pricing
SolarWinds NPM is praised for lower setup costs, making it budget-friendly, while Splunk Observability Cloud is noted for higher setup expenses, reflecting extensive capabilities.
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
PRTG Network Monitor
4.1 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor offers affordability and ease of use, ideal for simpler setups. In comparison, Splunk Observability Cloud delivers robust features and extensive customization, suitable for complex environments. PRTG's rapid deployment enhances accessibility, while Splunk's comprehensive capabilities provide long-term value despite higher costs.
Download PRTG Network Monitor vs. Splunk Observability Cloud Report
PRTG Network Monitor is recognized for its low setup cost, whereas Splunk Observability Cloud has higher initial pricing. The contrast in setup expenses highlights PRTG's budget-friendly approach compared to Splunk's premium positioning.
View comparison
Pricing
PRTG Network Monitor is recognized for its low setup cost, whereas Splunk Observability Cloud has higher initial pricing. The contrast in setup expenses highlights PRTG's budget-friendly approach compared to Splunk's premium positioning.
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
Grafana
3.9 out of 5
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
Grafana
3.9 out of 5
Splunk Observability Cloud offers extensive insights with strong security and integration, appealing to those needing advanced features despite higher costs. In comparison, Grafana excels in visualization and adaptability, preferred for cost-effectiveness and flexibility in organizations focusing on user-driven customization.
Download Grafana vs. Splunk Observability Cloud Report
Splunk Observability Cloud generally involves higher setup costs than Grafana, which tends to offer a more budget-friendly option for many users seeking observability solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk Observability Cloud generally involves higher setup costs than Grafana, which tends to offer a more budget-friendly option for many users seeking observability solutions.
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
Sentry
4.3 out of 5
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
Sentry
4.3 out of 5
Splunk Observability Cloud is favored for its comprehensive features and data integration, suitable for enterprises seeking advanced capabilities. In comparison, Sentry attracts startups with its competitive pricing and efficient error monitoring, appealing to developers who prioritize session replay and compatibility with tools like GitLab and Jira.
Download Sentry vs. Splunk Observability Cloud Report
Splunk Observability Cloud users express challenges with its setup cost, whereas Sentry is highlighted for its more manageable setup expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk Observability Cloud users express challenges with its setup cost, whereas Sentry is highlighted for its more manageable setup expenses.
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
Elastic Observability
4.0 out of 5
Splunk Observability Cloud excels in data integration and rapid log searching, offering customizable dashboards for efficient monitoring. In comparison, Elastic Observability provides robust log analytics and multi-tenancy support for quick data access. Each solution supports diverse deployment environments, enhancing their appeal for tech buyers.
Download Elastic Observability vs. Splunk Observability Cloud Report
Splunk Observability Cloud offers straightforward setup at a higher cost, while Elastic Observability is more budget-friendly but requires more configuration effort.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk Observability Cloud offers straightforward setup at a higher cost, while Elastic Observability is more budget-friendly but requires more configuration effort.
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
ThousandEyes
4.1 out of 5
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
ThousandEyes
4.1 out of 5
ThousandEyes excels in user-friendly network monitoring, ideal for detailed path analysis and connectivity insights. In comparison, Splunk Observability Cloud offers robust integration and analytics, suitable for comprehensive application performance monitoring across large-scale environments.
Download Splunk Observability Cloud vs. ThousandEyes Report
ThousandEyes offers lower setup costs, while Splunk Observability Cloud requires a higher initial investment, highlighting a key cost factor in their comparison.
View comparison
Pricing
ThousandEyes offers lower setup costs, while Splunk Observability Cloud requires a higher initial investment, highlighting a key cost factor in their comparison.
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
Nagios XI
4.0 out of 5
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
Nagios XI
4.0 out of 5
Nagios XI is valued for simplicity, scalability, and cost-effectiveness, especially with its open-source version providing budget-friendly options. In comparison, Splunk Observability Cloud offers advanced analytics, real-time monitoring, and deep insights, appealing to enterprises needing extensive data analytics despite higher costs.
Download Nagios XI vs. Splunk Observability Cloud Report
Nagios XI often incurs lower setup costs, whereas Splunk Observability Cloud features higher initial expenses, reflecting its comprehensive capabilities.
View comparison
Pricing
Nagios XI often incurs lower setup costs, whereas Splunk Observability Cloud features higher initial expenses, reflecting its comprehensive capabilities.
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
LogicMonitor
4.5 out of 5
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
LogicMonitor
4.5 out of 5
Splunk Observability Cloud excels in customization and integration, offering strong deployment in SaaS environments. In comparison, LogicMonitor provides robust dashboard capabilities and alert features, excelling in monitoring diverse environments effectively. Both solutions present opportunities for enhancement in integration, mapping, automation, and support responsiveness.
Download LogicMonitor vs. Splunk Observability Cloud Report
Splunk Observability Cloud incurs higher setup costs compared to LogicMonitor, which offers a more budget-friendly initial setup.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk Observability Cloud incurs higher setup costs compared to LogicMonitor, which offers a more budget-friendly initial setup.
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
Auvik Network Management (ANM)
4.4 out of 5
Splunk Observability Cloud offers comprehensive monitoring and advanced analytics. In comparison, Auvik Network Management emphasizes network visibility with straightforward device monitoring. Splunk's flexible deployment and analytics suit varied IT needs, while Auvik’s competitive pricing and ease of deployment benefit large network environments.
Download Auvik Network Management (ANM) vs. Splunk Observability Cloud Report
Splunk Observability Cloud has flexible setup costs, while Auvik Network Management offers a predictable pricing structure that simplifies budgeting.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk Observability Cloud has flexible setup costs, while Auvik Network Management offers a predictable pricing structure that simplifies budgeting.
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
Cisco Secure Network Analytics
4.1 out of 5
Splunk Observability Cloud offers robust customization and fast log searching, ideal for application performance monitoring. In comparison, Cisco Secure Network Analytics excels in network visibility and threat detection, appealing to those prioritizing detailed network activity views and security.
Download Cisco Secure Network Analytics vs. Splunk Observability Cloud Report
Splunk Observability Cloud offers a straightforward setup with transparent cost structures, whereas Cisco Secure Network Analytics has a more complex setup involving potentially higher initial expenses. Understanding these differences is crucial for evaluating deployment strategies.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk Observability Cloud offers a straightforward setup with transparent cost structures, whereas Cisco Secure Network Analytics has a more complex setup involving potentially higher initial expenses. Understanding these differences is crucial for evaluating deployment strategies.
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
Checkmk
4.2 out of 5
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
Checkmk
4.2 out of 5
Splunk Observability Cloud attracts tech buyers with its broad feature set, including data integration and custom dashboards. In comparison, Checkmk is appealing for its cost-effectiveness and practical automatic discovery, making it ideal for those with budget constraints seeking essential monitoring capabilities.
Download Checkmk vs. Splunk Observability Cloud Report
Splunk Observability Cloud has a higher setup cost compared to Checkmk, which provides a more budget-friendly option.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk Observability Cloud has a higher setup cost compared to Checkmk, which provides a more budget-friendly option.
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
Amazon OpenSearch Service
3.8 out of 5
Splunk Observability Cloud provides advanced monitoring, seamless integration, and adaptable deployment, appealing to users seeking extensive analytics and detailed logging. In comparison, Amazon OpenSearch Service offers cost-effective managed solutions, favoring users prioritizing strong search capabilities and controlled database management at competitive pricing.
Download Amazon OpenSearch Service vs. Splunk Observability Cloud Report
Splunk Observability Cloud involves higher setup costs compared to Amazon OpenSearch Service, which offers a more economical initial investment. The cost difference highlights Splunk's extensive capabilities versus Amazon's affordability.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk Observability Cloud involves higher setup costs compared to Amazon OpenSearch Service, which offers a more economical initial investment. The cost difference highlights Splunk's extensive capabilities versus Amazon's affordability.
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
SCOM
3.9 out of 5
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
SCOM
3.9 out of 5
SCOM suits enterprises rooted in Microsoft, offering integration with Windows and customization capabilities despite high costs and complexity. In comparison, Splunk Observability Cloud excels in real-time analytics with flexibility, though challenged by steep pricing and intricate configurations.
Download SCOM vs. Splunk Observability Cloud Report
SCOM setup cost is minimal, appealing to businesses prioritizing budget-friendly solutions, while Splunk Observability Cloud involves higher initial expenses, suitable for enterprises requiring advanced features.
View comparison
Pricing
SCOM setup cost is minimal, appealing to businesses prioritizing budget-friendly solutions, while Splunk Observability Cloud involves higher initial expenses, suitable for enterprises requiring advanced features.
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
WhatsUp Gold
3.9 out of 5
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
WhatsUp Gold
3.9 out of 5
WhatsUp Gold is preferred for budget-conscious organizations due to its cost-effectiveness and essential monitoring features. In comparison, Splunk Observability Cloud stands out with advanced analytics and integration capabilities, making it ideal for businesses needing extensive data insights.
Download Splunk Observability Cloud vs. WhatsUp Gold Report
WhatsUp Gold offers a straightforward setup cost, while Splunk Observability Cloud has a more complex pricing structure, highlighting differences in initial investment expectations.
View comparison
Pricing
WhatsUp Gold offers a straightforward setup cost, while Splunk Observability Cloud has a more complex pricing structure, highlighting differences in initial investment expectations.
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
Nagios Core
4.1 out of 5
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
Nagios Core
4.1 out of 5
Splunk Observability Cloud excels in real-time analysis with customizable dashboards offering substantial ROI despite higher costs. In comparison, Nagios Core provides a flexible, no-cost solution with extensive plugins, ideal for budget-conscious buyers seeking reliable, open-source monitoring despite requiring manual configuration.
Download Nagios Core vs. Splunk Observability Cloud Report
Splunk Observability Cloud's setup cost can be higher compared to Nagios Core's open-source model, highlighting a key difference in initial investment for businesses.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk Observability Cloud's setup cost can be higher compared to Nagios Core's open-source model, highlighting a key difference in initial investment for businesses.
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
Amazon CloudWatch
4.0 out of 5
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
Amazon CloudWatch
4.0 out of 5
Amazon CloudWatch integrates with AWS services, providing cost-effective monitoring for AWS solutions. In comparison, Splunk Observability Cloud excels in data aggregation and customization, offering real-time insights across environments. Tech buyers might prefer CloudWatch for seamless AWS integration or Splunk for extensive customization.
Download Amazon CloudWatch vs. Splunk Observability Cloud Report
Splunk Observability Cloud requires a higher setup cost, while Amazon CloudWatch offers a more economical setup. This price difference highlights contrasting cost approaches between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk Observability Cloud requires a higher setup cost, while Amazon CloudWatch offers a more economical setup. This price difference highlights contrasting cost approaches between the two solutions.
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
AWS X-Ray
3.9 out of 5
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
AWS X-Ray
3.9 out of 5
Splunk Observability Cloud excels in customization and data handling across environments. In comparison, AWS X-Ray provides real-time tracking and debugging within AWS infrastructure. Tech buyers may choose Splunk for customization, while AWS X-Ray suits those needing seamless AWS integration and performance analysis.
Download AWS X-Ray vs. Splunk Observability Cloud Report
Splunk Observability Cloud has a higher setup cost compared to AWS X-Ray, highlighting a clear difference in initial pricing structures between the two platforms.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk Observability Cloud has a higher setup cost compared to AWS X-Ray, highlighting a clear difference in initial pricing structures between the two platforms.
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
Icinga
3.8 out of 5
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
Icinga
3.8 out of 5
Icinga attracts budget-conscious tech buyers with its cost-effectiveness and adaptability. In comparison, Splunk Observability Cloud offers extensive analytics and real-time monitoring, making it appealing for those valuing comprehensive, robust features despite higher costs.
Download Icinga vs. Splunk Observability Cloud Report
Icinga offers a cost-effective setup compared to Splunk Observability Cloud's more significant initial investment, reflecting its comprehensive feature set.
View comparison
Pricing
Icinga offers a cost-effective setup compared to Splunk Observability Cloud's more significant initial investment, reflecting its comprehensive feature set.
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
ScienceLogic
4.3 out of 5
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
ScienceLogic
4.3 out of 5
ScienceLogic delivers extensive customization and built-in automation, appealing for infrastructure monitoring. In comparison, Splunk Observability Cloud offers real-time data integration with advanced analytics. ScienceLogic is praised for strong on-premises deployment, while Splunk offers ease across cloud platforms, with both presenting flexible licensing.
Download ScienceLogic vs. Splunk Observability Cloud Report
ScienceLogic's setup cost is upfront and fixed, while Splunk Observability Cloud offers a variable setup cost based on infrastructure size, emphasizing the adaptability of Splunk compared to the stability of ScienceLogic's pricing.
View comparison
Pricing
ScienceLogic's setup cost is upfront and fixed, while Splunk Observability Cloud offers a variable setup cost based on infrastructure size, emphasizing the adaptability of Splunk compared to the stability of ScienceLogic's pricing.
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline
4.3 out of 5
Splunk Observability Cloud excels in integrating applications for comprehensive analytics and monitoring. In comparison, Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline enhances network visibility with packet filtering. Splunk focuses on end-to-end logs, whereas Gigamon improves data noise reduction, appealing to different technical priorities.
Download Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline vs. Splunk Observability Cloud Report
Splunk Observability Cloud effectively manages setup costs with a straightforward pricing model, while Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline presents a more complex cost structure.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk Observability Cloud effectively manages setup costs with a straightforward pricing model, while Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline presents a more complex cost structure.
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
Centreon
4.2 out of 5
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
Centreon
4.2 out of 5
Splunk Observability Cloud excels in real-time insights and cloud integration, appealing to those needing comprehensive analytics. In comparison, Centreon offers cost-effective monitoring with flexible dashboards and data visualization, ideal for organizations prioritizing budget and customizability. Each solution caters to different integration and cost management needs.
Download Centreon vs. Splunk Observability Cloud Report
Splunk Observability Cloud's setup cost is competitive, offering simplified pricing, while Centreon's setup tends to be economical with flexible options. Splunk prioritizes user-friendly integration, whereas Centreon focuses on cost-effectiveness in deployment.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk Observability Cloud's setup cost is competitive, offering simplified pricing, while Centreon's setup tends to be economical with flexible options. Splunk prioritizes user-friendly integration, whereas Centreon focuses on cost-effectiveness in deployment.
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
ServiceNow IT Operations Management
4.1 out of 5
Splunk Observability Cloud offers powerful data insights through customizable dashboards and rapid deployment. In comparison, ServiceNow IT Operations Management focuses on streamlined operations via integration and service mapping. Tech buyers might select Splunk for analytics or ServiceNow for holistic IT management.
Download ServiceNow IT Operations Management vs. Splunk Observability Cloud Report
Splunk Observability Cloud setup costs highlight its advanced analytics, whereas ServiceNow IT Operations Management presents a more straightforward pricing structure for IT workflows, emphasizing their distinct approaches to setup.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk Observability Cloud setup costs highlight its advanced analytics, whereas ServiceNow IT Operations Management presents a more straightforward pricing structure for IT workflows, emphasizing their distinct approaches to setup.
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
OpsRamp
3.9 out of 5
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
OpsRamp
3.9 out of 5
Splunk Observability Cloud offers rapid log searching and advanced APM, providing broad deployment options enhancing visibility. In comparison, OpsRamp excels in centralized monitoring and ease of integration, offering a cost-effective model particularly appealing for large operations needing scalable and predictive analysis capabilities.
Download OpsRamp vs. Splunk Observability Cloud Report
Splunk Observability Cloud's setup cost can be considered a premium investment while OpsRamp offers a more cost-effective setup option.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk Observability Cloud's setup cost can be considered a premium investment while OpsRamp offers a more cost-effective setup option.
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor
4.0 out of 5
Splunk Observability Cloud provides powerful data handling and advanced dashboard customization for seamless IT monitoring. In comparison, SolarWinds SAM offers robust server and app insights with straightforward configuration, making it appealing for those seeking cost-effective and detailed monitoring solutions.
Download SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor vs. Splunk Observability Cloud Report
Splunk Observability Cloud setup costs are higher compared to SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor, which offers more budget-friendly setup options.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk Observability Cloud setup costs are higher compared to SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor, which offers more budget-friendly setup options.
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
Coralogix
4.2 out of 5
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
Coralogix
4.2 out of 5
Splunk Observability Cloud offers end-to-end visibility and robust reporting for complex environments. In comparison, Coralogix excels in log analysis with seamless integration capabilities. Splunk's deployment flexibility contrasts with Coralogix's straightforward public cloud focus. Both offer significant ROI, though Splunk is often pricier.
Download Coralogix vs. Splunk Observability Cloud Report
Splunk Observability Cloud has a higher setup cost compared to Coralogix.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk Observability Cloud has a higher setup cost compared to Coralogix.
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM)
4.2 out of 5
IBM SevOne NPM offers agentless visibility, scalability, and integration for extensive customization. In comparison, Splunk Observability Cloud provides comprehensive monitoring with robust log analytics and dashboard customization, ideal for cloud-native applications. Both offer strong support but differ in pricing models and deployment preferences.
Download IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM) vs. Splunk Observability Cloud Report
IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM) incurs lower setup costs compared to the Splunk Observability Cloud, providing a budget-friendly option for businesses seeking efficient network performance management solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM) incurs lower setup costs compared to the Splunk Observability Cloud, providing a budget-friendly option for businesses seeking efficient network performance management solutions.
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
ITRS Geneos
4.1 out of 5
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
ITRS Geneos
4.1 out of 5
ITRS Geneos offers real-time monitoring with customizable dashboards suited for diverse platforms, while Splunk Observability Cloud excels in log management and infrastructure insights. In comparison, ITRS Geneos may benefit financial sectors, and Splunk appeals with advanced analytics and broad integration support.
Download ITRS Geneos vs. Splunk Observability Cloud Report
ITRS Geneos has a lower setup cost compared to Splunk Observability Cloud, offering a more budget-friendly initial investment, while Splunk's higher cost indicates its comprehensive feature set.
View comparison
Pricing
ITRS Geneos has a lower setup cost compared to Splunk Observability Cloud, offering a more budget-friendly initial investment, while Splunk's higher cost indicates its comprehensive feature set.
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
VMware Aria Operations for Applications
4.0 out of 5
Splunk Observability Cloud offers agile dashboard customization and real-time monitoring, suitable for environments needing rapid deployment and data integration. In comparison, VMware Aria Operations for Applications excels with robust cloud integrations and advanced diagnostics, ideal for comprehensive management and environment-specific insights.
Download Splunk Observability Cloud vs. VMware Aria Operations for Applications Report
Splunk Observability Cloud's setup cost is higher initially, while VMware Aria Operations for Applications offers a more budget-friendly setup. This initial cost difference can impact the decision for organizations considering the long-term financial implication of each solution.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk Observability Cloud's setup cost is higher initially, while VMware Aria Operations for Applications offers a more budget-friendly setup. This initial cost difference can impact the decision for organizations considering the long-term financial implication of each solution.
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
Cisco Intersight
4.0 out of 5
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
Cisco Intersight
4.0 out of 5
Splunk Observability Cloud excels in real-time tracking and adaptability, ideal for comprehensive metrics with cloud provider integration. In comparison, Cisco Intersight focuses on efficient data center management and integrates deeply with Cisco products, offering robust orchestration but limited multi-cloud capabilities.
Download Cisco Intersight vs. Splunk Observability Cloud Report
The setup cost for Splunk Observability Cloud is higher, impacting initial budget considerations, while Cisco Intersight offers a more cost-effective setup, appealing to budget-conscious organizations.
View comparison
Pricing
The setup cost for Splunk Observability Cloud is higher, impacting initial budget considerations, while Cisco Intersight offers a more cost-effective setup, appealing to budget-conscious organizations.
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
BMC TrueSight
4.1 out of 5
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
BMC TrueSight
4.1 out of 5
BMC TrueSight offers extensive monitoring and a holistic view of infrastructure health, appealing to those needing comprehensive event management. In comparison, Splunk Observability Cloud provides real-time visibility and intuitive use, ideal for users seeking quick deployment and performance insights.
Download BMC TrueSight vs. Splunk Observability Cloud Report
BMC TrueSight setup costs are significantly lower than Splunk Observability Cloud, making it a more budget-friendly choice for organizations looking for cost efficiency in setup.
View comparison
Pricing
BMC TrueSight setup costs are significantly lower than Splunk Observability Cloud, making it a more budget-friendly choice for organizations looking for cost efficiency in setup.
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
NETSCOUT nGeniusONE
4.1 out of 5
NETSCOUT nGeniusONE excels in comprehensive traffic analysis but needs a more user-friendly interface. In comparison, Splunk Observability Cloud offers robust log searching and cloud visibility, though it could improve in sensor capabilities and platform integration.
Download NETSCOUT nGeniusONE vs. Splunk Observability Cloud Report
NETSCOUT nGeniusONE involves a significant initial setup cost, whereas Splunk Observability Cloud offers a more cost-effective setup.
View comparison
Pricing
NETSCOUT nGeniusONE involves a significant initial setup cost, whereas Splunk Observability Cloud offers a more cost-effective setup.
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
InfluxDB
4.1 out of 5
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
InfluxDB
4.1 out of 5
InfluxDB excels in time-series data performance and flexibility, ideal for integration with Grafana for visual insights. In comparison, Splunk Observability Cloud offers comprehensive monitoring with advanced data visualization, making it suitable for environments needing detailed incident alerts and operational insights.
Download InfluxDB vs. Splunk Observability Cloud Report
InfluxDB has a lower setup cost, focusing on scalability and developer-friendly tools, while Splunk Observability Cloud is more expensive, emphasizing advanced analytics and integrated features.
View comparison
Pricing
InfluxDB has a lower setup cost, focusing on scalability and developer-friendly tools, while Splunk Observability Cloud is more expensive, emphasizing advanced analytics and integrated features.
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
Nexthink
4.3 out of 5
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
Nexthink
4.3 out of 5
Nexthink offers detailed analytics and proactive issue resolution to enhance productivity. In comparison, Splunk Observability Cloud excels in monitoring and real-time visualization, integrating well across environments. Buyers might choose Nexthink for cost-effectiveness or Splunk for its comprehensive feature set.
Download Nexthink vs. Splunk Observability Cloud Report
Nexthink offers a lower setup cost than Splunk Observability Cloud, which is slightly higher.
View comparison
Pricing
Nexthink offers a lower setup cost than Splunk Observability Cloud, which is slightly higher.
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
Honeycomb Enterprise
4.0 out of 5
Splunk Observability Cloud provides extensive analytics and integration, appealing to organizations needing robust monitoring solutions. In comparison, Honeycomb Enterprise excels in performance insights, attracting those requiring detailed understanding of system behaviors and performance in microservices environments. Each offers unique benefits for different organizational needs.
Download Honeycomb Enterprise vs. Splunk Observability Cloud Report
Splunk Observability Cloud involves a substantial setup cost, whereas Honeycomb Enterprise offers a more streamlined and cost-effective setup process, highlighting the primary difference in initial investment requirements between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk Observability Cloud involves a substantial setup cost, whereas Honeycomb Enterprise offers a more streamlined and cost-effective setup process, highlighting the primary difference in initial investment requirements between the two solutions.
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
Kentik
4.6 out of 5
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
Kentik
4.6 out of 5
Splunk offers real-time monitoring and detailed dashboards with broad integration. In comparison, Kentik is lauded for cost-effective pricing and traffic analysis. Splunk appeals to those needing deep customization, while Kentik attracts cost-conscious buyers seeking efficient network monitoring.
Download Kentik vs. Splunk Observability Cloud Report
Splunk Observability Cloud involves a more complex setup process, highlighting its comprehensive features, while Kentik offers a simpler setup with a focus on network management, underscoring the distinct emphasis and capabilities of each platform.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk Observability Cloud involves a more complex setup process, highlighting its comprehensive features, while Kentik offers a simpler setup with a focus on network management, underscoring the distinct emphasis and capabilities of each platform.
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
Rancher Labs
4.2 out of 5
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
Rancher Labs
4.2 out of 5
Splunk Observability Cloud excels in data gathering and log analysis, with real-time problem-solving and integration for security measurement. In comparison, Rancher Labs offers simplified container management with Kubernetes, ease of deployment, and cost-effectiveness due to its open-source, community-driven nature.
Download Rancher Labs vs. Splunk Observability Cloud Report
Splunk Observability Cloud offers a straightforward setup cost, contrasting with Rancher Labs, which involves more elaborate pricing considerations.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk Observability Cloud offers a straightforward setup cost, contrasting with Rancher Labs, which involves more elaborate pricing considerations.
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver)
4.1 out of 5
Splunk Observability Cloud excels in customization and broad observability. In comparison, Google Cloud's operations suite offers simplicity in cloud-native application monitoring. Splunk is ideal for complex environments, while Google serves cost-conscious users needing effective standard monitoring.
Download Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver) vs. Splunk Observability Cloud Report
Splunk Observability Cloud offers a straightforward setup, while Google Cloud's operations suite may have hidden complexities, influencing initial deployment costs.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk Observability Cloud offers a straightforward setup, while Google Cloud's operations suite may have hidden complexities, influencing initial deployment costs.
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
DX Unified Infrastructure Management
4.1 out of 5
DX Unified Infrastructure Management's scalability and extensive monitoring probes suit adaptable ecosystems, though it lacks VMware functionalities. In comparison, Splunk Observability Cloud offers advanced visibility and analytics, excelling in cloud integrations but needing better synthetic monitoring. Buyer choice depends on specific scalability and visibility needs.
Download DX Unified Infrastructure Management vs. Splunk Observability Cloud Report
DX Unified Infrastructure Management offers a cost-effective setup, while Splunk Observability Cloud involves higher initial expenses but provides advanced features for comprehensive monitoring.
View comparison
Pricing
DX Unified Infrastructure Management offers a cost-effective setup, while Splunk Observability Cloud involves higher initial expenses but provides advanced features for comprehensive monitoring.
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
OpenNMS
1 out of 5
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
OpenNMS
1 out of 5
Splunk Observability Cloud offers advanced analytics and real-time insights, making it ideal for scalability. In comparison, OpenNMS provides open-source flexibility and cost savings, appealing to budget-conscious buyers seeking customization. Splunk's higher entry cost contrasts with OpenNMS's efficient network monitoring capabilities.
Splunk Observability Cloud typically has higher setup costs, emphasizing its robust enterprise features, whereas OpenNMS offers lower setup expenses, focusing on cost-effectiveness and open-source flexibility.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk Observability Cloud typically has higher setup costs, emphasizing its robust enterprise features, whereas OpenNMS offers lower setup expenses, focusing on cost-effectiveness and open-source flexibility.
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
Cisco Provider Connectivity Assurance
4.4 out of 5
Splunk Observability Cloud offers robust real-time monitoring with advanced log searching, ideal for comprehensive infrastructures. In comparison, Cisco Provider Connectivity Assurance focuses on network performance, providing cost-effective monitoring solutions. Splunk supports modern cloud environments, whereas Cisco is tailored to on-premises deployments.
Download Cisco Provider Connectivity Assurance vs. Splunk Observability Cloud Report
Splunk Observability Cloud involves moderate setup costs, whereas Cisco Provider Connectivity Assurance offers more economical setup fees, highlighting a significant cost difference between these solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk Observability Cloud involves moderate setup costs, whereas Cisco Provider Connectivity Assurance offers more economical setup fees, highlighting a significant cost difference between these solutions.

Related categories

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
Network Monitoring Software
IT Infrastructure Monitoring